Subject: Re: [netext] New Version Notification for draft-bernardos-netext-ll-statement-01

From: "Zuniga, Juan Carlos" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 14:52:54 -0500

Hi Raj,

Just to clarify, Telemaco is the one that had originally requested the agenda slot, and this is the draft that Carlos is talking about:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bernardos-netext-ll-statement-01 
for:
> Jul 2010  Initial WG document on Applicability Statement on Logical 
> Interface over Multiple Physical Interfaces

Regards,

Juan-Carlos 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: MELIA TELEMACO [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: Tuesday, 09 March, 2010 3:53 AM
> To: [email-masked]
> Cc: Zuniga, Juan Carlos; [email-masked]
> Subject: TR: New Version Notification for draft-bernardos-netext-ll-
> statement-01
> 
> 
> Hi Raj,
> 
> We would also request a slot for this ID clearly in scope of the Netext
> charter.
> 
> Thanks,
> telemaco
> 
> 
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : IETF I-D Submission Tool [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Envoyé : lundi 8 mars 2010 22:52
> À : [email-masked]
> Cc : [email-masked]; MELIA TELEMACO
> Objet : New Version Notification for draft-bernardos-netext-ll-
> statement-01
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-bernardos-netext-ll-statement-01.txt has
> been successfuly submitted by Carlos Bernardos and posted to the IETF
> repository.
> 
> Filename:	 draft-bernardos-netext-ll-statement
> Revision:	 01
> Title:		 Applicability Statement on Link Layer
> implementation/Logical Interface over Multiple Physical Interfaces
> Creation_date:	 2010-03-08
> WG ID:		 Independent Submission
> Number_of_pages: 10
> 
> Abstract:
> The NETLMM WG standardized Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) as [RFC5213].
> PMIPv6 enables mobile devices to connect to a PMIPv6 domain and roam
> across gateways without changing the IP address.  PMIPv6 also
> provides limited multi-homing support to multi-mode mobile devices.
> 
> Proxy mobility is based on the assumption that changes in host IP
> stacks are undesirable.  Link layer implementations can hide the
> actually used physical interfaces from the IP stack.  These
> techniques can be used to achieve inter-access technology handovers
> or flow mobility, i.e., the movement of selected flows from one
> access technology to another.  It is assumed that an IP layer
> interface can simultaneously and/or sequentially attach to multiple
> MAGs (possibly over multiple media).  This document provides an
> informational applicability statement that analyzes the issues
> involved with this approach (i.e. hiding access technology changes
> from host IP layer) and characterizes the contexts in which such use
> is or is not appropriate to achieve inter-access handovers or flow
> mobility.
> 
> 
> 
> The IETF Secretariat.
>