Subject: Re: [Netconf] LL review of yang-library-03

From: Randy Presuhn <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 11:30:02 -0800 (GMT-08:00)

Hi -

>From: Martin Bjorklund <[email-masked]>
>Sent: Feb 2, 2016 5:11 AM
>To: [email-masked]
>Cc: [email-masked]
>Subject: Re: [Netconf] LL review of yang-library-03
...
>To me "conformance role" sounds a bit weird, but maybe someone native
>speaker can comment?

The first meaning that comes to the mind of this native speaker
is not the intended one.  I'd suggest something like "conformance
category" or "conformance class".

Randy