Subject: [Netconf] Verifing session consensus with the maillist on RFC5539bis new port and YANG module separation

From: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 14:19:44 +0000

Dear Netconf WG,

in the Netconf session during IETF #88 we discussed the draft NETCONF Over TLS update - RFC5539bis.

Opinion poll of the WG concerning the use of a new port showed that many people were in favor of a new port and nobody against.
The WG also decided to separate the YANG module in a new document, align with the module in Reverse SSH draft and use it for both WG items.

This mail is a verification of the consensus in the session with the maillist.

Please state your opinion on the use of a new port as well as separation of the YANG module in a new document.
Please state your substantial and convincing arguments, if you have strong objections against.

In case of the YANG module separation there is the discussion started to select between module organization options in:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf/current/msg08429.html

The assumption in the session was simply aligning the YANG modules from RFC5539bis and Reverse SSH, and putting in a new draft.
Please state whether you prefer such a simple module separation (i.e. option #1 without any changes to RFC6242) or any other option for the module organization in the mail pointed above.

This consensus call will close on December 4, 2013 EOB PT.

Mehmet & Bert