Subject: [netmod] must-stmt in a refinement

From: Andy Bierman <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 02:52:11 -0800

Hi,

What are the use-cases for allowing must-stmt within
a refinement?  This clause is not like all the others
that can be refined, because it does not refine the
must expression conditional, but simply adds additional
AND sub-expressions.

The must-stmt does not have a name.  There
is no way to say "replace that must rule with this one".
IMO, this is also a way to 'break the contract'
that the original data object defined.  The must-stmt
should be part of the deviations, not part
of the refinements.

Andy

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod