Subject: RE: NETCONF Port Decision

From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 21:19:54 +0100

Inline

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]]On
> Behalf Of McDonald, Ira
> Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 11:44
> To: 'Andy Bierman'; netconf
> Subject: RE: NETCONF Port Decision
> 
> 
> Hi Andy,
> 
> No objection, but clear WG concensus is NOT sufficient.
> Bert Wijnen specifically asked for a technical justification
> of the working group's decision - NOT just a decision.
> 
My understaninding is that the WG chairs will be making asummary
of the arguments in favor of port <1024.

> [Also - small process thing - decisions in IETF WG's and on
> their concensus happen _only_ on mailing lists, not in any
> face-to-face meetings, per IETF Standards Process.]
> 

And that is exactly why Andy is veryfying this on the WG list
(to my understanding). 

Thanks,
Bert
> Cheers,
> - Ira
> 
> Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
> Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
> PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI  49839
> phone: +1-906-494-2434
> email: [email-masked]
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email-masked] 
[mailto:[email-masked]]On
> Behalf Of Andy Bierman
> Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 12:07 PM
> To: netconf
> Subject: NETCONF Port Decision
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The WG met this morning and discussed the port assignments 
> for the protocol.
> The clear consensus in the room was that the WG should ask 
> for well known
> ports instead of registered ports.
> 
> If anyone wishes to strongly object to this decision,
> then please send an email to the WG  mailing list by 12:00AM 
> EST 3/22/06
> demonstrating a "fatal flaw" in this decision.  (E.g.., why assigning
> a well-known port instead of a registered port will harm the 
> Internet).
> 
> The WG will ask for 4 ports:
>    - NETCONF over SSH
>    - NETCONF over BEEP
>    - NETCONF over SOAP over BEEP
>    - NETCONF over SOAP over HTTPS
> 
> 
> Andy
> 
> 
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to [email-masked] with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>
> 
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.2.5/284 - Release 
> Date: 3/17/2006
>  
> 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.2.5/284 - Release Date: 3/17/2006

--
to unsubscribe send a message to [email-masked] with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>

--
to unsubscribe send a message to [email-masked] with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>