
Return-Path: <owner-nmrg@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
Received: by mumm.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de (8.9.3/8.9.0) id PAA16278 for nmrg-outgoing; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 15:20:54 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from haerke.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de (IDENT:root@haerke.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de [134.169.34.84]) by mumm.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de (8.9.3/8.9.0) with ESMTP id PAA16273; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 15:20:51 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from schoenw@localhost) by haerke.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) id f94DKpT16958; Thu, 4 Oct 2001 15:20:51 +0200
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 15:20:51 +0200
Message-Id: <200110041320.f94DKpT16958@haerke.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
X-Authentication-Warning: haerke.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de: schoenw set sender to schoenw@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de using -f
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <schoenw@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
To: jp.martin-flatin@ieee.org
CC: nmrg@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de
In-reply-to: <3BAF6F2E.7090003@ieee.org> (jp.martin-flatin@ieee.org)
Subject: Re: [nmrg] NMRG meeting in Nancy?
References:  <3BAF6F2E.7090003@ieee.org>
Sender: owner-nmrg@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de
Precedence: bulk

>>>>> J P Martin-Flatin writes:

JP> Is there any plan for us to meet in Nancy, right before or right
JP> after DSOM 2001?

The responses I have collected (privately or on this list) were all
negative. So I conclude that there will be no official NMRG in Nancy.
This does of course not prevent us from getting together for a beer or
so. :-)

/js

