From nobody Thu Nov 20 06:59:10 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: multimob@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: multimob@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFB1F1A1A5B; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 06:59:05 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -107.496 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-107.496 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SmXuVe6jdVb6; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 06:59:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB05B1A1A10; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 06:59:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 0191D181C70; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 06:58:06 -0800 (PST) To: sgundave@cisco.com, lmcm@tid.es, cjbc@it.uc3m.es, isoto@it.uc3m.es X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php From: RFC Errata System Message-Id: <20141120145807.0191D181C70@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 06:58:06 -0800 (PST) Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/multimob/O91iycvPCXv8yk33kTxNRqwLC1Y Cc: multimob@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [multimob] [Errata Verified] RFC7161 (4146) X-BeenThere: multimob@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Multicast Mobility List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 14:59:06 -0000 The following errata report has been verified for RFC7161, "Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) Multicast Handover Optimization by the Subscription Information Acquisition through the LMA (SIAL)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7161&eid=4146 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Technical Reported by: Sri Gundavelli Date Reported: 2014-10-28 Verified by: Brian Haberman (IESG) Section: 4.2.2.1 Original Text ------------- 4.2.2.1. Proxy Binding Update Message As result of the new defined flag, the PBU message format is updated as follows: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Sequence # | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |A|H|L|K|M|R|P|S| Reserved | Lifetime | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | . . . Mobility Options . . . | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Corrected Text -------------- 4.2.2.1. Proxy Binding Update Message As result of the new defined flag, the PBU message format is updated as follows: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Sequence # | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |A|H|L|K|M|R|P|F|T|B|S| Reserved| Lifetime | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | . . . Mobility Options . . . | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Notes ----- There is a mistake in the flags portion of the PBU/PBA messages ? It seems to be overlapping with flags defined in RFC5845. RFC5555. Both the specs were published many years before RFC7161. Binding Update Flags Registration Procedure(s) Standards Action or IESG Approval Reference [RFC5213] Available Formats CSV Flag Value Reference A 0x8000 [RFC6275] H 0x4000 [RFC6275] L 0x2000 [RFC6275] K 0x1000 [RFC6275] M 0x0800 [RFC4140] R 0x0400 [RFC3963] P 0x0200 [RFC5213] F 0x0100 [RFC5555] T 0x0080 [RFC5845] B 0x0040 [RFC6602] S 0x0020 [RFC7161] RFC 5845: 6.2. Proxy Binding Update Message Extension This specification extends the Proxy Binding Update message as defined in [RFC5213] with the new TLV-header format (T) flag. The new (T) flag is described below and shown as part of the Proxy Binding Update message as in Figure 3. 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Sequence # | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |A|H|L|K|M|R|P|F|T| Reserved | Lifetime | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ RFC 7161 4.2.2.1. Proxy Binding Update Message As result of the new defined flag, the PBU message format is updated as follows: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Sequence # | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |A|H|L|K|M|R|P|S| Reserved | Lifetime | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | . . . Mobility Options . . . | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ -------------------------------------- RFC7161 (draft-ietf-multimob-handover-optimization-07) -------------------------------------- Title : Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) Multicast Handover Optimization by the Subscription Information Acquisition through the LMA (SIAL) Publication Date : March 2014 Author(s) : LM. Contreras, CJ. Bernardos, I. Soto Category : EXPERIMENTAL Source : Multicast Mobility Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG From nobody Thu Nov 20 06:59:50 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: multimob@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: multimob@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24A861A1A6A; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 06:59:44 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.496 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.496 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YVuzQ7PeOyTU; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 06:59:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E92931A1A5B; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 06:59:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id CAEE4181C70; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 06:58:45 -0800 (PST) To: sgundave@cisco.com, lmcm@tid.es, cjbc@it.uc3m.es, isoto@it.uc3m.es X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php From: RFC Errata System Message-Id: <20141120145845.CAEE4181C70@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 06:58:45 -0800 (PST) Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/multimob/SS8PfWxflJKM8Gk4nU3invPeDN8 Cc: multimob@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [multimob] [Errata Verified] RFC7161 (4147) X-BeenThere: multimob@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Multicast Mobility List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 14:59:44 -0000 The following errata report has been verified for RFC7161, "Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) Multicast Handover Optimization by the Subscription Information Acquisition through the LMA (SIAL)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7161&eid=4147 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Technical Reported by: Sri Gundavelli Date Reported: 2014-10-28 Verified by: Brian Haberman (IESG) Section: 4.2.2.2 Original Text ------------- 4.2.2.2. Proxy Binding Acknowledgement Message As result of the new defined flag, the PBA message format is updated as follows: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Status |K|R|P|S| Rsrvd | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Sequence # | Lifetime | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | . . . Mobility Options . . . | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Corrected Text -------------- 4.2.2.2. Proxy Binding Acknowledgement Message As result of the new defined flag, the PBA message format is updated as follows: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Status |K|R|P|T|B|S|Res| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Sequence # | Lifetime | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | . . . Mobility Options . . . | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Notes ----- There is an error in the flags portion of the PBA. Binding Acknowledgment Flags Registration Procedure(s) Standards Action or IESG Approval Reference [RFC5213] Available Formats CSV Flag Value Reference K 0x80 [RFC6275] R 0x40 [RFC3963] P 0x20 [RFC5213] T 0x10 [RFC5845] B 0x08 [RFC6602] S 0x04 [RFC7161] RFC5845: 6.3. Proxy Binding Acknowledgement Message Extension This specification extends the Proxy Binding Acknowledgement message as defined in [RFC5213] with the new TLV-header format (T) flag. The new (T) flag is described below and shown as part of the Proxy Binding Acknowledgement message as in Figure 4. 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Status |K|R|P|T| Res | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Sequence # | Lifetime | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Figure 4: Proxy Binding Acknowledgement Message RFC 7161 4.2.2.2. Proxy Binding Acknowledgement Message As result of the new defined flag, the PBA message format is updated as follows: 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Status |K|R|P|S| Rsrvd | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Sequence # | Lifetime | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | . . . Mobility Options . . . | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ -------------------------------------- RFC7161 (draft-ietf-multimob-handover-optimization-07) -------------------------------------- Title : Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) Multicast Handover Optimization by the Subscription Information Acquisition through the LMA (SIAL) Publication Date : March 2014 Author(s) : LM. Contreras, CJ. Bernardos, I. Soto Category : EXPERIMENTAL Source : Multicast Mobility Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG From nobody Sun Nov 30 18:32:42 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: multimob@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: multimob@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01DC01A01CB; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 18:32:39 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.912 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gnoncu-QBFoV; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 18:32:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13EA61A0278; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 18:32:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id C481B181CD8; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 18:32:11 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 6000:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20141201023211.C481B181CD8@rfc-editor.org> Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2014 18:32:11 -0800 (PST) Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/multimob/On05BlPtlMN2v7bJnwzDcw1NDQI Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, multimob@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [multimob] RFC 7411 on Multicast Listener Extensions for Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) and Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) Fast Handovers X-BeenThere: multimob@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Multicast Mobility List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 02:32:39 -0000 A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 7411 Title: Multicast Listener Extensions for Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) and Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) Fast Handovers Author: T. Schmidt, Ed., M. Waehlisch, R. Koodli, G. Fairhurst, D. Liu Status: Experimental Stream: IETF Date: November 2014 Mailbox: t.schmidt@haw-hamburg.de, mw@link-lab.net, rajeev.koodli@intel.com, gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk, liudapeng@chinamobile.com Pages: 30 Characters: 72298 Updates: RFC5568 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-multimob-fmipv6-pfmipv6-multicast-10.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7411.txt Fast handover protocols for Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) and Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) define mobility management procedures that support unicast communication at reduced handover latency. Fast handover base operations do not affect multicast communication and, hence, do not accelerate handover management for native multicast listeners. Many multicast applications like IPTV or conferencing, though, comprise delay-sensitive, real-time traffic and will benefit from fast handover completion. This document specifies extension of the Mobile IPv6 Fast Handovers (FMIPv6) and the Fast Handovers for Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PFMIPv6) protocols to include multicast traffic management in fast handover operations. This multicast support is provided first at the control plane by management of rapid context transfer between access routers and second at the data plane by optional fast traffic forwarding that may include buffering. An FMIPv6 access router indicates support for multicast using an updated Proxy Router Advertisements message format. This document updates RFC 5568, "Mobile IPv6 Fast Handovers". This document is a product of the Multicast Mobility Working Group of the IETF. EXPERIMENTAL: This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC