Subject: [nemo] Terminology [was Draft Agenda and CFP]

From: Thierry Ernst <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 14:04:05 +0900

Dear all, particularly Marcelo and Vijay,

Have you found the answers to your concerns appropriate, together with
my modifications in the text ?

Thierry.

On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:27:28 +0200
marcelo bagnulo braun <[email-masked]> wrote:

> Hi Thierry, T.J.,
> 
> El 12/07/2004, a las 11:47, Thierry Ernst escribió:
> 
> >
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > The San Diego meeting is fast approaching. The NEMO WG is scheduled on
> > Monday 2nd August.
> >
> >> ---------- Drafty Draft Agenda
> >
> >
> > During that meeting, we will
> > definitely speak about:
> > - status of the WG and WG documents
> > - WG charter and WG direction
> > - Results of WG Last Call for draft-ietf-nemo-terminology
> >
> 
> When did the last call ended?
> 
> i couldn't find it in the archives...
> 
> i sent some comments a while ago, but i didn't receive any answer
> 
> You can find them at:
> http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nemo/current/msg00910.html
> 
> regards, marcelo
> 
> > - Results of WG Last Call for draft-ietf-nemo-equirements
> > - Multihoming Problem Statement (draft-ietf-nemo-multihoming)
> >
> >
> > Other topics on which we wish to have contributions:
> > - MIB for NEMO Basic Support
> > - Securiry Threat Analysis
> > - Analysis of the Solution Space for Route Optimization
> > - Prefix Delegation for Mobile Networks
> > - NEMO Home Network models (draft-ietf-nemo-home-network-models-00)
> >
> >> ----------- Call for Participation
> >
> > If you intend to request a slot for a topic related with the above
> > listed topic, or to add an item, please send your request to both 
> > chairs
> > by July 20th. Requests must be justified and will be accepted based the
> > priorities of the WG and time allowed during our slot.
> >
> >> ----------- Submitted Drafts
> >
> > Also, if you have submitted a new draft since last meeting, or intend 
> > to
> > submit one before the deadline, please inform TJ and myself so that we
> > can list all the ACTIVE drafts in the reading list.
> >
> > Note that I've seen a couple of drafts passing on the IETF-Announce
> > Mailing List, but these drafts were usually not announced on the NEMO
> > ML. According to the new secretariat policy, it's now the 
> > responsability
> > of the author to send a note to the NEMO ML.
> >
> > Regards,
> > NEMO Chairs.
> >
> >
> 
>