From bew@cisco.com Mon Jul 6 16:38:53 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: msec@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: msec@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DF773A6853 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 16:38:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gbXhpRkfXX0Z for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 16:38:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com (sj-iport-5.cisco.com [171.68.10.87]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C6543A688D for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 16:38:46 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.42,359,1243814400"; d="scan'208";a="84798581" Received: from sj-dkim-2.cisco.com ([171.71.179.186]) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 Jul 2009 23:38:50 +0000 Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (sj-core-5.cisco.com [171.71.177.238]) by sj-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n66NcoKJ011086; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 16:38:50 -0700 Received: from xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-221.cisco.com [128.107.191.63]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n66Nco87004597; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 23:38:50 GMT Received: from xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.187]) by xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 6 Jul 2009 16:38:50 -0700 Received: from dhcp-128-107-163-99.cisco.com ([128.107.163.99]) by xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 6 Jul 2009 16:38:50 -0700 Message-Id: <016B93E4-1D61-47C8-977E-2CAFAB4B2842@cisco.com> From: Brian Weis To: Sean Shen In-Reply-To: <001201c9f3ab$8edec0d0$800c6f0a@china.huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 16:38:50 -0700 References: <001201c9f3ab$8edec0d0$800c6f0a@china.huawei.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Jul 2009 23:38:50.0054 (UTC) FILETIME=[E9F41E60:01C9FE92] DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=751; t=1246923530; x=1247787530; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim2002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=bew@cisco.com; z=From:=20Brian=20Weis=20 |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[MSEC]=20msec=20group |Sender:=20; bh=BAmU7NSDIcSPB+xY5NaRQ7PSDKPVo95HxIqFLPhgxP4=; b=bj7ltktpAzeENqA2Zo1gRHNcM3AnjJ0LNdWQUqjEIlCmI1wx0ZnnAvYVkC 9R6gUvTJwKz9+bBxIYH3E5jZcKQZqIMCdmF3zu0//TG2fEQ3hNK21PH1GUqV 4GhlmRNtsi; Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-2; header.From=bew@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim2002 verified; ); Cc: msec@ietf.org Subject: Re: [MSEC] msec group X-BeenThere: msec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multicast Security List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:38:53 -0000 Hi Sean, On Jun 22, 2009, at 7:37 PM, Sean Shen wrote: > Hi, > Is there a msec meeting in IETF75? The MSEC WG is not meeting in IETF75. However, the working group should be using the mailing list more, and that's my action item to rectify. > Or a meeting of kmart? The current draft agenda (https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/75/agenda.html ) does not show a BOF for KMART at this time. (It's not a working group.) Thanks, Brian > > Best, > > Sean > > > _______________________________________________ > MSEC mailing list > MSEC@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/msec -- Brian Weis Router/Switch Security Group, ARTG, Cisco Systems Telephone: +1 408 526 4796 Email: bew@cisco.com From sshen@huawei.com Mon Jul 6 18:21:49 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: msec@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: msec@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1535E3A6DF4 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 18:21:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.367 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.367 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.862, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b7kIt4WSYtaC for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 18:21:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com (unknown [119.145.14.67]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 348D63A6DD7 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 18:21:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from huawei.com (szxga04-in [172.24.2.12]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KME004B8140G5@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for msec@ietf.org; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 09:21:37 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.1.24]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KME009BX140EF@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for msec@ietf.org; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 09:21:36 +0800 (CST) Received: from s00102542 ([10.111.12.128]) by szxml04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0KME007GS13YA8@szxml04-in.huawei.com> for msec@ietf.org; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 09:21:36 +0800 (CST) Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 09:21:34 +0800 From: Sean Shen In-reply-to: <016B93E4-1D61-47C8-977E-2CAFAB4B2842@cisco.com> To: 'Brian Weis' Message-id: <003601c9fea1$447d9380$800c6f0a@china.huawei.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Thread-index: Acn+k2vc0ovSZK6ASJ+EUz4b40CVhwACeJOQ Cc: msec@ietf.org Subject: Re: [MSEC] msec group X-BeenThere: msec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multicast Security List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 01:21:49 -0000 Thank you, Brian, I am interested in this area. Since there are few messages in ml, I only saw just some info from minutesof ietf74, looks like there will be a recharter, but not sure what happened since ietf74. Best, Sean > -----Original Message----- > From: Brian Weis [mailto:bew@cisco.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 7:39 AM > To: Sean Shen > Cc: msec@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [MSEC] msec group > > Hi Sean, > > On Jun 22, 2009, at 7:37 PM, Sean Shen wrote: > > > Hi, > > Is there a msec meeting in IETF75? > > The MSEC WG is not meeting in IETF75. However, the working > group should be using the mailing list more, and that's my > action item to rectify. > > > Or a meeting of kmart? > > The current draft agenda > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/75/agenda.html > ) does not show a BOF for KMART at this time. (It's not a working > group.) > > Thanks, > Brian > > > > > Best, > > > > Sean > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > MSEC mailing list > > MSEC@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/msec > > > -- > Brian Weis > Router/Switch Security Group, ARTG, Cisco Systems > Telephone: +1 408 526 4796 > Email: bew@cisco.com > > >