From acee.lindem@ericsson.com Tue Oct 4 14:42:12 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9053921F8B59 for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 14:42:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.557 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.557 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.042, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hw-IOweD6-zW for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 14:42:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imr4.ericy.com (imr4.ericy.com [198.24.6.9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C898F21F877F for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 14:42:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eusaamw0707.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.32]) by imr4.ericy.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id p94Lj6QN026698 for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 16:45:08 -0500 Received: from EUSAACMS0702.eamcs.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.60]) by eusaamw0707.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.32]) with mapi; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 17:45:05 -0400 From: Acee Lindem To: OSPF List Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 17:45:01 -0400 Thread-Topic: OSPF TE Extensions for Delay, Loss, and Jitter (formerly known as OSPF Express Path) Thread-Index: AcyC3uDJn/lsnpOZQgO2hu6O0xKxYA== Message-ID: <8CFA0F99-827E-48E8-BF5F-C45C590043A6@ericsson.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [OSPF] OSPF TE Extensions for Delay, Loss, and Jitter (formerly known as OSPF Express Path) X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 21:42:12 -0000 We've discussed this draft at the last two IETFs and there seemed to be int= erest. We believe we sorted out the positioning/overlap with the MPLS and C= CAMP WGs and are now ready to accept it as a WG document.=20 Does anyone have any objections?=20 Here is a link to the current draft: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-giacalone= -ospf-te-express-path-02.txt Thanks, Acee and Abhay = From fu.xihua@zte.com.cn Fri Oct 7 22:40:03 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08B8F21F8B50; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 22:40:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -97.61 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-97.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.025, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_LOOSE=0.76, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q1S2ytUavTPA; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 22:40:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx5.zte.com.cn (mx6.zte.com.cn [95.130.199.165]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D65F221F8B70; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 22:40:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.30.17.100] by mx5.zte.com.cn with surfront esmtp id 466212131784202; Sat, 8 Oct 2011 13:38:28 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.30.3.21] by [192.168.168.16] with StormMail ESMTP id 39725.3508317564; Sat, 8 Oct 2011 13:42:55 +0800 (CST) Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse02.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id p985h7bg058615; Sat, 8 Oct 2011 13:43:07 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from fu.xihua@zte.com.cn) In-Reply-To: <8CFA0F99-827E-48E8-BF5F-C45C590043A6@ericsson.com> To: Acee Lindem MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.4 March 27, 2005 Message-ID: From: fu.xihua@zte.com.cn Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2011 13:43:07 +0800 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.1FP4|July 25, 2010) at 2011-10-08 13:43:09, Serialize complete at 2011-10-08 13:43:09 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 001F6E2A48257923_=" X-MAIL: mse02.zte.com.cn p985h7bg058615 Cc: OSPF List , ospf-bounces@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OSPF] OSPF TE Extensions for Delay, Loss, and Jitter (formerly known as OSPF Express Path) X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2011 05:40:03 -0000 This is a multipart message in MIME format. --=_alternative 001F6E2A48257923_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SGkgQWNlZSwNCg0KSSBoYXZlIHJlYWQgdGhyb3VnaCB0aGUgZHJhZnQuIEkgc3VwcG9ydCBpdCBh cyBhIFdHIGRvY3VtZW50IG5vdy4NClNvbWUgYXV0aG9ycyBmcm9tIHRoaXMgZHJhZnQgY29vcGVy YXRlZCB3aXRoIHVzIGluIGRvaW5nIHRoZSBmcmFtZXdvcmsgDQpkb2N1bWVudCBhbmQgc29ydGlu ZyBvdXQgdGhlIG92ZXJsYXAgd29yay4NCkkganVzdCB3YW50IHRvIGluZm9ybSBwZW9wbGUgd2hv IGFyZSBpbnRlcmVzdCBpbiB0aGlzIHRvcGljIGFsc28gbm90aWNlIA0KdGhlIHdvcmsgaW4gTVBM UyBXRy4NCmh0dHA6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL2RyYWZ0LWZ1eGgtbXBscy1kZWxheS1s b3NzLXRlLWZyYW1ld29yay0wMg0KDQoNCkJlc3QgUmVnYXJkcywNCg0KWGlodWEgRnUNCg0KDQoN CkFjZWUgTGluZGVtIDxhY2VlLmxpbmRlbUBlcmljc3Nvbi5jb20+IA0Kt6K8/sjLOiAgb3NwZi1i b3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3JnDQoyMDExLTEwLTA1IDA1OjQ1DQoNCsrVvP7Iyw0KT1NQRiBMaXN0IDxv c3BmQGlldGYub3JnPg0Ks63LzQ0KDQrW98ziDQpbT1NQRl0gT1NQRiBURSBFeHRlbnNpb25zIGZv ciBEZWxheSwgTG9zcywgYW5kIEppdHRlciAoZm9ybWVybHkga25vd24gYXMgDQpPU1BGIEV4cHJl c3MgUGF0aCkNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCldlJ3ZlIGRpc2N1c3NlZCB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0IGF0IHRoZSBs YXN0IHR3byBJRVRGcyBhbmQgdGhlcmUgc2VlbWVkIHRvIGJlIA0KaW50ZXJlc3QuIFdlIGJlbGll dmUgd2Ugc29ydGVkIG91dCB0aGUgcG9zaXRpb25pbmcvb3ZlcmxhcCB3aXRoIHRoZSBNUExTIA0K YW5kIENDQU1QIFdHcyBhbmQgYXJlIG5vdyByZWFkeSB0byBhY2NlcHQgaXQgYXMgYSBXRyBkb2N1 bWVudC4gDQpEb2VzIGFueW9uZSBoYXZlIGFueSBvYmplY3Rpb25zPyANCg0KSGVyZSBpcyBhIGxp bmsgdG8gdGhlIGN1cnJlbnQgZHJhZnQ6IA0KaHR0cDovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9pZC9kcmFmdC1n aWFjYWxvbmUtb3NwZi10ZS1leHByZXNzLXBhdGgtMDIudHh0DQoNClRoYW5rcywNCkFjZWUgYW5k IEFiaGF5IA0KX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18N Ck9TUEYgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0DQpPU1BGQGlldGYub3JnDQpodHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9t YWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL29zcGYNCg0KDQoNCg== --=_alternative 001F6E2A48257923_= Content-Type: text/html; charset="GB2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 DQo8YnI+PGZvbnQgc2l6ZT0yIGZhY2U9InNhbnMtc2VyaWYiPkhpIEFjZWUsPC9mb250Pg0KPGJy Pg0KPGJyPjxmb250IHNpemU9MiBmYWNlPSJzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj5JIGhhdmUgcmVhZCB0aHJvdWdo IHRoZSBkcmFmdC4gSSBzdXBwb3J0DQppdCBhcyBhIFdHIGRvY3VtZW50IG5vdy48L2ZvbnQ+DQo8 YnI+PGZvbnQgc2l6ZT0yIGZhY2U9InNhbnMtc2VyaWYiPlNvbWUgYXV0aG9ycyBmcm9tIHRoaXMg ZHJhZnQgY29vcGVyYXRlZA0Kd2l0aCB1cyBpbiBkb2luZyB0aGUgZnJhbWV3b3JrIGRvY3VtZW50 IGFuZCBzb3J0aW5nIG91dCB0aGUgb3ZlcmxhcCB3b3JrLjwvZm9udD4NCjxicj48Zm9udCBzaXpl PTIgZmFjZT0ic2Fucy1zZXJpZiI+SSBqdXN0IHdhbnQgdG8gaW5mb3JtIHBlb3BsZSB3aG8gYXJl DQppbnRlcmVzdCBpbiB0aGlzIHRvcGljIGFsc28gbm90aWNlIHRoZSB3b3JrIGluIE1QTFMgV0cu PC9mb250Pg0KPGJyPjxmb250IHNpemU9MiBmYWNlPSJzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj5odHRwOi8vdG9vbHMu aWV0Zi5vcmcvaHRtbC9kcmFmdC1mdXhoLW1wbHMtZGVsYXktbG9zcy10ZS1mcmFtZXdvcmstMDI8 L2ZvbnQ+DQo8YnI+PGZvbnQgc2l6ZT0yIGZhY2U9InNhbnMtc2VyaWYiPjxicj4NCjxicj4NCkJl c3QgUmVnYXJkcyw8YnI+DQo8YnI+DQpYaWh1YSBGdTwvZm9udD4NCjxicj4NCjxicj4NCjxicj4N Cjx0YWJsZSB3aWR0aD0xMDAlPg0KPHRyIHZhbGlnbj10b3A+DQo8dGQgd2lkdGg9MzUlPjxmb250 IHNpemU9MSBmYWNlPSJzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj48Yj5BY2VlIExpbmRlbSAmbHQ7YWNlZS5saW5kZW1A ZXJpY3Nzb24uY29tJmd0OzwvYj4NCjwvZm9udD4NCjxicj48Zm9udCBzaXplPTEgZmFjZT0ic2Fu cy1zZXJpZiI+t6K8/sjLOiAmbmJzcDtvc3BmLWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmc8L2ZvbnQ+DQo8cD48 Zm9udCBzaXplPTEgZmFjZT0ic2Fucy1zZXJpZiI+MjAxMS0xMC0wNSAwNTo0NTwvZm9udD4NCjx0 ZCB3aWR0aD02NCU+DQo8dGFibGUgd2lkdGg9MTAwJT4NCjx0ciB2YWxpZ249dG9wPg0KPHRkPg0K PGRpdiBhbGlnbj1yaWdodD48Zm9udCBzaXplPTEgZmFjZT0ic2Fucy1zZXJpZiI+ytW8/sjLPC9m b250PjwvZGl2Pg0KPHRkPjxmb250IHNpemU9MSBmYWNlPSJzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj5PU1BGIExpc3Qg Jmx0O29zcGZAaWV0Zi5vcmcmZ3Q7PC9mb250Pg0KPHRyIHZhbGlnbj10b3A+DQo8dGQ+DQo8ZGl2 IGFsaWduPXJpZ2h0Pjxmb250IHNpemU9MSBmYWNlPSJzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj6zrcvNPC9mb250Pjwv ZGl2Pg0KPHRkPg0KPHRyIHZhbGlnbj10b3A+DQo8dGQ+DQo8ZGl2IGFsaWduPXJpZ2h0Pjxmb250 IHNpemU9MSBmYWNlPSJzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj7W98ziPC9mb250PjwvZGl2Pg0KPHRkPjxmb250IHNp emU9MSBmYWNlPSJzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj5bT1NQRl0gT1NQRiBURSBFeHRlbnNpb25zIGZvciBEZWxh eSwNCkxvc3MsIGFuZCBKaXR0ZXIgKGZvcm1lcmx5IGtub3duIGFzIE9TUEYgRXhwcmVzcyBQYXRo KTwvZm9udD48L3RhYmxlPg0KPGJyPg0KPHRhYmxlPg0KPHRyIHZhbGlnbj10b3A+DQo8dGQ+DQo8 dGQ+PC90YWJsZT4NCjxicj48L3RhYmxlPg0KPGJyPg0KPGJyPg0KPGJyPjxmb250IHNpemU9Mj48 dHQ+V2UndmUgZGlzY3Vzc2VkIHRoaXMgZHJhZnQgYXQgdGhlIGxhc3QgdHdvIElFVEZzIGFuZA0K dGhlcmUgc2VlbWVkIHRvIGJlIGludGVyZXN0LiBXZSBiZWxpZXZlIHdlIHNvcnRlZCBvdXQgdGhl IHBvc2l0aW9uaW5nL292ZXJsYXANCndpdGggdGhlIE1QTFMgYW5kIENDQU1QIFdHcyBhbmQgYXJl IG5vdyByZWFkeSB0byBhY2NlcHQgaXQgYXMgYSBXRyBkb2N1bWVudC4NCjxicj4NCkRvZXMgYW55 b25lIGhhdmUgYW55IG9iamVjdGlvbnM/IDxicj4NCjxicj4NCkhlcmUgaXMgYSBsaW5rIHRvIHRo ZSBjdXJyZW50IGRyYWZ0OiBodHRwOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL2lkL2RyYWZ0LWdpYWNhbG9uZS1v c3BmLXRlLWV4cHJlc3MtcGF0aC0wMi50eHQ8YnI+DQo8YnI+DQpUaGFua3MsPGJyPg0KQWNlZSBh bmQgQWJoYXkgPGJyPg0KX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX188YnI+DQpPU1BGIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdDxicj4NCk9TUEZAaWV0Zi5vcmc8YnI+DQpodHRw czovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL29zcGY8YnI+DQo8YnI+DQo8L3R0Pjwv Zm9udD4NCjxicj4NCg== --=_alternative 001F6E2A48257923_=-- From wwwrun@rfc-editor.org Mon Oct 10 17:51:19 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9C6F21F8C1A for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:51:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.225 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.225 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.225, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_56=0.6, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nnnt8zrIccw0 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:51:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4008221F8BA2 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:51:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 2D6DA98C276; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:51:19 -0700 (PDT) To: manav@alcatel-lucent.com, vishwas@ipinfusion.com, mfanto@aegisdatasecurity.com, riw@cisco.com, mjbarnes@cisco.com, tony.li@tony.li, rja@extremenetworks.com, stbryant@cisco.com, adrian@olddog.co.uk, acee.lindem@ericsson.com, akr@cisco.com From: RFC Errata System Message-Id: <20111011005119.2D6DA98C276@rfc-editor.org> Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:51:19 -0700 (PDT) Cc: ospf@ietf.org, dai.wenjie@zte.com.cn, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5709 (2989) X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 00:51:19 -0000 The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5709, "OSPFv2 HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentication". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5709&eid=2989 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Dai Wenjie (David Jet) Section: 3. Original Text ------------- With the additions in this document, the currently valid algorithms (including mode) for OSPFv2 Cryptographic Authentication include: Keyed-MD5 (defined in RFC 2328, Appendix D) Corrected Text -------------- With the additions in this document, the currently valid algorithms (including mode) for OSPFv2 Cryptographic Authentication include: Keyed-MD5 (defined in RFC 2328, Appendix D) Notes ----- The link 'Appendix D' referenced is incorrect. It is now 'http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5709#appendix-D', and it should be 'http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2328#appendix-D'. Pay attention to the difference of the numbers in links,please. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5709 (draft-ietf-ospf-hmac-sha-07) -------------------------------------- Title : OSPFv2 HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentication Publication Date : October 2009 Author(s) : M. Bhatia, V. Manral, M. Fanto, R. White, M. Barnes, T. Li, R. Atkinson Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Open Shortest Path First IGP Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG From manav.bhatia@alcatel-lucent.com Mon Oct 10 17:59:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42CED21F8C8E for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:59:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.299 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_56=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k+-nAGBa0Dkp for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:59:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ihemail3.lucent.com (ihemail3.lucent.com [135.245.0.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8033621F8C8D for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:59:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from inbansmailrelay1.in.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-250-11-31.lucent.com [135.250.11.31]) by ihemail3.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id p9B0x8Bh004796 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:59:11 -0500 (CDT) Received: from INBANSXCHHUB03.in.alcatel-lucent.com (inbansxchhub03.in.alcatel-lucent.com [135.250.12.80]) by inbansmailrelay1.in.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id p9B0x5pi000988 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 11 Oct 2011 06:29:05 +0530 Received: from INBANSXCHMBSA1.in.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.250.12.59]) by INBANSXCHHUB03.in.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.250.12.80]) with mapi; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 06:29:04 +0530 From: "Bhatia, Manav (Manav)" To: RFC Errata System , "vishwas@ipinfusion.com" , "mfanto@aegisdatasecurity.com" , "riw@cisco.com" , "mjbarnes@cisco.com" , "tony.li@tony.li" , "rja@extremenetworks.com" , "stbryant@cisco.com" , "adrian@olddog.co.uk" , "acee.lindem@ericsson.com" , "akr@cisco.com" Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 06:29:02 +0530 Thread-Topic: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5709 (2989) Thread-Index: AcyHr+g4XPTP87ueRjy5BF8pr4JIfgAAHYqA Message-ID: <7C362EEF9C7896468B36C9B79200D8350D006D541C@INBANSXCHMBSA1.in.alcatel-lucent.com> References: <20111011005119.2D6DA98C276@rfc-editor.org> In-Reply-To: <20111011005119.2D6DA98C276@rfc-editor.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.37 Cc: "ospf@ietf.org" , "dai.wenjie@zte.com.cn" Subject: Re: [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5709 (2989) X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 00:59:22 -0000 Yes, the link is incorrect in the HTML version of the RFC. I don't remember= giving the URL and don't know how it was inserted in the HTML version. Can= t we just fix the HTML page to point to RFC 2328 Appendix D instead of poin= ting to RFC 5709 Appendix D (which does not even exist!)? There is no problem with the TXT version of the RFC.=20 Cheers, Manav > -----Original Message----- > From: RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org]=20 > Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 6:21 AM > To: Bhatia, Manav (Manav); vishwas@ipinfusion.com;=20 > mfanto@aegisdatasecurity.com; riw@cisco.com;=20 > mjbarnes@cisco.com; tony.li@tony.li; rja@extremenetworks.com;=20 > stbryant@cisco.com; adrian@olddog.co.uk;=20 > acee.lindem@ericsson.com; akr@cisco.com > Cc: dai.wenjie@zte.com.cn; ospf@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org > Subject: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5709 (2989) >=20 >=20 > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5709, > "OSPFv2 HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentication". >=20 > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3D5709&eid=3D2989 >=20 > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Dai Wenjie (David Jet) >=20 > Section: 3. >=20 > Original Text > ------------- > With the additions in this document, the currently valid=20 > algorithms (including mode) for OSPFv2 Cryptographic=20 > Authentication include: Keyed-MD5 =20 > (defined in RFC 2328, Appendix D) >=20 > Corrected Text > -------------- > With the additions in this document, the currently valid=20 > algorithms (including mode) for OSPFv2 Cryptographic=20 > Authentication include: Keyed-MD5 =20 > (defined in RFC 2328, Appendix D) >=20 > Notes > ----- > The link 'Appendix D' referenced is incorrect. It is now=20 > 'http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5709#appendix-D', and it=20 > should be 'http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2328#appendix-D'.=20 > Pay attention to the difference of the numbers in links,please. >=20 > Instructions: > ------------- > This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary,=20 > please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be=20 > verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the=20 > verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and=20 > edit the report, if necessary.=20 >=20 > -------------------------------------- > RFC5709 (draft-ietf-ospf-hmac-sha-07) > -------------------------------------- > Title : OSPFv2 HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentication > Publication Date : October 2009 > Author(s) : M. Bhatia, V. Manral, M. Fanto, R.=20 > White, M. Barnes, T. Li, R. Atkinson > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Open Shortest Path First IGP > Area : Routing > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > = From acee@lindem.com Mon Oct 10 18:21:03 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8193C21F8B08 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:21:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_56=0.6] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6LdeuRF05SBY for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:21:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com [75.180.132.123]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D11CB21F8AE6 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:21:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=F07b8ZsgLWZXGX8D4wUqVhnmZNKPLwOf2MHA3we2PYM= c=1 sm=0 a=g3L3RsfpP9oA:10 a=Wma4Of2gTTwA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=C2g1Hp6idNFTy4K9KrF8yg==:17 a=BqEg4_3jAAAA:8 a=tt9SZfeFAAAA:8 a=OIVRlTfHAAAA:8 a=AUd_NHdVAAAA:8 a=vI_dY4GQAAAA:8 a=AEDFM0qtAAAA:8 a=0FD05c-RAAAA:8 a=1RTuLK3dAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=X3JhBpYG6cQvVotxFasA:9 a=BJDY9egIidHeMjdalRYA:7 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=mhd2NDuUijAA:10 a=1eQkaoUQ5BgA:10 a=PTakdDTavvIA:10 a=1vLRZECtGpgA:10 a=JfD0Fch1gWkA:10 a=UmnohBiOdKAA:10 a=jqlaW5bC1iAA:10 a=f7GxY0FH8QIA:10 a=lZB815dzVvQA:10 a=C2g1Hp6idNFTy4K9KrF8yg==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 65.190.0.120 Received: from [65.190.0.120] ([65.190.0.120:49576] helo=[192.168.1.100]) by cdptpa-oedge02.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id FF/79-14490-CF9939E4; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 01:21:02 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Acee Lindem In-Reply-To: <7C362EEF9C7896468B36C9B79200D8350D006D541C@INBANSXCHMBSA1.in.alcatel-lucent.com> Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 21:21:00 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <4BDDAD34-A4D2-43DD-AF39-4D98F4191B46@lindem.com> References: <20111011005119.2D6DA98C276@rfc-editor.org> <7C362EEF9C7896468B36C9B79200D8350D006D541C@INBANSXCHMBSA1.in.alcatel-lucent.com> To: RFC Errata System X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: Vishwas Manral , dai.wenjie@zte.com.cn, rja@extremenetworks.com, mfanto@aegisdatasecurity.com, OSPF List Subject: Re: [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5709 (2989) X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 01:21:03 -0000 RFC-Editor(s), Can you simply update the html link as Manav suggests? Thanks, Acee On Oct 10, 2011, at 8:59 PM, Bhatia, Manav (Manav) wrote: > Yes, the link is incorrect in the HTML version of the RFC. I don't = remember giving the URL and don't know how it was inserted in the HTML = version. Cant we just fix the HTML page to point to RFC 2328 Appendix D = instead of pointing to RFC 5709 Appendix D (which does not even exist!)? >=20 > There is no problem with the TXT version of the RFC.=20 >=20 > Cheers, Manav >=20 >> -----Original Message----- >> From: RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org]=20 >> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 6:21 AM >> To: Bhatia, Manav (Manav); vishwas@ipinfusion.com;=20 >> mfanto@aegisdatasecurity.com; riw@cisco.com;=20 >> mjbarnes@cisco.com; tony.li@tony.li; rja@extremenetworks.com;=20 >> stbryant@cisco.com; adrian@olddog.co.uk;=20 >> acee.lindem@ericsson.com; akr@cisco.com >> Cc: dai.wenjie@zte.com.cn; ospf@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org >> Subject: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5709 (2989) >>=20 >>=20 >> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5709, >> "OSPFv2 HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentication". >>=20 >> -------------------------------------- >> You may review the report below and at: >> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3D5709&eid=3D2989 >>=20 >> -------------------------------------- >> Type: Editorial >> Reported by: Dai Wenjie (David Jet) >>=20 >> Section: 3. >>=20 >> Original Text >> ------------- >> With the additions in this document, the currently valid=20 >> algorithms (including mode) for OSPFv2 Cryptographic=20 >> Authentication include: Keyed-MD5 =20 >> (defined in RFC 2328, Appendix D) >>=20 >> Corrected Text >> -------------- >> With the additions in this document, the currently valid=20 >> algorithms (including mode) for OSPFv2 Cryptographic=20 >> Authentication include: Keyed-MD5 =20 >> (defined in RFC 2328, Appendix D) >>=20 >> Notes >> ----- >> The link 'Appendix D' referenced is incorrect. It is now=20 >> 'http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5709#appendix-D', and it=20 >> should be 'http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2328#appendix-D'.=20 >> Pay attention to the difference of the numbers in links,please. >>=20 >> Instructions: >> ------------- >> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary,=20 >> please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be=20 >> verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the=20 >> verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and=20 >> edit the report, if necessary.=20 >>=20 >> -------------------------------------- >> RFC5709 (draft-ietf-ospf-hmac-sha-07) >> -------------------------------------- >> Title : OSPFv2 HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentication >> Publication Date : October 2009 >> Author(s) : M. Bhatia, V. Manral, M. Fanto, R.=20 >> White, M. Barnes, T. Li, R. Atkinson >> Category : PROPOSED STANDARD >> Source : Open Shortest Path First IGP >> Area : Routing >> Stream : IETF >> Verifying Party : IESG >>=20 > _______________________________________________ > OSPF mailing list > OSPF@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf From acee.lindem@ericsson.com Tue Oct 11 15:19:50 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3BA021F8DE8 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:19:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.175 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.175 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.176, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_56=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2V62Cgz4xaRs for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:19:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imr4.ericy.com (imr4.ericy.com [198.24.6.9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB14C21F8CF3 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:19:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eusaamw0706.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.31]) by imr4.ericy.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id p9BMJfLF012422; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:19:43 -0500 Received: from EUSAACMS0702.eamcs.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.60]) by eusaamw0706.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.31]) with mapi; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:19:35 -0400 From: Acee Lindem To: Alice Hagens Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:19:32 -0400 Thread-Topic: [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5709 (2989) Thread-Index: AcyIY9sI4vDSa+UUROOLxATB77g0AA== Message-ID: <85A7C3DE-7455-46E8-A47A-16842B91B952@ericsson.com> References: <20111011005119.2D6DA98C276@rfc-editor.org> <7C362EEF9C7896468B36C9B79200D8350D006D541C@INBANSXCHMBSA1.in.alcatel-lucent.com> <4BDDAD34-A4D2-43DD-AF39-4D98F4191B46@lindem.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail-22-761956573"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Vishwas Manral , "dai.wenjie@zte.com.cn" , RJ Atkinson , "mfanto@aegisdatasecurity.com" , RFC Errata System , OSPF List Subject: Re: [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5709 (2989) X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 22:19:50 -0000 --Apple-Mail-22-761956573 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi Alice, Thanks for the information. In the hopes of dispensing of this matter = quickly, I have opened a tools ticket on this issue: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/tools/trac/ticket/6 Can you close this errata as "Rejected"? If not, I'll advise Steward to = do it (WG chairs don't have the authority).=20 Thanks, Acee=20 On Oct 11, 2011, at 5:51 PM, Alice Hagens wrote: > Acee, Manav, >=20 > The HTML versions of RFCs available from tools.ietf.org (e.g., = http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5709) are created and maintained by the = Tools Team, not the RFC Editor. They are automatically created by = running rfcmarkup (http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/) on the text = of the RFC. In short, the link on http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5709 was = automatically created based on parsing the string "RFC 2328, Appendix = D". >=20 > As noted on http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php, errata are for the = RFCs as available from rfc-editor.org, e.g., = http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5709.txt. >=20 > The verifiers (Area Directors) have the ability to edit the contents = of the errata report. Perhaps the Corrected Text could convey the = intended correction, maybe "Keyed-MD5 (defined in RFC 2328, Appendix D, = as updated by this document)", and the content of the Notes could be = removed. >=20 > Thank you. > RFC Editor/ah >=20 > On Oct 10, 2011, at 9:21 PM, Acee Lindem wrote: >=20 >> RFC-Editor(s), >> Can you simply update the html link as Manav suggests? >> Thanks, >> Acee >> On Oct 10, 2011, at 8:59 PM, Bhatia, Manav (Manav) wrote: >>=20 >>> Yes, the link is incorrect in the HTML version of the RFC. I don't = remember giving the URL and don't know how it was inserted in the HTML = version. Cant we just fix the HTML page to point to RFC 2328 Appendix D = instead of pointing to RFC 5709 Appendix D (which does not even exist!)? >>>=20 >>> There is no problem with the TXT version of the RFC.=20 >>>=20 >>> Cheers, Manav >>>=20 >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org]=20 >>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 6:21 AM >>>> To: Bhatia, Manav (Manav); vishwas@ipinfusion.com;=20 >>>> mfanto@aegisdatasecurity.com; riw@cisco.com;=20 >>>> mjbarnes@cisco.com; tony.li@tony.li; rja@extremenetworks.com;=20 >>>> stbryant@cisco.com; adrian@olddog.co.uk;=20 >>>> acee.lindem@ericsson.com; akr@cisco.com >>>> Cc: dai.wenjie@zte.com.cn; ospf@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org >>>> Subject: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5709 (2989) >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5709, >>>> "OSPFv2 HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentication". >>>>=20 >>>> -------------------------------------- >>>> You may review the report below and at: >>>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3D5709&eid=3D2989 >>>>=20 >>>> -------------------------------------- >>>> Type: Editorial >>>> Reported by: Dai Wenjie (David Jet) >>>>=20 >>>> Section: 3. >>>>=20 >>>> Original Text >>>> ------------- >>>> With the additions in this document, the currently valid=20 >>>> algorithms (including mode) for OSPFv2 Cryptographic=20 >>>> Authentication include: Keyed-MD5 =20 >>>> (defined in RFC 2328, Appendix D) >>>>=20 >>>> Corrected Text >>>> -------------- >>>> With the additions in this document, the currently valid=20 >>>> algorithms (including mode) for OSPFv2 Cryptographic=20 >>>> Authentication include: Keyed-MD5 =20 >>>> (defined in RFC 2328, Appendix D) >>>>=20 >>>> Notes >>>> ----- >>>> The link 'Appendix D' referenced is incorrect. It is now=20 >>>> 'http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5709#appendix-D', and it=20 >>>> should be 'http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2328#appendix-D'.=20 >>>> Pay attention to the difference of the numbers in links,please. >>>>=20 >>>> Instructions: >>>> ------------- >>>> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary,=20 >>>> please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be=20 >>>> verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the=20 >>>> verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and=20 >>>> edit the report, if necessary.=20 >>>>=20 >>>> -------------------------------------- >>>> RFC5709 (draft-ietf-ospf-hmac-sha-07) >>>> -------------------------------------- >>>> Title : OSPFv2 HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentication >>>> Publication Date : October 2009 >>>> Author(s) : M. Bhatia, V. Manral, M. Fanto, R.=20 >>>> White, M. Barnes, T. Li, R. Atkinson >>>> Category : PROPOSED STANDARD >>>> Source : Open Shortest Path First IGP >>>> Area : Routing >>>> Stream : IETF >>>> Verifying Party : IESG >>>>=20 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OSPF mailing list >>> OSPF@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf >>=20 >=20 --Apple-Mail-22-761956573 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIM8jCCBDQw ggMcoAMCAQICECFWwVQHDV12M/Sr0yNv0sYwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwOTERMA8GA1UECgwIRXJp Y3Nzb24xJDAiBgNVBAMMG0VyaWNzc29uIE5MIEluZGl2aWR1YWwgQ0EwMTAeFw0xMDEwMDEyMDA0 NTlaFw0xMzEwMDEyMDA0NDhaMG8xETAPBgNVBAoMCEVyaWNzc29uMR8wHQYDVQQDDBZBY2VlIExp bmRlbSBMaW5kZW0gSUlJMRAwDgYDVQQFEwdlYWxmbGluMScwJQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhhhY2VlLmxp bmRlbUBlcmljc3Nvbi5jb20wgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAI/Dc9ALiZuBMyuv bsc3eBxjXZpMi45Z0vzsUQZTJGTBeY7p9JsdzXC9J1uMisBxYVi39R3KJo6I4hXVp9wrA1rxh4AE bnP1+Gxfpj33uWEFYbBnVAJkIWYWF7CYTn8Zm/yd13vPXtuGA6ESeLnnJafwC9Y0YwUQ+4HX7PNv uauVAgMBAAGjggGEMIIBgDCBwAYDVR0fBIG4MIG1MIGyoIGvoIGshjdodHRwOi8vY3JsLnRydXN0 LnRlbGlhLmNvbS9Fcmljc3Nvbk5MSW5kaXZpZHVhbENBMDEuY3JshnFsZGFwOi8vbGRhcC50cnVz dC50ZWxpYS5jb20vY249RXJpY3Nzb24lMjBOTCUyMEluZGl2aWR1YWwlMjBDQTAxLG89RXJpY3Nz b24/Y2VydGlmaWNhdGVyZXZvY2F0aW9ubGlzdDtiaW5hcnk/YmFzZTAjBgNVHREEHDAagRhhY2Vl LmxpbmRlbUBlcmljc3Nvbi5jb20wRgYDVR0gBD8wPTA7BgYqhXBrAQEwMTAvBggrBgEFBQcCARYj aHR0cDovL3d3dy5lcmljc3Nvbi5jb20vbGVnYWwuc2h0bWwwHQYDVR0OBBYEFAgOzAPuplmPr7C1 BTqV94OyqUdhMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFJYnw7jepV9dRD45UuVFsXZfYzCbMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIF oDANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOCAQEAE1gyNW6c2t/YsLxW5sm67+gVGK0Lnge4ub+k8dgGrK7Mj7em nkOIFkjdv/tqdJ/SoUy/WEkBXba2TfpZ+lfluMgLYux1vSvqBUxYBsUHeNth2Q/Y6A9sCaDTBPlK vZ2jLz814NavrVfgTCLdxX6zNtGdwzhviz+FyqyxYF43Q86RP8Gd/Npaz1W8pmYAHm0+lezuTx5k F3Av3+SaZ/MR6s+RWuXEIdED36ajeQz+OG8Mh3nplofzdrOeoWGDz53YlfRhgj+TXo+H1lclZAvD WVaMMXPdb27h9Hngsq87dkCW9uAyv8DI993rdhqzlEgUyQIL32icAXfTmTYgoGPOwjCCBEUwggMt oAMCAQICEBPJ6v/eJq2p3KTKI4GDR+MwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwRDEaMBgGA1UECgwRVGVsaWFT b25lcmEgR3JvdXAxJjAkBgNVBAMMHVRlbGlhU29uZXJhIFB1YmxpYyBSb290IENBIHYxMB4XDTA2 MTAwNjEwMDA1M1oXDTE2MTAwMjA1MDQxN1owOTERMA8GA1UECgwIRXJpY3Nzb24xJDAiBgNVBAMM G0VyaWNzc29uIE5MIEluZGl2aWR1YWwgQ0EwMTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoC ggEBALYQd+Q1HuuHxDyNGFlEPzCxuPPFO5W2xyr+nqCVnNJ4QYFe1HACqavqNLwUGIqIEyHv1rLn fub9LBc7dQpRHjl/dggin0ONOFJ36nbGEbfHjLJz2BzOWvwl84Sc+Fx09IrDU/SZSWFSfhqTu3TT 39h79brHdRkdPBUgBYgsiFKriHI0TjP5G8628H27BDzqUpzGLSYWgt6/tpwuOH5lcfNfHWMcCYXR lobv0Klu8lxG5amWqAnqrH6ECOyYJTRbHTsaTIZOHy9Qw/0eXPujKT7tU5xxSI2SdceJqzUbAz2o FRQ6Px7/GydpM/Rl+qYoGPcauHUL1aSeVJZqDFqcIF0CAwEAAaOCATwwggE4MBIGA1UdEwEB/wQI MAYBAf8CAQAwRgYDVR0gBD8wPTA7BgcqhXAjAgEBMDAwLgYIKwYBBQUHAgEWImh0dHBzOi8vcmVw b3NpdG9yeS50cnVzdC50ZWxpYS5jb20wgYkGA1UdHwSBgTB/MH2ge6B5hndsZGFwOi8vbGRhcC50 cnVzdC50ZWxpYS5jb20vY249VGVsaWFTb25lcmElMjBQdWJsaWMlMjBSb290JTIwQ0ElMjB2MSxv PVRlbGlhU29uZXJhJTIwR3JvdXA/YXV0aG9yaXR5cmV2b2NhdGlvbmxpc3Q/YmFzZTAOBgNVHQ8B Af8EBAMCAQYwHQYDVR0OBBYEFJYnw7jepV9dRD45UuVFsXZfYzCbMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFEXb8I+4 GmKhqCMbY4g4o9vgGmLxMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4IBAQB2AEoqQz+M3Ra9alkpn/YnwhXIv6tP jhUvSuNs00Nhd0T9XhlIU3a65CaB/UKSqnayE0t7Q0Qq3r+x/GK3in/mik8i/PK2/q8HutzYFSzz 6Npztpo2JG7AEKOJPVaeebjng45m6vNC7RIfzU9sG2LBR/hewS8s6dFFn70w795xUwJBWZ67OzIK XrIVVvHTOYpbWA+MESKAXwFhnVONrOTWlVwrMUi4HbiPWpOk+xQbgehCEi7mu3cXsaU1Xq3kMXui NuC7VKoob8mFO9o9RT+dlirD2uRXwNpvCu3but6Kyhu0+nvy2iXGKjdlxlWTsdDyulXYz+OYCMZ9 lFWRzMIPMIIEbTCCA1WgAwIBAgIRAJywjASay5cieGNithuGWj0wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwOjEZ MBcGA1UEChMQUlNBIFNlY3VyaXR5IEluYzEdMBsGA1UECxMUUlNBIFNlY3VyaXR5IDIwNDggVjMw HhcNMDYxMDMxMjA0MjI3WhcNMTYxMTAxMTU0MjI1WjBEMRowGAYDVQQKDBFUZWxpYVNvbmVyYSBH cm91cDEmMCQGA1UEAwwdVGVsaWFTb25lcmEgUHVibGljIFJvb3QgQ0EgdjEwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQDKTxADapCAq3mplX4R4gNt+WZe5QKGnaVEQSyY7lICKF5DuVdW PMLHDjzhw5IzDd860ZZx/0VrhGB3DmP4SDIWCKo2PxvY5NckdBWPWp/T2uaQdOAwgqHpN0pe1X7/ jel59WsWYXKGg/81Wth73ZK/geE7Gz9Pvj1LU6N4YhLMgooxKnCS+ZjB5icWAg+Qd1QpQhF46H1i bp6LsBWDp56MPpg8F5X6y7MGVcKYLdnLOPs84uxRW9qs1kBopzQBj6s5SyVh8A+j5liDBjghXYpw /+paGEdqHPeSFYxZKeJatmjEKLYlxcZWRKf436KvQA9jBhMEmytMNbGicR1mRH6tAgMBAAGjggFi MIIBXjAfBgNVHSMEGDAWgBQHw1EwpKrpRa41JPr/JCwz0LGdjDAdBgNVHQ4EFgQURdvwj7gaYqGo IxtjiDij2+AaYvEwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBBDCBhQYDVR0gBH4wfDA9BgkqhkiG9w0FBgEw MDAuBggrBgEFBQcCARYiaHR0cHM6Ly9yZXBvc2l0b3J5LnRydXN0LnRlbGlhLmNvbTA7BgcqhXAj AgEBMDAwLgYIKwYBBQUHAgEWImh0dHBzOi8vcmVwb3NpdG9yeS50cnVzdC50ZWxpYS5jb20wcAYD VR0fBGkwZzBloGOgYYZfaHR0cDovL3d3dy5yc2FzZWN1cml0eS5jb20vcHJvZHVjdHMva2Vvbi9y ZXBvc2l0b3J5L2NlcnRpZmljYXRlX3N0YXR1cy9SU0FfU2VjdXJpdHlfMjA0OF92My5DUkwwDgYD VR0PAQH/BAQDAgEGMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4IBAQAEXpos2CnIm7/872ytSrEHWZgvhOUEkUm2 5PWf/XkWko41TaL9vIS1S6AdWChNqWmnYiS7GfaIiDM9s1D6K7hidWBDOm46bNdM3ZwhMyDCfkDJ SgeJ0w+7YmjvChu7gWqDZCsbtZ5gA1ixCTdDnuZB67JGSPGW6r73coraDP8diOpiQouMvM6bKuTP BH/1poLccsUxsKgrQ23JC9LWCRb8cYHkZjXFH1K44TsIl5Lne2oT0JI3pwdA2v6jO4p/OLHntP+n pjwPbedMPUZkDYCkd3LSxj8c3JTxtA8SlPCtIHE1hh65xihg1JRIliSphrqr9kbfwHdeVxPdOI5G tDYPMYICEjCCAg4CAQEwTTA5MREwDwYDVQQKDAhFcmljc3NvbjEkMCIGA1UEAwwbRXJpY3Nzb24g TkwgSW5kaXZpZHVhbCBDQTAxAhAhVsFUBw1ddjP0q9Mjb9LGMAkGBSsOAwIaBQCgggEbMBgGCSqG SIb3DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTExMTAxMTIyMTkzM1owIwYJKoZI hvcNAQkEMRYEFGZEPfVe+jtc/KirxJcp2OPPo5vxMFwGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDFPME0wOTERMA8GA1UE CgwIRXJpY3Nzb24xJDAiBgNVBAMMG0VyaWNzc29uIE5MIEluZGl2aWR1YWwgQ0EwMQIQIVbBVAcN XXYz9KvTI2/SxjBeBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzFPoE0wOTERMA8GA1UECgwIRXJpY3Nzb24xJDAiBgNV BAMMG0VyaWNzc29uIE5MIEluZGl2aWR1YWwgQ0EwMQIQIVbBVAcNXXYz9KvTI2/SxjANBgkqhkiG 9w0BAQEFAASBgB6RSJq8aF2iNFEY+f6mZM1VGiUYAa35oprncSByffVnK2ffjNj+9o4Zn3ln2KMO p9Id2f1JWK6B4uih4jVZQTwsgbX0gIAzrVzUlqrnGwZcXD7qCu4tCXTf2zoXAXR6TUqxtDb08qZO oMAzu4V3GJ+IP2JtizuvpHwxEPORBub4AAAAAAAA --Apple-Mail-22-761956573-- From vishwas.ietf@gmail.com Fri Oct 14 16:32:14 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FFB221F8CDB for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:32:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U0KaFQKarv61 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:32:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-yx0-f179.google.com (mail-yx0-f179.google.com [209.85.213.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B152B21F8CDA for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:32:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by yxn35 with SMTP id 35so1659448yxn.38 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:32:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=tSJ6nflLDi7EYSB1isNFUiP/FxXN8s27rn0I+6j8xfc=; b=oVekQHa5oNS1HrEr9MtqKzjxRtLhcrjUi3ABV8pRh1T80kveVba1oOXd0VhAH8mE5D ebexwnYJOfjK1IjrpcCxIeGc+WuEksrxuD4wHSffBp5eUDjYWmL8WsPGk1odLgCvDqTF sNOvl8YoOj0YyTLxkpkZVu0L5G+Ht7zr5nSvg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.114.67 with SMTP id je3mr6642519obb.30.1318635132090; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:32:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.11.7 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:32:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8CFA0F99-827E-48E8-BF5F-C45C590043A6@ericsson.com> References: <8CFA0F99-827E-48E8-BF5F-C45C590043A6@ericsson.com> Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:32:12 -0700 Message-ID: From: Vishwas Manral To: Acee Lindem Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04447463a2f75c04af4aaa86 Cc: OSPF List Subject: Re: [OSPF] OSPF TE Extensions for Delay, Loss, and Jitter (formerly known as OSPF Express Path) X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 23:32:14 -0000 --f46d04447463a2f75c04af4aaa86 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Spencer, I think we have discussed this within ourselves earlier, but I was wondering if you saw most of the loss on a link or on the device itself? Thanks, Vishwas On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Acee Lindem wrote: > We've discussed this draft at the last two IETFs and there seemed to be > interest. We believe we sorted out the positioning/overlap with the MPLS and > CCAMP WGs and are now ready to accept it as a WG document. > Does anyone have any objections? > > Here is a link to the current draft: > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-giacalone-ospf-te-express-path-02.txt > > Thanks, > Acee and Abhay > _______________________________________________ > OSPF mailing list > OSPF@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf > --f46d04447463a2f75c04af4aaa86 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Spencer,
=A0
I think we have discussed this within ourselves earlier, but I was won= dering=A0if you saw most of the loss on a link or on the device itself?
=A0
Thanks,
Vishwas
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@ericsson.com> wrote:
We've discussed this draft a= t the last two IETFs and there seemed to be interest. We believe we sorted = out the positioning/overlap with the MPLS and CCAMP WGs and are now ready t= o accept it as a WG document.
Does anyone have any objections?

Here is a link to the current draft= : http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-giacalone-ospf-te-expr= ess-path-02.txt

Thanks,
Acee and Abhay
__________________________________________= _____
OSPF mailing list
OSPF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

--f46d04447463a2f75c04af4aaa86-- From dean.cheng@huawei.com Tue Oct 18 17:04:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA4E21F877F for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:04:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fJQ2LnfiwoGW for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:04:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.64]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C258221F86EC for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:04:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from huawei.com (szxga05-in [172.24.2.49]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LTA00KJPDJEO9@szxga05-in.huawei.com> for ospf@ietf.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 08:04:26 +0800 (CST) Received: from szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LTA00IYKDJDIR@szxga05-in.huawei.com> for ospf@ietf.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 08:04:26 +0800 (CST) Received: from szxeml202-edg.china.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.1.9-GA) with ESMTP id AEH46198; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 08:04:25 +0800 Received: from SZXEML411-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.138) by szxeml202-edg.china.huawei.com (172.24.2.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.270.1; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 08:04:19 +0800 Received: from SZXEML523-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.6.73]) by szxeml411-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.138]) with mapi id 14.01.0270.001; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 08:04:17 +0800 Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 00:04:17 +0000 From: Dean cheng X-Originating-IP: [10.193.34.154] To: "ospf@ietf.org" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_wHI6/MHkCpeXbVpHuthsaQ)" Content-language: en-US Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Thread-topic: posted - draft-ietf-ospf-ipv4-embedded-ipv6-routing-01 Thread-index: AcyN8qOMBP7g52BeSMeJ/LrlIxY+eQ== X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Cc: "mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com" Subject: [OSPF] posted - draft-ietf-ospf-ipv4-embedded-ipv6-routing-01 X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 00:04:29 -0000 --Boundary_(ID_wHI6/MHkCpeXbVpHuthsaQ) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Dear OSPFers, We posted draft-ietf-ospf-ipv4-embedded-ipv6-routing-01 last week and comparing to the 00 text, the only change is a reference update (RFC6145). Please review and provide comments. Thanks Dean --Boundary_(ID_wHI6/MHkCpeXbVpHuthsaQ) Content-type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

Dear OSPFers,

 

We posted draft-ietf-ospf-ipv4-embedded-ipv6-routing-01 last week

and comparing to the 00 text, the only change is a reference update

(RFC6145).

 

Please review and provide comments.

 

Thanks

Dean

--Boundary_(ID_wHI6/MHkCpeXbVpHuthsaQ)-- From fu.xihua@zte.com.cn Mon Oct 24 20:06:19 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC68021F8C40; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 20:06:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.838 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.838 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_LOOSE=0.76, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nQyEy6AjHDRG; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 20:06:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx5.zte.com.cn (mx5.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D43F21F8C3E; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 20:06:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.30.17.99] by mx5.zte.com.cn with surfront esmtp id 417132623888924; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:02:52 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.30.3.21] by [192.168.168.15] with StormMail ESMTP id 20387.2623888924; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:06:10 +0800 (CST) Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse02.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id p9P367m3022103; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:06:07 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from fu.xihua@zte.com.cn) In-Reply-To: <20111008012424.15402.48430.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> To: mpls@ietf.org, ccamp@ietf.org, ospf@ietf.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.4 March 27, 2005 Message-ID: From: fu.xihua@zte.com.cn Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:06:08 +0800 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.1FP4|July 25, 2010) at 2011-10-25 11:06:09, Serialize complete at 2011-10-25 11:06:09 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 00110BAC48257934_=" X-MAIL: mse02.zte.com.cn p9P367m3022103 Subject: Re: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-fuxh-mpls-delay-loss-te-framework-02.txt X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 03:06:20 -0000 This is a multipart message in MIME format. --=_alternative 00110BAC48257934_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Hi All, We updated this delay-loss-te framework document. We want to request it as WG document in the future. If you have any comments, please let me know. Please also notice there some several protocol extension to support delay-loss-te. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fuxh-mpls-delay-loss-rsvp-te-ext-00 http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-atlas-mpls-te-express-path-00.txt http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-giacalone-ospf-te-express-path-02 http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-previdi-isis-te-metric-extensions-00 Xihua Fu i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org wrote 2011-10-08 09:24:24: > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > > Title : Traffic Engineering architecture for services aware MPLS > Author(s) : Xihua Fu > Vishwas Manral > Dave McDysan > Andrew Malis > Spencer Giacalone > Malcolm Betts > Qilei Wang > John Drake > Filename : draft-fuxh-mpls-delay-loss-te-framework-02.txt > Pages : 14 > Date : 2011-10-07 > > With more and more enterprises using cloud based services, the > distances between the user and the applications are growing. A lot > of the current applications are designed to work across LAN's and > have various inherent assumptions. For multiple applications such as > High Performance Computing and Electronic Financial markets, the > response times are critical as is packet loss, while other > applications require more throughput. > > [RFC3031] describes the architecture of MPLS based networks. This > draft extends the MPLS architecture to allow for latency, loss and > jitter as properties. It describes requirements and control plane > implication for latency and packet loss as a traffic engineering > performance metric in today's network which is consisting of > potentially multiple layers of packet transport network and optical > transport network in order to make a accurate end-to-end latency and > loss prediction before a path is established. > > Note MPLS architecture for Multicast will be taken up in a future > version of the draft. > > > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-fuxh-mpls-delay-loss-te- > framework-02.txt > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-fuxh-mpls-delay-loss-te- > framework-02.txt > _______________________________________________ > I-D-Announce mailing list > I-D-Announce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce > Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html > or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt > --=_alternative 00110BAC48257934_= Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Hi All,

We updated this delay-loss-te framework document.
We want to request it as WG document in the future. If you have any comments, please let me know.

Please also notice there some several protocol extension to support delay-loss-te.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fuxh-mpls-delay-loss-rsvp-te-ext-00
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-atlas-mpls-te-express-path-00.txt
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-giacalone-ospf-te-express-path-02
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-previdi-isis-te-metric-extensions-00

Xihua Fu


i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org wrote 2011-10-08 09:24:24:

> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
>
>    Title           : Traffic Engineering architecture for services aware MPLS
>    Author(s)       : Xihua Fu
>                           Vishwas Manral
>                           Dave McDysan
>                           Andrew Malis
>                           Spencer Giacalone
>                           Malcolm Betts
>                           Qilei Wang
>                           John Drake
>    Filename        : draft-fuxh-mpls-delay-loss-te-framework-02.txt
>    Pages           : 14
>    Date            : 2011-10-07
>
>    With more and more enterprises using cloud based services, the
>    distances between the user and the applications are growing.  A lot
>    of the current applications are designed to work across LAN&#39;s and
>    have various inherent assumptions.  For multiple applications such as
>    High Performance Computing and Electronic Financial markets, the
>    response times are critical as is packet loss, while other
>    applications require more throughput.
>
>    [RFC3031] describes the architecture of MPLS based networks.  This
>    draft extends the MPLS architecture to allow for latency, loss and
>    jitter as properties.  It describes requirements and control plane
>    implication for latency and packet loss as a traffic engineering
>    performance metric in today&#39;s network which is consisting of
>    potentially multiple layers of packet transport network and optical
>    transport network in order to make a accurate end-to-end latency and
>    loss prediction before a path is established.
>
>    Note MPLS architecture for Multicast will be taken up in a future
>    version of the draft.
>
>
>
> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-fuxh-mpls-delay-loss-te-
> framework-02.txt
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-fuxh-mpls-delay-loss-te-
> framework-02.txt
> _______________________________________________
> I-D-Announce mailing list
> I-D-Announce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
>
--=_alternative 00110BAC48257934_=-- From acee.lindem@ericsson.com Wed Oct 26 16:48:47 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A74A1F0C38 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:48:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.534 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.534 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.065, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8cvkF+JqEORT for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:48:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imr3.ericy.com (imr3.ericy.com [198.24.6.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 940B71F0C36 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:48:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eusaamw0707.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.32]) by imr3.ericy.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p9QNmiYB025126 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 18:48:45 -0500 Received: from EUSAACMS0702.eamcs.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.60]) by eusaamw0707.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.32]) with mapi; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:48:44 -0400 From: Acee Lindem To: OSPF List Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:48:42 -0400 Thread-Topic: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-08.txt Thread-Index: AcyUOcvPg7kxbBcnQDy1nhozOv8Jaw== Message-ID: <21C419E2-D51A-40FD-816B-4DC3D2BD98AB@ericsson.com> References: <20111026221935.25142.59175.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [OSPF] New Version Notification - draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-08.txt X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 23:48:47 -0000 This version includes changes in response to the external reviews that have= taken place since we completed WG last call. A few things have been clarif= ied and the following two items have been added: 1. Mitigation of Cross Protocol Attacks by appending a protocol specifi= c byte to the key. This will prevent replay attacks when the same key is us= ed by multiple protocols (and the sets of valid input packets intercept). S= ee sections 4.4 and 4.5. 2. Recommendations for authentication key selection have been added to = the "Security Considerations". See section 6. Links to be the new version and a nicely annotated diff with the previous v= ersion are included in the forwarded E-mail below. Thanks, Acee Begin forwarded message: From: "internet-drafts@ietf.org" > Date: October 26, 2011 6:19:35 PM EDT To: "ospf-chairs@tools.ietf.org" >, "draft-ietf-ospf-= auth-trailer-ospfv3@tools.ietf.org" >, "stbryant@cisco.c= om" > Subject: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-08.= txt New version (-08) has been submitted for draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv= 3-08.txt. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-08.= txt Diff from previous version: http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-08 IETF Secretariat. From acee.lindem@ericsson.com Wed Oct 26 16:53:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D871F0C38 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:53:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.892 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.892 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.585, BAYES_00=-2.599, MISSING_HEADERS=1.292, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rsr4MN-j08i0 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:53:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imr4.ericy.com (imr4.ericy.com [198.24.6.9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D81C1F0C34 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:53:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eusaamw0712.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.181]) by imr4.ericy.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id p9QNrd3s024902 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 18:53:41 -0500 Received: from EUSAACMS0702.eamcs.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.60]) by eusaamw0712.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.181]) with mapi; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:53:35 -0400 From: Acee Lindem CC: OSPF List Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:53:33 -0400 Thread-Topic: [OSPF] New Version Notification - draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-08.txt Thread-Index: AcyUOnlCAAX/p/ayRn+WqdsDiQNamA== Message-ID: <0CE91E74-8EFF-45FE-B241-BF0012B5E0F3@ericsson.com> References: <20111026221935.25142.59175.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <21C419E2-D51A-40FD-816B-4DC3D2BD98AB@ericsson.com> In-Reply-To: <21C419E2-D51A-40FD-816B-4DC3D2BD98AB@ericsson.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [OSPF] New Version Notification - draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-08.txt X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 23:53:43 -0000 Of course, I meant "intersect" rather than "intercept" below. In other word= s, a packet from one protocol could potentially also represent a valid pack= et in another protocol and be replayed.=20 Thanks, Acee =20 On Oct 26, 2011, at 7:48 PM, Acee Lindem wrote: > This version includes changes in response to the external reviews that ha= ve taken place since we completed WG last call. A few things have been clar= ified and the following two items have been added: >=20 > 1. Mitigation of Cross Protocol Attacks by appending a protocol specif= ic byte to the key. This will prevent replay attacks when the same key is u= sed by multiple protocols (and the sets of valid input packets intercept). = See sections 4.4 and 4.5. >=20 > 2. Recommendations for authentication key selection have been added to= the "Security Considerations". See section 6. >=20 > Links to be the new version and a nicely annotated diff with the previous= version are included in the forwarded E-mail below. >=20 > Thanks, > Acee >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > Begin forwarded message: >=20 > From: "internet-drafts@ietf.org" > > Date: October 26, 2011 6:19:35 PM EDT > To: "ospf-chairs@tools.ietf.org" >, "draft-ietf-osp= f-auth-trailer-ospfv3@tools.ietf.org" >, "stbryant@cisco= .com" > > Subject: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-0= 8.txt >=20 > New version (-08) has been submitted for draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-osp= fv3-08.txt. > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-0= 8.txt >=20 >=20 > Diff from previous version: > http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-= 08 >=20 > IETF Secretariat. >=20 > _______________________________________________ > OSPF mailing list > OSPF@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf From acee.lindem@ericsson.com Thu Oct 27 12:21:51 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFEF621F87E2 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 12:21:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.859 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.859 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.552, BAYES_00=-2.599, MISSING_HEADERS=1.292, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dhKHkzbpHAUN for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 12:21:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imr4.ericy.com (imr4.ericy.com [198.24.6.9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E13BD21F86C3 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 12:21:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eusaamw0707.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.32]) by imr4.ericy.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id p9RJLktG017855 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:21:47 -0500 Received: from EUSAACMS0702.eamcs.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.60]) by eusaamw0707.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.32]) with mapi; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:21:40 -0400 From: Acee Lindem CC: OSPF List Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:21:37 -0400 Thread-Topic: [OSPF] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ospf-multi-instance-05.txt Thread-Index: AcyU3aa52Ex5CCoMSp6CoJzFExgCeA== Message-ID: <130C1FB6-FC82-457D-AF7F-6310DD3B5C5A@ericsson.com> References: <20110921012222.29825.13586.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <73906447-A474-49D1-9D3F-37694F9C621B@ericsson.com> In-Reply-To: <73906447-A474-49D1-9D3F-37694F9C621B@ericsson.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [OSPF] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ospf-multi-instance-05.txt X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 19:21:51 -0000 The OSPF WG last call has ended and the 05 version addresses comments.=20 Thanks, Acee On Sep 21, 2011, at 4:56 PM, Acee Lindem wrote: > All, > This version addresses Vladica's and Paul's comments as well as specifyin= g the details for IANA OSPF Instance ID allocation. Please base your OSPF W= G last call review on this version. >=20 > Thanks, > Acee >=20 > Begin forwarded message: >=20 > From: "internet-drafts@ietf.org" > > Date: September 20, 2011 9:22:22 PM EDT > To: Acee Lindem > > Cc: Acee Lindem >, "sina@cisco.com" >, "akr@cisco.com" > > Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ospf-multi-instance-05.t= xt >=20 > A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-ospf-multi-instance-05.txt has been succ= essfully submitted by Acee Lindem and posted to the IETF repository. >=20 > Filename: draft-ietf-ospf-multi-instance > Revision: 05 > Title: OSPF Multi-Instance Extensions > Creation date: 2011-09-20 > WG ID: ospf > Number of pages: 13 >=20 > Abstract: > OSPFv3 includes a mechanism for supporting multiple instances on the > same link. OSPFv2 could benefit from such a mechanism in order to > support multiple routing domains on the same subnet. The OSPFv2 > instance ID is reserved for support of separate OSPFv2 protocol > instances. This is different from OSPFv3 where it could be used for > other purposes such as putting the same link in multiple areas. > OSPFv2 supports this capability using a separate subnet or the OSPF > multi-area adjacency capability. >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > The IETF Secretariat >=20 > _______________________________________________ > OSPF mailing list > OSPF@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf From thiruma.thirug@gmail.com Sat Oct 29 10:04:51 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7EC621F84AC for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 10:04:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QFz4z3k8TRgz for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 10:04:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vw0-f44.google.com (mail-vw0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EA7F21F84A6 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 10:04:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by vws5 with SMTP id 5so4898377vws.31 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 10:04:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=EDENY5+uco/mOMonnU8REkklm5fhnKVboHwJE9deq+k=; b=vIgiTgpoW9+Gm5bvBG3Y46zQ8fRgC9hw7fVuBevPoAdOA4Vey2H4VK50mOd93drkue C42Bf2YrkDrQQYyHHIdcRAXSCGPZCdu6+GH1UcqpNg3LcIDH0hrfIeIvr8CQ9+eLBcJg 8Q4kDWKu9B1anbjSkJHYOgy3Ad9f0aFcqTcpk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.64.169 with SMTP id p9mr1731708vds.99.1319907889547; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 10:04:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.183.101 with HTTP; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 10:04:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 22:34:49 +0530 Message-ID: From: thiruma valavan To: ospf@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3079b74ce4894b04b07300f1 Subject: Re: [OSPF] OSPF Digest, Vol 68, Issue 8 X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 17:04:51 -0000 --20cf3079b74ce4894b04b07300f1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi OSPF group members, Is this the objective of using Instance Id in OSPFv2. Instance id will be used If interface having more than one addresses, so we need to configure different subnets in router interface (Using secondary address cli command). So we can connect multiple areas on single link, No need different physical connection for each area. Thanks, Thiru On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:30 AM, wrote: > If you have received this digest without all the individual message > attachments you will need to update your digest options in your list > subscription. To do so, go to > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf > > Click the 'Unsubscribe or edit options' button, log in, and set "Get > MIME or Plain Text Digests?" to MIME. You can set this option > globally for all the list digests you receive at this point. > > > > Send OSPF mailing list submissions to > ospf@ietf.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > ospf-request@ietf.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > ospf-owner@ietf.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of OSPF digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. New Version Notification - > draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-08.txt (Acee Lindem) > 2. Re: New Version Notification - > draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-08.txt (Acee Lindem) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:48:42 -0400 > From: Acee Lindem > To: OSPF List > Subject: [OSPF] New Version Notification - > draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-08.txt > Message-ID: <21C419E2-D51A-40FD-816B-4DC3D2BD98AB@ericsson.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > This version includes changes in response to the external reviews that have > taken place since we completed WG last call. A few things have been > clarified and the following two items have been added: > > 1. Mitigation of Cross Protocol Attacks by appending a protocol specific > byte to the key. This will prevent replay attacks when the same key is used > by multiple protocols (and the sets of valid input packets intercept). See > sections 4.4 and 4.5. > > 2. Recommendations for authentication key selection have been added to > the "Security Considerations". See section 6. > > Links to be the new version and a nicely annotated diff with the previous > version are included in the forwarded E-mail below. > > Thanks, > Acee > > > > > Begin forwarded message: > > From: "internet-drafts@ietf.org" < > internet-drafts@ietf.org> > Date: October 26, 2011 6:19:35 PM EDT > To: "ospf-chairs@tools.ietf.org" < > ospf-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, " > draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3@tools.ietf.org draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3@tools.ietf.org>" < > draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3@tools.ietf.org draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3@tools.ietf.org>>, "stbryant@cisco.com > " >> > Subject: New Version Notification - > draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-08.txt > > New version (-08) has been submitted for > draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-08.txt. > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-08.txt > > > Diff from previous version: > http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-08 > > IETF Secretariat. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:53:33 -0400 > From: Acee Lindem > Cc: OSPF List > Subject: Re: [OSPF] New Version Notification - > draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-08.txt > Message-ID: <0CE91E74-8EFF-45FE-B241-BF0012B5E0F3@ericsson.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > > Of course, I meant "intersect" rather than "intercept" below. In other > words, a packet from one protocol could potentially also represent a valid > packet in another protocol and be replayed. > Thanks, > Acee > > On Oct 26, 2011, at 7:48 PM, Acee Lindem wrote: > > > This version includes changes in response to the external reviews that > have taken place since we completed WG last call. A few things have been > clarified and the following two items have been added: > > > > 1. Mitigation of Cross Protocol Attacks by appending a protocol > specific byte to the key. This will prevent replay attacks when the same key > is used by multiple protocols (and the sets of valid input packets > intercept). See sections 4.4 and 4.5. > > > > 2. Recommendations for authentication key selection have been added to > the "Security Considerations". See section 6. > > > > Links to be the new version and a nicely annotated diff with the previous > version are included in the forwarded E-mail below. > > > > Thanks, > > Acee > > > > > > > > > > Begin forwarded message: > > > > From: "internet-drafts@ietf.org" < > internet-drafts@ietf.org> > > Date: October 26, 2011 6:19:35 PM EDT > > To: "ospf-chairs@tools.ietf.org" < > ospf-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, " > draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3@tools.ietf.org draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3@tools.ietf.org>" < > draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3@tools.ietf.org draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3@tools.ietf.org>>, "stbryant@cisco.com > " >> > > Subject: New Version Notification - > draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-08.txt > > > > New version (-08) has been submitted for > draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-08.txt. > > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-08.txt > > > > > > Diff from previous version: > > > http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-08 > > > > IETF Secretariat. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OSPF mailing list > > OSPF@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > OSPF mailing list > OSPF@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf > > > End of OSPF Digest, Vol 68, Issue 8 > *********************************** > --20cf3079b74ce4894b04b07300f1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi OSPF group members,

=A0

Is this the objective of using Instance Id in OSP= Fv2.

=A0

Instance id will be used If interface having more= than one addresses, so we need to configure different subnets in router interface (U= sing secondary address cli command).

=A0

So we can connect multiple areas on single link, = No need different physical connection for each area.

=A0

Thanks,
Thiru

On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:30 = AM, <ospf-re= quest@ietf.org> wrote:
If you have received this digest without all t= he individual message
attachments you will need to update your digest options in your list
subscription. =A0To do so, go to

ht= tps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

Click the 'Unsubscribe or edit options' button, log in, and set &qu= ot;Get
MIME or Plain Text Digests?" to MIME. =A0You can set this option
globally for all the list digests you receive at this point.



Send OSPF mailing list submissions to
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0ospf@ietf.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0ospf-request@ietf.= org

You can reach the person managing the list at
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0ospf-owner@ietf.org<= /a>

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of OSPF digest..."


Today's Topics:

=A0 1. =A0New Version Notification -
=A0 =A0 =A0draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-08.txt (Acee Lindem)
=A0 2. Re: =A0New Version Notification -
=A0 =A0 =A0draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-08.txt (Acee Lindem)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:48:42 -0400
From: Acee Lindem <acee.lind= em@ericsson.com>
To: OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org> Subject: [OSPF] New Version Notification -
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-08.txt
Message-ID: <21C419E2-D51A-40FD-816B-4DC3D2BD98AB@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"us-ascii"

This version includes changes in response to the external reviews that have= taken place since we completed WG last call. A few things have been clarif= ied and the following two items have been added:

=A0 =A01. Mitigation of Cross Protocol Attacks by appending a protocol spe= cific byte to the key. This will prevent replay attacks when the same key i= s used by multiple protocols (and the sets of valid input packets intercept= ). See sections 4.4 and 4.5.

=A0 =A02. Recommendations for authentication key selection have been added= to the "Security Considerations". =A0See section 6.

Links to be the new version and a nicely annotated diff with the previous v= ersion are included in the forwarded E-mail below.

Thanks,
Acee




Begin forwarded message:

From: "internet-drafts@iet= f.org<mailto:internet-dr= afts@ietf.org>" <internet-drafts@ietf.org<mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>>
Date: October 26, 2011 6:19:35 PM EDT
To: "ospf-chairs@tools.i= etf.org<mailto:ospf-ch= airs@tools.ietf.org>" <ospf-chairs@tools.ietf.org<mailto:ospf-chairs@tools.ietf.org>>, "draft-ietf-o= spf-auth-trailer-ospfv3@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-ospf-auth-traile= r-ospfv3@tools.ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3@to= ols.ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3@tools.ietf.org>>, "stbryant@cisco.com<mailto:stbryant@cisco.com&g= t;" <stbryant@cisco.com&l= t;mailto:stbryant@cisco.com>&g= t;
Subject: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-08.= txt

New version (-08) has been submitted for draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv= 3-08.txt.
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft= -ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-08.txt


Diff from previous version:
http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-i= etf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-08

IETF Secretariat.



------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:53:33 -0400
From: Acee Lindem <acee.lind= em@ericsson.com>
Cc: OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [OSPF] New Version Notification -
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-08.txt
Message-ID: <0CE91E74-8EFF-45FE-B241-BF0012B5E0F3@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"us-ascii"


Of course, I meant "intersect" rather than "intercept" = below. In other words, a packet from one protocol could potentially also re= present a valid packet in another protocol and be replayed.
Thanks,
Acee

On Oct 26, 2011, at 7:48 PM, Acee Lindem wrote:

> This version includes changes in response to the external reviews that= have taken place since we completed WG last call. A few things have been c= larified and the following two items have been added:
>
> =A0 =A01. Mitigation of Cross Protocol Attacks by appending a protocol= specific byte to the key. This will prevent replay attacks when the same k= ey is used by multiple protocols (and the sets of valid input packets inter= cept). See sections 4.4 and 4.5.
>
> =A0 =A02. Recommendations for authentication key selection have been a= dded to the "Security Considerations". =A0See section 6.
>
> Links to be the new version and a nicely annotated diff with the previ= ous version are included in the forwarded E-mail below.
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
>
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: "internet-draft= s@ietf.org<mailto:intern= et-drafts@ietf.org>" <internet-drafts@ietf.org<mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>>
> Date: October 26, 2011 6:19:35 PM EDT
> To: "ospf-chairs@to= ols.ietf.org<mailto:os= pf-chairs@tools.ietf.org>" <ospf-chairs@tools.ietf.org<mailto:ospf-chairs@tools.ietf.org>>, "draft-ie= tf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-ospf-auth-tr= ailer-ospfv3@tools.ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv= 3@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3@tools.ietf.or= g>>, "stbryant@cisco.c= om<mailto:stbryant@cisco.com>" <stbryant@cisco.com<mailto:stbryant@cisco.com&g= t;>
> Subject: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv= 3-08.txt
>
> New version (-08) has been submitted for draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-= ospfv3-08.txt.
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/= draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-08.txt
>
>
> Diff from previous version:
> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddr= aft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-08
>
> IETF Secretariat.
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf



------------------------------

_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF@ietf.org
ht= tps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf


End of OSPF Digest, Vol 68, Issue 8
***********************************

--20cf3079b74ce4894b04b07300f1-- From acee.lindem@ericsson.com Sat Oct 29 10:36:00 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 867CB21F85D1 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 10:36:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.488 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.488 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.111, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KR4JirYaTK0V for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 10:35:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imr4.ericy.com (imr4.ericy.com [198.24.6.9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E80F21F85C7 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 10:35:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eusaamw0707.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.32]) by imr4.ericy.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id p9THZtIC015852; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 12:35:56 -0500 Received: from EUSAACMS0702.eamcs.ericsson.se ([169.254.2.215]) by eusaamw0707.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.32]) with mapi; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 13:35:50 -0400 From: Acee Lindem To: thiruma valavan Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 13:35:47 -0400 Thread-Topic: [OSPF] OSPF Digest, Vol 68, Issue 8 Thread-Index: AcyWYTLohJ+jrzTQQ5OAmV7W/NXpvw== Message-ID: <2EE3C4F7-25D0-4747-9966-1DFBC9CEF86A@ericsson.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "ospf@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [OSPF] OSPF Digest, Vol 68, Issue 8 X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 17:36:00 -0000 Hi Thiru, You are not precluded from using the OSPFv2 Instance ID for this purpose. H= owever, we already have RFC 5185 to allow a single interface to be in multi= ple areas (note that no secondary IP address is necessary): http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5185.txt The primary application is supporting multiple OSPF instances using the sam= e link. One application is OSPF Transport Instance: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ospf-transport-instance-07.txt Thanks, Acee On Oct 29, 2011, at 1:04 PM, thiruma valavan wrote: Hi OSPF group members, Is this the objective of using Instance Id in OSPFv2. Instance id will be used If interface having more than one addresses, so we= need to configure different subnets in router interface (Using secondary a= ddress cli command). So we can connect multiple areas on single link, No need different physical= connection for each area. Thanks, Thiru On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:30 AM, > wrote: If you have received this digest without all the individual message attachments you will need to update your digest options in your list subscription. To do so, go to https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf Click the 'Unsubscribe or edit options' button, log in, and set "Get MIME or Plain Text Digests?" to MIME. You can set this option globally for all the list digests you receive at this point. Send OSPF mailing list submissions to ospf@ietf.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to ospf-request@ietf.org You can reach the person managing the list at ospf-owner@ietf.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of OSPF digest..." Today's Topics: 1. New Version Notification - draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-08.txt (Acee Lindem) 2. Re: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-08.txt (Acee Lindem) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:48:42 -0400 From: Acee Lindem > To: OSPF List > Subject: [OSPF] New Version Notification - draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-08.txt Message-ID: <21C419E2-D51A-40FD-816B-4DC3D2BD98AB@ericsson.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"us-ascii" This version includes changes in response to the external reviews that have= taken place since we completed WG last call. A few things have been clarif= ied and the following two items have been added: 1. Mitigation of Cross Protocol Attacks by appending a protocol specific= byte to the key. This will prevent replay attacks when the same key is use= d by multiple protocols (and the sets of valid input packets intercept). Se= e sections 4.4 and 4.5. 2. Recommendations for authentication key selection have been added to t= he "Security Considerations". See section 6. Links to be the new version and a nicely annotated diff with the previous v= ersion are included in the forwarded E-mail below. Thanks, Acee Begin forwarded message: From: "internet-drafts@ietf.org>" >> Date: October 26, 2011 6:19:35 PM EDT To: "ospf-chairs@tools.ietf.org>" >>, "draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trail= er-ospfv3@tools.ietf.org>" >>, "stbryant@cisco.= com>" >> Subject: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-08.= txt New version (-08) has been submitted for draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv= 3-08.txt. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-08.= txt Diff from previous version: http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-08 IETF Secretariat. ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:53:33 -0400 From: Acee Lindem > Cc: OSPF List > Subject: Re: [OSPF] New Version Notification - draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-08.txt Message-ID: <0CE91E74-8EFF-45FE-B241-BF0012B5E0F3@ericsson.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"us-ascii" Of course, I meant "intersect" rather than "intercept" below. In other word= s, a packet from one protocol could potentially also represent a valid pack= et in another protocol and be replayed. Thanks, Acee On Oct 26, 2011, at 7:48 PM, Acee Lindem wrote: > This version includes changes in response to the external reviews that ha= ve taken place since we completed WG last call. A few things have been clar= ified and the following two items have been added: > > 1. Mitigation of Cross Protocol Attacks by appending a protocol specif= ic byte to the key. This will prevent replay attacks when the same key is u= sed by multiple protocols (and the sets of valid input packets intercept). = See sections 4.4 and 4.5. > > 2. Recommendations for authentication key selection have been added to= the "Security Considerations". See section 6. > > Links to be the new version and a nicely annotated diff with the previous= version are included in the forwarded E-mail below. > > Thanks, > Acee > > > > > Begin forwarded message: > > From: "internet-drafts@ietf.org>" >> > Date: October 26, 2011 6:19:35 PM EDT > To: "ospf-chairs@tools.ietf.org>" >>, "draft-ietf-ospf-auth-tra= iler-ospfv3@tools.ietf.org>" >>, "stbryant@cisc= o.com>" >> > Subject: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-0= 8.txt > > New version (-08) has been submitted for draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-osp= fv3-08.txt. > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-0= 8.txt > > > Diff from previous version: > http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-= 08 > > IETF Secretariat. > > _______________________________________________ > OSPF mailing list > OSPF@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list OSPF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf End of OSPF Digest, Vol 68, Issue 8 *********************************** _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list OSPF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf From zhangfatai@huawei.com Sun Oct 30 20:04:59 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 023D711E8085 for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 20:04:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.05 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.05 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.655, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zwSbZQsYVOz7 for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 20:04:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.64]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85A3921F8BDC for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 20:04:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from huawei.com (szxga05-in [172.24.2.49]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LTW004RETW53P@szxga05-in.huawei.com> for ospf@ietf.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:04:53 +0800 (CST) Received: from szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LTW002F4TW2VF@szxga05-in.huawei.com> for ospf@ietf.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:04:53 +0800 (CST) Received: from szxeml203-edg.china.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.1.9-GA) with ESMTP id AEP19900; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:04:52 +0800 Received: from SZXEML412-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.91) by szxeml203-edg.china.huawei.com (172.24.2.55) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.270.1; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:04:51 +0800 Received: from SZXEML520-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.196]) by szxeml412-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.91]) with mapi id 14.01.0270.001; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:04:45 +0800 Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 03:04:44 +0000 From: Zhangfatai In-reply-to: <8CFA0F99-827E-48E8-BF5F-C45C590043A6@ericsson.com> X-Originating-IP: [10.70.76.157] To: Acee Lindem , OSPF List Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_GPaX4tX01eaK8SBHPjyU/Q)" Content-language: en-US Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Thread-topic: [OSPF] OSPF TE Extensions for Delay, Loss, and Jitter (formerly known as OSPF Express Path) Thread-index: AcyC3uDJn/lsnpOZQgO2hu6O0xKxYAUmEuYA X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected References: <8CFA0F99-827E-48E8-BF5F-C45C590043A6@ericsson.com> Subject: Re: [OSPF] OSPF TE Extensions for Delay, Loss, and Jitter (formerly known as OSPF Express Path) X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 03:04:59 -0000 --Boundary_(ID_GPaX4tX01eaK8SBHPjyU/Q) Content-type: text/plain; charset=gb2312 Content-transfer-encoding: base64 SGkgdGhlIGF1dGhvcnMgYW5kIGFsbCwNCg0KDQoNClNvbWUgY29tbWVudHMgZm9yIGNsYXJpZmlj YXRpb246DQoNCg0KDQooMSkgICAgIEhvdyB0byBtZWFzdXJlIHRoZSBsaW5rIGRlbGF5LCBsb3Nz oa0gYmVmb3JlIHRoZSBMU1AgaXMgY3JlYXRlZD8gV2Uga25vdyB0aGF0IHRoZSBleGlzdGluZyBt ZWNoYW5pc21zIGZvciB0aGUgbWVhc3VyZW1lbnQgKGRlbGF5LCBsb3Nzoa0pIGFyZSBiYXNlZCBv biBpbi1zZXJ2aWNlLg0KDQoNCg0KKDIpICAgICBXaHkgbm90IHRha2UgaW50byBhY2NvdW50IHRo ZSBub2RlIGRlbGF5LCBsb3NzPyBIb3cgbXVjaCBwZXJjZW50YWdlIGJldHdlZW4gdGhlIG5vZGUg ZGVsYXkgYW5kIGxpbmsgZGVsYXk/DQoNCg0KDQooMykgICAgIEhvdyBtdWNoIGRpZmZlcmVudCBi ZXR3ZWVuIHRoZSBjb21wb25lbnQgbGlua3MgZm9yIHRoZSBkZWxheSBvciBsb3NzPyBIb3cgdG8g YWR2ZXJ0aXNlIHRoZSBURSBsaW5rcyBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbiB3aGVuIHRoZXJlIGlzIG11Y2ggZGlm ZmVyZW50IGJldHdlZW4gdGhlIGNvbXBvbmVudCBsaW5rcz8NCg0KDQoNCig0KSAgICAgSG93IG11 Y2ggZGlmZmVyZW5jZSBiZXR3ZWVuIHRoZSBsaW5rcyAobm90IG9ubHkgdGhlIGNvbXBvbmVudCBs aW5rcyBiZXR3ZWVuIHRoZSBzYW1lIGVuZHMpIGluIHRoZSBuZXR3b3Jrcz8gSSBtZWFuIGlmIHRo ZXJlIGlzIG5vdCBtdWNoIGRpZmZlcmVudCAodGhleSBjb3VsZCBiZSBhcHByb3hpbWF0ZSksIHRo ZSBlbmQtdG8tZW5kIGRlbGF5IGNhbiBiZSBzaW1waWx5IGNhY3VsYXRlZCBhcyChsG51bWJlciBv ZiB0aGUgaG9wcyAqIGRlbGF5IChhcHByb3hpbWF0ZSBjb25zdGFudCB2YWx1ZSBpbiB0aGUgbmV0 d29yaymhsS4NCg0KDQoNCig1KSAgICAgQ2FuIHRoaXMgcm91dGluZyBleHRlbnNpb25zIGFsc28g YmUgdXNlZCBpbiBHTVBMUyBuZXR3b3JrcyAoZS5nLiwgVERNIG5ldHdvcmsgb3IgV1NPTik/DQoN Cg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KVGhhbmtzDQoNCg0KDQpGYXRhaQ0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCi0tLS0tT3JpZ2lu YWwgTWVzc2FnZS0tLS0tDQpGcm9tOiBvc3BmLWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmcgW21haWx0bzpvc3Bm LWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmddIE9uIEJlaGFsZiBPZiBBY2VlIExpbmRlbQ0KU2VudDogMjAxMcTq MTDUwjXI1SA1OjQ1DQpUbzogT1NQRiBMaXN0DQpTdWJqZWN0OiBbT1NQRl0gT1NQRiBURSBFeHRl bnNpb25zIGZvciBEZWxheSwgTG9zcywgYW5kIEppdHRlciAoZm9ybWVybHkga25vd24gYXMgT1NQ RiBFeHByZXNzIFBhdGgpDQoNCg0KDQpXZSd2ZSBkaXNjdXNzZWQgdGhpcyBkcmFmdCBhdCB0aGUg bGFzdCB0d28gSUVURnMgYW5kIHRoZXJlIHNlZW1lZCB0byBiZSBpbnRlcmVzdC4gV2UgYmVsaWV2 ZSB3ZSBzb3J0ZWQgb3V0IHRoZSBwb3NpdGlvbmluZy9vdmVybGFwIHdpdGggdGhlIE1QTFMgYW5k IENDQU1QIFdHcyBhbmQgYXJlIG5vdyByZWFkeSB0byBhY2NlcHQgaXQgYXMgYSBXRyBkb2N1bWVu dC4NCg0KRG9lcyBhbnlvbmUgaGF2ZSBhbnkgb2JqZWN0aW9ucz8NCg0KDQoNCkhlcmUgaXMgYSBs aW5rIHRvIHRoZSBjdXJyZW50IGRyYWZ0OiBodHRwOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL2lkL2RyYWZ0LWdp YWNhbG9uZS1vc3BmLXRlLWV4cHJlc3MtcGF0aC0wMi50eHQNCg0KDQoNClRoYW5rcywNCg0KQWNl ZSBhbmQgQWJoYXkNCg0KX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX18NCg0KT1NQRiBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QNCg0KT1NQRkBpZXRmLm9yZw0KDQpodHRwczovL3d3 dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL29zcGYNCg== --Boundary_(ID_GPaX4tX01eaK8SBHPjyU/Q) Content-type: text/html; charset=gb2312 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

Hi the authors and all,=

 

Some comments for clarificat= ion:

 

(= 1)   =   How to measure the link= delay, loss=A1=AD before the LSP is created? We= know that the existing mechanisms for the measurement (delay, loss=A1=AD) are based on in-service.

 

(= 2)   =   Why not take into accou= nt the node delay, loss? How much percentage between the node delay and lin= k delay?

 =

(= 3)   =   How much different betw= een the component links for the delay or loss? How to advertise the TE link= s information when there is much different between the component links?

 =

(= 4)   =   How much difference bet= ween the links (not only the component links between the same ends) in the = networks? I mean if there is not much different (they could be approximate)= , the end-to-end delay can be simpily caculated as =A1=B0number of the hops * delay (= approximate constant value in the network)=A1=B1= .

 =

(= 5)   =   Can this routing extens= ions also be used in GMPLS networks (e.g., TDM network or WSON)?=

 

 

 

 

Thanks

 

Fatai

 

 

-----Original Message----- From: ospf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ace= e Lindem
Sent: 2011=C4=EA10=D4=C25= =C8=D5 5:45
To: OSPF List
Subject: [OSPF] OSPF TE Extensions for Delay, Loss, and Jitter (formerly kn= own as OSPF Express Path)

 

We've discussed this draft a= t the last two IETFs and there seemed to be interest. We believe we sorted = out the positioning/overlap with the MPLS and CCAMP WGs and are now ready t= o accept it as a WG document.

Does anyone have any objecti= ons?

 

Here is a link to the curren= t draft: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-giacalone-ospf-te-express-path-02.txt=

 

Thanks,

Acee and Abhay

____________________________= ___________________

OSPF mailing list=

OSPF@ietf.org

https://www.ietf.org/mailman= /listinfo/ospf

--Boundary_(ID_GPaX4tX01eaK8SBHPjyU/Q)-- From acee.lindem@ericsson.com Mon Oct 31 09:14:46 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 935C421F8CF2; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:14:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.497 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.101, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rcum1QbxkJKn; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:14:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imr4.ericy.com (imr4.ericy.com [198.24.6.9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABB9821F853E; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:14:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eusaamw0706.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.31]) by imr4.ericy.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id p9VGEGhC014213; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:14:22 -0500 Received: from EUSAACMS0702.eamcs.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.105]) by eusaamw0706.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.31]) with mapi; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:14:10 -0400 From: Acee Lindem To: "ospf-ads@tools.ietf.org" Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:14:08 -0400 Thread-Topic: Request for publication of OSPF Multi-Instance Extensions - draft-ietf-ospf-multi-instance-06.txt Thread-Index: AcyX6B9k1ii5zlFgReubLzmqirwPGw== Message-ID: <88C26728-BB4A-4351-BC8D-190E6D5D398B@ericsson.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_003_88C26728BB4A4351BC8D190E6D5D398Bericssoncom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: OSPF List , IETF Secretariat Subject: [OSPF] Request for publication of OSPF Multi-Instance Extensions - draft-ietf-ospf-multi-instance-06.txt X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:14:46 -0000 --_003_88C26728BB4A4351BC8D190E6D5D398Bericssoncom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The OSPF WG requests publication for OSPF Multi-Instance Extensions - draft= -ietf-ospf-multi-instance-06.txt. The document shepherd write-up is attached. Thanks, Acee --_003_88C26728BB4A4351BC8D190E6D5D398Bericssoncom_ Content-Type: text/plain; name="ospf-multi-instance-doc-shep.txt" Content-Description: ospf-multi-instance-doc-shep.txt Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="ospf-multi-instance-doc-shep.txt"; size=7914; creation-date="Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:14:10 GMT"; modification-date="Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:14:10 GMT" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 ICAoMS5hKSBXaG8gaXMgdGhlIERvY3VtZW50IFNoZXBoZXJkIGZvciB0aGlzIGRvY3VtZW50PyBI YXMgdGhlDQ0KICAgICAgICBEb2N1bWVudCBTaGVwaGVyZCBwZXJzb25hbGx5IHJldmlld2VkIHRo aXMgdmVyc2lvbiBvZiB0aGUgDQ0KICAgICAgICBkb2N1bWVudCBhbmQsIGluIHBhcnRpY3VsYXIs IGRvZXMgaGUgb3Igc2hlIGJlbGlldmUgdGhpcyANDQogICAgICAgIHZlcnNpb24gaXMgcmVhZHkg Zm9yIGZvcndhcmRpbmcgdG8gdGhlIElFU0cgZm9yIHB1YmxpY2F0aW9uPyANDQoNDQogICAgICAg IE1hbmF2IEJoYXRpYSwgWWVzDQ0KDQ0KICAoMS5iKSBIYXMgdGhlIGRvY3VtZW50IGhhZCBhZGVx dWF0ZSByZXZpZXcgYm90aCBmcm9tIGtleSBXRyBtZW1iZXJzIA0NCiAgICAgICAgYW5kIGZyb20g a2V5IG5vbi1XRyBtZW1iZXJzPyBEb2VzIHRoZSBEb2N1bWVudCBTaGVwaGVyZCBoYXZlIA0NCiAg ICAgICAgYW55IGNvbmNlcm5zIGFib3V0IHRoZSBkZXB0aCBvciBicmVhZHRoIG9mIHRoZSByZXZp ZXdzIHRoYXQgDQ0KICAgICAgICBoYXZlIGJlZW4gcGVyZm9ybWVkPyAgDQ0KDQ0KCVllcywgTm8N DQoNDQogICgxLmMpIERvZXMgdGhlIERvY3VtZW50IFNoZXBoZXJkIGhhdmUgY29uY2VybnMgdGhh dCB0aGUgZG9jdW1lbnQgDQ0KICAgICAgICBuZWVkcyBtb3JlIHJldmlldyBmcm9tIGEgcGFydGlj dWxhciBvciBicm9hZGVyIHBlcnNwZWN0aXZlLCANDQogICAgICAgIGUuZy4sIHNlY3VyaXR5LCBv cGVyYXRpb25hbCBjb21wbGV4aXR5LCBzb21lb25lIGZhbWlsaWFyIHdpdGggDQ0KICAgICAgICBB QUEsIGludGVybmF0aW9uYWxpemF0aW9uIG9yIFhNTD8gDQ0KDQ0KCU5vDQ0KDQ0KICAoMS5kKSBE b2VzIHRoZSBEb2N1bWVudCBTaGVwaGVyZCBoYXZlIGFueSBzcGVjaWZpYyBjb25jZXJucyBvciAN DQogICAgICAgIGlzc3VlcyB3aXRoIHRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQgdGhhdCB0aGUgUmVzcG9uc2libGUg QXJlYSBEaXJlY3Rvcg0NCiAgICAgICAgYW5kL29yIHRoZSBJRVNHIHNob3VsZCBiZSBhd2FyZSBv Zj8gRm9yIGV4YW1wbGUsIHBlcmhhcHMgaGUgDQ0KICAgICAgICBvciBzaGUgaXMgdW5jb21mb3J0 YWJsZSB3aXRoIGNlcnRhaW4gcGFydHMgb2YgdGhlIGRvY3VtZW50LCBvciANDQogICAgICAgIGhh cyBjb25jZXJucyB3aGV0aGVyIHRoZXJlIHJlYWxseSBpcyBhIG5lZWQgZm9yIGl0LiBJbiBhbnkg DQ0KICAgICAgICBldmVudCwgaWYgdGhlIFdHIGhhcyBkaXNjdXNzZWQgdGhvc2UgaXNzdWVzIGFu ZCBoYXMgaW5kaWNhdGVkIA0NCiAgICAgICAgdGhhdCBpdCBzdGlsbCB3aXNoZXMgdG8gYWR2YW5j ZSB0aGUgZG9jdW1lbnQsIGRldGFpbCB0aG9zZSANDQogICAgICAgIGNvbmNlcm5zIGhlcmUuIEhh cyBhbiBJUFIgZGlzY2xvc3VyZSByZWxhdGVkIHRvIHRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQgDQ0KICAgICAgICBi ZWVuIGZpbGVkPyBJZiBzbywgcGxlYXNlIGluY2x1ZGUgYSByZWZlcmVuY2UgdG8gdGhlIA0NCiAg ICAgICAgZGlzY2xvc3VyZSBhbmQgc3VtbWFyaXplIHRoZSBXRyBkaXNjdXNzaW9uIGFuZCBjb25j bHVzaW9uIG9uIA0NCiAgICAgICAgdGhpcyBpc3N1ZS4gDQ0KDQ0KCU5vDQ0KDQ0KICAoMS5lKSBI b3cgc29saWQgaXMgdGhlIFdHIGNvbnNlbnN1cyBiZWhpbmQgdGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudD8gRG9lcyBp dCANDQogICAgICAgIHJlcHJlc2VudCB0aGUgc3Ryb25nIGNvbmN1cnJlbmNlIG9mIGEgZmV3IGlu ZGl2aWR1YWxzLCB3aXRoIA0NCiAgICAgICAgb3RoZXJzIGJlaW5nIHNpbGVudCwgb3IgZG9lcyB0 aGUgV0cgYXMgYSB3aG9sZSB1bmRlcnN0YW5kIGFuZCANDQogICAgICAgIGFncmVlIHdpdGggaXQ/ ICAgDQ0KDQ0KCVRoaXMgZHJhZnQgaXMgZGVzY3JpYmluZyBhIG1lY2hhbmlzbSB0byBzdXBwb3J0 IG11bHRpcGxlDQ0KICAgICAgICByb3V0aW5nIGRvbWFpbnMgb24gdGhlIHNhbWUgc3VibmV0LCBh IG1lY2hhbmlzbSB0aGF0IGFscmVhZHkNDQogICAgICAgIGV4aXN0cyBpbiBPU1BGdjMuIEl0IG1v ZGlmaWVzIHRoZSBPU1BGIHBhY2tldCBoZWFkZXIgYW5kIHRha2VzDQ0KICAgICAgICA4IGJpdHMg ZnJvbSB0aGUgMTYgYml0cyBvZiBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBUeXBlIHRvIGluZGljYXRlIHRoZSAN DQogICAgICAgIEluc3RhbmNlIElELiBUaGUgbWVjaGFuaXNtIGRlc2NyaWJlZCBpbiB0aGlzIGRy YWZ0IGlzIGJhY2t3YXJkDQ0KICAgICAgICBjb21wYXRpYmxlIHdpdGggcm91dGVycyB0aGF0IGNh bm5vdCBzdXBwb3J0IG11bHRpcGxlIGluc3RhbmNlcy4NDQoNDQoJVGhlcmUgaXMgc3Ryb25nIGNv bnNlbnN1cyBpbiB0aGUgV0cgYmVoaW5kIHRoaXMgZHJhZnQuDQ0KDQ0KICAoMS5mKSBIYXMgYW55 b25lIHRocmVhdGVuZWQgYW4gYXBwZWFsIG9yIG90aGVyd2lzZSBpbmRpY2F0ZWQgZXh0cmVtZSAN DQogICAgICAgIGRpc2NvbnRlbnQ/IElmIHNvLCBwbGVhc2Ugc3VtbWFyaXNlIHRoZSBhcmVhcyBv ZiBjb25mbGljdCBpbiANDQogICAgICAgIHNlcGFyYXRlIGVtYWlsIG1lc3NhZ2VzIHRvIHRoZSBS ZXNwb25zaWJsZSBBcmVhIERpcmVjdG9yLiAoSXQgDQ0KICAgICAgICBzaG91bGQgYmUgaW4gYSBz ZXBhcmF0ZSBlbWFpbCBiZWNhdXNlIHRoaXMgcXVlc3Rpb25uYWlyZSBpcyANDQogICAgICAgIGVu dGVyZWQgaW50byB0aGUgSUQgVHJhY2tlci4pIA0NCg0NCglObw0NCg0NCiAgKDEuZykgSGFzIHRo ZSBEb2N1bWVudCBTaGVwaGVyZCBwZXJzb25hbGx5IHZlcmlmaWVkIHRoYXQgdGhlIA0NCiAgICAg ICAgZG9jdW1lbnQgc2F0aXNmaWVzIGFsbCBJRCBuaXRzPyAoU2VlIHRoZSBJbnRlcm5ldC1EcmFm dHMgQ2hlY2tsaXN0IA0NCiAgICAgICAgYW5kIGh0dHA6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy90b29scy9p ZG5pdHMvKS4gQm9pbGVycGxhdGUgY2hlY2tzIGFyZSANDQogICAgICAgIG5vdCBlbm91Z2g7IHRo aXMgY2hlY2sgbmVlZHMgdG8gYmUgdGhvcm91Z2guIEhhcyB0aGUgZG9jdW1lbnQgDQ0KICAgICAg ICBtZXQgYWxsIGZvcm1hbCByZXZpZXcgY3JpdGVyaWEgaXQgbmVlZHMgdG8sIHN1Y2ggYXMgdGhl IE1JQiANDQogICAgICAgIERvY3RvciwgbWVkaWEgdHlwZSBhbmQgVVJJIHR5cGUgcmV2aWV3cz8g DQ0KDQ0KCVllcw0NCiAgLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0NDQoNDQogIGlkbml0cyAyLjEy LjEyIA0NCg0NCiAgdG1wL2RyYWZ0LWlldGYtb3NwZi1tdWx0aS1pbnN0YW5jZS0wNi50eHQ6DQ0K DQ0KICBDaGVja2luZyBib2lsZXJwbGF0ZSByZXF1aXJlZCBieSBSRkMgNTM3OCBhbmQgdGhlIElF VEYgVHJ1c3QgKHNlZQ0NCiAgaHR0cDovL3RydXN0ZWUuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbGljZW5zZS1pbmZvKToN DQogIC0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0NDQoNDQogICAgIE5vIGlzc3VlcyBmb3VuZCBoZXJlLg0N Cg0NCiAgQ2hlY2tpbmcgbml0cyBhY2NvcmRpbmcgdG8gaHR0cDovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9pZC1p bmZvLzFpZC1ndWlkZWxpbmVzLnR4dDoNDQogIC0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0NDQoNDQogICAg IE5vIGlzc3VlcyBmb3VuZCBoZXJlLg0NCg0NCiAgQ2hlY2tpbmcgbml0cyBhY2NvcmRpbmcgdG8g aHR0cDovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9pZC1pbmZvL2NoZWNrbGlzdCA6DQ0KICAtLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tDQ0KDQ0KICAtLSBUaGUgZHJhZnQgaGVhZGVyIGluZGljYXRlcyB0aGF0IHRoaXMgZG9j dW1lbnQgdXBkYXRlcyBSRkMyMzI4LCBidXQgdGhlDQ0KICAgICBhYnN0cmFjdCBkb2Vzbid0IHNl ZW0gdG8gbWVudGlvbiB0aGlzLCB3aGljaCBpdCBzaG91bGQuDQ0KDQ0KDQ0KICBNaXNjZWxsYW5l b3VzIHdhcm5pbmdzOg0NCiAgLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLQ0NCg0NCiAgICAgTm8gaXNzdWVz IGZvdW5kIGhlcmUuDQ0KDQ0KICBDaGVja2luZyByZWZlcmVuY2VzIGZvciBpbnRlbmRlZCBzdGF0 dXM6IFByb3Bvc2VkIFN0YW5kYXJkDQ0KICAtLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tDQ0KDQ0KICAgICAo U2VlIFJGQ3MgMzk2NyBhbmQgNDg5NyBmb3IgaW5mb3JtYXRpb24gYWJvdXQgdXNpbmcgbm9ybWF0 aXZlIHJlZmVyZW5jZXMNDQogICAgIHRvIGxvd2VyLW1hdHVyaXR5IGRvY3VtZW50cyBpbiBSRkNz KQ0NCg0NCiAgICAgTm8gaXNzdWVzIGZvdW5kIGhlcmUuDQ0KDQ0KICAgICBTdW1tYXJ5OiAwIGVy cm9ycyAoKiopLCAwIHdhcm5pbmdzICg9PSksIDEgY29tbWVudCAoLS0pLg0NCg0NCiAgICAgUnVu IGlkbml0cyB3aXRoIHRoZSAtLXZlcmJvc2Ugb3B0aW9uIGZvciBtb3JlIGRldGFpbGVkIGluZm9y bWF0aW9uIGFib3V0DQ0KICAgICB0aGUgaXRlbXMgYWJvdmUuDQ0KICAtLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLQ0NCiAgDQ0KICAoMS5oKSBIYXMgdGhlIGRvY3VtZW50IHNwbGl0IGl0cyByZWZlcmVu Y2VzIGludG8gbm9ybWF0aXZlIGFuZCANDQogICAgICAgIGluZm9ybWF0aXZlPyBBcmUgdGhlcmUg bm9ybWF0aXZlIHJlZmVyZW5jZXMgdG8gZG9jdW1lbnRzIHRoYXQgDQ0KICAgICAgICBhcmUgbm90 IHJlYWR5IGZvciBhZHZhbmNlbWVudCBvciBhcmUgb3RoZXJ3aXNlIGluIGFuIHVuY2xlYXIgDQ0K ICAgICAgICBzdGF0ZT8gSWYgc3VjaCBub3JtYXRpdmUgcmVmZXJlbmNlcyBleGlzdCwgd2hhdCBp cyB0aGUgDQ0KICAgICAgICBzdHJhdGVneSBmb3IgdGhlaXIgY29tcGxldGlvbj8gQXJlIHRoZXJl IG5vcm1hdGl2ZSByZWZlcmVuY2VzIA0NCiAgICAgICAgdGhhdCBhcmUgZG93bndhcmQgcmVmZXJl bmNlcywgYXMgZGVzY3JpYmVkIGluIFtSRkMzOTY3XT8gSWYgDQ0KICAgICAgICBzbywgbGlzdCB0 aGVzZSBkb3dud2FyZCByZWZlcmVuY2VzIHRvIHN1cHBvcnQgdGhlIEFyZWEgDQ0KICAgICAgICBE aXJlY3RvciBpbiB0aGUgTGFzdCBDYWxsIHByb2NlZHVyZSBmb3IgdGhlbSBbUkZDMzk2N10uIA0N Cg0NCglZZXMsIE5vCQ0NCg0NCiAgKDEuaSkgSGFzIHRoZSBEb2N1bWVudCBTaGVwaGVyZCB2ZXJp ZmllZCB0aGF0IHRoZSBkb2N1bWVudCBJQU5BIA0NCiAgICAgICAgY29uc2lkZXJhdGlvbiBzZWN0 aW9uIGV4aXN0cyBhbmQgaXMgY29uc2lzdGVudCB3aXRoIHRoZSBib2R5IA0NCiAgICAgICAgb2Yg dGhlIGRvY3VtZW50PyBJZiB0aGUgZG9jdW1lbnQgc3BlY2lmaWVzIHByb3RvY29sIA0NCiAgICAg ICAgZXh0ZW5zaW9ucywgYXJlIHJlc2VydmF0aW9ucyByZXF1ZXN0ZWQgaW4gYXBwcm9wcmlhdGUg SUFOQSANDQogICAgICAgIHJlZ2lzdHJpZXM/IEFyZSB0aGUgSUFOQSByZWdpc3RyaWVzIGNsZWFy bHkgaWRlbnRpZmllZD8gSWYgDQ0KICAgICAgICB0aGUgZG9jdW1lbnQgY3JlYXRlcyBhIG5ldyBy ZWdpc3RyeSwgZG9lcyBpdCBkZWZpbmUgdGhlIA0NCiAgICAgICAgcHJvcG9zZWQgaW5pdGlhbCBj b250ZW50cyBvZiB0aGUgcmVnaXN0cnkgYW5kIGFuIGFsbG9jYXRpb24gDQ0KICAgICAgICBwcm9j ZWR1cmUgZm9yIGZ1dHVyZSByZWdpc3RyYXRpb25zPyBEb2VzIGl0IHN1Z2dlc3QgYSANDQogICAg ICAgIHJlYXNvbmFibGUgbmFtZSBmb3IgdGhlIG5ldyByZWdpc3RyeT8gU2VlIFtSRkM1MjI2XS4g SWYgdGhlIA0NCiAgICAgICAgZG9jdW1lbnQgZGVzY3JpYmVzIGFuIEV4cGVydCBSZXZpZXcgcHJv Y2VzcyBoYXMgU2hlcGhlcmQgDQ0KICAgICAgICBjb25mZXJyZWQgd2l0aCB0aGUgUmVzcG9uc2li bGUgQXJlYSBEaXJlY3RvciBzbyB0aGF0IHRoZSBJRVNHIA0NCiAgICAgICAgY2FuIGFwcG9pbnQg dGhlIG5lZWRlZCBFeHBlcnQgZHVyaW5nIHRoZSBJRVNHIEV2YWx1YXRpb24/IA0NCg0NCglZZXMg KHRvIGFsbCBxdWVzdGlvbnMgYWJvdmUpDQ0KCQ0NCiAgKDEuaikgSGFzIHRoZSBEb2N1bWVudCBT aGVwaGVyZCB2ZXJpZmllZCB0aGF0IHNlY3Rpb25zIG9mIHRoZSANDQogICAgICAgIGRvY3VtZW50 IHRoYXQgYXJlIHdyaXR0ZW4gaW4gYSBmb3JtYWwgbGFuZ3VhZ2UsIHN1Y2ggYXMgWE1MIA0NCiAg ICAgICAgY29kZSwgQk5GIHJ1bGVzLCBNSUIgZGVmaW5pdGlvbnMsIGV0Yy4sIHZhbGlkYXRlIGNv cnJlY3RseSBpbiANDQogICAgICAgIGFuIGF1dG9tYXRlZCBjaGVja2VyPyANDQoNDQoJWWVzDQ0K DQ0KICAoMS5rKSBUaGUgSUVTRyBhcHByb3ZhbCBhbm5vdW5jZW1lbnQgaW5jbHVkZXMgYSBEb2N1 bWVudCANDQogICAgICAgIEFubm91bmNlbWVudCBXcml0ZS1VcC4gUGxlYXNlIHByb3ZpZGUgc3Vj aCBhIERvY3VtZW50IA0NCiAgICAgICAgQW5ub3VuY2VtZW50IFdyaXRlLVVwPyBSZWNlbnQgZXhh bXBsZXMgY2FuIGJlIGZvdW5kIGluIHRoZQ0NCiAgICAgICAgIkFjdGlvbiIgYW5ub3VuY2VtZW50 cyBmb3IgYXBwcm92ZWQgZG9jdW1lbnRzLiBUaGUgYXBwcm92YWwgDQ0KICAgICAgICBhbm5vdW5j ZW1lbnQgY29udGFpbnMgdGhlIGZvbGxvd2luZyBzZWN0aW9uczogDQ0KDQ0KICAgICBUZWNobmlj YWwgU3VtbWFyeSANDQoNDQogICAgIFRoaXMgZHJhZnQgZXh0ZW5kcyBPU1BGdjIgdG8gc3VwcG9y dCBtdWx0aXBsZSByb3V0aW5nIGRvbWFpbnMNDQogICAgIG9uIHRoZSBzYW1lIHN1Ym5ldCAtIGEg Y2FwYWJpbGl0eSB0aGF0IGFscmVhZHkgZXhpc3RzIGluIE9TUEZ2My4NDQogICAgIFRoaXMgaXMg ZGlmZmVyZW50IGZyb20gT1NQRnYzIHdoZXJlIGl0IGNvdWxkIGJlIHVzZWQgZm9yDQ0KICAgICBv dGhlciBwdXJwb3NlcyBzdWNoIGFzIHB1dHRpbmcgdGhlIHNhbWUgaW50ZXJmYWNlIGluIG11bHRp cGxlIGFyZWFzLg0NCiAgICAgT1NQRnYyIHN1cHBvcnRzIHRoaXMgY2FwYWJpbGl0eSB1c2luZyBh IHNlcGFyYXRlIHN1Ym5ldCBvciB0aGUgT1NQRg0NCiAgICAgbXVsdGktYXJlYSBhZGphY2VuY3kg Y2FwYWJpbGl0eS4NDQoNDQogICAgIFdvcmtpbmcgR3JvdXAgU3VtbWFyeSANDQoNDQogICAgIFRo ZSBvbmx5IGRpc2N1c3Npb24gd29ydGggbm90aW5nIHdhcyB0aGUgYmVoYXZpb3Igb2YgDQ0KICAg ICBsZWdhY3kgcm91dGVycyByZWNlaXZpbmcgT1NQRiBwYWNrZXRzIHdpdGggbm9uLVplcm8gaW5z dGFuY2UgDQ0KICAgICBJRC4gSXQgd2FzIGNvbmNsdWRlZCB0aGF0IHRoZSBzdWNoIHBhY2tldHMg d291bGQgYmUgDQ0KICAgICBtaXNpbnRlcnByZXRlZCBhcyBoYXZpbmcgbWlzbWF0Y2hlZCBhdXRo ZW50aWNhdGlvbiB0eXBlDQ0KICAgICBhbmQgd291bGQgZ2V0IGRyb3BwZWQuIFN1Y2ggZXJyb3Jz IHNob3VsZCBnZXQgbG9nZ2VkIGFuZCANDQogICAgIHNob3VsZCByZXN1bHQgaW4gdGhlIGdlbmVy YXRpb24gb2YgU05NUCB0cmFwcy4gVGhlcmUgd2FzIA0NCiAgICAgY29uY2VybiB0aGF0IHRoaXMg Y291bGQgYmUgYW4gaXNzdWUgaWYgZXZlcnkgcGFja2V0IHdvdWxkDQ0KICAgICByZXN1bHQgaW4g U05NUCB0cmFwIGdlbmVyYXRpb24uIEhvd2V2ZXIsIGl0IHdhcyBkaXNjdXNzZWQgdGhhdA0NCiAg ICAgdGhpcyB3aWxsIG5vdCBiZSBhbiBpc3N1ZSBzaW5jZSBtb3N0IGltcGxlbWVudGF0aW9ucyB3 aWxsIGRhbXANDQogICAgIHRoZSBsb2dnaW5nIG9mIGVycm9ycyBhbmQgZ2VuZXJhdGlvbiBvZiBp ZGVudGljYWwgU05NUCB0cmFwcy4NDQogICAgIA0NCiANDQogICAgIERvY3VtZW50IFF1YWxpdHkg DQ0KDQ0KICAgICBUaGVyZSBpcyBvbmUga25vd24gaW1wbGVtZW50YXRpb24uDQ0K --_003_88C26728BB4A4351BC8D190E6D5D398Bericssoncom_ Content-Type: text/html; name="ATT00001.htm" Content-Description: ATT00001.htm Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="ATT00001.htm"; size=285; creation-date="Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:14:10 GMT"; modification-date="Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:14:10 GMT" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGh0bWw+PGhlYWQ+PC9oZWFkPjxib2R5IHN0eWxlPSJ3b3JkLXdyYXA6IGJyZWFrLXdvcmQ7IC13 ZWJraXQtbmJzcC1tb2RlOiBzcGFjZTsgLXdlYmtpdC1saW5lLWJyZWFrOiBhZnRlci13aGl0ZS1z cGFjZTsgIj48ZGl2Pjxmb250IGNsYXNzPSJBcHBsZS1zdHlsZS1zcGFuIiBmYWNlPSJtb25vc3Bh Y2UiPjxzcGFuIGNsYXNzPSJBcHBsZS1zdHlsZS1zcGFuIiBzdHlsZT0id2hpdGUtc3BhY2U6IHBy ZTsiPjxicj48L3NwYW4+PC9mb250PjxkaXY+PGJyPjwvZGl2PjwvZGl2PjwvYm9keT48L2h0bWw+ --_003_88C26728BB4A4351BC8D190E6D5D398Bericssoncom_--