
From wwwrun@rfc-editor.org  Tue Jul  5 09:45:56 2011
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B14611E8182; Tue,  5 Jul 2011 09:45:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.272
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.272 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.328, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fgLoyuVSj-hJ; Tue,  5 Jul 2011 09:45:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B16A411E817C; Tue,  5 Jul 2011 09:45:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id A226298C4EF; Tue,  5 Jul 2011 09:45:51 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20110705164551.A226298C4EF@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue,  5 Jul 2011 09:45:51 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: opsec@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [OPSEC] RFC 6274 on Security Assessment of the Internet Protocol Version 4
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 16:45:56 -0000

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 6274

        Title:      Security Assessment of the Internet 
                    Protocol Version 4 
        Author:     F. Gont
        Status:     Informational
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       July 2011
        Mailbox:    fernando@gont.com.ar
        Pages:      75
        Characters: 179909
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-opsec-ip-security-07.txt

        URL:        http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6274.txt

This document contains a security assessment of the IETF
specifications of the Internet Protocol version 4 and of a number of
mechanisms and policies in use by popular IPv4 implementations.  It
is based on the results of a project carried out by the UK's Centre
for the Protection of National Infrastructure (CPNI).  This document 
is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for
informational purposes.

This document is a product of the Operational Security Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure Working Group of the IETF.


INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community.
It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html.
For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC



From warren@kumari.net  Wed Jul  6 12:48:53 2011
Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9B2321F8B4E for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed,  6 Jul 2011 12:48:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QxirxsYrlISY for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed,  6 Jul 2011 12:48:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vimes.kumari.net (vimes.kumari.net [198.186.192.250]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAE9C21F8B41 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Wed,  6 Jul 2011 12:48:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dot.her.corp.google.com (unknown [74.202.225.33]) by vimes.kumari.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 20BCE1B403F5 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Wed,  6 Jul 2011 15:48:52 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
In-Reply-To: <20110705164551.A226298C4EF@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 15:48:51 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E12AB122-142E-4FD8-AFB1-6FB4F28030EE@kumari.net>
References: <20110705164551.A226298C4EF@rfc-editor.org>
To: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] RFC 6274 on Security Assessment of the Internet Protocol Version 4
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 19:48:53 -0000

Hi all,

I'd just like to take a minute to thank Fernando for all of his hard =
work writing this. It is a very full and complete document and contains =
a huge amount of info.

Unfortunately it had gotten stuck for a while with an AD that became =
unreachable / a black hole. His persistence finally paid off...

Thanks again.
W


On Jul 5, 2011, at 12:45 PM, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org wrote:

>=20
> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
>=20
>=20
>        RFC 6274
>=20
>        Title:      Security Assessment of the Internet=20
>                    Protocol Version 4=20
>        Author:     F. Gont
>        Status:     Informational
>        Stream:     IETF
>        Date:       July 2011
>        Mailbox:    fernando@gont.com.ar
>        Pages:      75
>        Characters: 179909
>        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None
>=20
>        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-opsec-ip-security-07.txt
>=20
>        URL:        http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6274.txt
>=20
> This document contains a security assessment of the IETF
> specifications of the Internet Protocol version 4 and of a number of
> mechanisms and policies in use by popular IPv4 implementations.  It
> is based on the results of a project carried out by the UK's Centre
> for the Protection of National Infrastructure (CPNI).  This document=20=

> is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for
> informational purposes.
>=20
> This document is a product of the Operational Security Capabilities =
for IP Network Infrastructure Working Group of the IETF.
>=20
>=20
> INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet =
community.
> It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
> this memo is unlimited.
>=20
> This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
> To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
>  http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
>  http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
>=20
> For searching the RFC series, see =
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html.
> For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.
>=20
> Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
> author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  =
Unless
> specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
> unlimited distribution.
>=20
>=20
> The RFC Editor Team
> Association Management Solutions, LLC
>=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> OPSEC@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
>=20

