From nobody Thu Oct 16 13:25:10 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: multimob@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: multimob@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FD021A8997; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 13:25:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XX8mZCzhGb4w; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 13:25:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8920E1A898D; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 13:25:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.6.4 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20141016202503.14868.49689.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 13:25:03 -0700 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/multimob/3TDBf7Zl8M5jol1dt4TQRrGPshI Cc: multimob@ietf.org Subject: [multimob] I-D Action: draft-ietf-multimob-fmipv6-pfmipv6-multicast-10.txt X-BeenThere: multimob@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Multicast Mobility List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 20:25:05 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Multicast Mobility Working Group of the IETF. Title : Multicast Listener Extensions for MIPv6 and PMIPv6 Fast Handovers Authors : Thomas C. Schmidt Matthias Waehlisch Rajeev Koodli Godred Fairhurst Dapeng Liu Filename : draft-ietf-multimob-fmipv6-pfmipv6-multicast-10.txt Pages : 29 Date : 2014-10-16 Abstract: Fast handover protocols for Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) and Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) define mobility management procedures that support unicast communication at reduced handover latency. Fast handover base operations do not affect multicast communication, and hence do not accelerate handover management for native multicast listeners. Many multicast applications like IPTV or conferencing, though, comprise delay-sensitive real-time traffic and will benefit from fast handover completion. This document specifies extension of the Mobile IPv6 Fast Handovers (FMIPv6) and the Fast Handovers for Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PFMIPv6) protocols to include multicast traffic management in fast handover operations. This multicast support is provided first at the control plane by a management of rapid context transfer between access routers, second at the data plane by an optional fast traffic forwarding that may include buffering. An FMIPv6 access router indicates support for multicast using an updated Proxy Router Advertisements message format. This document updates RFC5568 "Mobile IPv6 Fast Handovers". The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-multimob-fmipv6-pfmipv6-multicast/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-multimob-fmipv6-pfmipv6-multicast-10 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-multimob-fmipv6-pfmipv6-multicast-10 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Mon Oct 20 13:49:55 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: multimob@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: multimob@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D87741ACE14; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:49:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Svsfptv4dnhY; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:49:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1492E1ACE8B; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:49:48 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.6.4.p1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20141020204948.20477.99722.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:49:48 -0700 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/multimob/uqIRYpqNBGqffANOpvj1EofaqVc Cc: multimob mailing list , multimob chair , RFC Editor Subject: [multimob] Document Action: 'Multicast Listener Extensions for MIPv6 and PMIPv6 Fast Handovers' to Experimental RFC (draft-ietf-multimob-fmipv6-pfmipv6-multicast-10.txt) X-BeenThere: multimob@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Multicast Mobility List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 20:49:52 -0000 The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Multicast Listener Extensions for MIPv6 and PMIPv6 Fast Handovers' (draft-ietf-multimob-fmipv6-pfmipv6-multicast-10.txt) as Experimental RFC This document is the product of the Multicast Mobility Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Brian Haberman and Ted Lemon. A URL of this Internet Draft is: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-multimob-fmipv6-pfmipv6-multicast/ Technical Summary This document specifies extension of the Mobile IPv6 Fast Handovers (FMIPv6) and the Fast Handovers for Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PFMIPv6) protocols to include multicast traffic management in fast handover operations. Working Group Summary No controversy. Good support in the WG. Document Quality I believe there are no implementations. The document has been thoroughly reviewed by multiple people and should be of good quality. Personnel Shepherd: Stig Venaas AD: Brian Haberman From nobody Tue Oct 28 14:13:04 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: multimob@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: multimob@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 640A61ACFBD for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:12:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -100.013 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.013 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cyZYRJkk0HGT for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:12:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC7BB1ACFC8 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:12:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id D1E17181C81; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:12:12 -0700 (PDT) To: lmcm@tid.es, cjbc@it.uc3m.es, isoto@it.uc3m.es, brian@innovationslab.net, ted.lemon@nominum.com, stig@venaas.com, sarikaya@ieee.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 6000:errata_mail_lib.php From: RFC Errata System Message-Id: <20141028211212.D1E17181C81@rfc-editor.org> Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:12:12 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/multimob/2n9ZFhxiddnf2Ysu_XKQhxYSsmQ Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, multimob@ietf.org Subject: [multimob] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7161 (4146) X-BeenThere: multimob@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Multicast Mobility List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 21:12:58 -0000 The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7161, "Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) Multicast Handover Optimization by the Subscription Information Acquisition through the LMA (SIAL)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7161&eid=4146 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Sri Gundavelli Section: 4.2.2.1 Original Text ------------- 4.2.2.1. Proxy Binding Update Message As result of the new defined flag, the PBU message format is updated as follows: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Sequence # | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |A|H|L|K|M|R|P|S| Reserved | Lifetime | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | . . . Mobility Options . . . | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Corrected Text -------------- 4.2.2.1. Proxy Binding Update Message As result of the new defined flag, the PBU message format is updated as follows: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Sequence # | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |A|H|L|K|M|R|P|F|T|B|S| Reserved| Lifetime | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | . . . Mobility Options . . . | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Notes ----- There is a mistake in the flags portion of the PBU/PBA messages ? It seems to be overlapping with flags defined in RFC5845. RFC5555. Both the specs were published many years before RFC7161. Binding Update Flags Registration Procedure(s) Standards Action or IESG Approval Reference [RFC5213] Available Formats CSV Flag Value Reference A 0x8000 [RFC6275] H 0x4000 [RFC6275] L 0x2000 [RFC6275] K 0x1000 [RFC6275] M 0x0800 [RFC4140] R 0x0400 [RFC3963] P 0x0200 [RFC5213] F 0x0100 [RFC5555] T 0x0080 [RFC5845] B 0x0040 [RFC6602] S 0x0020 [RFC7161] RFC 5845: 6.2. Proxy Binding Update Message Extension This specification extends the Proxy Binding Update message as defined in [RFC5213] with the new TLV-header format (T) flag. The new (T) flag is described below and shown as part of the Proxy Binding Update message as in Figure 3. 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Sequence # | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |A|H|L|K|M|R|P|F|T| Reserved | Lifetime | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ RFC 7161 4.2.2.1. Proxy Binding Update Message As result of the new defined flag, the PBU message format is updated as follows: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Sequence # | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |A|H|L|K|M|R|P|S| Reserved | Lifetime | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | . . . Mobility Options . . . | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7161 (draft-ietf-multimob-handover-optimization-07) -------------------------------------- Title : Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) Multicast Handover Optimization by the Subscription Information Acquisition through the LMA (SIAL) Publication Date : March 2014 Author(s) : LM. Contreras, CJ. Bernardos, I. Soto Category : EXPERIMENTAL Source : Multicast Mobility Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG From nobody Tue Oct 28 14:18:01 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: multimob@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: multimob@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EF161ACFF6 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:17:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.912 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v95on0ezxtea for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:17:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE521ACFF5 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:17:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 74BC8181C81; Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:17:06 -0700 (PDT) To: lmcm@tid.es, cjbc@it.uc3m.es, isoto@it.uc3m.es, brian@innovationslab.net, ted.lemon@nominum.com, stig@venaas.com, sarikaya@ieee.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 6000:errata_mail_lib.php From: RFC Errata System Message-Id: <20141028211706.74BC8181C81@rfc-editor.org> Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:17:06 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/multimob/1nl3I70Ns-4StQyXqkagoDgpH28 Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, multimob@ietf.org Subject: [multimob] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7161 (4147) X-BeenThere: multimob@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Multicast Mobility List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 21:17:58 -0000 The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7161, "Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) Multicast Handover Optimization by the Subscription Information Acquisition through the LMA (SIAL)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7161&eid=4147 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Sri Gundavelli Section: 4.2.2.2 Original Text ------------- 4.2.2.2. Proxy Binding Acknowledgement Message As result of the new defined flag, the PBA message format is updated as follows: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Status |K|R|P|S| Rsrvd | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Sequence # | Lifetime | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | . . . Mobility Options . . . | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Corrected Text -------------- 4.2.2.2. Proxy Binding Acknowledgement Message As result of the new defined flag, the PBA message format is updated as follows: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Status |K|R|P|T|B|S|Res| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Sequence # | Lifetime | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | . . . Mobility Options . . . | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Notes ----- There is an error in the flags portion of the PBA. Binding Acknowledgment Flags Registration Procedure(s) Standards Action or IESG Approval Reference [RFC5213] Available Formats CSV Flag Value Reference K 0x80 [RFC6275] R 0x40 [RFC3963] P 0x20 [RFC5213] T 0x10 [RFC5845] B 0x08 [RFC6602] S 0x04 [RFC7161] RFC5845: 6.3. Proxy Binding Acknowledgement Message Extension This specification extends the Proxy Binding Acknowledgement message as defined in [RFC5213] with the new TLV-header format (T) flag. The new (T) flag is described below and shown as part of the Proxy Binding Acknowledgement message as in Figure 4. 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Status |K|R|P|T| Res | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Sequence # | Lifetime | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Figure 4: Proxy Binding Acknowledgement Message RFC 7161 4.2.2.2. Proxy Binding Acknowledgement Message As result of the new defined flag, the PBA message format is updated as follows: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Status |K|R|P|S| Rsrvd | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Sequence # | Lifetime | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | . . . Mobility Options . . . | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7161 (draft-ietf-multimob-handover-optimization-07) -------------------------------------- Title : Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) Multicast Handover Optimization by the Subscription Information Acquisition through the LMA (SIAL) Publication Date : March 2014 Author(s) : LM. Contreras, CJ. Bernardos, I. Soto Category : EXPERIMENTAL Source : Multicast Mobility Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG