Subject: Re: LDP Status Codes in <draft-ietf-diff-ext-05.txt>

From: Francois Le Faucheur <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 10:28:48 +0200

Bob and all,

Agreed: we will change the Status Code values specified in
<draft-ietf-diff-ext-05.txt>.

Looking at ldp-07, I noticed that 0x00000018 and 0x00000019 are now also
already used by LDP.

So, we will modify <draft-ietf-diff-ext-05.txt>, to the following:

Status Code                   E   Status Data   

     Unsupported PHB                0   0x0000001A
     Invalid EXP<-->PHB mapping     0   0x0000001B
     Unsupported PSC                0   0x0000001C
     Unexpected Diff-Serv TLV 0   0x0000001D

thanks

Francois

At 10:14 16/06/2000 -0400, Bob Thomas wrote:
>> All,
>> 
>> what do we want to do about this? 
>
>I think the codes in t the diff-ext draft need to be changed.
>
>For what it is worth, Section 4.4 of the ldp-07 addresses this
>issue (assignment of Status Codes).
>
>Bob
>
>
>> /Loa
>> 
>> Michelle Burns wrote:
>> > 
>> > Loa & Francois,
>> > 
>> > Two of the new status codes introduced by
>> > draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-07 are already used in
>> > draft-ietf-mpls-diff-ext-05.
>> > 
>> > STATUS CODE                   E   STATUS DATA
>> > draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-07:
>> > Missing Message Parameters    0   0x00000016
>> > Unsupported Address Family    0   0x00000017
>> > 
>> > draft-ietf-mpls-diff-ext-05:
>> > Unsupported PHB               0   0x00000016
>> > Invalid EXP<-->PHB mapping    0   0x00000017
>> > 
>> > It is probably easiest to change the status codes
>> > in the Diff Serv draft since the LDP last call
>> > has closed.
>> > 
>> > / Michelle
>> 
>> -- 
>