Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] 'Scope' parameter proposal

From: Eran Hammer-Lahav <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:59:18 -0700

My proposal is just that, a proposal. And it is an attemp to get  
closer to how most companies plan to use it. We have no consensus on  
defining a prameter name without defining a value.

Got new ideas?

EHL

On Apr 22, 2010, at 13:50, "Brian Eaton" <[email-masked]> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav <[email-masked] 
> > wrote:
>> Drop the 'scope' parameter as well and we're on the same page.
>
> So we have a choice between
>
> a) not documenting something that a bunch of providers have already
> implemented and found useful
>   or
> b) documenting something that no one has built yet, and that might not
> actually work
>
> Bummer. =)