Subject: access-denied error

From: Andy Bierman <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 12:56:05 -0700

Hi,

I wanted to sneak in another comment on the non-existent
access control model for netconf.

There is no guidance whatsoever when to send the access-denied
error.  Therefore, it must be okay for implementors to
make up their own rules.

For example, on <get> and <get-config> operations, one may
choose never to issue access-denied errors, and simply
treat an explicit or implicit request for data that the
session is not authorized to view as a 'false' filter.

In other words, the <get> and <get-config> operations
by definition are requesting only data that the session
has access to read.  Anything else is just skipped,
similar to the way SNMP getNext works wrt/ VACM.

This will make it harder for hackers to learn anything
about the data model instances, especially since
access to <get> and <get-config> will tend to be
unrestricted, as opposed to <edit-config> access.

Andy

--
to unsubscribe send a message to [email-masked] with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>