From bew@cisco.com Wed Sep 9 10:48:58 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: msec@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: msec@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FC7D3A68EC for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:48:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BGT4pSOPOGe2 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:48:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 755783A68B4 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:48:57 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAPOGp0qrR7O6/2dsb2JhbADGMIhDAZBgBYQY X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,359,1249257600"; d="scan'208";a="385285061" Received: from sj-dkim-2.cisco.com ([171.71.179.186]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Sep 2009 17:49:30 +0000 Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (sj-core-2.cisco.com [171.71.177.254]) by sj-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n89HnURM007583 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:49:30 -0700 Received: from xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-211.cisco.com [171.70.151.144]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n89HnUQg020426 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 17:49:30 GMT Received: from xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.187]) by xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:49:29 -0700 Received: from dhcp-128-107-163-122.cisco.com ([128.107.163.122]) by xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:49:29 -0700 Message-Id: <56A570CF-EC8B-4D97-B884-E9BA3AE27E33@cisco.com> From: Brian Weis To: msec@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:49:27 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Sep 2009 17:49:29.0041 (UTC) FILETIME=[E1111C10:01CA3175] DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=324; t=1252518570; x=1253382570; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim2002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=bew@cisco.com; z=From:=20Brian=20Weis=20 |Subject:=20New=20version=20of=20daft-ietf-msec-tesla-for-a lc-norm |Sender:=20; bh=ncRcyGjGeECjD5CRvrOCzXweQnpXXwzbT1FQ9QGKIs8=; b=MrSemK8VlvDYHcNGw/pLqoVV/xgZKTU6PCm4sYAYo75WLIVo4Y4EQ8UDWH 5ffg4f5qtaD76aXFtx51LmmRwC8HzH/CGGiz1rAK/bvZblnsCMWyC5J//eAn dR5NSd5fij; Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-2; header.From=bew@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim2002 verified; ); Subject: [MSEC] New version of daft-ietf-msec-tesla-for-alc-norm X-BeenThere: msec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multicast Security List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 17:48:58 -0000 Folks, There's a new version of the MSEC WG "Use of TESLA in the ALC and NORM Protocols" I-D: . It addresses comments made during the IETF last call period. Please review and send any comments that you might have to the list. Thanks, Brian