From Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com Thu Jun 3 14:17:41 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: netext@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: netext@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B34FC3A6A3A for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 14:17:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.149 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.150, BAYES_50=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XxQxWaIUjcBY for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 14:17:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mgw-mx03.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [192.100.122.230]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E58853A69F3 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 14:17:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vaebh105.NOE.Nokia.com (vaebh105.europe.nokia.com [10.160.244.31]) by mgw-mx03.nokia.com (Switch-3.3.3/Switch-3.3.3) with ESMTP id o53LHL3J008998 for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 00:17:21 +0300 Received: from esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.183]) by vaebh105.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 4 Jun 2010 00:17:20 +0300 Received: from vaebh101.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.160.244.22]) by esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 4 Jun 2010 00:17:20 +0300 Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.7]) by vaebh101.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 4 Jun 2010 00:17:02 +0300 Received: from NOK-EUMSG-03.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.108]) by nok-am1mhub-03.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.7]) with mapi; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 23:17:01 +0200 From: To: Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 23:16:59 +0200 Thread-Topic: Progressing the work item: Applicability Statement on Logical Interface over Multiple Physical Interfaces Thread-Index: AcsDYhodG9hmgadlxEGu9904NOKwdg== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Jun 2010 21:17:02.0217 (UTC) FILETIME=[1C083790:01CB0362] X-Nokia-AV: Clean Subject: [netext] Progressing the work item: Applicability Statement on Logical Interface over Multiple Physical Interfaces X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 21:17:41 -0000 Hello, At IETF77 we had a discussion on the topic of logical interfaces and the associated applicability of the same for inter-technology handovers among others.=20 The I-Ds that were relevant to this discussion are: A. draft-bernardos-netext-ll-statement B. draft-yokota-netlmm-pmipv6-mn-itho-support We also had some good feedback on what the I-D needs to cover in its scope. At this time, we have decided to nominate Telemaco Melia and Sri Gundavelli as the editors for the WG I-D on this topic. We hope to have a preliminary version of the I-D in the next couple of week= s at which time we will do a consensus call to accept it as WG doc and move forward.=20 Please note that as per the charter we need to have the initial version of the WG doc by IETF78. " Jul 2010 Initial WG document on Applicability Statement on Logical Interface over Multiple Physical Interfaces " -Chairs From Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com Thu Jun 3 14:27:48 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: netext@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: netext@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50E6A3A680A for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 14:27:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.766 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.766 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.233, BAYES_50=0.001, GB_I_INVITATION=-2, GB_I_LETTER=-2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4KGL2ix0cTwh for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 14:27:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mgw-mx06.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [192.100.122.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 289833A681E for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 14:27:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh105.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.211]) by mgw-mx06.nokia.com (Switch-3.3.3/Switch-3.3.3) with ESMTP id o53LRTjF024620 for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 00:27:30 +0300 Received: from vaebh104.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.160.244.30]) by esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 4 Jun 2010 00:27:29 +0300 Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.5]) by vaebh104.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 4 Jun 2010 00:27:24 +0300 Received: from NOK-EUMSG-03.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.108]) by nok-am1mhub-01.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.5]) with mapi; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 23:27:24 +0200 From: To: Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 23:27:20 +0200 Thread-Topic: IETF 78 - Meeting and Sponsorship Information Thread-Index: AcsDY4xCOh8mfi/6jUuNF+ixn7eYQQ== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Jun 2010 21:27:24.0859 (UTC) FILETIME=[8F27D8B0:01CB0363] X-Nokia-AV: Clean Subject: [netext] IETF 78 - Meeting and Sponsorship Information X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 21:27:49 -0000 DQpGWUksDQoNCi0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tDQoNCjc4dGggSUVURiBNZWV0 aW5nDQpNYWFzdHJpY2h0LCBOZXRoZXJsYW5kcw0KSnVseSAyNS0zMCwgMjAxMA0KDQoxLiBTcG9u c29yc2hpcCBPcHBvcnR1bml0aWVzDQoyLiBSZWdpc3RyYXRpb24gVHlwZXMNCjMuIFZpc2FzIGFu ZCBMZXR0ZXJzIG9mIEludml0YXRpb24NCjQuIEFjY29tbW9kYXRpb25zICYgQnJlYWtmYXN0IElu Zm9ybWF0aW9uDQo1LiBJRVRGIDc5IChCZWlqaW5nKSBWaXNhIEluZm9ybWF0aW9uDQoNCjEpIFNw b25zb3JzaGlwIE9wcG9ydHVuaXRpZXMNClRoZXJlIGFyZSBzdGlsbCBzcG9uc29yc2hpcCBvcHBv cnR1bml0aWVzIGFuZCBiZW5lZml0cyBmb3IgaGlnaCBwcm9maWxlDQpjb21wYW55L29yZ2FuaXph dGlvbmFsIGV4cG9zdXJlIGF0IHRoZSB1cGNvbWluZyBJRVRGIG1lZXRpbmcgaW4NCk1hYXN0cmlj aHQsIE5ldGhlcmxhbmRzIGZyb20gSnVseSAyNS0zMCwgMjAxMC4gIEFsbCBzcG9uc29yc2hpcCBm ZWVzIGdvDQpkaXJlY3RseSB0byBmdW5kIHRoZSBvcGVyYXRpb25zIG9mIHRoZSBJRVRGLiAgU2Vl IHRoZSBvcHRpb25zIGF0Og0KaHR0cDovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9tZWV0aW5nLzc4L2luZGV4Lmh0 bWwg77+9U3BvbnNvcnNoaXAgT3Bwb3J0dW5pdGllc++/vQ0KdW5kZXIg77+9R2VuZXJhbO+/vS4g IEVhY2ggb2YgdGhlIHNwb25zb3JzaGlwIG9wdGlvbnMgcHJvdmlkZSBleHRlbmRlZCBhbmQNCnJl cGVhdCBleHBvc3VyZSBhdCB0aGlzIHdlZWtsb25nIG1lZXRpbmcuDQoNClBsZWFzZSBjb250YWN0 IERyZXcgRHZvcnNoYWssIGR2b3JzaGFrQGlzb2Mub3JnLCB3aXRoIGFueSBxdWVzdGlvbnMNCmFu ZC9vciB0byByZXNlcnZlIHlvdXIgb3JnYW5pemF0aW9u77+9cyBzcG90LiAgVGhhbmtzIGluIGFk dmFuY2UgZm9yDQpzdXBwb3J0aW5nIHRoZSBjcml0aWNhbCB3b3JrIG9mIHRoZSBJRVRGIQ0KDQoy KSBSZWdpc3RlciBvbmxpbmUgYXQ6ICBodHRwOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL21lZXRpbmdzLzc4Lw0K DQozKSBMZXR0ZXJzIG9mIEludml0YXRpb24gYW5kIFZpc2FzDQpMZXR0ZXJzIG9mIEludml0YXRp b24NCkFmdGVyIHlvdSBjb21wbGV0ZSB0aGUgbWVldGluZyByZWdpc3RyYXRpb24gcHJvY2Vzcywg eW91IHdpbGwgYmUgZ2l2ZW4gdGhlDQpvcHRpb24gdG8gcmVxdWVzdCBhIGxldHRlciBvZiBpbnZp dGF0aW9uLiBZb3UgY2FuIHJlcXVlc3QgdGhlIExldHRlciBvZg0KSW52aXRhdGlvbiBhcyBzb29u IGFzIHlvdSBmaW5pc2ggcmVnaXN0cmF0aW9uLCBvciBhdCBhIGxhdGVyIHRpbWUgYnkNCmZvbGxv d2luZyB0aGUgbGluayBwcm92aWRlZCBpbiB0aGUgY29uZmlybWF0aW9uIGVtYWlsLg0KDQpWaXNh cw0KUGxlYXNlIGNoZWNrIHRoZSBOZXRoZXJsYW5kcyBNaW5pc3RyeSBvZiBGb3JlaWduIEFmZmFp cnMgc2l0ZQ0KKGh0dHA6Ly93d3cubWluYnV6YS5ubC9lbi9TZXJ2aWNlcy9Db25zdWxhcl9TZXJ2 aWNlcy9WaXNhKSBmb3IgbGlzdCBvZg0KY291bnRyaWVzIHdpdGggdmlzYSBleGVtcHRpb25zLg0K DQpXZSByZWNvbW1lbmQgeW91IGdpdmUgeW91cnNlbGYgYXQgbGVhc3Qgb25lIG1vbnRoIHRvIGNv bXBsZXRlIHRoZSB2aXNhDQpwcm9jZXNzLg0KDQo0KSBBY2NvbW1vZGF0aW9ucyAmIEJyZWFrZmFz dCBJbmZvcm1hdGlvbg0KaHR0cDovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9tZWV0aW5nLzc4L2hvdGVsLmh0bWwN Cg0KNSkgSWYgeW91IHdhbnQgdG8gc3RhcnQgcGxhbm5pbmcgZm9yIHlvdXIgdHJpcCB0byBJRVRG IDc5IGluIEJlaWppbmcsIHdlDQpoYXZlIHZpc2EgaW5mb3JtYXRpb24gb25saW5lIGhlcmU6DQpo dHRwOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL21lZXRpbmcvNzkvdmlzYS5odG1sDQoNCk9ubHkgNTIgZGF5cyB1 bnRpbCBJRVRGIDc4IQ0KDQo= From behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com Tue Jun 15 11:46:01 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: netext@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: netext@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE66C3A699D for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:46:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.615 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.615 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.650, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M6dklptkBcQa for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:45:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web111409.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (web111409.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [67.195.15.180]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 119E33A6977 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:45:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 42769 invoked by uid 60001); 15 Jun 2010 18:45:54 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1276627554; bh=j6RI2QeFrza+emuTvyvhz5MY0Q4YlFiPmu6Vyi8A5WE=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Y3czd0U2P22vv4h+dK6W0vLGmdfNlgbWfZ0uLem3hVojn2kjZ0iRNjpAZrpQKD/hYg77PQVhwU1hEl1OTds4riAjex/zlzr7A6pQvhigqemzy/j69ROZNnp3IdUAt+CytewfHjS9Ut/aKExfOPtkk+8fZzY+int9SlKROMLdYMk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=xb/rWWZfNvPdVbKjOWnD/5sOTmsnR28xQOrjYJnx+lOWNWFUQ06eKn9YGkc8nxnOr+AG57oSemmxaxdqhwuoxpypAPfBEiXpLkqhkIlaUvmGICP+6A/8NE3KCYVlpD1QkM4xE79Bltm4KHSHhX0pNiGdTUmz7bYeVvQ/5ACROyY=; Message-ID: <840390.41794.qm@web111409.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: fvXRaqgVM1mshN9eJvLBjjqUMvrTHuTSDXfNUsBVRdPBx7T uq2hXrmrmGaN6PxlgkaBOQsxFZN9Oig5_AiJpKPgsSNirJic59jZap03vrNU 9RpzLTLzOKTayEDJUjZinvqqnqWNw_NilMYtokNutTQLobT0z5127kRbjkRO oCOQRDXUg8YSEOF1zKjgI.EVEeYall1njQq.9abMQZJdnefDd0o75pBJE_b1 qVYNACmNjhmi.6bbhVoOa9HX_Muk7prNcGqTpl.zCFfg0slcooaO_zbfVD.M oq3.iSwCWwF3Mbe8.wzKk03bsD.3HptQRcJEl3UjQxHzvuIvVD.ikp9xDvqz 55s9RSGoDGwgIfoQp0vOwi_3R Received: from [206.16.17.212] by web111409.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:45:54 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/397.8 YahooMailWebService/0.8.103.269680 Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:45:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Behcet Sarikaya To: behave@ietf.org, netext@ietf.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [netext] NAT64 for PMIP X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: Behcet Sarikaya List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:46:01 -0000 Hello Folks,=0A=A0 There is a new draft on =0ANAT64 for Proxy Mobile IPv6= =0Aat=0Ahttp://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-sarikaya-behave-netext-nat64-pmip-00= .txt=0APlease post your comments on the lists.=0A=0ARegards,=0A=0ABehcet=0A= =0A=0A From xiayangsong@huawei.com Thu Jun 17 22:31:33 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: netext@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: netext@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E33D3A6984 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:31:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.995 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.995 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n7wfnce2Huw4 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:31:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com (unknown [119.145.14.65]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9739A3A689B for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:31:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from huawei.com (szxga02-in [172.24.2.6]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0L4700I9Y3CD0S@szxga02-in.huawei.com> for netext@ietf.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:31:25 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0L4700F173CD8J@szxga02-in.huawei.com> for netext@ietf.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:31:25 +0800 (CST) Received: from X24512z ([10.51.0.16]) by szxml06-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0L4700HU73CADE@szxml06-in.huawei.com> for netext@ietf.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:31:25 +0800 (CST) Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:31:20 -0700 From: Frank Xia To: netext@ietf.org Message-id: <000401cb0ea7$7d6ddb70$0301a8c0@china.huawei.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_lllfvHW6UaWz4XxrH5yHSw)" Thread-index: AcsOp3uFO9/8dOTnT4Oy3/Aw+guLew== Subject: [netext] update of individual draft "Flow Binding in Proxy Mobile IPv6" X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 05:31:33 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Boundary_(ID_lllfvHW6UaWz4XxrH5yHSw) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Hi Guys I updated this draft http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-xia-netext-flow-binding-01.txt. Comments are very welcome. BR Frank --Boundary_(ID_lllfvHW6UaWz4XxrH5yHSw) Content-type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Guys

 

I updated this = draft

http= ://www.ietf.org/id/draft-xia-netext-flow-binding-01.txt.

 

Comments are very = welcome.

 

BR

Frank

--Boundary_(ID_lllfvHW6UaWz4XxrH5yHSw)-- From Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com Tue Jun 22 15:51:38 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: netext@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: netext@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A33B3A6863 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:51:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RfijD+mscyoQ for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:51:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mgw-mx06.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [192.100.122.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D86E53A68A0 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:51:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh105.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.211]) by mgw-mx06.nokia.com (Switch-3.3.3/Switch-3.3.3) with ESMTP id o5MMp9Tq031056 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 01:51:35 +0300 Received: from vaebh102.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.160.244.23]) by esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 23 Jun 2010 01:51:17 +0300 Received: from vaebh101.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.160.244.22]) by vaebh102.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 23 Jun 2010 01:51:13 +0300 Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.5]) by vaebh101.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 23 Jun 2010 01:51:08 +0300 Received: from NOK-EUMSG-03.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.88]) by nok-am1mhub-01.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.5]) with mapi; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 00:51:08 +0200 From: To: Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 00:51:05 +0200 Thread-Topic: Nomcom 2010-2011: Second Call for Volunteers Thread-Index: AcsSXEMJ/Mu+epRxRPmuPc+92eRxgAAAQ/5A Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jun 2010 22:51:08.0318 (UTC) FILETIME=[67381BE0:01CB125D] X-Nokia-AV: Clean Subject: [netext] FW: Nomcom 2010-2011: Second Call for Volunteers X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 22:51:38 -0000 FYI, > From: NomCom Chair > Date: June 21, 2010 5:49:08 PM EDT > To: IETF Announcement list > Subject: Nomcom 2010-2011: Second Call for Volunteers > > Hi all, > > This is the Second call for Volunteers for the 2010-11 nomcom. We are > just about halfway through the volunteer period so if you are =20 > considering > volunteering please do so very soon. > > I am pleased to report that we have 29 volunteers thus far whose > qualifications have been confirmed by the secretariat. I have notified > each of these volunteers by email. > > If you volunteered before 08:00 PDT (15:00 UTC) on June 21 to serve =20 > as a > voting member and have not received a confirmation email from me, =20 > please > re-submit and bring to my attention right away! > > However, we need many more volunteers. You have until 17:00 PDT =20 > (24:00 > UTC) on July 8, 2010 to volunteer for nomcom but it is much better =20 > if you > volunteer as early as possible. The more volunteers, the better =20 > chance we > have of choosing a random yet representative cross section of the IETF > pouplation. > > As a reminder, volunteers must have attended 3 of the past 5 IETF > meetings - per RFC 3777, which means 3 of the following meetings: =20 > IETF-73, > IETF-74, IETF-75, IETF-76 and IETF-77. If you qualify, and are =20 > willing to > forgo appointment to any of the positions for which the nominating > committee is responsible, please volunteer. > > The 10 nominating committee members are selected randomly from a =20 > pool of > volunteers. The details of the operation of nomcom may be found in =20 > RFC > 3777. The process on how to volunteer for nomcom is in the initial > announcement: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ann/nomcom/2330/ > > The lists of open positions and people whose terms end in March 2011 =20 > and > thus the positions for which the nominating committee is responsible =20 > are > summarized in the initial announcement: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ann/nomcom/2330/ > > The 29 volunteers who have thus far been qualified by the secretariat > are: > > Fred Baker, Cisco Systems > > Stephan Wenger, Vidyo, Inc. > > Marc Blanchet, Viagenie > > Lixia Zhang, UCLA > > John Drake, Juniper Networks > > Ole Troan, Cisco > > Jiankang Yao, CNNIC > > Wassim Haddad, Ericsson > > Yi Zhao, Huawei USA > > Teemu Savolainen, Nokia > > Jouni Korhonen, Nokia Siemens Networks > > Mehmet Ersue, Nokia Siemens Networks > > Christian Schmidt, Nokia Siemens Networks > > Stephen Hanna, Juniper Networks > > Suresh Krishnan, Ericsson > > Eric Gray, Ericsson > > David Sinicrope, Ericsson > > Jan Melen, Ericsson > > Richard Barnes, BBN Technologies > > Hugo Salgado Hernandez, NIC Chile > > Ning Zong, Huawei Technologies > > Qin Wu, Huawei Technologies > > Karen Seo, BBN Technologies > > Haibin Song, Huawei Technologies > > Susan Hares, Huawei Technologies > > Tony Hansen. AT&T Labs > > Fuqing Huang, Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. > > Huub van Helvoort, Huawei Technologies > > Miya Kohno, Juniper Networks > > The primary activity for this nomcom will begin just prior to =20 > IETF-78 in > Maastricht and should be completed in early January 2011. The =20 > nomcom will > be collecting requirements from the community, as well as talking to > candidates and to community members about candidates. There will be =20 > weekly > conference calls to ensure progress. Thus, being a nomcom member does > require some time commitment. > > While, there is no requirement in RFC 3777 that a participant attend =20 > IETF > meetings while serving on nomcom, please consider that during the IETF > meetings, people that do not attend would be expected to remotely > participate during the day in the time zones of the meeting =20 > locations - > Maastricht at the end of July and Beijing in November. > > If you are not yet sure you would like to volunteer, please consider =20 > that > nomcom members play a very important role in shaping the leadership =20 > of the > IETF. Ensuring the leadership of the IETF is fair and balanced and > comprised of those who can lead the IETF in the right direction is an > important responsibility that rests on the IETF participants at large. > Volunteering for the nomcom is a good way of contributing in that > direction. > > Please volunteer by sending an email before: > 17:00 PDT (24:00 UTC) July 8, 2010 as follows: > > To: nomcom-chair@ietf.org > Subject: Nomcom 2010-11 Volunteer > > Please include the following information in the body: > > // As you enter in the IETF Registration Form, > // First/Given name followed by Last/Family Name > > > // typically what goes in the Company field > // in the IETF Registration Form > > [] > // > > // For confirmation if selected > > Please expect an email response from me within 3 days stating =20 > whether or > not you are qualified. If you don't receive a response, please re-=20 > send > your email with the tag "Duplicate:" added to the subject line. > > Thank you and I hope to hear from you, > > Thomas Walsh > Chair, Nomcom 2010-11 > Email: nomcom-chair@ietf.org > > > _______________________________________________ > IETF-Announce mailing list > IETF-Announce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce > From ext-fuad.junior@nokia.com Mon Jun 28 04:01:44 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: netext@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: netext@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118103A69B0 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 04:01:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MZvQb9+zPUIw for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 04:01:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mgw-mx03.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [192.100.122.230]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B634F3A6900 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 04:01:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vaebh105.NOE.Nokia.com (vaebh105.europe.nokia.com [10.160.244.31]) by mgw-mx03.nokia.com (Switch-3.3.3/Switch-3.3.3) with ESMTP id o5SB1juS011231 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:01:49 +0300 Received: from vaebh104.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.160.244.30]) by vaebh105.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:01:46 +0300 Received: from mzebe101.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.18.252.71]) by vaebh104.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:01:45 +0300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CB16B1.4A63EC45" Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 07:01:53 -0400 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Review/feedback on draft-ietf-netext-bulk-re-registration Thread-Index: AcsWsVDTDl/4b4ZhTwq5y4AWPgALZw== From: To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jun 2010 11:01:45.0893 (UTC) FILETIME=[4C83F550:01CB16B1] X-Nokia-AV: Clean Subject: [netext] Review/feedback on draft-ietf-netext-bulk-re-registration X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 11:01:44 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CB16B1.4A63EC45 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, As the IETF 78 meeting is approaching, I'd like to request you to some additional comments on the "Bulk Re-registration for Proxy Mobile IPv6" (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netext-bulk-re-registration-00) I-D, which was requested by the chairs to proceed with its revision process. I believe is quite mature, but it would be really nice if some of you could provide feedback. There is no newer version, it's the same version presented on IETF #77 meeting, but as I haven't receive any feedback also there, I'd like to request that again. Regards, Fuad Abinader ------_=_NextPart_001_01CB16B1.4A63EC45 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Review/feedback on draft-ietf-netext-bulk-re-registration

Hi = all,

        As the IETF 78 meeting is approaching, I'd like = to request you to some additional comments on the "Bulk = Re-registration for Proxy Mobile IPv6" (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netext-bulk-re-regis= tration-00) I-D, which was requested by the chairs to proceed with = its revision process. I believe is quite mature, but it would be really = nice if some of you could provide feedback. There is no newer version, = it's the same version presented on IETF #77 meeting, but as I haven't = receive any feedback also there, I'd like to request that = again.

Regards,

Fuad = Abinader

------_=_NextPart_001_01CB16B1.4A63EC45-- From Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com Mon Jun 28 15:20:48 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: netext@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: netext@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A95283A6A72 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:20:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YB8rgxRGENnK for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:20:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mgw-mx09.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [192.100.105.134]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B381F3A67C0 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:20:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh105.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.211]) by mgw-mx09.nokia.com (Switch-3.3.3/Switch-3.3.3) with ESMTP id o5SMKIK2017855 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:20:54 -0500 Received: from vaebh104.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.160.244.30]) by esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 29 Jun 2010 01:20:41 +0300 Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.7]) by vaebh104.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 29 Jun 2010 01:20:37 +0300 Received: from NOK-EUMSG-03.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.88]) by nok-am1mhub-03.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.7]) with mapi; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 00:20:36 +0200 From: To: Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 00:20:33 +0200 Thread-Topic: Agenda requests for IETF78 Thread-Index: AcsXEB/DBzQQddpwFkCEMHm0C6+1lA== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jun 2010 22:20:37.0353 (UTC) FILETIME=[225B8590:01CB1710] X-Nokia-AV: Clean Subject: [netext] Agenda requests for IETF78 X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 22:20:48 -0000 Hello, The Netext WG will meet at IETF78. Emphasis will be on the working group documents and topics that are within the scope of the charter and milestones. If you need a timeslot to present an I-D, please send a request to netext-chairs@tools.ietf.org Note that you need to have an I-D in order to request a timeslot. Please specify the amount of time that you need and also how the I-D itself is relevant within the context of the netext charter and/or milestones. Also it is always useful to have some interest and discussion via the WG ML= . -Chairs From Xiangsong.Cui@huawei.com Mon Jun 28 20:06:41 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: netext@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: netext@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2F6B3A688B for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 20:06:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.961 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.961 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.959, BAYES_50=0.001, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2w9WSAWrqdA8 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 20:06:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.64]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7300F3A6774 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 20:06:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from huawei.com (szxga01-in [172.24.2.3]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0L4R00L249ZAVN@szxga01-in.huawei.com> for netext@ietf.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:06:46 +0800 (CST) Received: from c00111037 ([10.111.16.150]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0L4R009WE9ZA4E@szxga01-in.huawei.com> for netext@ietf.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:06:46 +0800 (CST) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:06:46 +0800 From: Xiangsong Cui To: ext-fuad.junior@nokia.com, netext@ietf.org Message-id: <008301cb1738$1bedae40$96106f0a@china.huawei.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3598 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1; reply-type=original Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal References: Subject: Re: [netext] Review/feedback on draft-ietf-netext-bulk-re-registration X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 03:06:42 -0000 Hello, I have read this draft and have some comments, In general, does this draft UPDATE RFC5213? I think it does, because PBU message may carry no MN ID (while that is required MUST in RFC 5213), but I don't see this information in the head of the draft. Section 3.1, According to this proposal a MAG adds a MN to a set of MNs re- registered in a bulk mode by setting the bulk re-registration bit (B) in the PBU message. The PBU message sent in response contains the Mobile Node Group Identifier mobility option which is defined later in this document. In the context of bulk re-registrations the Mobile Node Group Identifier is an opaque identifier that is allocated by the LMA and which uniquely identifies the bulk set to which the MN was added. In the third line, "The PBU message sent in response....", Should it be "The PBA message sent in response...." ? section 3.2, When requested to add a MN to the bulk re-registration set, the LMA may reject the request. In this case the LMA processes the PBU message as if the bulk re-registration flag was not set and responds with PBAck message where the bulk re-registration flag is set to 0. I think the request message has two purposes, MN binding and joining the group, otherwise, I mean if there was only joining meaning, the MN is not attached after the PBAck message with group id option. right? In this case, if the LMA rejects the joining request, it processes as if the bulk flag was not set. But at this time, the binding request is processed, so that is not really a *reject* (I prefer that was partial acceptance), the PBAck status should be success value, just without bulk flag. The text in the draft looks like the PBAck status was a rejected value? section 4.1, If the bulk registration flag (B) is set to 1, then the PBU message is a request to add the MN to the bulk re-registration set. Again, if the PBU is just adding request without binding purpose, why does the LMA, in section 3.2, processes the PBU as if the bulk flag was not set? ignoring the bulk flag, means the PBU has other meaning, right? If that was true, I prefer this text as: If the bulk registration flag (B) is set to 1, then the PBU message is additionally loaded a request of adding the MN to a bulk re-registration set. section 5, When the binding lifetime of any MN contained in the bulk re- registration set is about to expire, the MAG SHALL request the bulk re-registration by sending the PBU message..... About the binding timer, if the individual timer is running, when MN1 is about to expire, MN2 is also about to expire, so I am worrying, do multiple MNs trigger multiple PBU? At least, IMHO, *binding lifetime of any MN* is inappropriate, first expiration triggers PBU is better but still need explanation what is *first*, maybe we can say if there is a pending bulk PBU/PBA transaction between the LMA/MAG pair, then no other bulk PBU for the same group is sent, except the PBU expires.... anyway, I think this arithmetic should be clarified. (I would like there is only one timer for the group binding.) section 5, If the MAG sets the bulk re-registration bit to 1 in a PBU message but the bulk registration bit (B) is set to 0 in a PBAck message, the MAG SHALL process the PBAck message as per [RFC5213]. In addition, the MAG SHALL infer that the LMA does not support bulk re- registration procedure. The MAG SHALL switch to regular, per-MN re- registration mode as described in [RFC5213]. The MAG MAY retry the bulk re-registration procedure after sufficient time has elapsed from the previous unsuccessful bulk re-registration. This amount of time SHOULD be configurable at the MAG. if the LMA doesn't support bulk re-registration, why does the MAG retry bulk re-registration? why does the situation change? why the delay time *SHOULD* be configurable? I suggest to extend PBA status value, to represent temporary reject, not support bulk re-registration, and other reject reasons. section 8, The mobile node's identifier is always present in the Proxy Mobile IPv6 signaling messages and additionally carrying the group identity of the mobile node introduces similar vulnerabilities. As this draft specifies, MN ID is not present in bulk PBU/PBA messages, *is always present* is inappropriate? Regards, Xiangsong ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 7:01 PM Subject: [netext] Review/feedback on draft-ietf-netext-bulk-re-registration Hi all, As the IETF 78 meeting is approaching, I'd like to request you to some additional comments on the "Bulk Re-registration for Proxy Mobile IPv6" (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netext-bulk-re-registration-00) I-D, which was requested by the chairs to proceed with its revision process. I believe is quite mature, but it would be really nice if some of you could provide feedback. There is no newer version, it's the same version presented on IETF #77 meeting, but as I haven't receive any feedback also there, I'd like to request that again. Regards, Fuad Abinader -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ > netext mailing list > netext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext > From Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com Mon Jun 28 20:09:46 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: netext@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: netext@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EEC03A688B for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 20:09:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J69F0k4kLjQR for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 20:09:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mgw-mx06.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [192.100.122.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 653383A67D3 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 20:09:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh105.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.211]) by mgw-mx06.nokia.com (Switch-3.3.3/Switch-3.3.3) with ESMTP id o5T39cRe005613 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 06:09:53 +0300 Received: from esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.183]) by esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 29 Jun 2010 06:09:27 +0300 Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.7]) by esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 29 Jun 2010 06:09:27 +0300 Received: from NOK-EUMSG-03.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.88]) by nok-am1mhub-03.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.7]) with mapi; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 05:09:27 +0200 From: To: Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 05:09:23 +0200 Thread-Topic: Incorrectly approved I-D.. Thread-Index: AcsXOHk/QNqxC92VJE6cLQ5bD0G9eg== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Jun 2010 03:09:27.0700 (UTC) FILETIME=[7C0C9D40:01CB1738] X-Nokia-AV: Clean Subject: [netext] Incorrectly approved I-D.. X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 03:09:46 -0000 Hello, Just wanted to let the WG know that I inadvertently approved an I-D: draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-cpc I have asked the administrator to revoke the approval. -Basavaraj From root@core3.amsl.com Mon Jun 28 20:15:01 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: netext@ietf.org Delivered-To: netext@core3.amsl.com Received: by core3.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id 965F73A680F; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 20:15:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; Boundary="NextPart" Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20100629031501.965F73A680F@core3.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 20:15:01 -0700 (PDT) Cc: netext@ietf.org Subject: [netext] I-D Action:draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-cpc-00.txt X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 03:15:01 -0000 --NextPart A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Network-Based Mobility Extensions Working Group of the IETF. Title : A central policy controlling based PMIPv6 Solutions Author(s) : J. Hu, X. Guang Filename : draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-cpc-00.txt Pages : 19 Date : 2010-06-28 This document defines a central policy controlling network-based mobility management solution through Authentication, Authorization, Accounting (AAA), and policy controller interactions between Proxy Mobile IPv6 entities(both Mobile Access Gateway and Local Mobility Anchor) under an AAA server and policy server group within a Proxy Mobile IPv6 Domain. The AAA and policy interactions are not only used to download and update mobile node specific user data information between Proxy Mobile IPv6 entities and a remote policy store, but also update the local mobility anchor about the current location of the mobile node instead of signaling messages between the mobile access gateway and local mobility anchor. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-cpc-00.txt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the Internet-Draft. --NextPart Content-Type: Message/External-body; name="draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-cpc-00.txt"; site="ftp.ietf.org"; access-type="anon-ftp"; directory="internet-drafts" Content-Type: text/plain Content-ID: <2010-06-28200241.I-D@ietf.org> --NextPart-- From Xiangsong.Cui@huawei.com Mon Jun 28 23:54:53 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: netext@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: netext@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2326B3A6966 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 23:54:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.233 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.233 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.728, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J8bsIYcH4zf5 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 23:54:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com (unknown [119.145.14.67]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36E1B3A68B2 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 23:54:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from huawei.com (szxga04-in [172.24.2.12]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0L4R00HN3KJBI5@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for netext@ietf.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 14:54:47 +0800 (CST) Received: from c00111037 ([10.111.16.150]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0L4R00B73KJBDI@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for netext@ietf.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 14:54:47 +0800 (CST) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 14:54:44 +0800 From: Xiangsong Cui To: ext-fuad.junior@nokia.com, netext@ietf.org Message-id: <01da01cb1757$f4d144a0$96106f0a@china.huawei.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3598 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1; reply-type=original Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal References: Subject: Re: [netext] Review/feedback on draft-ietf-netext-bulk-re-registration X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 06:54:53 -0000 Hello Fuad, Another comment, in section 4.3 Mobile Node Group Identifier option Length 8-bit unsigned integer indicating the length in octets of the option, excluding the type and length fields. The value for this field MUST be set to 6. while in section 6, If the length of the Mobile Node Group Identifier option is zero, the MAG is requesting a lifetime refreshment of all the MN attached to the MAG that are members of any bulk set. The LMA SHALL extend the binding lifetime of all affected MNs attached to the MAG that sent the bulk PBU. the length, MUST be 6 or may be zero? Regards Xiangsong ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 7:01 PM Subject: [netext] Review/feedback on draft-ietf-netext-bulk-re-registration Hi all, As the IETF 78 meeting is approaching, I'd like to request you to some additional comments on the "Bulk Re-registration for Proxy Mobile IPv6" (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netext-bulk-re-registration-00) I-D, which was requested by the chairs to proceed with its revision process. I believe is quite mature, but it would be really nice if some of you could provide feedback. There is no newer version, it's the same version presented on IETF #77 meeting, but as I haven't receive any feedback also there, I'd like to request that again. Regards, Fuad Abinader -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ > netext mailing list > netext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext >