Subject: Re: [Netconf] server-model #34: Are the features granular enough?

From: Kent Watsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 20:51:01 +0000

This issue is verified.  The server-model draft will use the YANG 1.1 if-feature statements, as we had them before...

Kent

From: Kent Watsen <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Date: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 at 3:29 PM
To: "[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>" <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Subject: [Netconf] server-model #34: Are the features granular enough?

This issue was discussed yesterday with no clear agreement on what to do but, when discussing issue #49, there was an agreement to use the YANG 1.1 if-feature statement, which we could apply to this issue as well.

Specifically, we can go back to the feature statements we had in -04: ssh-listen, tls-listen, ssh-call-home, and tls-call-home and use statements like "if-feature "(ssh-listen or tls-listen)".

Essentially, to revert this change: https://github.com/netconf-wg/server-model/commit/c5ae65b679b9dceff91a2fe03f86330123e88f2a

This issue will move to the EDIT state, with the plan to revert to the -04 features, if no objection is raised by April 6th.

https://github.com/netconf-wg/server-model/issues/34

Thanks,
Kent