Subject: Re: [netmod] Proposed consensus mail on yang-00755: adding a 'prefix'substatement to 'belongs-to'

From: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 18:51:29 +0100

Although we don't see it as very useful we don't have a 
problem with adding a prefix substatement to belongs-to.

Cheers, 
Mehmet

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] 
> [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of ext David Partain
> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 4:14 PM
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: [netmod] Proposed consensus mail on yang-00755: 
> adding a 'prefix'substatement to 'belongs-to'
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> This is a call for consensus about issue 'yang-00755: adding a
> 'prefix' substatement to 'belongs-to'.  See the wiki at
> http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/wg/netmod/trac/wiki/Issues_yang#issue-00755
> 
> PLEASE speak up if you favor or object to the proposed change,
> including people who attended the interim.  Silence is impossible
> to interpret.
> 
> Proposal to add a 'prefix' substatement to 'belongs-to' in order
> to allow a submodule to be validated in isolation from its main
> module.
> 
> David Harrington asked what the downsides are, and none were
> identified.
> 
> David Reid asked a clarifying question about whether the purpose
> is for the submodule to be self-contained?  (Yes, that's the
> purpose.)
> 
> Everyone in the room at the interim agreed that this should be
> added.
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> 
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod