Subject: Re: [Netconf] server-model #33: Is it a good idea to name the top-level node "netconf-server"?

From: Kent Watsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 20:47:45 +0000

This issue is now considered DEAD.

Thanks,
Kent

From: Kent Watsen <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Date: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 at 2:51 PM
To: "[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>" <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Subject: [Netconf] server-model #33: Is it a good idea to name the top-level node "netconf-server"?

This issue was discussed yesterday and again this morning.  The current agreement is to leave the top-level name as it is.  The issue is hence moved to the VERIFY state.  The issue will move to the DEAD state If no objection is raised by April 6th.

https://github.com/netconf-wg/server-model/issues/33

Thanks,
Kent