Subject: [mpls] Comments solicited on Delay-Loss-Delay Variation Problem Statement & Framework Drafts

From: "Mcdysan, David E" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 18:20:35 -0500

Hi,

As agreed in the mpls meeting today, Lou and Adrian indicated that we
should advance this work in ccamp, but want to cross post comments and
discussion to the mpls list for the following drafts:

http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-fuxh-mpls-delay-loss-te-problem-statement-01
.txt

http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-fuxh-mpls-delay-loss-te-framework-06.txt

We are soliciting input on at least the following:
* Are other operators interested in this problem?
* Are there additional related problems (e.g., fate sharing, SRLG) that
should be included?
* Specific comments on the structure and content of the problem statement/
requirements.
* Comments on the structure and content of the framework.
* Are there additional types of approaches not considered in the framework?

Please post responses to both the ccamp and mpls lists.

Thank you,

Xihua Fu  ZTE (Editor)
Dave McDysan  Verizon (Editor, Presenter)
Vishwas Manral  HP
Andrew Malis  Verizon
Spencer Giacalone  Thomson Reuters
Malcolm Betts  ZTE
Qilei Wang  ZTE
John Drake  Juniper Networks