Subject: Re: [Netconf] server-model #41: should address be mandatory?

From: Kent Watsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 22:55:28 +0000

The solution to this issue proposed below is now verified.

Kent

From: Kent Watsen <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Date: Sunday, March 29, 2015 at 1:00 PM
To: "[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>" <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Subject: [Netconf] server-model #41: should address be mandatory?

This issue was discussed during the Dallas meeting with an agreement to leave as mandatory false and add to the description that a missing address is to be interpreted as a wildcard meaning "all interfaces".

The issue is hence moved to the VERIFY state.  The issue will move to the EDIT state If no objection is raised by April 6th.

https://github.com/netconf-wg/server-model/issues/41

Thanks,
Kent