Subject: [Netconf] Action by August 1st: WG call for consensus to have ONE netconf-callhome document

From: Bert Wijnen <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 21:16:04 +0200

WG participants, during our IET90 session, Kent presented
and we discussed reverse ssh this issue:

    Asymmetric document structure
    5539bis vs RFC6242 + reverse-ssh  -> 6242bis instead?

    Placement for generic content, Including:
      Section 3: "Benefits to Device Management”
      Section 5: "SSH Server Identification and Verification”

    Best if moved to a common “Call Home” draft
    A “6242bis” wouldn’t work after all…

    Proposal:
    Have a single “NETCONF Call Home” (draft-ietf-netconf-call-home)
    draft that is equally valid for all NETCONF transports
    rename this draft and move 5539bis content into it

We did a hum in the room and there was overwhelming support to accept
the proposal. No-one hummed against or abstained.

So we're confirming this consensus on the WG mailing list.

Please speak up by Friday August 1st if you disagree.

Bert and Mehmet