Subject: [mpls] fwd: New Version Notification for draft-xu-mpls-in-udp-06.txt

From: Xuxiaohu <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:42:45 +0000

Hi all,

An updated version has been submitted. This revision incorporates the following suggestion from Vivek.

***********************
> > Hi Lucy,
> >    Thanks for clarification.  In Section 3 of draft, the figure says 
> > MPLS
> Packet. Wouldn’t it be more consistent to change it to MPLS label 
> stack same as mentioned in RFC 4023.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Vivek
*************************

Best regards,
Xiaohu

> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]]
> 发送时间: 2012年12月10日 17:29
> 收件人: Xuxiaohu
> 抄送: [email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked];
> Lucy yong
> 主题: New Version Notification for draft-xu-mpls-in-udp-06.txt
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-xu-mpls-in-udp-06.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Xiaohu Xu and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Filename:	 draft-xu-mpls-in-udp
> Revision:	 06
> Title:		 Encapsulating MPLS in UDP
> Creation date:	 2012-12-10
> WG ID:		 Individual Submission
> Number of pages: 9
> URL:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-xu-mpls-in-udp-06.txt
> Status:          http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-xu-mpls-in-udp
> Htmlized:        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xu-mpls-in-udp-06
> Diff:            http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-xu-mpls-in-udp-06
> 
> Abstract:
>    Existing technologies to encapsulate Multi-Protocol Label Switching
>    (MPLS) over IP are not adequate for efficient load balancing of MPLS
>    application traffic, such as MPLS-based Layer2 Virtual Private
>    Network (L2VPN) or Layer3 Virtual Private Network (L3VPN) traffic
>    across IP networks. This document specifies additional IP-based
>    encapsulation technology, referred to as MPLS-in-User Datagram
>    Protocol (UDP), which can facilitate the load balancing of MPLS
>    application traffic across IP networks.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The IETF Secretariat