From nobody Fri Oct 20 17:32:45 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: modern@ietf.org Delivered-To: modern@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E731345BA; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 17:24:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "\"IETF Secretariat\"" To: , Cc: adam@nostrum.com, modern@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.63.2 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <150854547366.20809.14973535065027996212.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 17:24:33 -0700 Archived-At: Subject: [Modern] modern - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 100 X-BeenThere: modern@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: "Managing, Ordering, Distributing, Exposing, & Registering telephone Numbers non-WG discussion list" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 00:24:34 -0000 Dear Steve Donovan, The session(s) that you have requested have been scheduled. Below is the scheduled session information followed by the original request. modern Session 1 (1:00:00) Wednesday, Morning Session I 0930-1200 Room Name: Orchard size: 50 --------------------------------------------- Special Note: 1100-1200 Request Information: --------------------------------------------------------- Working Group Name: Managing, Ordering, Distributing, Exposing, & Registering telephone Numbers Area Name: Applications and Real-Time Area Session Requester: Steve Donovan Number of Sessions: 1 Length of Session(s): 1 Hour Number of Attendees: 40 Conflicts to Avoid: First Priority: dime dispatch netslicing sipcore stir Second Priority: mmusic People who must be present: Steve Donovan Adam Roach Tom McGarry Jon Peterson Chris Wendt Resources Requested: Special Requests: --------------------------------------------------------- From nobody Sun Oct 22 10:03:18 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: modern@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: modern@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B7EE139F82 for ; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 10:03:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=team.neustar Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GtYrBVMAnnGd for ; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 10:03:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx0b-0018ba01.pphosted.com (mx0b-0018ba01.pphosted.com [67.231.157.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEB6D139F81 for ; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 10:03:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0049401.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-0018ba01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v9MGrPvT031414 for ; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 13:03:13 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=team.neustar; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : content-type : mime-version; s=selector1; bh=86reM538bhmHTas1Idg04QWiXsRpQkuIiuipdxvE43M=; b=n45fhm7WeGudIir0RoXakUX+xCj6DBxPWBq6x8wurz7VUswwxd8wnn3MNP37ZQvUQmp+ /wNqHjohpJaiGC9uvPveCUnxgtBd6M6wZMSMSOzexFoJgRd/6r+4pO8feD1DjJgCrVHC ZHuvxTrfrbZ8jibqFLQOOxooruvIyuJn5a/suPeTf/0D92IKzzqxIwc+aU27gR7Lo2ok toy8KsCkQdF8duVaD7BYHKUSqB+IR8Fy2m87ONLihPfOLuEX/vTPtICXtjTX0crLjR4T To9kvxuY3804Yjm2RJ5O9lpjpryCAd/SLr1skcU4xQzsWwe9dhqO1gY6dT/vnURxd8Da 1g== Received: from stntexhc11.cis.neustar.com ([156.154.17.216]) by mx0b-0018ba01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2dr2j842v4-1 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 13:03:12 -0400 Received: from STNTEXMB13.cis.neustar.com ([169.254.3.234]) by stntexhc11.cis.neustar.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0279.002; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 13:03:12 -0400 From: "McGarry, Tom" To: Modern List Thread-Topic: Comments on draft-wendt-modern-drip-02 Thread-Index: AQHTS1ekGrEE0s62nkyNobyTih8cqw== Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 17:03:11 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.4.160422 x-originating-ip: [10.96.8.179] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D612478C4505Dtommcgarryneustarbiz_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-10-22_06:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000 definitions=main-1710220245 Archived-At: Subject: [Modern] Comments on draft-wendt-modern-drip-02 X-BeenThere: modern@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Managing, Ordering, Distributing, Exposing, & Registering telephone Numbers non-WG discussion list" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 17:03:17 -0000 --_000_D612478C4505Dtommcgarryneustarbiz_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable A few comments on the draft: * 5.4, 1st bullet - says "if the node ID has NEVER been seen, store the= values, and propagate the key=96value data=94. Shouldn=92t the node not b= e trusted, and values NOT stored and data NOT propagated? * 5.4, 2nd bullet, 1st subbullet =96 says if the counter field is great= er, then the data must be propagated and new value must be stored. Shouldn= 't this happen only if the new value is +1 of the existing value? If it=92= s >+1 shouldn=92t it assume that it=92s missed updates and it needs to sync= h? * Nits =96 5.3, in many of the =93Descriptions=94 of the "Field Names= =94 the last sentence says =93forward=94, when I believe it should say =93f= orwards=94. Tom --_000_D612478C4505Dtommcgarryneustarbiz_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
A few comments on the draft:  
  • 5.4, 1st bullet - says "if the node ID has NEVER been seen, store = the values, and propagate the key=96value data=94.  Shouldn=92t the no= de not be trusted, and values NOT stored and data NOT propagated?  
  • 5.4, 2nd bullet, 1st subbullet =96 says if the counter field is greater= , then the data must be propagated and new value must be stored.  Shou= ldn't this happen only if the new value is +1 of the existing value? &n= bsp;If it=92s >+1 shouldn=92t it assume that it=92s missed updates and it needs to synch?
  •   Nits =96 5.3, in many of the =93Descriptions=94 of the "Fie= ld Names=94 the last sentence says =93forward=94, when I believe it should = say =93forwards=94.  
Tom
--_000_D612478C4505Dtommcgarryneustarbiz_-- From nobody Sun Oct 22 12:10:07 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: modern@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: modern@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B446D13A920 for ; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 12:10:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=team.neustar Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6Le9LzZwobzJ for ; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 12:10:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx0b-0018ba01.pphosted.com (mx0b-0018ba01.pphosted.com [67.231.157.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A58313A91F for ; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 12:10:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0049401.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-0018ba01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v9MJ3CsA027906 for ; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 15:10:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=team.neustar; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=selector1; bh=YJAY9/VEPkFF/p+JI4ZJrdiwPkv6mlrQGYEwIiinz14=; b=aZC0ZZ06frYnIDjeIBvU9uANHDGvpkv23SVzhqJLiraPYQGRUtN9DuptJYTfEjOqwRWq v3CBZbTgdGYCXcWyOyNnflF7vzWaG16en9I8fp1X3bSZusxRC6IQISoSMv4UOb8OQ2Yt bWAVf1GzWJvLhVvEUOckXRzOKdOUctN3KjQ+1crXTisSU4DFSSmJY6aCe0FI9OBDoDD4 v2Wgn2cUkCSq9ewT8NlVbu8z5IoDUS0b2TMsLYNTlFgLD3b1su62nnLy0XSMggAb/OQa Qbql2oEawGSnqImfLZrmAXivh0orHioxqBsZ2ybGEmuOldkTz6Kf793Il6g5L7JahUJl dw== Received: from stntexhc11.cis.neustar.com ([156.154.17.216]) by mx0b-0018ba01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2dr2j84a3y-1 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 15:10:02 -0400 Received: from STNTEXMB13.cis.neustar.com ([169.254.3.234]) by stntexhc11.cis.neustar.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0279.002; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 15:10:01 -0400 From: "McGarry, Tom" To: Modern List Thread-Topic: Comments on draft-wendt-modern-drip-02 Thread-Index: AQHTS1ekGrEE0s62nkyNobyTih8cq6LwPAOA Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 19:10:01 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.4.160422 x-originating-ip: [10.96.8.179] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D612650245066tommcgarryneustarbiz_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-10-22_08:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000 definitions=main-1710220277 Archived-At: Subject: [Modern] Comments on draft-wendt-modern-drip-02 X-BeenThere: modern@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Managing, Ordering, Distributing, Exposing, & Registering telephone Numbers non-WG discussion list" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 19:10:06 -0000 --_000_D612650245066tommcgarryneustarbiz_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable A few comments on the draft: * 5.4, 1st bullet - says "if the node ID has NEVER been seen, store the= values, and propagate the key=96value data=94. Shouldn=92t the node not b= e trusted, and values NOT stored and data NOT propagated? * 5.4, 2nd bullet, 1st subbullet =96 says if the counter field is great= er, then the data must be propagated and new value must be stored. Shouldn= 't this happen only if the new value is +1 of the existing value? If it=92= s >+1 shouldn=92t it assume that it=92s missed updates and it needs to sync= h? * Nits =96 5.3, in many of the =93Descriptions=94 of the "Field Names= =94 the last sentence says =93forward=94, when I believe it should say =93f= orwards=94. Tom --_000_D612650245066tommcgarryneustarbiz_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: <5A6F938C4907824EAD33EB593353596C@neustar.biz> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
A few comments on the draft:  
  • 5.4, 1st bullet - says "if the node ID has NEVER been seen, store = the values, and propagate the key=96value data=94.  Shouldn=92t the no= de not be trusted, and values NOT stored and data NOT propagated?  
  • 5.4, 2nd bullet, 1st subbullet =96 says if the counter field is greater= , then the data must be propagated and new value must be stored.  Shou= ldn't this happen only if the new value is +1 of the existing value? &n= bsp;If it=92s >+1 shouldn=92t it assume that it=92s missed updates and it needs to synch?
  •   Nits =96 5.3, in many of the =93Descriptions=94 of the "Fie= ld Names=94 the last sentence says =93forward=94, when I believe it should = say =93forwards=94.  
Tom
 --_000_D612650245066tommcgarryneustarbiz_-- From nobody Mon Oct 30 08:40:37 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: modern@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: modern@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F10A49CB for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 08:40:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=team.neustar Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H9z1SDgIuECu for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 08:40:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx0b-0018ba01.pphosted.com (mx0a-0018ba01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 141E41FF5D8 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 08:32:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0078666.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-0018ba01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v9UF4AlP005401 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 11:31:59 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=team.neustar; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=selector1; bh=DOCJQfZZRgX8J1rX9+++WJ7Cwc4nRh6/6IMdJ7VGwjQ=; b=hIx+VHXJrK9+SYtGuEvBSTBKbaI9TE2GmOO4uclWDtjJpTGBnLLjML9GzNWazQiO0Yax VHF5gVIh6RHBTkfI8w4y221l1BeuEm+RTEu6chlatJOtCMzzxutOdlnnSmw1tTimJPMn DOpxt3gZdzhNDaym8DMKkiPuLVWMIfsO9H9+TfXMtDsRdiQ0CbmGlgsyBXGct3+jnQ5J rObpf65mp2aXGC2Vej8Wa/ZUu0ivGP1ZSXVNXit2WXYSHHJwC+7LmKsXYoXw0m4Fz3FL U8SAKl1KiPX4/ia/G5+YSvoIJQ6p4f41FZECAngOgYAfi5pne7hpD7AlykmJTdGkzsK0 RQ== Received: from stntexhc12.cis.neustar.com ([156.154.17.216]) by mx0a-0018ba01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2dvp0t5242-3 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 11:31:58 -0400 Received: from STNTEXMB13.cis.neustar.com ([169.254.3.234]) by stntexhc12.cis.neustar.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0279.002; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 11:31:53 -0400 From: "McGarry, Tom" To: Modern List Thread-Topic: Comments on draft-wendt-modern-drip-02 Thread-Index: AQHTS1ekGrEE0s62nkyNobyTih8cq6LwPAOAgAxVtYA= Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 15:31:53 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.4.160422 x-originating-ip: [10.33.205.64] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D61CBCFC452F7tommcgarryneustarbiz_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-10-30_04:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000 definitions=main-1710300205 Archived-At: Subject: [Modern] Comments on draft-wendt-modern-drip-02 X-BeenThere: modern@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Managing, Ordering, Distributing, Exposing, & Registering telephone Numbers non-WG discussion list" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 15:40:36 -0000 --_000_D61CBCFC452F7tommcgarryneustarbiz_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable A few comments on the draft: * 5.4, 1st bullet - says "if the node ID has NEVER been seen, store the= values, and propagate the key=96value data=94. Shouldn=92t the node not b= e trusted, and values NOT stored and data NOT propagated? * 5.4, 2nd bullet, 1st subbullet =96 says if the counter field is great= er, then the data must be propagated and new value must be stored. Shouldn= 't this happen only if the new value is +1 of the existing value? If it=92= s >+1 shouldn=92t it assume that it=92s missed updates and it needs to sync= h? * Nits =96 5.3, in many of the =93Descriptions=94 of the "Field Names= =94 the last sentence says =93forward=94, when it should say =93forwards=94= . Tom --_000_D61CBCFC452F7tommcgarryneustarbiz_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: <416C2A18C1408A4DB85B199BEA38CCC0@neustar.biz> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
A few comments on the draft:  
  • 5.4, 1st bullet - says "if the node ID has NEVER been seen, store = the values, and propagate the key=96value data=94.  Shouldn=92t the no= de not be trusted, and values NOT stored and data NOT propagated?  
  • 5.4, 2nd bullet, 1st subbullet =96 says if the counter field is greater= , then the data must be propagated and new value must be stored.  Shou= ldn't this happen only if the new value is +1 of the existing value? &n= bsp;If it=92s >+1 shouldn=92t it assume that it=92s missed updates and it needs to synch?
  •   Nits =96 5.3, in many of the =93Descriptions=94 of the "Fie= ld Names=94 the last sentence says =93forward=94, when it should say =93for= wards=94.  
Tom
 --_000_D61CBCFC452F7tommcgarryneustarbiz_--