From nobody Thu Apr 2 12:20:23 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E631A8868 for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 12:20:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.225 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.225 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_MODEMCABLE=0.768, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TVGExIFgSt50 for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 12:20:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cdpipgw02.twcable.com (cdpipgw02.twcable.com [165.237.59.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20F8A1A6FEA for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 12:20:15 -0700 (PDT) X-SENDER-IP: 10.136.163.11 X-SENDER-REPUTATION: None X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,512,1422939600"; d="scan'208";a="669743762" Received: from unknown (HELO PRVPEXHUB02.corp.twcable.com) ([10.136.163.11]) by cdpipgw02.twcable.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-MD5; 02 Apr 2015 15:05:50 -0400 Received: from PRVPEXVS10.corp.twcable.com ([10.136.163.40]) by PRVPEXHUB02.corp.twcable.com ([10.136.163.11]) with mapi; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 15:20:14 -0400 From: "George, Wes" To: "opsec@ietf.org" Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 15:20:13 -0400 Thread-Topic: [OPSEC] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsec-v6-06.txt Thread-Index: AdBtegssnKBjvRNHTUexy44HL9yoIw== Message-ID: References: <20150309110722.2150.57623.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20150309110722.2150.57623.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.8.150116 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [OPSEC] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsec-v6-06.txt X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: opsec wg mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 19:20:22 -0000 SSBnYXZlIHRoaXMgZG9jIGEgcmVhZCwgYW5kIGhhdmUgYSBmZXcgY29tbWVudHM6DQoNCjIuMSAt IEknbSBub3QgY2VydGFpbiB0aGF0IHRoZSB1bnN1YnN0YW50aWF0ZWQgYXNzZXJ0aW9uIGFib3V0 IHJlbnVtYmVyaW5nDQpiZWluZyBkaWZmaWN1bHQgaGVscHMgdGhpcyBzZWN0aW9uLiBJZiB5b3Ug cmVhbGx5IHdhbnQgdG8gZGlzY3Vzcw0KcmVudW1iZXJpbmcsIHBlcmhhcHMgY2l0ZSB0aGUgZG9j dW1lbnRzIHRoYXQgZGlzY3VzcyB0aGlzIGluIGdvcnkgZGV0YWlsPw0KaHR0cDovL3Rvb2xzLmll dGYub3JnL3dnLzZyZW51bS8NCkFsc28sIG1pZ2h0IGJlIHdvcnRoIGRpc2N1c3NpbmcgdGhlIGlk ZWEgb2YgZ2VvZ3JhcGhpY2FsL3RvcG9sb2dpY2FsDQpoaWVyYXJjaHkgdG8gZWFzZSBzZWN1cml0 eSBpbiBhIGJpdCBtb3JlIGRldGFpbCwgc3BlY2lmaWNhbGx5IGNhbGxpbmcgb3V0DQp0aGluZ3Mg bGlrZSBzaW1wbGlmeWluZyBBQ0xzIGJ5IGxpbWl0aW5nIHRoZSBudW1iZXIgb2YgYWRkcmVzcyBi bG9ja3MsDQp1c2luZyBuaWJibGUgYm91bmRhcmllcywgZXRjLiBzaW5jZSB0aGF0J3MgYWN0dWFs bHkgdGhlIG1vcmUNCnVzZWZ1bC9yZWxldmFudCBqdXN0aWZpY2F0aW9uIGZvciBoYXZpbmcgYSBn b29kIGFkZHJlc3MgcGxhbi4NCg0KVGhlcmUncyBub3QgcmVhbGx5IGFueSBkaXNjdXNzaW9uIG9m IERIQ1B2NiBQRCAodnMgSUFfTkEpIGluIDIuNS4yLCBhbmQNCnRoYXQgbWlnaHQgYmUgb2YgaW50 ZXJlc3Qgc2luY2UgdGhlIGludmVudG9yeSBhbmQgY29ycmVsYXRpb24gYW5kIGxvZ2dpbmcNCm1p Z2h0IGJlIGF0IHBlci1hZGRyZXNzIGxldmVsLCBidXQgdGhlcmUgbWF5IGJlIGEgbXVjaCBsYXJn ZXIgYmxvY2sgdGhhdA0KaXMgYWN0dWFsbHkgYXNzb2NpYXRlZCB3aXRoIGEgZ2l2ZW4gY3VzdG9t ZXIgb3Igc2l0ZSwgbGlrZSBhIC80OCBvciBhIC81Ng0KdGhhdCBoYXMgYmVlbiBhbGxvY2F0ZWQg d2l0aCB0aGUgaWRlYSB0aGF0IGl0IHdpbGwgYmUgZnVydGhlciBkZWxlZ2F0ZWQgdG8NCnN1Ym5l dHMgYXMgYXBwcm9wcmlhdGUuIEJhc2ljYWxseSwgeW91IG1heSB3YW50IHRvIGRpc2N1c3MgdGhl IGlkZWEgb2YNCnBlci1ob3N0IGFkZHJlc3NpbmcgdnMgcGVyLW5ldHdvcmsgZGVsZWdhdGlvbiBh bmQgd2hldGhlciBpdCBoYXMgYW55DQppbXBhY3QgaGVyZS4NCg0KDQoyLjUuMi4yIC0gQ01UUyBk ZXZpY2VzIHVzZSBhIG1ldGhvZCBjYWxsZWQgZ2xlYW5pbmcgdG8gd2F0Y2ggdGhlIERIQ1B2Ng0K bWVzc2FnZXMgYXMgdGhleSBnbyBieS4gVGhpcyBtaWdodCBiZSBhbiBhZGRpdGlvbmFsIG1ldGhv ZCB0byBhZGQuDQpTZWUgUkZDIDQ3NzkgNS4yLjIuNS4yLg0KDQozLjEgLSByZWZlcmVuY2UgZm9y IGFudGktc3Bvb2Zpbmc/IChCQ1AzOC84NCBvciBzb21ldGhpbmcgZWxzZT8pDQoNCkZpbmFsbHks IG5vdCBzdXJlIGV4YWN0bHkgd2hlcmUgdGhpcyBmaXRzOg0KTWlnaHQgYmUgdXNlZnVsIHRvIGhh dmUgc29tZSBkaXNjdXNzaW9uIGFib3V0IHNpbmdsZS1zdGFjayAoSVB2Ni1vbmx5KSBhcw0KYSBz ZWN1cml0eSBtZXRob2QuIEluIG90aGVyIHdvcmRzIGZvciBhIGdpdmVuIHNldCBvZiBmZWF0dXJl cyBvciBzZXJ2aWNlcywNCmlmIGV2ZXJ5dGhpbmcgdXNpbmcgaXQgY2FuIHJlYWNoIGl0IG92ZXIg SVB2NiwgaXQgbWFrZXMgc2Vuc2UgdG8gZGlzYWJsZQ0KSVB2NCBhY2Nlc3Mgc28gdGhhdCB5b3Ug cmVkdWNlIHRoZSBhdHRhY2sgc3VyZmFjZS4gVGhpcyBpcyBlc3BlY2lhbGx5DQppbnRlcmVzdGlu ZyBmb3IgaW50ZXJuYWwgc2VydmljZXMgbGlrZSBtYW5hZ2VtZW50IHByb3RvY29scyBzaW5jZSB5 b3UNCmNvbnRyb2wgYm90aCBlbmRzIGFuZCBjYW4gYmUgbW9yZSBhZ2dyZXNzaXZlIGFib3V0IG1v dmluZyBhd2F5IGZyb20NCmR1YWwtc3RhY2suIEkga25vdyBpbiBteSBvd24gbmV0d29yayBpdCB3 b3VsZCBhbGxvdyBtZSB0byBlbGltaW5hdGUgc29tZQ0KdmVyeSBsb25nIEFDTHMgdGhhdCBoYXZl IGhhZCBsb3RzIG9mIGhvbGVzIHB1bmNoZWQgb3ZlciB0aW1lIHdpdGhvdXQNCnN1ZmZpY2llbnQg Y2xlYW51cCBpbiBmYXZvciBvZiBhIG11Y2ggY2xlYW5lciBhbmQgc21hbGxlciBsaXN0IG9mDQpw ZXJtaXR0ZWQgSVB2NiBwcmVmaXhlcyBmcm9tIGluIG1hbnkgY2FzZXMgb25lIHNpbmdsZSBibG9j ayBvZiBwZXJtaXR0ZWQNCmFkZHJlc3Nlcy4gSXQncyBhbG1vc3QgbGlrZSBhIHJlc2V0IGJ1dHRv biBmb3IgYWNjZXNzIGNvbnRyb2xzLCBiZWNhdXNlDQp5b3Ugc3RhcnQgd2l0aCBub3RoaW5nLCBh bmQgZXhwbGljaXRseSBhZGQgdGhpbmdzIHN1Y2ggdGhhdCB0aGUgbGVnYWN5DQpjcnVmdCB0aGF0 IGV2ZXJ5b25lIHdhcyBhZnJhaWQgdG8gdG91Y2ggZm9yIGZlYXIgb2YgYnJlYWtpbmcgc29tZXRo aW5nDQpjcml0aWNhbCBnb2VzIGF3YXkuIEdlbmVyYWwgaWRlYSBpcyB0aGF0IGFueXdoZXJlIHlv dSBjYW4gZ28gc2luZ2xlIHN0YWNrLA0KeW91J3JlIHJlZHVjaW5nIHRoZSBvdmVyaGVhZCBvZiBt YW5hZ2VtZW50IGJ5IGVsaW1pbmF0aW5nIHRoZSBuZWVkIHRvDQpkdXBsaWNhdGUgYW5kIG1haW50 YWluIHlvdXIgc2VjdXJpdHkgZm9yIHR3byBzdGFja3MuDQoNCg0KVGhhbmtzLA0KDQpXZXMNCg0K DQoNCk9uIDMvOS8xNSwgNzowNyBBTSwgImludGVybmV0LWRyYWZ0c0BpZXRmLm9yZyIgPGludGVy bmV0LWRyYWZ0c0BpZXRmLm9yZz4NCndyb3RlOg0KDQo+DQo+QSBOZXcgSW50ZXJuZXQtRHJhZnQg aXMgYXZhaWxhYmxlIGZyb20gdGhlIG9uLWxpbmUgSW50ZXJuZXQtRHJhZnRzDQo+ZGlyZWN0b3Jp ZXMuDQo+IFRoaXMgZHJhZnQgaXMgYSB3b3JrIGl0ZW0gb2YgdGhlIE9wZXJhdGlvbmFsIFNlY3Vy aXR5IENhcGFiaWxpdGllcyBmb3INCj5JUCBOZXR3b3JrIEluZnJhc3RydWN0dXJlIFdvcmtpbmcg R3JvdXAgb2YgdGhlIElFVEYuDQo+DQo+ICAgICAgICBUaXRsZSAgICAgICAgICAgOiBPcGVyYXRp b25hbCBTZWN1cml0eSBDb25zaWRlcmF0aW9ucyBmb3IgSVB2Ng0KPk5ldHdvcmtzDQo+ICAgICAg ICBBdXRob3JzICAgICAgICAgOiBLaXJhbiBLLiBDaGl0dGltYW5lbmkNCj4gICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgIE1lcmlrZSBLYWVvDQo+ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBFcmlj IFZ5bmNrZQ0KPiAgICAgICBGaWxlbmFtZSAgICAgICAgOiBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLW9wc2VjLXY2LTA2 LnR4dA0KPiAgICAgICBQYWdlcyAgICAgICAgICAgOiA0MQ0KPiAgICAgICBEYXRlICAgICAgICAg ICAgOiAyMDE1LTAzLTA5DQo+DQo+QWJzdHJhY3Q6DQo+ICAgS25vd2xlZGdlIGFuZCBleHBlcmll bmNlIG9uIGhvdyB0byBvcGVyYXRlIElQdjQgc2VjdXJlbHkgaXMNCj4gICBhdmFpbGFibGU6IHdo ZXRoZXIgaXQgaXMgdGhlIEludGVybmV0IG9yIGFuIGVudGVycHJpc2UgaW50ZXJuYWwNCj4gICBu ZXR3b3JrLiAgSG93ZXZlciwgSVB2NiBwcmVzZW50cyBzb21lIG5ldyBzZWN1cml0eSBjaGFsbGVu Z2VzLiAgUkZDDQo+ICAgNDk0MiBkZXNjcmliZXMgdGhlIHNlY3VyaXR5IGlzc3VlcyBpbiB0aGUg cHJvdG9jb2wgYnV0IG5ldHdvcmsNCj4gICBtYW5hZ2VycyBhbHNvIG5lZWQgYSBtb3JlIHByYWN0 aWNhbCwgb3BlcmF0aW9ucy1taW5kZWQgZG9jdW1lbnQgdG8NCj4gICBlbnVtZXJhdGUgYWR2YW50 YWdlcyBhbmQvb3IgZGlzYWR2YW50YWdlcyBvZiBjZXJ0YWluIGNob2ljZXMuDQo+DQo+ICAgVGhp cyBkb2N1bWVudCBhbmFseXplcyB0aGUgb3BlcmF0aW9uYWwgc2VjdXJpdHkgaXNzdWVzIGluIGFs bCBwbGFjZXMNCj4gICBvZiBhIG5ldHdvcmsgKHNlcnZpY2UgcHJvdmlkZXJzLCBlbnRlcnByaXNl cyBhbmQgcmVzaWRlbnRpYWwgdXNlcnMpDQo+ICAgYW5kIHByb3Bvc2VzIHRlY2huaWNhbCBhbmQg cHJvY2VkdXJhbCBtaXRpZ2F0aW9ucyB0ZWNobmlxdWVzLg0KDQpBbnl0aGluZyBiZWxvdyB0aGlz IGxpbmUgaGFzIGJlZW4gYWRkZWQgYnkgbXkgY29tcGFueeKAmXMgbWFpbCBzZXJ2ZXIsIEkNCmhh dmUgbm8gY29udHJvbCBvdmVyIGl0Lg0KLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0NCg0KDQpUaGlzIEUtbWFpbCBhbmQg YW55IG9mIGl0cyBhdHRhY2htZW50cyBtYXkgY29udGFpbiBUaW1lIFdhcm5lciBDYWJsZSBwcm9w cmlldGFyeSBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbiwgd2hpY2ggaXMgcHJpdmlsZWdlZCwgY29uZmlkZW50aWFsLCBv ciBzdWJqZWN0IHRvIGNvcHlyaWdodCBiZWxvbmdpbmcgdG8gVGltZSBXYXJuZXIgQ2FibGUuIFRo aXMgRS1tYWlsIGlzIGludGVuZGVkIHNvbGVseSBmb3IgdGhlIHVzZSBvZiB0aGUgaW5kaXZpZHVh bCBvciBlbnRpdHkgdG8gd2hpY2ggaXQgaXMgYWRkcmVzc2VkLiBJZiB5b3UgYXJlIG5vdCB0aGUg aW50ZW5kZWQgcmVjaXBpZW50IG9mIHRoaXMgRS1tYWlsLCB5b3UgYXJlIGhlcmVieSBub3RpZmll ZCB0aGF0IGFueSBkaXNzZW1pbmF0aW9uLCBkaXN0cmlidXRpb24sIGNvcHlpbmcsIG9yIGFjdGlv biB0YWtlbiBpbiByZWxhdGlvbiB0byB0aGUgY29udGVudHMgb2YgYW5kIGF0dGFjaG1lbnRzIHRv IHRoaXMgRS1tYWlsIGlzIHN0cmljdGx5IHByb2hpYml0ZWQgYW5kIG1heSBiZSB1bmxhd2Z1bC4g SWYgeW91IGhhdmUgcmVjZWl2ZWQgdGhpcyBFLW1haWwgaW4gZXJyb3IsIHBsZWFzZSBub3RpZnkg dGhlIHNlbmRlciBpbW1lZGlhdGVseSBhbmQgcGVybWFuZW50bHkgZGVsZXRlIHRoZSBvcmlnaW5h bCBhbmQgYW55IGNvcHkgb2YgdGhpcyBFLW1haWwgYW5kIGFueSBwcmludG91dC4NCg== From nobody Thu Apr 9 11:05:18 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCAF61B305F; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 11:05:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N__3AtaLdAtx; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 11:05:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from st13p11im-asmtp002.me.com (st13p11im-asmtp002.me.com [17.164.40.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62AA31B3065; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 11:05:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.43.50] (unknown [109.140.215.122]) by st13p11im-asmtp002.me.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.35.0 64bit (built Dec 4 2014)) with ESMTPSA id <0NMJ00EQPWWJR520@st13p11im-asmtp002.me.com>; Thu, 09 Apr 2015 18:05:10 +0000 (GMT) From: Gunter Van De Velde Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DBF0A75F-6EA6-47D5-9AB3-A255D8A9DCE4" Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 20:08:11 +0200 Message-id: <9242D615-D355-4521-B60B-56F30AD6F368@icloud.com> To: opsec@ietf.org MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.13.68,1.0.33,0.0.0000 definitions=2015-04-09_05:2015-04-09,2015-04-09,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=12 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1412110000 definitions=main-1504090145 Archived-At: Cc: draft-ietf-opsec-v6.all@ietf.org Subject: [OPSEC] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: opsec wg mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 18:05:16 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_DBF0A75F-6EA6-47D5-9AB3-A255D8A9DCE4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Dear OpSec WG, This starts a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-opsec-v6-06 (Wes George=E2=80=99s comments on 2th April will be included in the = final WGLC comments) The draft is available here: = https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-v6/ = Please review this draft to see if you think it is ready for = publication. Send comments to the list, clearly stating your view. This WGLC ends Friday 23-Apr-2014. Thanks, G/ (as OpSec WG co-chair) --Apple-Mail=_DBF0A75F-6EA6-47D5-9AB3-A255D8A9DCE4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 
Dear OpSec WG,

This starts a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-opsec-v6-06
(Wes George=E2=80=99s comments on 2th April will be included in the =
final WGLC comments)
The draft is available here: =
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-v6/

Please review this draft to see if you think it is ready for =
publication.

Send comments to the list, clearly stating your view.

This WGLC ends Friday 23-Apr-2014.

Thanks,
G/
(as OpSec WG co-chair)

= --Apple-Mail=_DBF0A75F-6EA6-47D5-9AB3-A255D8A9DCE4-- From nobody Thu Apr 9 14:21:26 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B80031B3338; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 14:21:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.899 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yN8BzWIvUT7j; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 14:21:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sudnp799.qwest.com (sudnp799.qwest.com [155.70.32.99]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86D731B333A; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 14:21:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lxdenvmpc030.qintra.com (emailout.qintra.com [10.1.51.30]) by sudnp799.qwest.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t39LLJqV023568 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 9 Apr 2015 15:21:19 -0600 (MDT) Received: from lxdenvmpc030.qintra.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSA (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB4EA1E0072; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 15:21:13 -0600 (MDT) Received: from lxomp06u.corp.intranet (unknown [151.119.91.93]) by lxdenvmpc030.qintra.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BACFC1E006F; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 15:21:13 -0600 (MDT) Received: from lxomp06u.corp.intranet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lxomp06u.corp.intranet (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id t39LLD6G031008; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 16:21:13 -0500 Received: from vddcwhubex502.ctl.intranet (vddcwhubex502.ctl.intranet [151.119.128.29]) by lxomp06u.corp.intranet (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id t39LLDru031002 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 9 Apr 2015 16:21:13 -0500 Received: from PDDCWMBXEX503.ctl.intranet ([fe80::9033:ef22:df02:32a9]) by vddcwhubex502.ctl.intranet ([2002:9777:801d::9777:801d]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 15:21:13 -0600 From: "Smith, Donald" To: Gunter Van De Velde , "opsec@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [OPSEC] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 Thread-Index: AQHQcu/Ag3D6JiaQE0avt7wm5YQY+J1FL07N Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 21:21:12 +0000 Message-ID: <68EFACB32CF4464298EA2779B058889D24CE733C@PDDCWMBXEX503.ctl.intranet> References: <9242D615-D355-4521-B60B-56F30AD6F368@icloud.com> In-Reply-To: <9242D615-D355-4521-B60B-56F30AD6F368@icloud.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [151.117.206.34] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_68EFACB32CF4464298EA2779B058889D24CE733CPDDCWMBXEX503ct_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Cc: "draft-ietf-opsec-v6.all@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [OPSEC] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: opsec wg mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 21:21:24 -0000 --_000_68EFACB32CF4464298EA2779B058889D24CE733CPDDCWMBXEX503ct_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Wrong link. Your link goes to : https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield/ But the document in question is here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-v6/ (coffee !=3D sleep) & (!coffee =3D=3D sleep) Donald.Smith@centurylink.com ________________________________ From: OPSEC [opsec-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of Gunter Van De Velde [gunt= ervandeveldecc@icloud.com] Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 12:08 PM To: opsec@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-opsec-v6.all@ietf.org Subject: [OPSEC] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 Dear OpSec WG, This starts a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-opsec-v6-06 (Wes George=92s comments on 2th April will be included in the final WGLC co= mments) The draft is available here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-op= sec-v6/ Please review this draft to see if you think it is ready for publication. Send comments to the list, clearly stating your view. This WGLC ends Friday 23-Apr-2014. Thanks, G/ (as OpSec WG co-chair) This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain confident= ial or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is st= rictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communicat= ion in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and dest= roy all copies of the communication and any attachments. --_000_68EFACB32CF4464298EA2779B058889D24CE733CPDDCWMBXEX503ct_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Wrong link.

 

Your link goes to :

 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield/

 

 

But the document in question is here:

https:= //datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-v6/

 

 

 

(coffee !=3D sleep) & (!coffee =3D=3D sleep)
 Donald.Smith@centuryl= ink.com
From: OPSEC [opsec-bounces@ietf.org] on be= half of Gunter Van De Velde [guntervandeveldecc@icloud.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 12:08 PM
To: opsec@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-opsec-v6.all@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSEC] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6

Dear OpSec WG,

This starts a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-opsec-v6-06
(Wes George=92s comments on 2th April will be included in the final WGLC co=
mments)
The draft is available here: http=
s://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-v6/

Please review this draft to see if you think it is ready for publication.

Send comments to the list, clearly stating your view.

This WGLC ends Friday 23-Apr-2014.

Thanks,
G/
(as OpSec WG co-chair)

This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain c= onfidential or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communicati= on is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this co= mmunication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the communicat= ion and any attachments.
--_000_68EFACB32CF4464298EA2779B058889D24CE733CPDDCWMBXEX503ct_-- From nobody Sun Apr 19 11:36:01 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 590811A886B for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 11:35:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c_-yEdBiYbPy for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 11:35:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98C8D1A874F for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 11:35:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mb-aye.local (c-98-248-47-249.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.248.47.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t3JIZrPZ095251 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 18:35:54 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com) To: "opsec@ietf.org" From: joel jaeggli message-id: <5533F583.1000609@bogus.com> Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 11:35:47 -0700 user-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0 mime-version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TtmlISPeJXfcf4hlOWdL9mUfsnV1MXttE" Archived-At: Subject: [OPSEC] reported errata for rfc 7404 X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: opsec wg mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 18:35:59 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --TtmlISPeJXfcf4hlOWdL9mUfsnV1MXttE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable these seems uncontroversial... https://www.rfc-editor.org/verify_errata_select.php?eid=3D4182 typo https://www.rfc-editor.org/verify_errata_select.php?eid=3D4183 --TtmlISPeJXfcf4hlOWdL9mUfsnV1MXttE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iEYEARECAAYFAlUz9YMACgkQ8AA1q7Z/VrIGzQCdHH6ZroLUUdQkJRAg86gew6EM m50An0M/SQkJ4z6Z3iuvWaf+3GJgiyNv =NyzW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TtmlISPeJXfcf4hlOWdL9mUfsnV1MXttE-- From nobody Mon Apr 20 08:15:30 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D13AE1B2EBF; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 08:15:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.912 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5kf2JJbysC0p; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 08:15:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 866871B2ECB; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 08:15:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 4DCB6180092; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 08:14:27 -0700 (PDT) To: bortzmeyer@nic.fr, mbehring@cisco.com, evyncke@cisco.com X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php From: RFC Errata System Message-Id: <20150420151427.4DCB6180092@rfc-editor.org> Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 08:14:27 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Cc: opsec@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [OPSEC] [Errata Verified] RFC7404 (4182) X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: opsec wg mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 15:15:30 -0000 The following errata report has been verified for RFC7404, "Using Only Link-Local Addressing inside an IPv6 Network". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7404&eid=4182 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Editorial Reported by: Stéphane Bortzmeyer Date Reported: 2014-11-16 Verified by: joel jaeggli (IESG) Section: 2.1 Original Text ------------- Telnet [RFC0495] Corrected Text -------------- Telnet [RFC0854] Notes ----- Isn't STD 8 (RFC 854) the official telnet specification? -------------------------------------- RFC7404 (draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-11) -------------------------------------- Title : Using Only Link-Local Addressing inside an IPv6 Network Publication Date : November 2014 Author(s) : M. Behringer, E. Vyncke Category : INFORMATIONAL Source : Operational Security Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG From nobody Mon Apr 20 08:15:59 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AB131B2ECA; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 08:15:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.912 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BznU1d2MbjTK; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 08:15:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47FCB1B2EC1; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 08:15:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 3E580180092; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 08:14:53 -0700 (PDT) To: andreas.cudok@datev.de, mbehring@cisco.com, evyncke@cisco.com X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php From: RFC Errata System Message-Id: <20150420151453.3E580180092@rfc-editor.org> Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 08:14:53 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Cc: opsec@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [OPSEC] [Errata Verified] RFC7404 (4183) X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: opsec wg mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 15:15:59 -0000 The following errata report has been verified for RFC7404, "Using Only Link-Local Addressing inside an IPv6 Network". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7404&eid=4183 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Technical Reported by: Andreas Cudok Date Reported: 2014-11-16 Verified by: joel jaeggli (IESG) Section: 2.3 Original Text ------------- Hardware dependency: LLAs have usually been based on 64-bit Extended Unique Identifiers (EUI-64); hence, they change when the Message Authentication Code (MAC) address is changed. Corrected Text -------------- Hardware dependency: LLAs have usually been based on 64-bit Extended Unique Identifiers (EUI-64); hence, they change when the Media Access Control (MAC) address is changed. Notes ----- -------------------------------------- RFC7404 (draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-11) -------------------------------------- Title : Using Only Link-Local Addressing inside an IPv6 Network Publication Date : November 2014 Author(s) : M. Behringer, E. Vyncke Category : INFORMATIONAL Source : Operational Security Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG From nobody Mon Apr 20 10:16:25 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F1BC1B2C30 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 10:16:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.758 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.758 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DATE_IN_PAST_06_12=1.543, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qh7nnAbmuQTI for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 10:16:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from st13p11im-asmtp001.me.com (st13p11im-asmtp001.me.com [17.164.40.160]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6B321B2C2E for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 10:16:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.14] (243.40-242-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be [81.242.40.243]) by st13p11im-asmtp001.me.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.35.0 64bit (built Dec 4 2014)) with ESMTPSA id <0NN400K5A7YCKR30@st13p11im-asmtp001.me.com> for opsec@ietf.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 17:15:50 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.13.68,1.0.33,0.0.0000 definitions=2015-04-20_03:2015-04-20,2015-04-20,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=57 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1412110000 definitions=main-1504200138 From: Gunter Van De Velde Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_716EB761-A46A-4784-872C-35EE52DDBEC9" Message-id: <51C37E9E-D747-4E21-BF68-71903596FFA9@icloud.com> Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 09:32:24 +0200 To: opsec@ietf.org MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098) Archived-At: Subject: [OPSEC] DON'T PANIC: Reminder about IPR relating to draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: opsec wg mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 17:16:24 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_716EB761-A46A-4784-872C-35EE52DDBEC9 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Dear OpSec WG, Be not alarmed. This email was created to satisfy RFC 6702 "Promoting Compliance with = Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)" = (http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6702.txt = ). The authors of draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning have asked for a = Working Group Last Call. Before issuing the Working Group Last Call, we = would like to check whether any claims of Intellectual Property Rights = (IPR) on the document have not yet been disclosed. Are you personally aware of any IPR that applies to = draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning? If so, has this IPR been disclosed = in compliance with IETF IPR rules? (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and 5378 for more details.) If you are a document author or listed contributor on this document, = please reply to this email regardless of whether or not you are = personally aware of any relevant IPR. We might not be able to advance = this document to the next stage until we have received a reply from each = author and listed contributor. If you are on the OpSec WG email list but are not an author or listed = contributor for this document, you are reminded of your opportunity for = a voluntary IPR disclosure under BCP 79. Please do not reply unless you = want to make such a voluntary disclosure. Online tools for filing IPR disclosures can be found at = >. Thanks, G/= --Apple-Mail=_716EB761-A46A-4784-872C-35EE52DDBEC9 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Dear OpSec = WG,

Be not = alarmed.
This email was = created to satisfy RFC 6702 "Promoting Compliance with Intellectual = Property Rights (IPR)"  (http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6702.txt).


The authors of draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning have asked = for a Working Group Last Call.  Before issuing the Working Group = Last Call, we would like to check whether any claims of Intellectual = Property Rights (IPR) on the document have not yet been = disclosed.

Are you = personally aware of any IPR that applies to = draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning?  If so, has this IPR been = disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules?
(See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and = 5378 for more details.)

If you are a document author or listed contributor on this = document, please reply to this email regardless of whether or not you = are personally aware of any relevant IPR.  We might not be able to = advance this document to the next stage until we have received a reply = from each author and listed contributor.

If you are on the OpSec WG email = list but are not an author or listed contributor for this document, you = are reminded of your opportunity for a voluntary IPR disclosure under = BCP 79.  Please do not reply unless you want to make such a = voluntary disclosure.

Online tools for filing IPR disclosures can be found at = <http://www.ietf.org/ipr/file-disclosure>.

Thanks,
G/
= --Apple-Mail=_716EB761-A46A-4784-872C-35EE52DDBEC9-- From nobody Mon Apr 20 13:41:30 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46C6A1B307F for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 13:41:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nvP6U05sVBHa for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 13:41:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web01.jbserver.net (web01.jbserver.net [IPv6:2a00:8240:6:a::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED5181B304C for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 13:41:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [190.210.48.181] (helo=[192.168.88.119]) by web01.jbserver.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1YkIVP-0004Wy-Ou; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 22:41:24 +0200 Message-ID: <553563FB.5040907@si6networks.com> Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 17:39:23 -0300 From: Fernando Gont User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gunter Van De Velde References: <51C37E9E-D747-4E21-BF68-71903596FFA9@icloud.com> In-Reply-To: <51C37E9E-D747-4E21-BF68-71903596FFA9@icloud.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Cc: opsec@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OPSEC] DON'T PANIC: Reminder about IPR relating to draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: opsec wg mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 20:41:29 -0000 On 04/20/2015 04:32 AM, Gunter Van De Velde wrote: > Dear OpSec WG, > > Be not alarmed. > This email was created to satisfy RFC 6702 "Promoting Compliance with > Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)" > (http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6702.txt). > > > The authors of draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning have asked for a > Working Group Last Call. Before issuing the Working Group Last Call, we > would like to check whether any claims of Intellectual Property Rights > (IPR) on the document have not yet been disclosed. > > Are you personally aware of any IPR that applies to > draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning? If so, has this IPR been disclosed > in compliance with IETF IPR rules? > (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and 5378 for more details.) > > If you are a document author or listed contributor on this document, > please reply to this email regardless of whether or not you are > personally aware of any relevant IPR. We might not be able to advance > this document to the next stage until we have received a reply from each > author and listed contributor. I'm not aware of any IPR on this document. Cheers, Fernando (co-author hat on) -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 From nobody Tue Apr 21 09:38:23 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B6251AD351 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 09:38:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.601 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f8kVJa7na4CT for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 09:38:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from st13p11im-asmtp002.me.com (st13p11im-asmtp002.me.com [17.164.40.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0FA81AD350 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 09:35:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.14] (243.40-242-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be [81.242.40.243]) by st13p11im-asmtp002.me.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.35.0 64bit (built Dec 4 2014)) with ESMTPSA id <0NN600LTA0PNLS40@st13p11im-asmtp002.me.com> for opsec@ietf.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 16:34:38 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.13.68,1.0.33,0.0.0000 definitions=2015-04-21_06:2015-04-21,2015-04-21,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=50 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1412110000 definitions=main-1504210173 From: Gunter Van De Velde Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 18:38:10 +0200 Message-id: <15F01232-F5A2-4D80-A486-243327DCEABD@icloud.com> To: opsec@ietf.org MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098) Archived-At: Cc: "Kiran K. Chittimaneni" Subject: [OPSEC] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: opsec wg mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 16:38:11 -0000 Dear OpSec WG,=20 This starts a 1 week Working Group Last Call for = draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning. The current draft version includes according the editors all = improvements suggestions during=20 the previous WGLC end 2013. The draft is available here: = https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning/ Please review this draft to see if you think it is ready for = publication. Please send your comments=20 to the list, clearly stating your view if there would be a problem = publishing this document.=20 This WGLC ends Tuesday 28-Apr-2014.=20 Thanks,=20 G/=20 (as OpSec WG co-chair) From nobody Tue Apr 21 10:09:55 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B85A1B29CA for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 10:09:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.911 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3QTcVLUoZw_g for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 10:09:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from globis01.globis.net (mail.globis.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f15:62e::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CD6A1A0041 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 10:09:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by globis01.globis.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5627A40340; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 19:09:47 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at globis01.globis.net Received: from globis01.globis.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.globis.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id inoOykwzBTbg; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 19:09:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Rays-iMac.local (092-111-140-211.static.chello.nl [92.111.140.211]) (Authenticated sender: v6ops@globis.net) by globis01.globis.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 873ED4033B; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 19:09:44 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <55368457.1090207@globis.net> Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 19:09:43 +0200 From: Ray Hunter User-Agent: Postbox 3.0.11 (Macintosh/20140602) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: opsec@ietf.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [OPSEC] OPSEC Digest, Vol 88, Issue 7 X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: opsec wg mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 17:09:53 -0000 opsec-request@ietf.org wrote: > Message: 1 > Date:Mon, 20 Apr 2015 09:32:24 +0200 > From: Gunter Van De Velde > To:opsec@ietf.org > Subject: [OPSEC] DON'T PANIC: Reminder about IPR relating to > draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning > Message-ID:<51C37E9E-D747-4E21-BF68-71903596FFA9@icloud.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Dear OpSec WG, > > Be not alarmed. > This email was created to satisfy RFC 6702 "Promoting Compliance with Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)" (http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6702.txt ). > > > The authors of draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning have asked for a Working Group Last Call. Before issuing the Working Group Last Call, we would like to check whether any claims of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) on the document have not yet been disclosed. > > Are you personally aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning? If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules? > (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and 5378 for more details.) > > If you are a document author or listed contributor on this document, please reply to this email regardless of whether or not you are personally aware of any relevant IPR. We might not be able to advance this document to the next stage until we have received a reply from each author and listed contributor. > > If you are on the OpSec WG email list but are not an author or listed contributor for this document, you are reminded of your opportunity for a voluntary IPR disclosure under BCP 79. Please do not reply unless you want to make such a voluntary disclosure. > > Online tools for filing IPR disclosures can be found at>. > > Thanks, > G/ I contributed text that was incorporated into this document. I'm not aware of any IPR on my contribution. Thanks RayH From nobody Wed Apr 22 23:43:10 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED2AA1A910E for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 23:43:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FsawgyzENjY8 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 23:43:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lb0-x22e.google.com (mail-lb0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A10231ACD9F for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 23:42:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by lbcga7 with SMTP id ga7so6192446lbc.1 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 23:42:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=JpS3K9LP0NTNS2U24OaeVm699VRYcLIp2MugE/DwxOI=; b=Of/C19ZOkAylIrpvwB3ik31jadycX2PjJV5ilVroOyqKvGN2kYzOg50d4yvxA7bxzU esSnFZITjuO9kyHsKt5vBWWRUbYbG0slK06artPeuDRNybjQPB0R1YtdfIVc0eXDDp/X ueBnhk8rw8CsaRv4sm5W2aahR30Z0RDwNYpmuLK/bSk05Jh2RIWyUnyD27tjWekrE0yl n+uAhRLNN5djBoSl7r2VDFfeYgrfYOjvHLCLdiwByKzGEqpFQyoBVDoxloNT+JNNGQAf qipPkw427xxCs+rMc2JeuHgqiXbwVH5zVza2PL0bYrfSmq2TsLU9de8puNZ+My+GWhZ9 xASg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.207.41 with SMTP id lt9mr1141318lac.52.1429771372169; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 23:42:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.143.129 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 23:42:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <15F01232-F5A2-4D80-A486-243327DCEABD@icloud.com> References: <15F01232-F5A2-4D80-A486-243327DCEABD@icloud.com> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:42:52 +0900 Message-ID: From: Tomoyuki Sahara To: opsec@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11345a28bf908905145e96bc Archived-At: Cc: "Kiran K. Chittimaneni" Subject: Re: [OPSEC] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: opsec wg mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 06:43:08 -0000 --001a11345a28bf908905145e96bc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I have read the latest version (-06) of the draft and find it helpful. One (minor) comment: 4.4. DNS Reverse Mappings ... Basically, an attacker would walk the ip6.arpa zone corresponding to a target network (e.g. "0.8.0.0.8.b.d.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa." for "2001:db8:80::/32"), ... "2001:db8:80::/32" shuold be "2001:db8:80::/48". Thanks, Tomoyuki --001a11345a28bf908905145e96bc Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I have read the latest version (-06) of the draft and= find it helpful.

One (minor) comment:
<= br>
4.4. DNS Reverse Mappings

=C2=A0= =C2=A0...
=C2=A0 =C2=A0Basically, an attacker would walk th= e ip6.arpa zone corresponding to
=C2=A0 =C2=A0a target networ= k (e.g. "0.8.0.0.8.b.d.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa." for
=C2=A0 = =C2=A0"2001:db8:80::/32"), ...

&qu= ot;2001:db8:80::/32" shuold be "2001:db8:80::/48".


Thanks,
Tomoyuk= i

--001a11345a28bf908905145e96bc-- From nobody Thu Apr 23 08:41:20 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26DFF1ACC7F for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 08:41:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.225 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.225 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_MODEMCABLE=0.768, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id asZTgiVRGsSO for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 08:41:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cdcipgw02.twcable.com (cdcipgw02.twcable.com [165.237.91.111]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3224A1ACD03 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 08:40:44 -0700 (PDT) X-SENDER-IP: 10.136.163.12 X-SENDER-REPUTATION: None X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,631,1422939600"; d="scan'208";a="242034106" Received: from unknown (HELO PRVPEXHUB03.corp.twcable.com) ([10.136.163.12]) by cdcipgw02.twcable.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-MD5; 23 Apr 2015 11:26:14 -0400 Received: from PRVPEXVS10.corp.twcable.com ([10.136.163.41]) by PRVPEXHUB03.corp.twcable.com ([10.136.163.12]) with mapi; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 11:40:43 -0400 From: "George, Wes" To: Gunter Van De Velde , "opsec@ietf.org" Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 11:40:47 -0400 Thread-Topic: [OPSEC] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning Thread-Index: AdB929vwQQGfbtgIQ+eTOL1QvQ0p0Q== Message-ID: References: <15F01232-F5A2-4D80-A486-243327DCEABD@icloud.com> In-Reply-To: <15F01232-F5A2-4D80-A486-243327DCEABD@icloud.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.9.150325 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "Kiran K. Chittimaneni" Subject: Re: [OPSEC] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: opsec wg mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:41:18 -0000 SSB0aGluayB0aGlzIGlzIGEgdXNlZnVsIGRyYWZ0LCBhbmQgYXBwZWFycyByZWFkeSBmb3IgcHVi bGljYXRpb24uDQoNCk9uZSBjb21tZW50Og0KDQo0LjQgLSBtYXkgYmUgdXNlZnVsIHRvIHJlZmVy ZW5jZSBkcmFmdC1ob3dhcmQtaXNwLWlwNnJkbnMgYXMgdGhpcyBtYXkNCmZpZ3VyZSBpbnRvIHRo ZSBlZmZpY2FjeSBvZiB0aGlzIG1ldGhvZCBvZiBzY2FubmluZw0KDQpUaGFua3MsDQoNCldlcyBH ZW9yZ2UNCg0KQW55dGhpbmcgYmVsb3cgdGhpcyBsaW5lIGhhcyBiZWVuIGFkZGVkIGJ5IG15IGNv bXBhbnnigJlzIG1haWwgc2VydmVyLCBJDQpoYXZlIG5vIGNvbnRyb2wgb3ZlciBpdC4NCi0tLS0t LS0tLS0tDQoNCg0KVGhpcyBFLW1haWwgYW5kIGFueSBvZiBpdHMgYXR0YWNobWVudHMgbWF5IGNv bnRhaW4gVGltZSBXYXJuZXIgQ2FibGUgcHJvcHJpZXRhcnkgaW5mb3JtYXRpb24sIHdoaWNoIGlz IHByaXZpbGVnZWQsIGNvbmZpZGVudGlhbCwgb3Igc3ViamVjdCB0byBjb3B5cmlnaHQgYmVsb25n aW5nIHRvIFRpbWUgV2FybmVyIENhYmxlLiBUaGlzIEUtbWFpbCBpcyBpbnRlbmRlZCBzb2xlbHkg Zm9yIHRoZSB1c2Ugb2YgdGhlIGluZGl2aWR1YWwgb3IgZW50aXR5IHRvIHdoaWNoIGl0IGlzIGFk ZHJlc3NlZC4gSWYgeW91IGFyZSBub3QgdGhlIGludGVuZGVkIHJlY2lwaWVudCBvZiB0aGlzIEUt bWFpbCwgeW91IGFyZSBoZXJlYnkgbm90aWZpZWQgdGhhdCBhbnkgZGlzc2VtaW5hdGlvbiwgZGlz dHJpYnV0aW9uLCBjb3B5aW5nLCBvciBhY3Rpb24gdGFrZW4gaW4gcmVsYXRpb24gdG8gdGhlIGNv bnRlbnRzIG9mIGFuZCBhdHRhY2htZW50cyB0byB0aGlzIEUtbWFpbCBpcyBzdHJpY3RseSBwcm9o aWJpdGVkIGFuZCBtYXkgYmUgdW5sYXdmdWwuIElmIHlvdSBoYXZlIHJlY2VpdmVkIHRoaXMgRS1t YWlsIGluIGVycm9yLCBwbGVhc2Ugbm90aWZ5IHRoZSBzZW5kZXIgaW1tZWRpYXRlbHkgYW5kIHBl cm1hbmVudGx5IGRlbGV0ZSB0aGUgb3JpZ2luYWwgYW5kIGFueSBjb3B5IG9mIHRoaXMgRS1tYWls IGFuZCBhbnkgcHJpbnRvdXQuDQo= From nobody Thu Apr 23 12:29:57 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C73461B29CB for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 12:29:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.21 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BLdQwl1mVs3B for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 12:29:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DA8F1B31AB for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 12:29:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BVG57586; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 19:29:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from SZXEML425-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.180) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 20:29:37 +0100 Received: from szxeml557-mbs.china.huawei.com ([169.254.6.131]) by szxeml425-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.180]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 03:29:32 +0800 From: Tina TSOU To: "George, Wes" Thread-Topic: [OPSEC] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning Thread-Index: AQHQfFGa1T+6UpnJtUWxM1ZZ12Xa6p1aOPyAgADGBpg= Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 19:29:31 +0000 Message-ID: <1912F9D7-C11B-4CF0-8FCA-ED64A192D02F@huawei.com> References: <15F01232-F5A2-4D80-A486-243327DCEABD@icloud.com>, In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_1912F9D7C11B4CF08FCAED64A192D02Fhuaweicom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Cc: "opsec@ietf.org" , "Kiran K. Chittimaneni" Subject: Re: [OPSEC] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: opsec wg mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 19:29:56 -0000 --_000_1912F9D7C11B4CF08FCAED64A192D02Fhuaweicom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear all, I think this document provides very valuable information, and support its p= ublication as an RFC. Thank you, Tina On Apr 23, 2015, at 5:41 PM, George, Wes > wrote: I think this is a useful draft, and appears ready for publication. One comment: 4.4 - may be useful to reference draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns as this may figure into the efficacy of this method of scanning Thanks, Wes George Anything below this line has been added by my company=92s mail server, I have no control over it. ----------- This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable propri= etary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyrig= ht belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the u= se of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the= intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissem= ination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents= of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawf= ul. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender imm= ediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail an= d any printout. _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list OPSEC@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec --_000_1912F9D7C11B4CF08FCAED64A192D02Fhuaweicom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear all,

I think this= document provides very valuable information, and support its publicat= ion as an RFC.


Thank you,
Tina

On Apr 23, 2015, at 5:41 PM, George, Wes <wesley.george@twcable.com> wrote:

I think this is a useful draft, and appears ready for publicatio= n.

One comment:

4.4 - may be useful to reference draft-howard-isp-ip6rdns as this may=
figure into the efficacy of this method of scanning

Thanks,

Wes George

Anything below this line has been added by my company=92s mail server= , I
have no control over it.
-----------


This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable = proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to c= opyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for= the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-= mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying= , or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-= mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify = the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of = this E-mail and any printout.
_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
OPSEC@ietf.org
https://www.i= etf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
--_000_1912F9D7C11B4CF08FCAED64A192D02Fhuaweicom_-- From nobody Thu Apr 30 11:34:20 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ABB31B2EB2; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 11:34:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PyX1VfDJDROD; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 11:34:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A35961B2EB6; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 11:34:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.0.2 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20150430183415.29024.96699.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 11:34:15 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: opsec@ietf.org Subject: [OPSEC] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning-07.txt X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: opsec wg mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 18:34:18 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Operational Security Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure Working Group of the IETF. Title : Network Reconnaissance in IPv6 Networks Authors : Fernando Gont Tim Chown Filename : draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning-07.txt Pages : 33 Date : 2015-04-30 Abstract: IPv6 offers a much larger address space than that of its IPv4 counterpart. An IPv6 subnet of size /64 can (in theory) accommodate approximately 1.844 * 10^19 hosts, thus resulting in a much lower host density (#hosts/#addresses) than is typical in IPv4 networks, where a site typically has 65,000 or less unique addresses. As a result, it is widely assumed that it would take a tremendous effort to perform address scanning attacks against IPv6 networks, and therefore brute-force IPv6 address scanning attacks have been considered unfeasible. This document updates RFC 5157, which first discussed this assumption, by providing further analysis on how traditional address scanning techniques apply to IPv6 networks, and exploring some additional techniques that can be employed for IPv6 network reconnaissance. In doing so, this document formally obsoletes RFC 5157. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning-07 A diff from the previous version is available at: https:https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning-07 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Thu Apr 30 11:35:21 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD751B2EBE for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 11:35:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y1AJz2SDKHja for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 11:35:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web01.jbserver.net (web01.jbserver.net [IPv6:2a00:8240:6:a::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E7F41AC44E for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 11:35:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [186.137.82.224] (helo=[192.168.3.107]) by web01.jbserver.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1YntIe-0006Cu-MK; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 20:35:04 +0200 Message-ID: <55424F72.4050908@si6networks.com> Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 12:51:14 -0300 From: Fernando Gont User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomoyuki Sahara , opsec@ietf.org References: <15F01232-F5A2-4D80-A486-243327DCEABD@icloud.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Cc: "Kiran K. Chittimaneni" Subject: Re: [OPSEC] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: opsec wg mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 18:35:20 -0000 Hi, Tomoyuki, On 04/23/2015 03:42 AM, Tomoyuki Sahara wrote: > I have read the latest version (-06) of the draft and find it helpful. > > One (minor) comment: > > 4.4. DNS Reverse Mappings > > ... > Basically, an attacker would walk the ip6.arpa zone corresponding to > a target network (e.g. "0.8.0.0.8.b.d.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa." for > "2001:db8:80::/32"), ... > > "2001:db8:80::/32" shuold be "2001:db8:80::/48". You're absolutely right. Thanks! Cheers, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492