Subject: Re: [netext] draft-chan-netext-distributed-lma-00

From: Anthony Chan <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:35:21 -0600

Xiaoyan,

Thanks for your 2 questions, which are answered as follows:

The home network and the visited network may be administered by the same
party. 

HNP is allocated by H-LMA and not a V-LMA.

These points as well as other points have been clarified in the later
version of this draft. A new section on Interworking has also been added in
version 02. 

H Anthony Chan

  _____  

From: Xiaoyan Jiang [mailto:[email-masked]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 6:39 AM
To: [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: RE:draft-chan-netext-distributed-lma-00

Hi,Anthony
 
  Please see in line... 
 
>> Distributed local mobility anchors provides visiting local 
>> mobility anchors in different networks with mobility routing >> function
to avoid triangle routing problem in Proxy mobile IP
>> or Mobile IP, but keeps the internetwork location management >> function
at the home local mobility anchors at registered 
>> networks.
 -Do the home network and visiting network have to be in the same PMIPv6
domain or not, or is there any restrictions?
 
>> To perform HoA allocation, each H-LMA may use its own block of >> IP
prefixes to allocate IP addresses to the MNs registering to >> its network.

 - When MN moves from its H-LMA to a V-LMA, how to guarantee the V-LMA has
the authorities to allocate the same HNP to MN?
Do I miss anything?...
 
Thank you
Xiaoyan Jiang