From nobody Sun Nov 2 23:02:49 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE9F1A1A64 for ; Sun, 2 Nov 2014 23:02:47 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.095 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GA4x79Uw9GdX for ; Sun, 2 Nov 2014 23:02:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50A391A1A5F for ; Sun, 2 Nov 2014 23:02:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=209; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414998166; x=1416207766; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject: content-transfer-encoding; bh=37kZcdsvQBZmACemZ9tTkvJ+zN/KYXVx9p5gBs0HctM=; b=UZkkcW5UDDUkKA19XAXZwI/vjnlxt7zEnTr5kuPj/V0V0C3l90CS3iT/ P9TZl1VvFxoS4QbAAO3kUT68S54f4N3AB1f8ucm7CbNDMhWF77MMqbCgc A/FLj7maUzcT+V2R/g9g0X6eZ62NdllIjr27Uqp0/dc2HI9nw+Rp5s3yq Y=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlULADcoV1StJA2I/2dsb2JhbABcgw6PE6wrBQF0mhqBLBYBAQEBAXILhEF9NAJMDQgBAYg9pXWjXAEBAQcCAR+GN48rBYt2kguBMYNNgneKUoQJhBkcgnoBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,305,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="92741994" Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 Nov 2014 07:02:45 +0000 Received: from [10.21.92.56] (sjc-vpn5-1080.cisco.com [10.21.92.56]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sA372jVN027698 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 07:02:45 GMT Message-ID: <545728A4.80204@cisco.com> Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2014 23:03:00 -0800 From: Abhay Roy User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "ospf@ietf.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/hZ14SGoUOFKi06g2YTbKgMMhVtU Subject: [OSPF] WG Adoption poll for draft-zzhang-ospf-two-part-metric-05 X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 07:02:47 -0000 This document has seen some good discussions and a few revisions to cater to those suggested changes. Please indicate your support (or concerns) for adopting this as a WG Document. Regards, -Abhay From nobody Sun Nov 2 23:10:21 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D561C1A1A8E for ; Sun, 2 Nov 2014 23:10:20 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.095 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AtEalbkBCoPp for ; Sun, 2 Nov 2014 23:10:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3CBC1A1A79 for ; Sun, 2 Nov 2014 23:10:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=151; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414998615; x=1416208215; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AgvNX11y1oHiuN93KJZ/Pw6yNW9m93ZJ1pIXgCoVVX8=; b=DqmjQ3aG+QAwFq5Ek5ZMWCxz5jaK9Ww3v6PmICLrz49L0+tkru+tYWUx t8nZDmIxnsAVJRsFVhtTlLGxPYgkmkZa/Yqv8uFKAOLaPS2UrzvFqHOCE edvNiz/ihmZGCqPvJx7Z0ota33jJXmXoUjUR7Xr3/orl/ks/J1A3rQxHO 8=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,305,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="368708831" Received: from alln-core-5.cisco.com ([173.36.13.138]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 Nov 2014 07:10:14 +0000 Received: from [10.21.92.56] (sjc-vpn5-1080.cisco.com [10.21.92.56]) by alln-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sA37AD0O002763; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 07:10:13 GMT Message-ID: <54572A65.1000000@cisco.com> Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2014 23:10:29 -0800 From: Abhay Roy User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ing-Wher Chen , Acee Lindem , RJ Atkinson , "ospf@ietf.org" References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/IIOXp-1hU_pzWC-zZODPrIOo4yM Subject: [OSPF] WG adoption---draft-chen-ospf-transition-to-ospfv3 X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 07:10:21 -0000 Authors, There is plenty of support for this work. Please resubmit the draft as draft-ietf-ospf-transition-to-ospfv3-00.txt Regards, -Abhay From nobody Sun Nov 2 23:15:28 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ADAC1A1A81; Sun, 2 Nov 2014 23:15:25 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.094 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SQQK6Ks2Cqps; Sun, 2 Nov 2014 23:15:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 928871A1A74; Sun, 2 Nov 2014 23:15:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=12202; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1414998922; x=1416208522; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to; bh=iWTaFvKIXUKQkZ0V9z3l4Ogi/HnJ+5zsCngZJnSaevI=; b=Fo4w+yEwphkJkbew5GA07YOPMiSblTDcFHaqfwpr3A0QJtfTB5EQobOQ vhNvNSVX4+LPLpfKjirdoS+i4dfLqBTR30IndLXkdN0gSy91RKytaRf76 MBpzNPYiKREoDNsFGN3KdeboAI9yUpB6u032h9TVWzg8UnQM/gfqWjPej 0=; X-Files: iesg-writeup-draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-autoconfig.txt : 7850 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aj8LAI8qV1StJA2I/2dsb2JhbABSCoMOVINehVuxMwUBdJJTh1ECgSAWAQEBAQF9g3kKAQEEI0gDBBcOAQIbIQICAg0CRgYBDAgBAQUSiCYNtSmUGgEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAReGN4l3BgsBV4J3gVQFi3aEBYQ0iVKBMYNNgneOW4QZHIE3BxcGgR8BAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,305,1413244800"; d="txt'?scan'208,217";a="92740244" Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 Nov 2014 07:15:21 +0000 Received: from [10.21.92.56] (sjc-vpn5-1080.cisco.com [10.21.92.56]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sA37FL4B002713; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 07:15:21 GMT Message-ID: <54572B98.70901@cisco.com> Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2014 23:15:36 -0800 From: Abhay Roy User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ietf-secretariat@ietf.org, "adrian@olddog.co.uk" , Alia Atlas , "ospf@ietf.org" References: <53A7B6D2.1000809@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <53A7B6D2.1000809@cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------060202080307060207000206" Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/20-JCoI-2MUBPg_ay77OxlywxcE Subject: [OSPF] Publication request for "OSPFv3 Auto-Configuration" X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 07:15:25 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060202080307060207000206 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010303010207020206060806" --------------010303010207020206060806 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Please publish draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-autoconfig-09.txt as a Standards Track document. Thanks to Helen Chen for doing the Document Writeup (attached). Regards, -Abhay --------------010303010207020206060806 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Please publish  draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-autoconfig-09.txt as a Standards Track document.

Thanks to Helen Chen for doing the Document Writeup (attached).

Regards,
-Abhay
--------------010303010207020206060806-- --------------060202080307060207000206 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; name="iesg-writeup-draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-autoconfig.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="iesg-writeup-draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-autoconfig.txt" KDEpIFdoYXQgdHlwZSBvZiBSRkMgaXMgYmVpbmcgcmVxdWVzdGVkIChCQ1AsIFByb3Bvc2Vk IFN0YW5kYXJkLCBJbnRlcm5ldA0KICAgIFN0YW5kYXJkLCBJbmZvcm1hdGlvbmFsLCBFeHBl cmltZW50YWwsIG9yIEhpc3RvcmljKT8gV2h5IGlzIHRoaXMgdGhlDQogICAgcHJvcGVyIHR5 cGUgb2YgUkZDPyBJcyB0aGlzIHR5cGUgb2YgUkZDIGluZGljYXRlZCBpbiB0aGUgdGl0bGUg cGFnZQ0KICAgIGhlYWRlcj8NCg0KICAgICAgQSBTdGFuZGFyZHMgVHJhY2sgUkZDIGlzIGJl aW5nIHJlcXVlc3RlZCBhbmQgaXMgaW5kaWNhdGVkIGluIHRoZQ0KICAgICAgdGl0bGUgcGFn ZSBoZWFkZXIuDQoNCigyKSBUaGUgSUVTRyBhcHByb3ZhbCBhbm5vdW5jZW1lbnQgaW5jbHVk ZXMgYSBEb2N1bWVudCBBbm5vdW5jZW1lbnQNCiAgICBXcml0ZS1VcC4gIFBsZWFzZSBwcm92 aWRlIHN1Y2ggYSBEb2N1bWVudCBBbm5vdW5jZW1lbnQgV3JpdGUtVXAuDQogICAgUmVjZW50 IGV4YW1wbGVzIGNhbiBiZSBmb3VuZCBpbiB0aGUgIkFjdGlvbiIgYW5ub3VuY2VtZW50cyBm b3INCiAgICBhcHByb3ZlZCBkb2N1bWVudHMuIFRoZSBhcHByb3ZhbCBhbm5vdW5jZW1lbnQg Y29udGFpbnMgdGhlIGZvbGxvd2luZw0KICAgIHNlY3Rpb25zOg0KDQpUZWNobmljYWwgU3Vt bWFyeToNCg0KICAgICAgVGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCBzcGVjaWZpZXMgYXV0by1jb25maWd1cmF0 aW9uIG9mIE9TUEZ2MyByb3V0ZXJzIGluDQogICAgICBjZXJ0YWluIGVudmlyb25tZW50cyB0 aGF0IHJlcXVpcmUgYXV0by1jb25maWd1cmF0aW9uLCBzdWNoIGFzIGluIGENCiAgICAgIHNt YWxsIElQdjYgbmV0d29yayBsaWtlIGEgaG9tZSBuZXR3b3JrLiAgVG8gZmFjaWxpdGF0ZQ0K ICAgICAgYXV0by1jb25maWd1cmF0aW9uLCB0aGlzIGRvY3VtZW50IHNwZWNpZmllcyB0aGUg ZGVmYXVsdA0KICAgICAgY29uZmlndXJhdGlvbiwgYWxsb3dzIG1vcmUgZmxleGliaWxpdHkg aW4gc29tZSB2ZXJpZmljYXRpb25zDQogICAgICByZXF1aXJlZCBieSB0aGUgT1NQRnYzIHNw ZWNpZmljYXRpb24sIGFuZCBhbHNvIGRlc2NyaWJlcyBhDQogICAgICBwb3NzaWJsZSBjb2xs aXNpb24gYXMgd2VsbCBhcyB0aGUgbWVjaGFuaXNtIHRvIHJlc29sdmUgdGhlIA0KICAgICAg Y29sbGlzaW9uLg0KDQpXb3JraW5nIEdyb3VwIFN1bW1hcnk6DQoNCiAgICAgIFRoZSBPU1BG djMgcm91dGVyIElEIGNvbGxpc2lvbiBkZXRlY3Rpb24gYW5kIHJlc29sdXRpb24gd2FzIGEN CiAgICAgIGhlYXRlZCBwb2ludCBvZiBkaXNjdXNzaW9uIGEgZmV3IG1vbnRocyBhZ28sIGJ1 dCB0aGUgaXNzdWUgaGFzDQogICAgICBiZWVuIHJlc29sdmVkIGJ5IElFVEYgODkuICBUaGUg dGVjaG5pY2FsIGFzcGVjdCBvZiB0aGUgZG9jdW1lbnQsDQogICAgICBib3RoIHdpdGhpbiB0 aGUgZG9jdW1lbnQgYW5kIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdCBkaXNjdXNzaW9ucywgaGF2ZSBiZWVuDQog ICAgICBzdGFibGUgZm9yIHRoZSBsYXN0IHNpeCBtb250aHMuDQoNCkRvY3VtZW50IFF1YWxp dHk6DQoNCiAgICAgIFRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQgaGFzIGJlZW4gYSBXRyBkb2N1bWVudCBmb3Ig YSBsaXR0bGUgdW5kZXIgdHdvIHllYXJzLg0KICAgICAgSXQgaXMgc3RhYmxlLCB3aXRob3V0 IGNoYW5nZXMgdG8gdGhlIHRlY2huaWNhbCBzb2x1dGlvbiBmb3IgbW9yZQ0KICAgICAgdGhh biBzaXggbW9udGhzLiAgVGhlcmUgYXJlIGFsc28gdHdvIGltcGxlbWVudGF0aW9ucyBiYXNl ZCBvbiB0aGlzDQogICAgICBkb2N1bWVudCBhbHJlYWR5LiAgVGhlcmUgaXMgcG90ZW50aWFs bHkgYSB0aGlyZCBpbXBsZW1lbnRhdGlvbg0KICAgICAgd2hpY2ggaW1wbGVtZW50cyBwYXJ0 cyBvZiB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0Lg0KDQpQZXJzb25uZWw6DQoNCiAgICAgIEhlbGVuIENoZW4gaXMg dGhlIERvY3VtZW50IFNoZXBoZXJkLg0KICAgICAgQWxpYSBBdGxhcyBpcyB0aGUgUmVzcG9u c2libGUgQXJlYSBEaXJlY3Rvci4NCg0KKDMpIEJyaWVmbHkgZGVzY3JpYmUgdGhlIHJldmll dyBvZiB0aGlzIGRvY3VtZW50IHRoYXQgd2FzIHBlcmZvcm1lZCBieQ0KICAgIHRoZSBEb2N1 bWVudCBTaGVwaGVyZC4gSWYgdGhpcyB2ZXJzaW9uIG9mIHRoZSBkb2N1bWVudCBpcyBub3Qg cmVhZHkNCiAgICBmb3IgcHVibGljYXRpb24sIHBsZWFzZSBleHBsYWluIHdoeSB0aGUgZG9j dW1lbnQgaXMgYmVpbmcgZm9yd2FyZGVkDQogICAgdG8gdGhlIElFU0cuDQoNCiAgICAgIFRo aXMgZHJhZnQgZGVzY3JpYmVzIHRoZSBtZWNoYW5pc20gZm9yIGF1dG8tY29uZmlndXJhdGlv biBvZg0KICAgICAgT1NQRnYzIHJvdXRlcnMgaW4gYSBob21lIG5ldHdvcmsgZW52aXJvbm1l bnQuICBUaGVyZSBpcyBoZWFsdGh5DQogICAgICBwYXJ0aWNpcGF0aW9uLCBkaXNjdXNzaW9u LCBhbmQgcmV2aWV3IGJ5IGJvdGggdGhlIE9TUEYgV0cgYW5kIHRoZQ0KICAgICAgaG9tZW5l dCBXRywgaW5jbHVkaW5nIHR3byBjb21wbGV0ZSBpbXBsZW1lbnRhdGlvbnMgYXMgd2VsbCBh cyBhIA0KICAgICAgdGhpcmQgaW1wbGVtZW50YXRpb24gdGhhdCBwYXJ0aWFsbHkgaW1wbGVt ZW50cyB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0LiAgDQogICAgICBUaGVyZSBhcmUgbm8gb3V0c3RhbmRpbmcgaXNz dWVzIHdpdGggdGhpcyBkcmFmdC4NCg0KKDQpIERvZXMgdGhlIGRvY3VtZW50IFNoZXBoZXJk IGhhdmUgYW55IGNvbmNlcm5zIGFib3V0IHRoZSBkZXB0aCBvcg0KICAgIGJyZWFkdGggb2Yg dGhlIHJldmlld3MgdGhhdCBoYXZlIGJlZW4gcGVyZm9ybWVkPw0KDQogICAgICBOby4NCg0K KDUpIERvIHBvcnRpb25zIG9mIHRoZSBkb2N1bWVudCBuZWVkIHJldmlldyBmcm9tIGEgcGFy dGljdWxhciBvciBmcm9tDQogICAgYnJvYWRlciBwZXJzcGVjdGl2ZSwgZS5nLiwgc2VjdXJp dHksIG9wZXJhdGlvbmFsIGNvbXBsZXhpdHksIEFBQSwNCiAgICBETlMsIERIQ1AsIFhNTCwg b3IgaW50ZXJuYXRpb25hbGl6YXRpb24/IElmIHNvLCBkZXNjcmliZSB0aGUgcmV2aWV3DQog ICAgdGhhdCB0b29rIHBsYWNlLg0KDQogICAgICBOby4NCg0KKDYpIERlc2NyaWJlIGFueSBz cGVjaWZpYyBjb25jZXJucyBvciBpc3N1ZXMgdGhhdCB0aGUgRG9jdW1lbnQgU2hlcGhlcmQN CiAgICBoYXMgd2l0aCB0aGlzIGRvY3VtZW50IHRoYXQgdGhlIFJlc3BvbnNpYmxlIEFyZWEg RGlyZWN0b3IgYW5kL29yDQogICAgdGhlIElFU0cgc2hvdWxkIGJlIGF3YXJlIG9mPyBGb3Ig ZXhhbXBsZSwgcGVyaGFwcyBoZSBvciBzaGUgaXMNCiAgICB1bmNvbWZvcnRhYmxlIHdpdGgg Y2VydGFpbiBwYXJ0cyBvZiB0aGUgZG9jdW1lbnQsIG9yIGhhcyBjb25jZXJucw0KICAgIHdo ZXRoZXIgdGhlcmUgcmVhbGx5IGlzIGEgbmVlZCBmb3IgaXQuIEluIGFueSBldmVudCwgaWYg dGhlIFdHIGhhcw0KICAgIGRpc2N1c3NlZCB0aG9zZSBpc3N1ZXMgYW5kIGhhcyBpbmRpY2F0 ZWQgdGhhdCBpdCBzdGlsbCB3aXNoZXMgdG8NCiAgICBhZHZhbmNlIHRoZSBkb2N1bWVudCwg ZGV0YWlsIHRob3NlIGNvbmNlcm5zIGhlcmUuDQoNCiAgICAgIE5vbmUuDQoNCig3KSBIYXMg ZWFjaCBhdXRob3IgY29uZmlybWVkIHRoYXQgYW55IGFuZCBhbGwgYXBwcm9wcmlhdGUgSVBS DQogICAgZGlzY2xvc3VyZXMgcmVxdWlyZWQgZm9yIGZ1bGwgY29uZm9ybWFuY2Ugd2l0aCB0 aGUgcHJvdmlzaW9ucyBvZiBCQ1ANCiAgICA3OCBhbmQgQkNQIDc5IGhhdmUgYWxyZWFkeSBi ZWVuIGZpbGVkLiBJZiBub3QsIGV4cGxhaW4gd2h5Pw0KICANCiAgICAgIFllcy4NCg0KKDgp IEhhcyBhbiBJUFIgZGlzY2xvc3VyZSBiZWVuIGZpbGVkIHRoYXQgcmVmZXJlbmNlcyB0aGlz IGRvY3VtZW50PyBJZg0KICAgIHNvLCBzdW1tYXJpemUgYW55IFdHIGRpc2N1c3Npb24gYW5k IGNvbmNsdXNpb24gcmVnYXJkaW5nIHRoZSBJUFINCiAgICBkaXNjbG9zdXJlcy4NCg0KICAg ICAgTm8uDQoNCig5KSBIb3cgc29saWQgaXMgdGhlIFdHIGNvbnNlbnN1cyBiZWhpbmQgdGhp cyBkb2N1bWVudD8gRG9lcyBpdA0KICAgIHJlcHJlc2VudCB0aGUgc3Ryb25nIGNvbmN1cnJl bmNlIG9mIGEgZmV3IGluZGl2aWR1YWxzLCB3aXRoIG90aGVycw0KICAgIGJlaW5nIHNpbGVu dCwgb3IgZG9lcyB0aGUgV0cgYXMgYSB3aG9sZSB1bmRlcnN0YW5kIGFuZCBhZ3JlZSB3aXRo IGl0Pw0KDQogICAgICBUaGVyZSBpcyBzdHJvbmcgY29uc2Vuc3VzIGZyb20gdGhlIFdHLCB3 aXRoIGEgY29yZSBncm91cCBvZiBXRw0KICAgICAgcGFydGljaXBhbnRzIGFncmVlaW5nIHdp dGggdGhlIHNvbHV0aW9uIGFuZCBhbm90aGVyIGdyb3VwIG9mIG1vcmUNCiAgICAgIGludmVz dGVkIHBhcnRpY2lwYW50cyBpbnZvbHZlZCBpbiBsb25nIGRpc2N1c3Npb25zIHRoYXQgY29u dmVyZ2VkLg0KDQooMTApIEhhcyBhbnlvbmUgdGhyZWF0ZW5lZCBhbiBhcHBlYWwgb3Igb3Ro ZXJ3aXNlIGluZGljYXRlZCBleHRyZW1lDQogICAgIGRpc2NvbnRlbnQ/ICBJZiBzbywgcGxl YXNlIHN1bW1hcmlzZSB0aGUgYXJlYXMgb2YgY29uZmxpY3QgaW4NCiAgICAgc2VwYXJhdGUg ZW1haWwgbWVzc2FnZXMgdG8gdGhlIFJlc3BvbnNpYmxlIEFyZWEgRGlyZWN0b3IuIChJdA0K ICAgICBzaG91bGQgYmUgaW4gYSBzZXBhcmF0ZSBlbWFpbCBiZWNhdXNlIHRoaXMgcXVlc3Rp b25uYWlyZSBpcw0KICAgICBwdWJsaWNseSBhdmFpbGFibGUuKQ0KDQogICAgICBOby4NCg0K KDExKSBJZGVudGlmeSBhbnkgSUQgbml0cyB0aGUgRG9jdW1lbnQgU2hlcGhlcmQgaGFzIGZv dW5kIGluIHRoaXMNCiAgICAgZG9jdW1lbnQuICAoU2VlIGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcv dG9vbHMvaWRuaXRzLyBhbmQgdGhlDQogICAgIEludGVybmV0LURyYWZ0cyBDaGVja2xpc3Qp LiAgQm9pbGVycGxhdGUgY2hlY2tzIGFyZSBub3QgZW5vdWdoOw0KICAgICB0aGlzIGNoZWNr IG5lZWRzIHRvIGJlIHRob3JvdWdoLg0KDQogICAgICBBdXRob3JzIGhhdmUgcmVzb2x2ZWQg YWxsIG5pdHMuDQoNCigxMikgRGVzY3JpYmUgaG93IHRoZSBkb2N1bWVudCBtZWV0cyBhbnkg cmVxdWlyZWQgZm9ybWFsIHJldmlldw0KICAgICBjcml0ZXJpYSwgc3VjaCBhcyB0aGUgTUlC IERvY3RvciwgbWVkaWEgdHlwZSwgYW5kIFVSSSB0eXBlIHJldmlld3MuDQoNCiAgICAgIE5v dCBhcHBsaWNhYmxlLg0KDQooMTMpIEhhdmUgYWxsIHJlZmVyZW5jZXMgd2l0aGluIHRoaXMg ZG9jdW1lbnQgYmVlbiBpZGVudGlmaWVkIGFzIGVpdGhlcg0KICAgICBub3JtYXRpdmUgb3Ig aW5mb3JtYXRpdmU/DQoNCiAgICAgIFllcy4NCg0KKDE0KSBBcmUgdGhlcmUgbm9ybWF0aXZl IHJlZmVyZW5jZXMgdG8gZG9jdW1lbnRzIHRoYXQgYXJlIG5vdCByZWFkeSBmb3INCiAgICAg YWR2YW5jZW1lbnQgb3IgYXJlIG90aGVyd2lzZSBpbiBhbiB1bmNsZWFyIHN0YXRlPyBJZiBz dWNoDQogICAgIG5vcm1hdGl2ZSByZWZlcmVuY2VzIGV4aXN0LCB3aGF0IGlzIHRoZSBwbGFu IGZvciB0aGVpciBjb21wbGV0aW9uPw0KICANCiAgICAgIE5vLg0KDQooMTUpIEFyZSB0aGVy ZSBkb3dud2FyZCBub3JtYXRpdmUgcmVmZXJlbmNlcyByZWZlcmVuY2VzIChzZWUgUkZDIDM5 NjcpPw0KICAgICBJZiBzbywgbGlzdCB0aGVzZSBkb3dud2FyZCByZWZlcmVuY2VzIHRvIHN1 cHBvcnQgdGhlIEFyZWEgRGlyZWN0b3INCiAgICAgaW4gdGhlIExhc3QgQ2FsbCBwcm9jZWR1 cmUuDQoNCiAgICAgIE5vLg0KDQooMTYpIFdpbGwgcHVibGljYXRpb24gb2YgdGhpcyBkb2N1 bWVudCBjaGFuZ2UgdGhlIHN0YXR1cyBvZiBhbnkgZXhpc3RpbmcNCiAgICAgUkZDcz8gIEFy ZSB0aG9zZSBSRkNzIGxpc3RlZCBvbiB0aGUgdGl0bGUgcGFnZSBoZWFkZXIsIGxpc3RlZCBp bg0KICAgICB0aGUgYWJzdHJhY3QsIGFuZCBkaXNjdXNzZWQgaW4gdGhlIGludHJvZHVjdGlv bj8gSWYgdGhlIFJGQ3MgYXJlDQogICAgIG5vdCBsaXN0ZWQgaW4gdGhlIEFic3RyYWN0IGFu ZCBJbnRyb2R1Y3Rpb24sIGV4cGxhaW4gd2h5LCBhbmQgcG9pbnQNCiAgICAgdG8gdGhlIHBh cnQgb2YgdGhlIGRvY3VtZW50IHdoZXJlIHRoZSByZWxhdGlvbnNoaXAgb2YgdGhpcyBkb2N1 bWVudA0KICAgICB0byB0aGUgb3RoZXIgUkZDcyBpcyBkaXNjdXNzZWQuIElmIHRoaXMgaW5m b3JtYXRpb24gaXMgbm90IGluIHRoZQ0KICAgICBkb2N1bWVudCwgZXhwbGFpbiB3aHkgdGhl IFdHIGNvbnNpZGVycyBpdCB1bm5lY2Vzc2FyeS4NCg0KICAgICAgTm8uDQoNCigxNykgRGVz Y3JpYmUgdGhlIERvY3VtZW50IFNoZXBoZXJkJ3MgcmV2aWV3IG9mIHRoZSBJQU5BIGNvbnNp ZGVyYXRpb25zDQogICAgIHNlY3Rpb24sIGVzcGVjaWFsbHkgd2l0aCByZWdhcmQgdG8gaXRz IGNvbnNpc3RlbmN5IHdpdGggdGhlIGJvZHkgb2YNCiAgICAgdGhlIGRvY3VtZW50LiAgQ29u ZmlybSB0aGF0IGFsbCBwcm90b2NvbCBleHRlbnNpb25zIHRoYXQgdGhlDQogICAgIGRvY3Vt ZW50IG1ha2VzIGFyZSBhc3NvY2lhdGVkIHdpdGggdGhlIGFwcHJvcHJpYXRlIHJlc2VydmF0 aW9ucyBpbg0KICAgICBJQU5BIHJlZ2lzdHJpZXMuIENvbmZpcm0gdGhhdCBhbnkgcmVmZXJl bmNlZCBJQU5BIHJlZ2lzdHJpZXMgaGF2ZQ0KICAgICBiZWVuIGNsZWFybHkgaWRlbnRpZmll ZC4gQ29uZmlybSB0aGF0IG5ld2x5IGNyZWF0ZWQgSUFOQSByZWdpc3RyaWVzDQogICAgIGlu Y2x1ZGUgYSBkZXRhaWxlZCBzcGVjaWZpY2F0aW9uIG9mIHRoZSBpbml0aWFsIGNvbnRlbnRz IGZvciB0aGUNCiAgICAgcmVnaXN0cnksIHRoYXQgYWxsb2NhdGlvbnMgcHJvY2VkdXJlcyBm b3IgZnV0dXJlIHJlZ2lzdHJhdGlvbnMgYXJlDQogICAgIGRlZmluZWQsIGFuZCBhIHJlYXNv bmFibGUgbmFtZSBmb3IgdGhlIG5ldyByZWdpc3RyeSBoYXMgYmVlbg0KICAgICBzdWdnZXN0 ZWQgKHNlZSBSRkMgNTIyNikuDQogIA0KICAgICAgVGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCBkZWZpbmVzIGEg bmV3IHR5cGUgb2YgT1NQRnYzIExTQSwgd2hpY2ggcmVxdWlyZXMNCiAgICAgIGFzc2lnbm1l bnQgb2YgYSBudW1iZXIgZnJvbSB0aGUgZXhpc3RpbmcgIk9TUEZ2MyBMU0EgRnVuY3Rpb24N CiAgICAgIENvZGUiIHJlZ2lzdHJ5LiAgVGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCBhbHNvIGRlZmluZXMgYSBu ZXcgcmVnaXN0cnkgZm9yIHRoZQ0KICAgICAgVExWcyBvZiB0aGlzIG5ldyBPU1BGdjMgTFNB LiAgVGhlIElBTkEgQ29uc2lkZXJhdGlvbnMgc2VjdGlvbg0KICAgICAgY29ycmVjdGx5IGlk ZW50aWZpZXMgdGhlIHJlcXVpcmVkIHJlZ2lzdHJhdGlvbnMuDQoNCigxOCkgTGlzdCBhbnkg bmV3IElBTkEgcmVnaXN0cmllcyB0aGF0IHJlcXVpcmUgRXhwZXJ0IFJldmlldyBmb3IgZnV0 dXJlDQogICAgIGFsbG9jYXRpb25zLiBQcm92aWRlIGFueSBwdWJsaWMgZ3VpZGFuY2UgdGhh dCB0aGUgSUVTRyB3b3VsZCBmaW5kDQogICAgIHVzZWZ1bCBpbiBzZWxlY3RpbmcgdGhlIElB TkEgRXhwZXJ0cyBmb3IgdGhlc2UgbmV3IHJlZ2lzdHJpZXMuDQoNCiAgICAgIEEgbmV3IHJl Z2lzdHJ5IGZvciBPU1BGdjMgQXV0by1Db25maWd1cmF0aW9uIChBQykgTFNBIFRMVnMgaXMN CiAgICAgIHJlcXVpcmVkLiAgTm8gRXhwZXJ0IFJldmlldyBpcyBuZWNlc3Nhcnkgd2hlbiBh bGxvY2F0aW5nIG5ldw0KICAgICAgdmFsdWVzLCBhcyBuZXcgdmFsdWVzIGNhbiBiZSBhbGxv Y2F0ZWQgdmlhIElFVEYgQ29uc2Vuc3VzIG9yIElFU0cNCiAgICAgIEFwcHJvdmFsLg0KDQoo MTkpIERlc2NyaWJlIHJldmlld3MgYW5kIGF1dG9tYXRlZCBjaGVja3MgcGVyZm9ybWVkIGJ5 IHRoZSBEb2N1bWVudA0KICAgICBTaGVwaGVyZCB0byB2YWxpZGF0ZSBzZWN0aW9ucyBvZiB0 aGUgZG9jdW1lbnQgd3JpdHRlbiBpbiBhIGZvcm1hbA0KICAgICBsYW5ndWFnZSwgc3VjaCBh cyBYTUwgY29kZSwgQk5GIHJ1bGVzLCBNSUIgZGVmaW5pdGlvbnMsIGV0Yy4NCiANCiAgICAg IE5vdCBhcHBsaWNhYmxlLg0KDQo= --------------060202080307060207000206-- From nobody Mon Nov 3 06:20:30 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18F0B1A0367 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 06:20:29 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.095 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id INN6yy_UH6he for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 06:20:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EA5D1A033B for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 06:20:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=355; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1415024429; x=1416234029; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=g58kSermFleSE6UU/2TfznM4ptfAPxdJeW8Dks25jMk=; b=UXAkK9SRtwBhcEe5tgaSbtf5oADrzcBwD10VtO0Wxh0yzUYyjJTAgeQ+ KK4S85lLLZjoi8cc62WHJUzQqr0yy7qN1oZeQem+oWJLxY+VmSd8Jwcl7 tMDDu+6ZacKYD45fSZ+26yHnBbcAvIIjJKisIfE57D1GiLYT+krDcL7ql 0=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgcFAK6OV1StJV2P/2dsb2JhbABcgw6BMNZ1FgEBAQEBfYQJOlEBPgU9JwSIVKNyo24BAQgCAR+VYgWSGotngTGDTY1JhAmCNIFEgjSBAwEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,308,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="92843118" Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 Nov 2014 14:20:29 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com [173.37.183.81]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sA3EKRlo027048 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 14:20:27 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.61]) by xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com ([173.37.183.81]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 08:20:27 -0600 From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" To: OSPF WG List Thread-Topic: WG Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extensions to Support Maximally Redundant Trees" - draft-atlas-ospf-mrt-03 Thread-Index: AQHP93FQCqOuGAAuIkuxwA9maUkTeA== Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 14:20:26 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.204] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <7AEC35AFDECA2348982E15155FB6AAE3@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/ltuhzUTxGzcBpv8MpVCGct1851I Subject: [OSPF] WG Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extensions to Support Maximally Redundant Trees" - draft-atlas-ospf-mrt-03 X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 14:20:29 -0000 The base MRT specifications are rtgwg WG documents. Additionally, this document now uses the OSPFv2 link extensions that we have converged upon for OSPFv2 protocol extension. Hence, the chairs believe this document is ready for a WG adoption poll. Please indicate your support (or concerns) for adopting this as a WG Document. Regards, -Abhay From nobody Mon Nov 3 07:17:26 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69C291A037B for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 07:17:18 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5OWYGCHysLFv for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 07:17:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0137.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF5991A0211 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 07:17:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from BLUPR05MB291.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.23.26) by BLUPR05MB055.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.255.210.150) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.11.14; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 15:17:13 +0000 Received: from BLUPR05MB292.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.23.27) by BLUPR05MB291.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.23.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.11.14; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 15:17:12 +0000 Received: from BLUPR05MB292.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.23.27]) by BLUPR05MB292.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.23.27]) with mapi id 15.01.0011.000; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 15:17:12 +0000 From: Chris Bowers To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" , OSPF WG List Thread-Topic: WG Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extensions to Support Maximally Redundant Trees" - draft-atlas-ospf-mrt-03 Thread-Index: AQHP93FQCqOuGAAuIkuxwA9maUkTeJxPA1FA Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 15:17:11 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.13] x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR05MB291;UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-forefront-prvs: 0384275935 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(189002)(377454003)(13464003)(199003)(76576001)(19580405001)(122556002)(40100003)(19580395003)(87936001)(2656002)(76176999)(54356999)(77156002)(15975445006)(50986999)(86362001)(92566001)(101416001)(105586002)(108616004)(120916001)(95666004)(31966008)(99286002)(107046002)(107886001)(106356001)(106116001)(99396003)(230783001)(33646002)(21056001)(66066001)(74316001)(64706001)(46102003)(20776003)(62966003)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR05MB291; H:BLUPR05MB292.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR05MB055; X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/6wqIolhQX2KNlXx-O22U-zeiioE Subject: Re: [OSPF] WG Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extensions to Support Maximally Redundant Trees" - draft-atlas-ospf-mrt-03 X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 15:17:19 -0000 Support, as a co-author. Chris -----Original Message----- From: OSPF [mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Monday, November 03, 2014 8:20 AM To: OSPF WG List Subject: [OSPF] WG Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extensions to Support Maximally = Redundant Trees" - draft-atlas-ospf-mrt-03 The base MRT specifications are rtgwg WG documents. Additionally, this docu= ment now uses the OSPFv2 link extensions that we have converged upon for OS= PFv2 protocol extension. Hence, the chairs believe this document is ready f= or a WG adoption poll. Please indicate your support (or concerns) for adopting this as a WG Docume= nt. Regards, -Abhay _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list OSPF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf From nobody Mon Nov 3 07:19:05 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 789871A0AFE for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 07:19:04 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sutvl9lWXM3B for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 07:19:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0121.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.121]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF43A1A040B for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 07:19:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from BN1PR05MB520.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.65.151) by BN1PR05MB517.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.65.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.11.14; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 15:19:00 +0000 Received: from BN1PR05MB520.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.14.76]) by BN1PR05MB520.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.14.76]) with mapi id 15.01.0011.000; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 15:19:00 +0000 From: Pushpasis Sarkar To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" , OSPF WG List Thread-Topic: [OSPF] WG Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extensions to Support Maximally Redundant Trees" - draft-atlas-ospf-mrt-03 Thread-Index: AQHP93l+WJW7C4f3qke0kZrPFw66Dg== Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 15:19:00 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.5.141003 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [116.197.184.17] x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN1PR05MB517; x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-forefront-prvs: 0384275935 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(377454003)(199003)(479174003)(189002)(24454002)(51704005)(36756003)(101416001)(54356999)(50986999)(86362001)(92566001)(92726001)(40100003)(122556002)(97736003)(77156002)(77096003)(62966003)(19580395003)(15975445006)(19580405001)(83506001)(2656002)(95666004)(99286002)(31966008)(106356001)(105586002)(20776003)(106116001)(64706001)(46102003)(4396001)(21056001)(230783001)(87936001)(99396003)(120916001)(107046002)(107886001)(66066001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN1PR05MB517; H:BN1PR05MB520.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <55FCA1121EADD046A28939CB382A5262@namprd05.prod.outlook.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/4k534T2nQr2lmg2QTYPXFatCVN4 Subject: Re: [OSPF] WG Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extensions to Support Maximally Redundant Trees" - draft-atlas-ospf-mrt-03 X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 15:19:04 -0000 Support. On 11/3/14, 7:50 PM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" wrote: >The base MRT specifications are rtgwg WG documents. Additionally, this >document now uses the OSPFv2 link extensions that we have converged upon >for OSPFv2 protocol extension. Hence, the chairs believe this document is >ready for a WG adoption poll. > >Please indicate your support (or concerns) for adopting this as a WG >Document. > >Regards, >-Abhay > >_______________________________________________ >OSPF mailing list >OSPF@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf From nobody Mon Nov 3 07:19:36 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 135FB1A19E2 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 07:19:35 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UgSHeWwwK6xf for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 07:19:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0115.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BAF51A0AFE for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 07:19:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from BN1PR05MB520.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.65.151) by BN1PR05MB517.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.65.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.11.14; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 15:19:31 +0000 Received: from BN1PR05MB520.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.14.76]) by BN1PR05MB520.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.14.76]) with mapi id 15.01.0011.000; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 15:19:31 +0000 From: Pushpasis Sarkar To: Abhay Roy , "ospf@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [OSPF] WG Adoption poll for draft-zzhang-ospf-two-part-metric-05 Thread-Index: AQHP93mQ0VFHmz2S9U220HL/SLcw8g== Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 15:19:31 +0000 Message-ID: References: <545728A4.80204@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <545728A4.80204@cisco.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.5.141003 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [116.197.184.17] x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN1PR05MB517; x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-forefront-prvs: 0384275935 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(979002)(6009001)(377454003)(199003)(479174003)(189002)(24454002)(51704005)(36756003)(101416001)(54356999)(76176999)(50986999)(86362001)(92566001)(92726001)(40100003)(122556002)(97736003)(77156002)(77096003)(62966003)(19580395003)(15975445006)(19580405001)(83506001)(2656002)(95666004)(2501002)(99286002)(31966008)(106356001)(105586002)(20776003)(106116001)(64706001)(46102003)(4396001)(21056001)(230783001)(87936001)(99396003)(120916001)(107046002)(107886001)(66066001)(969003)(989001)(999001)(1009001)(1019001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN1PR05MB517; H:BN1PR05MB520.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:ovrnspm; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts) authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=psarkar@juniper.net; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <20146B022456BE4ABA86A6408CDFC3EA@namprd05.prod.outlook.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/13XQKgJOdImi2ellvjX3vbYWKO0 Subject: Re: [OSPF] WG Adoption poll for draft-zzhang-ospf-two-part-metric-05 X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 15:19:35 -0000 Support. On 11/3/14, 12:33 PM, "Abhay Roy" wrote: >This document has seen some good discussions and a few revisions to >cater to those suggested changes. > >Please indicate your support (or concerns) for adopting this as a WG >Document. > >Regards, >-Abhay > >_______________________________________________ >OSPF mailing list >OSPF@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf From nobody Mon Nov 3 07:33:23 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A8921A0398 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 07:33:18 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PFiz1agHDF87 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 07:33:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0147.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E90531A03A9 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 07:33:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from BLUPR05MB436.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.27.152) by BLUPR05MB707.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.207.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.11.14; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 15:33:14 +0000 Received: from hannes-mba.local (193.110.55.11) by BLUPR05MB436.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.27.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.11.14; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 15:33:12 +0000 Received: from hannes-mba.local (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by hannes-mba.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72058561F2C; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 16:33:03 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 16:33:03 +0100 From: Hannes Gredler To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" Message-ID: <20141103153303.GB27173@hannes-mba.local> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Originating-IP: [193.110.55.11] X-ClientProxiedBy: AM3PR06CA021.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.141.192.139) To BLUPR05MB436.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.27.152) X-MS-Exchange-Transport-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:;UriScan:; X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR05MB436; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:; X-Forefront-PRVS: 0384275935 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(24454002)(189002)(199003)(23726002)(92566001)(66066001)(64706001)(92726001)(120916001)(105586002)(47776003)(20776003)(76506005)(40100003)(62966003)(77096003)(77156002)(97736003)(46406003)(122856001)(98436002)(106356001)(107046002)(122386002)(50986999)(97756001)(54356999)(87976001)(33656002)(102836001)(86362001)(101416001)(46102003)(76176999)(4396001)(99396003)(110136001)(95666004)(83506001)(50466002)(230783001)(15975445006)(21056001)(19580405001)(19580395003)(31966008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR05MB436; H:hannes-mba.local; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR05MB707; X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/Xv_nffPNt7semLXLhlmQ3oAObmU Cc: OSPF WG List Subject: Re: [OSPF] WG Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extensions to Support Maximally Redundant Trees" - draft-atlas-ospf-mrt-03 X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 15:33:18 -0000 support; On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 02:20:26PM +0000, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: | The base MRT specifications are rtgwg WG documents. Additionally, this | document now uses the OSPFv2 link extensions that we have converged upon | for OSPFv2 protocol extension. Hence, the chairs believe this document is | ready for a WG adoption poll. | | Please indicate your support (or concerns) for adopting this as a WG | Document. | | Regards, | -Abhay | | _______________________________________________ | OSPF mailing list | OSPF@ietf.org | https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf From nobody Mon Nov 3 08:36:32 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 263E01A07BC for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 08:36:32 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KU37Bz2ZpPpq for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 08:36:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0132.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A4841A0235 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 08:36:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from BY1PR0501MB1381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.160.107.139) by BY1PR0501MB1381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.160.107.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.11.14; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 16:36:27 +0000 Received: from BY1PR0501MB1381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([25.160.107.139]) by BY1PR0501MB1381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([25.160.107.139]) with mapi id 15.01.0011.000; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 16:36:27 +0000 From: Shraddha Hegde To: Abhay Roy , "ospf@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [OSPF] WG Adoption poll for draft-zzhang-ospf-two-part-metric-05 Thread-Index: AQHP9zQw1pySa3PzY0WD+UBSF5TMupxPGiAg Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 16:36:27 +0000 Message-ID: References: <545728A4.80204@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <545728A4.80204@cisco.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [116.197.184.17] x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY1PR0501MB1381; x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-forefront-prvs: 0384275935 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(377454003)(13464003)(199003)(189002)(19580395003)(40100003)(54356999)(76176999)(108616004)(230783001)(4396001)(21056001)(15975445006)(101416001)(122556002)(19580405001)(74316001)(87936001)(2656002)(50986999)(99396003)(2501002)(120916001)(64706001)(46102003)(105586002)(99286002)(86362001)(62966003)(31966008)(97736003)(95666004)(66066001)(33646002)(92566001)(77096003)(106116001)(107886001)(106356001)(107046002)(77156002)(20776003)(76576001)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY1PR0501MB1381; H:BY1PR0501MB1381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/DZMRnvnPsd9rzSBZXKtb8k6OOR0 Subject: Re: [OSPF] WG Adoption poll for draft-zzhang-ospf-two-part-metric-05 X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 16:36:32 -0000 Support. Rgds Shraddha -----Original Message----- From: OSPF [mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Abhay Roy Sent: Monday, November 03, 2014 12:33 PM To: ospf@ietf.org Subject: [OSPF] WG Adoption poll for draft-zzhang-ospf-two-part-metric-05 This document has seen some good discussions and a few revisions to cater t= o those suggested changes. Please indicate your support (or concerns) for adopting this as a WG Docume= nt. Regards, -Abhay _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list OSPF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf From nobody Mon Nov 3 08:39:03 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA9571A0AF7 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 08:39:01 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MJdLV9pibzka for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 08:39:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0144.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 081561A039D for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 08:38:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from BY1PR0501MB1381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.160.107.139) by BY1PR0501MB1381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.160.107.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.11.14; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 16:38:57 +0000 Received: from BY1PR0501MB1381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([25.160.107.139]) by BY1PR0501MB1381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([25.160.107.139]) with mapi id 15.01.0011.000; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 16:38:57 +0000 From: Shraddha Hegde To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" , OSPF WG List Thread-Topic: WG Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extensions to Support Maximally Redundant Trees" - draft-atlas-ospf-mrt-03 Thread-Index: AQHP93FQCqOuGAAuIkuxwA9maUkTeJxPGfcg Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 16:38:57 +0000 Message-ID: <4a648adf623d4c0caa3aa974d2833be6@BY1PR0501MB1381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [116.197.184.17] x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY1PR0501MB1381; x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-forefront-prvs: 0384275935 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(377454003)(13464003)(199003)(189002)(19580395003)(40100003)(54356999)(76176999)(108616004)(230783001)(4396001)(21056001)(15975445006)(101416001)(122556002)(19580405001)(74316001)(87936001)(2656002)(50986999)(99396003)(120916001)(64706001)(46102003)(105586002)(99286002)(86362001)(62966003)(31966008)(97736003)(95666004)(66066001)(33646002)(92566001)(77096003)(106116001)(107886001)(106356001)(107046002)(77156002)(20776003)(76576001)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY1PR0501MB1381; H:BY1PR0501MB1381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/b52svR6Z-fY9l26yERcJlQpUraI Subject: Re: [OSPF] WG Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extensions to Support Maximally Redundant Trees" - draft-atlas-ospf-mrt-03 X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 16:39:02 -0000 Support as co-author. Rgds Shraddha -----Original Message----- From: OSPF [mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Monday, November 03, 2014 7:50 PM To: OSPF WG List Subject: [OSPF] WG Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extensions to Support Maximally = Redundant Trees" - draft-atlas-ospf-mrt-03 The base MRT specifications are rtgwg WG documents. Additionally, this docu= ment now uses the OSPFv2 link extensions that we have converged upon for OS= PFv2 protocol extension. Hence, the chairs believe this document is ready f= or a WG adoption poll. Please indicate your support (or concerns) for adopting this as a WG Docume= nt. Regards, -Abhay _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list OSPF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf From nobody Mon Nov 3 09:01:59 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 330AC1A1A50 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 09:01:57 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.095 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IGR_BfVsjxWE for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 09:01:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FA521A0211 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 09:01:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1032; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1415034112; x=1416243712; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gAgfBRYAN2wqitDF3QruB9h0wVkKbPICt3rTC4TboNg=; b=NlFMSMAj+ycXwm1KlEevoia1vsjWOlbef1MauGX7ueqGgZelInYr3Fq7 iKidRbg/l9+YlqVPcXGc66BnO6eeXvO7cjV5j0ScsDBhZvsvflapBkyP1 IjU250ZzQwDcAkN6V8UPzQkbb+UMRwuatqzUmaTOhvz2D5K2QvJWyAS94 Q=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,308,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="92838175" Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 Nov 2014 17:01:51 +0000 Received: from [10.61.69.49] (ams3-vpn-dhcp1329.cisco.com [10.61.69.49]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sA3H1oP6018557; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 17:01:50 GMT Message-ID: <5457B4FE.2060505@cisco.com> Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 17:01:50 +0000 From: Stewart Bryant User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" , OSPF WG List References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/P9QWnLD7iAj3YQcgAGDKBT4zDVc Subject: Re: [OSPF] WG Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extensions to Support Maximally Redundant Trees" - draft-atlas-ospf-mrt-03 X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 17:01:57 -0000 On 03/11/2014 14:20, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > The base MRT specifications are rtgwg WG documents. Additionally, this > document now uses the OSPFv2 link extensions that we have converged upon > for OSPFv2 protocol extension. Hence, the chairs believe this document is > ready for a WG adoption poll. > > Please indicate your support (or concerns) for adopting this as a WG > Document. > > Regards, > -Abhay > > _______________________________________________ > OSPF mailing list > OSPF@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf > A comment that I made over on the MPLS list. I am not convinced that MRT has the degree of maturity that we would normally require for a routing protocol intended for deployment as part of a major IGP. This is obviously a discussion that needs to happen in RTGWG. I would therefore suggest that whilst the WG may adopt this component draft, it needs to sequence publication behind a number of the main MRT drafts and set the track accordingly. - Stewart From nobody Mon Nov 3 09:57:47 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D85AD1A6F63 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 09:57:43 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.095 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hPTcQ86E42fI for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 09:57:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62A2E1A6F62 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 09:57:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1447; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1415037462; x=1416247062; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=qKJMxgB/1dr43Cnn+d9KAfFDpn63HuvgRSjrS/fOTW8=; b=XNu+D2lPZiBg53WxqmBHWduREXkhOW9psoorncl4ADM3+DdJT2C5NYC9 5U9aHMChUV2EOZnzxSB6pcknrIJ71N+qY0wXW/9F5wYZykbcuXk0GwJGK FB8lxWUI9EVFXj8DIr0jQBfxGuUtJzx15fhidnj7r3cgXGTGhr807Irlm Q=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgYFAMfBV1StJA2F/2dsb2JhbABcgw6BMNZ4FgEBAQEBfYQJgQsBgQAnBIhUpDujVQEBCAIgjVOIDwWLOIZii2eWUIIAHoFagjSBAwEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,308,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="92907991" Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 Nov 2014 17:57:26 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com [173.37.183.84]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sA3HvQQo004123 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 17:57:26 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.61]) by xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([173.37.183.84]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 11:57:26 -0600 From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" To: OSPF WG List Thread-Topic: Security Extension for OSPFv2 when using Manual Key Management Thread-Index: AQHP94+gFEK2XzG7+UOVpJoC+LsJaQ== Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 17:57:25 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.204] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-ID: <3B2DD19B4D555249AAD197CBF1306097@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/Wmh2JdK0UL26tS5sx7I2G8buF7Q Subject: [OSPF] Security Extension for OSPFv2 when using Manual Key Management X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 17:57:44 -0000 Are there any implementations of this draft? There is, what I consider, a mistake in the source address protection. I=B9d like to make it consistent with RFC 7166. Rather than repeating the IP Source Address (L/4) times in Apad, it is included once the same as is done with the IPv6 address in RFC 7166. Does this cause anyone any incompatibilities with deployed implementations?=20 OLD: OSPF routers sending OSPF packets must initialize Apad to the value of the IP source address that would be used when sending an OSPFv2 packet, repeated L/4 times, where L is the length of the hash, measured in octets. The basic idea is to incorporate the IP source address from the IP header in the cryptographic authentication computation so that any change of IP source address in a replayed packet can be detected. NEW: OSPF routers sending OSPF packets must initialize the first 4 octets of Apad to the value of the IP source address that would be used when sending the OSPFv2 packet. The remainder of Apad will contain the value of 0x878FE1F3 repeated (L - 4)/4 times, where L is the length of the hash, measured in octets. The basic idea is to incorporate the IP source address from the IP header in the cryptographic authentication computation so that any change of IP source address in a replayed packet can be detected. Thanks, Acee From nobody Mon Nov 3 10:32:24 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 169A21A6FEF for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 10:32:22 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.095 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ewxQH3ZLKOex for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 10:32:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD8961A1B70 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 10:32:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1411; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1415039541; x=1416249141; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=xNzHtWbg8y9mn/qGW9D4XyqoNtuT7rCm3eeOKIv2nUQ=; b=KLbR0whlhzo9HpkJvZ6dCay2CY1MZ4BJn5uBPVh7dB9LtH6tQlPH7jJv 8B7XFFPVqvoVsX4aKOJWrmf8oDYSJulWautS5wJMzpPy9lK2Jxw8nRHGJ zC8oCukcj8EIlKwSb08PeVq83fb9wM/5iZX93oIU+3+qNxuW+bNHwoX0L k=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhcFAAfJV1StJA2B/2dsb2JhbABcgw5UWATNfAqHTQKBJRYBAQEBAX2EAwEBBAEBAWsbAgEIGCMLJwslAgQBEohBDcgaAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBFgSRF4RLBYs4hmKLZ4Exg02NSYQJgjSBRGyBSIEDAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,308,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="369200247" Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 Nov 2014 18:32:20 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com [173.37.183.82]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sA3IWJcj001907 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 18:32:20 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.61]) by xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com ([173.37.183.82]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 12:32:19 -0600 From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" To: "Stewart Bryant (stbryant)" , OSPF WG List Thread-Topic: [OSPF] WG Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extensions to Support Maximally Redundant Trees" - draft-atlas-ospf-mrt-03 Thread-Index: AQHP93FQCqOuGAAuIkuxwA9maUkTeJxPhWoA///FdIA= Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 18:32:19 +0000 Message-ID: References: <5457B4FE.2060505@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <5457B4FE.2060505@cisco.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.204] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/LPCek6zoUBt04izjhi7SQ0GzGL4 Subject: Re: [OSPF] WG Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extensions to Support Maximally Redundant Trees" - draft-atlas-ospf-mrt-03 X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 18:32:22 -0000 Hi Stewart,=20 I agree. We would not progress this document prior to the RTGWG progression of the base MRT documents. Also, if the RTGWG documents change status, then we=B9d expect the companion OSPF document to also change status.=20 Thanks, Acee=20 On 11/3/14, 12:01 PM, "Stewart Bryant (stbryant)" wrote: >On 03/11/2014 14:20, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: >> The base MRT specifications are rtgwg WG documents. Additionally, this >> document now uses the OSPFv2 link extensions that we have converged upon >> for OSPFv2 protocol extension. Hence, the chairs believe this document >>is >> ready for a WG adoption poll. >> >> Please indicate your support (or concerns) for adopting this as a WG >> Document. >> >> Regards, >> -Abhay >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OSPF mailing list >> OSPF@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf >> >A comment that I made over on the MPLS list. > >I am not convinced that MRT has the degree of maturity that we would >normally >require for a routing protocol intended for deployment as part of a major >IGP. This is obviously a discussion that needs to happen in RTGWG. > >I would therefore suggest that whilst the WG may adopt this component >draft, it needs to sequence publication behind a number of the main MRT >drafts and set the track accordingly. > >- Stewart > > From nobody Mon Nov 3 12:04:59 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CA281A8718 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 12:04:55 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XRzyhyjF2kzz for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 12:04:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1on0748.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::748]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBC351A86F3 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 12:04:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.202.141) by BLUPR05MB564.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.202.150) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.11.14; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 20:04:24 +0000 Received: from BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.202.141]) by BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.202.141]) with mapi id 15.01.0011.000; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 20:04:24 +0000 From: John E Drake To: Abhay Roy , "ospf@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [OSPF] WG Adoption poll for draft-zzhang-ospf-two-part-metric-05 Thread-Index: AQHP9zQxUu7cTTYfmkG9v1WDpP6px5xPVA5A Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 20:04:23 +0000 Message-ID: <8dc10d82656d42a38920ed0de5e440d1@BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> References: <545728A4.80204@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <545728A4.80204@cisco.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.14] x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR05MB564; x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-forefront-prvs: 0384275935 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(13464003)(189002)(51704005)(377454003)(199003)(31966008)(21056001)(86362001)(230783001)(40100003)(33646002)(15975445006)(19580395003)(101416001)(77156002)(19580405001)(92566001)(97736003)(2501002)(4396001)(76576001)(108616004)(2656002)(87936001)(99396003)(122556002)(54356999)(76176999)(50986999)(46102003)(64706001)(66066001)(105586002)(120916001)(74316001)(20776003)(106356001)(95666004)(107886001)(106116001)(107046002)(62966003)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR05MB564; H:BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/TFxv_kRBT0yV_FmPR2TAhvx0e5o Subject: Re: [OSPF] WG Adoption poll for draft-zzhang-ospf-two-part-metric-05 X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 20:04:55 -0000 Support. This solves a real customer problem in a very precise manner. Yours Irrespectively, John > -----Original Message----- > From: OSPF [mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Abhay Roy > Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2014 11:03 PM > To: ospf@ietf.org > Subject: [OSPF] WG Adoption poll for draft-zzhang-ospf-two-part-metric-05 >=20 > This document has seen some good discussions and a few revisions to cater= to > those suggested changes. >=20 > Please indicate your support (or concerns) for adopting this as a WG > Document. >=20 > Regards, > -Abhay >=20 > _______________________________________________ > OSPF mailing list > OSPF@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf From nobody Mon Nov 3 13:04:36 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA2991A1A33 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 13:04:34 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lp-8JRkO_ynU for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 13:04:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1bon0752.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::1:752]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACEB21A0164 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 13:04:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from BLUPR05CA0071.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.20.41) by BN1PR05MB437.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.58.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.6.9; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 21:04:10 +0000 Received: from BL2FFO11FD050.protection.gbl (2a01:111:f400:7c09::132) by BLUPR05CA0071.outlook.office365.com (2a01:111:e400:855::41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.11.14 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 21:04:10 +0000 Received: from P-EMF01-SAC.jnpr.net (66.129.239.15) by BL2FFO11FD050.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.173.161.212) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.6.13 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 21:04:10 +0000 Received: from magenta.juniper.net (172.17.27.123) by P-EMF01-SAC.jnpr.net (172.24.192.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.146.0; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 13:04:09 -0800 Received: from juniper.net (sapphire.juniper.net [172.17.28.108]) by magenta.juniper.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id sA3L44R68597; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 13:04:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yakov@juniper.net) Message-ID: <201411032104.sA3L44R68597@magenta.juniper.net> To: Abhay Roy In-Reply-To: <545728A4.80204@cisco.com> References: <545728A4.80204@cisco.com> X-MH-In-Reply-To: Abhay Roy message dated "Sun, 02 Nov 2014 23:03:00 -0800." MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <44091.1415048644.1@juniper.net> Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 13:04:04 -0800 From: Yakov Rekhter X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:66.129.239.15; CTRY:US; IPV:NLI; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(51704005)(199003)(189002)(97736003)(86362001)(230783001)(21056001)(47776003)(97756001)(92726001)(20776003)(105596002)(50466002)(16796002)(15975445006)(92566001)(19580405001)(46102003)(120916001)(4396001)(62966003)(84676001)(54356999)(19580395003)(81156004)(44976005)(107046002)(31966008)(23726002)(87936001)(99396003)(46406003)(76176999)(50986999)(69596002)(64706001)(102836001)(6806004)(110136001)(106466001)(68736004)(95666004)(77156002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN1PR05MB437; H:P-EMF01-SAC.jnpr.net; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoDomainNonexistent; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:; X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN1PR05MB437; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:; X-Forefront-PRVS: 0384275935 Received-SPF: SoftFail (protection.outlook.com: domain of transitioning juniper.net discourages use of 66.129.239.15 as permitted sender) Authentication-Results: spf=softfail (sender IP is 66.129.239.15) smtp.mailfrom=yakov@juniper.net; X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/8kCLJtMCJXDvc5pzA44lyYlF1WY Cc: "ospf@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [OSPF] WG Adoption poll for draft-zzhang-ospf-two-part-metric-05 X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 21:04:35 -0000 Abhay, > This document has seen some good discussions and a few revisions to > cater to those suggested changes. > > Please indicate your support (or concerns) for adopting this as a WG Support. Yakov. > Document. > > Regards, > -Abhay > > _______________________________________________ > OSPF mailing list > OSPF@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf From nobody Mon Nov 3 19:10:12 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73BAA1A887F for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 19:10:10 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.006 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.006 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xHePeVND0bgH for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 19:10:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5106E1A1BCA for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 19:10:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BLG28316; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 03:10:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from SZXEMA404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.36) by lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 03:10:05 +0000 Received: from SZXEMA508-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.32]) by SZXEMA404-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.36]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 11:10:02 +0800 From: "Wunan (Eric)" To: OSPF WG List Thread-Topic: [OSPF] WG Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extensions to Support Maximally Redundant Trees" - draft-atlas-ospf-mrt-03 Thread-Index: AQHP93lhkMVlirrvvU2bC6mUovqJI5xPyjpQ Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 03:10:01 +0000 Message-ID: <0F26584357FD124DB93F1535E4B0A650372A377C@szxema508-mbx.china.huawei.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.87.25] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/QZG1ADJefcZcI6DsJvVPaoObjxA Subject: Re: [OSPF] WG Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extensions to Support Maximally Redundant Trees" - draft-atlas-ospf-mrt-03 X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 03:10:10 -0000 U3VwcG9ydC4NCg0KLS0tLS3Tyrz+1K28/i0tLS0tDQq3orz+yMs6IEFjZWUgTGluZGVtIChhY2Vl KSBbbWFpbHRvOmFjZWVAY2lzY28uY29tXSANCreiy83KsbzkOiAyMDE0xOoxMdTCM8jVIDIyOjIw DQrK1bz+yMs6IE9TUEYgV0cgTGlzdA0K1vfM4jogW09TUEZdIFdHIEFkb3B0aW9uIFBvbGwgZm9y ICJPU1BGIEV4dGVuc2lvbnMgdG8gU3VwcG9ydCBNYXhpbWFsbHkgUmVkdW5kYW50IFRyZWVzIiAt IGRyYWZ0LWF0bGFzLW9zcGYtbXJ0LTAzDQoNClRoZSBiYXNlIE1SVCBzcGVjaWZpY2F0aW9ucyBh cmUgcnRnd2cgV0cgZG9jdW1lbnRzLiBBZGRpdGlvbmFsbHksIHRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQgbm93IHVz ZXMgdGhlIE9TUEZ2MiBsaW5rIGV4dGVuc2lvbnMgdGhhdCB3ZSBoYXZlIGNvbnZlcmdlZCB1cG9u IGZvciBPU1BGdjIgcHJvdG9jb2wgZXh0ZW5zaW9uLiBIZW5jZSwgdGhlIGNoYWlycyBiZWxpZXZl IHRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQgaXMgcmVhZHkgZm9yIGEgV0cgYWRvcHRpb24gcG9sbC4NCg0KUGxlYXNl IGluZGljYXRlIHlvdXIgc3VwcG9ydCAob3IgY29uY2VybnMpIGZvciBhZG9wdGluZyB0aGlzIGFz IGEgV0cgRG9jdW1lbnQuDQoNClJlZ2FyZHMsDQotQWJoYXkNCg0KDQo= From nobody Tue Nov 4 04:42:54 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F8141A00AE for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 04:42:52 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.494 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.494 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id frg34svFuo21 for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 04:42:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0D471A0092 for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 04:42:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BOK09466; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 12:42:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.34) by lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 12:42:47 +0000 Received: from NKGEML506-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.162]) by nkgeml403-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.34]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 20:42:42 +0800 From: Lizhenbin To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" Thread-Topic: WG Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extensions to Support Maximally Redundant Trees" - draft-atlas-ospf-mrt-03 Thread-Index: AQHP93FQCqOuGAAuIkuxwA9maUkTeJxQai7w Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 12:42:40 +0000 Message-ID: <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D232D5A77@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.76.77] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/i7_p-BVGJAwNkoAbGFGomyXvjBI Cc: OSPF WG List Subject: [OSPF] =?gb2312?b?tPC4tDogV0cgQWRvcHRpb24gUG9sbCBmb3IgIk9TUEYg?= =?gb2312?b?RXh0ZW5zaW9ucyB0byBTdXBwb3J0IE1heGltYWxseSBSZWR1bmRhbnQgVHJl?= =?gb2312?b?ZXMiIC0gZHJhZnQtYXRsYXMtb3NwZi1tcnQtMDM=?= X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 12:42:52 -0000 U3VwcG9ydCBhcyB0aGUgY28tYXV0aG9yLg0KDQoNClpoZW5iaW4oUm9iaW4pDQoNCg0KDQoNCi0t LS0t08q8/tStvP4tLS0tLQ0Kt6K8/sjLOiBPU1BGIFttYWlsdG86b3NwZi1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYu b3JnXSC0+rHtIEFjZWUgTGluZGVtIChhY2VlKQ0Kt6LLzcqxvOQ6IDIwMTTE6jEx1MIzyNUgMjI6 MjANCsrVvP7IyzogT1NQRiBXRyBMaXN0DQrW98ziOiBbT1NQRl0gV0cgQWRvcHRpb24gUG9sbCBm b3IgIk9TUEYgRXh0ZW5zaW9ucyB0byBTdXBwb3J0IE1heGltYWxseSBSZWR1bmRhbnQgVHJlZXMi IC0gZHJhZnQtYXRsYXMtb3NwZi1tcnQtMDMNCg0KVGhlIGJhc2UgTVJUIHNwZWNpZmljYXRpb25z IGFyZSBydGd3ZyBXRyBkb2N1bWVudHMuIEFkZGl0aW9uYWxseSwgdGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCBub3cg dXNlcyB0aGUgT1NQRnYyIGxpbmsgZXh0ZW5zaW9ucyB0aGF0IHdlIGhhdmUgY29udmVyZ2VkIHVw b24gZm9yIE9TUEZ2MiBwcm90b2NvbCBleHRlbnNpb24uIEhlbmNlLCB0aGUgY2hhaXJzIGJlbGll dmUgdGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCBpcyByZWFkeSBmb3IgYSBXRyBhZG9wdGlvbiBwb2xsLg0KDQpQbGVh c2UgaW5kaWNhdGUgeW91ciBzdXBwb3J0IChvciBjb25jZXJucykgZm9yIGFkb3B0aW5nIHRoaXMg YXMgYSBXRyBEb2N1bWVudC4NCg0KUmVnYXJkcywNCi1BYmhheQ0KDQpfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0KT1NQRiBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QNCk9TUEZA aWV0Zi5vcmcNCmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vb3NwZg0K From nobody Tue Nov 4 06:34:07 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D171A888D for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 06:34:06 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19TZNqtgrQEl for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 06:34:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0127.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.127]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 258D31A88DB for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 06:34:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from BLUPR05MB561.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.202.139) by BLUPR05MB499.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.29.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.11.14; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 14:34:02 +0000 Received: from BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.202.141) by BLUPR05MB561.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.202.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.11.14; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 14:34:00 +0000 Received: from BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.202.141]) by BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.202.141]) with mapi id 15.01.0011.000; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 14:34:00 +0000 From: John E Drake To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" , "draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions@tools.ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions (draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-06.txt) Thread-Index: AQHP1kwRt2W4kADXMU+3Wez32PlegZwzN9QAgB2RjpA= Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 14:34:00 +0000 Message-ID: <9cf84f74ab614b9e81f1ca4107b31be9@BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> References: <23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B865FACE0@szxeml556-mbs.china.huawei.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.14] x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR05MB561;UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-forefront-prvs: 03853D523D x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(53754006)(377454003)(479174003)(199003)(13464003)(189002)(164054003)(51704005)(37854004)(24454002)(99286002)(19580395003)(20776003)(107046002)(40100003)(64706001)(106356001)(105586002)(62966003)(106116001)(76576001)(66066001)(95666004)(19580405001)(31966008)(33646002)(92566001)(15975445006)(86362001)(230783001)(108616004)(122556002)(99396003)(54356999)(97736003)(2656002)(50986999)(87936001)(21056001)(15202345003)(46102003)(74316001)(76176999)(101416001)(120916001)(4396001)(77156002)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR05MB561; H:BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR05MB499; X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/EwvWgxkfaElqM03F-U2DV_uoyJw Cc: OSPF WG List Subject: Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions (draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-06.txt) X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 14:34:06 -0000 Comments inline Yours Irrespectively, John > -----Original Message----- > From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:acee@cisco.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 11:52 AM > To: draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions@tools.ietf.org > Cc: Dhruv Dhody; OSPF WG List > Subject: Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Traffic Engineering = (TE) > Metric Extensions (draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-06.txt) >=20 > Authors, > Can we get these issues taken care of in the version which will go throug= h the > next phase of reviews? > Thanks, > Acee >=20 > On 9/22/14, 5:59 AM, "Dhruv Dhody" wrote: >=20 > >Hi All, > > > >Fully support moving this work along. > > > >I have following comments/suggestions, which can handled along with > >other last call comments. > > > >(1) Sec 1: Introduction > > > > This document describes extensions to OSPF TE (hereafter called "OSPF > > TE Metric Extensions"), that can be used to distribute network > > performance information (such as link delay, delay variation, packet > > loss, residual bandwidth, and available bandwidth). > > > >Utilized Bandwidth can also be added in the above list. [JD] Okay=20 > > > >(2) A reference to PCE should also be added along with the mention of > >ALTO server. See > >http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware/ > >In fact the steps mentioned for the ingress in section 3 are applicable > >for a stateful PCE as well. [JD] Why?=20 > > > >(3)Is there a particular reason to reference RFC6375, which is MPLS-TP > >document below? Or the intention was to use 6374? > > > > The methods for initially gathering that > > performance information, such as [RFC6375], or acting on it once it > > is distributed are outside the scope of this document. Example > > mechanisms to measure latency, delay variation, and loss in an MPLS > > network are given in [RFC6374]. [JD] I will delete the reference to RFC 6375=20 > > > >(4) Suggested change to add delay variation and to update packet-loss > >to just say percentage (the unit). > >OLD: > > Delay values MUST be quantified in units of microseconds, > > packet loss MUST be quantified as a percentage of packets sent, and > > bandwidth MUST be sent as bytes per second. > >NEW: > > Delay and delay variation values MUST be quantified in units of > >microseconds, > > packet loss MUST be quantified as a percentage, and > > bandwidth MUST be sent as bytes per second. > > [JD] Okay=20 > >(5) Sec 4.2.7. Reserved > > > > This field is reserved for future use. It MUST be set to 0 when sent > > and MUST be ignored when received. > > > > When only an average delay value is sent, this field is not present > > in the TLV. > > > >I think you meant to say that the Min/Max Unidirectional Link Delay > >Sub-TLV is not present instead of reserved field. [JD] Okay=20 > > > >(6) Sec 4.3. Unidirectional Delay Variation Sub-TLV > > > > The delay variation advertised by > > this sub-TLV MUST be the delay from the local neighbor to the remote > > one (i.e. the forward path latency). > > > >We should say 'forward path latency-variation' in this case. [JD] Okay > > > >(7) Sec 11. Security Considerations > >Since the network performance metric might be considered extra > >sensitive in some deployments it should be strongly suggested that this > >information must be protected from tampering using existing mechanism. [JD] Okay =20 > > > >(8) Sec 12. IANA Considerations > >This section needs updating with the list of the TLVs [JD] Okay > > > >(9) A reference to RFC5392 for Inter-AS-TE-v2 LSA should be added to > >avoid any confusion to the reader.. [JD] I don't see any reason to put in a plug for this particular RFC > > > >Nits > >- Remove reference from abstract for [RFC3630] > >- Update [Alto] reference to [RFC7285] > >- Expand CSPF, RSVP-TE, LSA on first use > >- Min/Max delay and Low/High delay are used interchangeably, suggest to > >use only one [JD] Okay > > > >Regards, > >Dhruv > > From nobody Tue Nov 4 06:52:54 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 405D11A894C for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 06:52:53 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.146 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.146 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W-51NV5GFhEM for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 06:52:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from linfre.de (linfre.de [83.151.26.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CF781A702A for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 06:52:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from e7240.linfre (109.47.3.3) by linfreserv.linfre (Axigen) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA id 081921; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 15:52:41 +0100 From: Karsten Thomann To: ospf@ietf.org Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 15:52:39 +0100 Message-ID: <3413594.RgQCpJ1SCx@e7240.linfre> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.2 (Linux/3.17.1-52.g5c4d099-desktop; KDE/4.14.2; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <545728A4.80204@cisco.com> References: <545728A4.80204@cisco.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-AXIGEN-DK-Result: No records DomainKey-Status: no signature X-AxigenSpam-Level: 6 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/1ZsR5ic2zfRW0Maryyv3SUlrqXI Subject: Re: [OSPF] WG Adoption poll for draft-zzhang-ospf-two-part-metric-05 X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 14:52:53 -0000 Read the draft and support adoption Regards Karsten Am Sonntag, 2. November 2014, 23:03:00 schrieb Abhay Roy: > This document has seen some good discussions and a few revisions to > cater to those suggested changes. > > Please indicate your support (or concerns) for adopting this as a WG > Document. > > Regards, > -Abhay > > _______________________________________________ > OSPF mailing list > OSPF@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf From nobody Tue Nov 4 07:32:02 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75B251A896F for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 07:31:56 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.795 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.795 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0CJPOjkKYqWn for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 07:31:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B02A1A8A14 for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 07:31:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BLG95176; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 15:31:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from SZXEML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.93) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 15:31:14 +0000 Received: from szxeml556-mbs.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.112]) by szxeml406-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.93]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 23:31:05 +0800 From: Dhruv Dhody To: John E Drake , "Acee Lindem (acee)" , "draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions@tools.ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions (draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-06.txt) Thread-Index: AQHP1DIEHMSGequlDk2aRIP+ttVfipwM3iIggCXXyQCAHZRTAIAAkvuQ Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 15:31:04 +0000 Message-ID: <23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B8661273B@szxeml556-mbs.china.huawei.com> References: <23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B865FACE0@szxeml556-mbs.china.huawei.com> <9cf84f74ab614b9e81f1ca4107b31be9@BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> In-Reply-To: <9cf84f74ab614b9e81f1ca4107b31be9@BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.47.153.76] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/PB5fcRnos-jLrbsg-YXCiVLWZd8 Cc: OSPF WG List Subject: Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions (draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-06.txt) X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 15:31:56 -0000 Hi John,=20 Snip to the only open point.. (snip) > > >(2) A reference to PCE should also be added along with the mention > of > > >ALTO server. See > > >http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware/ > > >In fact the steps mentioned for the ingress in section 3 are > > >applicable for a stateful PCE as well. >=20 > [JD] Why? > I feel just the following minor change should be fine in the introduction s= ection. =20 OLD: The data distributed by OSPF TE Metric Extensions is meant to be used as part of the operation of the routing protocol (e.g. by replacing cost with latency or considering bandwidth as well as cost), by enhancing CSPF, or for other uses such as supplementing the data used by an Alto server [Alto]. With respect to CSPF, the data distributed by OSPF TE Metric Extensions can be used to setup, fail over, and fail back data paths using protocols such as RSVP-TE [RFC3209].[ Draft-ietf-mpls-te-express-path] describes some methods for using this information to compute Label Switched Paths (LSPs) at the LSP ingress. NEW: The data distributed by OSPF TE Metric Extensions is meant to be used as part of the operation of the routing protocol (e.g. by replacing cost with latency or considering bandwidth as well as cost), by enhancing CSPF, or for other uses such as supplementing the data used by a PCE [RFC4655] or an Alto server [Alto]. With respect to CSPF, the d= ata distributed by OSPF TE Metric Extensions can be used to setup, fail over, and fail back data paths using protocols such as RSVP-TE [RFC3209].[ Draft-ietf-mpls-te-express-path] and [draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware]= =20 describes some methods for using this information to compute Label Switched Paths (LSPs) at the LSP ingress and PCE respectively. =20 This would let the reader know that PCE can also use this information along= with the Ingress/ALTO server.=20 =20 (snip) Regards, Dhruv From nobody Wed Nov 5 05:06:48 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D13E1A8896 for ; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 05:06:42 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.095 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oQgWyGhNvWbY for ; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 05:05:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4811D1A88AE for ; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 05:05:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=422; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1415192712; x=1416402312; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject: content-transfer-encoding; bh=iytvwbE7WMOGx+Hjncrf3X7TsxQOItrK1U99XPTvrPs=; b=b248J3tevvfqw6utccB7T6gRUmfPIO8Vph2ug8JF/EGG+seprOOARsk/ 1VjBIlngy/fv0ZEqJHjQ/HyAGrZhO2toKe1Bn1NtfFdCBKvfTb+H2e6F+ 7C2Yjij9vNuSJN1ZIpjMsocqgNa2xMw4gjqUUq9561iPcIQXOwkHKxJWf c=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArEEAE8gWlStJssW/2dsb2JhbABch0HTKgEBAQEBfYQsFUA2AgUWCwILAwIBAgFLDQgBAYg9pA2PQpUnAQEBBwEBAQEegS2SYoFUBZ4QgTGDTIMyjiaDeTyCegEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,319,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="231419695" Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Nov 2014 13:05:00 +0000 Received: from as-lnx.cisco.com (ams-asmirnov-8714.cisco.com [10.55.140.85]) (authenticated bits=0) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sA5D4uTY010391 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 13:04:59 GMT Message-ID: <545A2078.4050203@cisco.com> Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 14:04:56 +0100 From: Anton Smirnov Organization: Cisco Systems User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: OSPF List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-User: asmirnov Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/ER1kM7MQ9So2Ele3d69CqHge64M Subject: [OSPF] OSPF Cross-Address Family MPLS TE routing X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 13:06:44 -0000 Hi all, there is a -02 revision of draft-smirnov-ospf-xaf-te. This draft describes technique how OSPFv3 may reliably compute IPv6 routes over MPLS TE tunnels signaled by OSPFv2 (and vice verse). The revision contains only cosmetic editorial changes. Otherwise this draft is stable for the past few months. If you haven't had a chance yet to read the draft please do. Thanks. -- Anton From nobody Wed Nov 5 14:33:16 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A3401A00A6 for ; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 14:33:15 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.095 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FFNN0AQSHeBz for ; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 14:33:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 981F21A008C for ; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 14:33:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1976; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1415226793; x=1416436393; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=AzT4/VVbNswxvxIuyslaq/R/2QcI7UlG9FICm91AFzo=; b=JwjUuKVKBbS8ysMLP6uCezcjJuMCIR9/KGU7KkwcUjQha9Cn20ImBkYZ fIfIbGbl7ZuWdHnolE58D/GP9N6wxz4xoVNPyhKSPWhisTYS4QcoXQQ6x hLfbpt0JoNVKhU5P4800f9DiFEYUBaMxLGhVIEXTM2jM36OWbRhH0ZsV1 M=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgUFAPWkWlStJA2E/2dsb2JhbABbgw6BMdYJFgEBAQEBfYQJOlEBPkInBIhUp1+kdQEBCAIBH5VjBZIhi2+BMYNNiieHMoN4gjSBAwEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,322,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="93722984" Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Nov 2014 22:33:12 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com [173.36.12.83]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sA5MXCs3020429 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 22:33:12 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.61]) by xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com ([173.36.12.83]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 16:33:12 -0600 From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" To: OSPF WG List Thread-Topic: OSPFv3 Extended LSA Update Thread-Index: AQHP+Uh7z0j0bRRh3UKgjpb47CCVKQ== Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 22:33:11 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.204] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <701FBE0BAF7E6D42A7AE5FF371B0DD25@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/qhIek5KCC5uz0WuHvVvphmBiGV8 Subject: [OSPF] OSPFv3 Extended LSA Update X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 22:33:15 -0000 Given the high volume of OSPF session requests for IETF 91 and the fact that the changes since the last IETF are minor, I decided not to allocate any session time to this important OSPF WG draft. However, I am providing an update here: Recent Changes: - Added an IPv4 Forwarding address sub-TLV in support of IPv4 addresses families. This is consistent with the IPv4 link-local address sub-TLV.=20 - Added text with respect to mandatory TLVs. If the mandatory TLVs are not present, the LSA is treated as malformed. This will simplify implementation and is consistent with the base LSAs where this information must be included. * For E-Network-LSAs, the Attached-Router TLV is mandatory.=20 * For E-Inter-Area-Prefix-LSAs, the Inter-Area-Prefix TLV is mandatory. * For E-Inter-Area-Router-LSAs, the Inter-Area-Router TLV is mandatory.=20 * For E-AS-External-LSAs, the External-Prefix TLV is mandatory. =20 * For E-NSSA-LSAs, the External-Prefix TLV is mandatory. =20 * For E-Link-LSAs, either an IPv6-Link-Local Address TLV or IPv4-Link-Local Address TLV is mandatory (dependent on the address family). =20 - I did NOT make at least one Router-Link TLV in the E-Router-LSA or at least one Intra-Area-Prefix TLV in the E-Intra-Area-Prefix LSA. We can discuss this. However, since the number is variable most implementation already handled 0 links or prefixes. Also, I seem to remember one implementation not including the full LSAs contents when purging stale LSAs. =20 - Added a section on the behavior for received malformed LSAs. Next Steps:=20 - Please review. - Looking for some implementation momentum - I can see OSPFv3 evolving into the NG IGP. Thanks, Acee=20 =20 =20 =20 =20 From nobody Fri Nov 7 12:50:18 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 151081A1B13 for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 12:50:16 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.095 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yUBMudbFHKFH for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 12:50:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C6E71A1B12 for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 12:50:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2210; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1415393414; x=1416603014; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=m07j+aHyDKyLS1x6NAlRzTv/Re0MRA2fbZx63wDxEqY=; b=QJ0f/gTCDPtqSFurnvjddWyoQ0M6rPBilU3OOhqD0H1LZWPyhtVUCAs6 HNKIJBQXgGQ4PNfa99CRflAh2cmc8nUKPJCRjb+4+O2fc7dKQfwgDTJtk qFEf6Nm37u68OHy3DKi4uvQ8IZ4HTEXAKHFJDy6e72c9bfg9isbjNkp9R s=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Au0HAJIvXVStJV2Y/2dsb2JhbABbgw6BLQSDAtAkAhx/FgEBAQEBfYQDAQEENFUCAQgcKAICMCUCBBOIQZ0OnFcGlWcBAQEBAQEBAwEBAQEBHYEnjC2DRIJxgVoFkieLc5ZcggEegVpsgUiBAwEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,334,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="370371162" Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Nov 2014 20:50:13 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com [173.37.183.89]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sA7KoDM0020933 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 20:50:13 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.61]) by xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com ([173.37.183.89]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 14:50:13 -0600 From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" To: OSPF WG List Thread-Topic: Security Extension for OSPFv2 when using Manual Key Management Thread-Index: AQHP94+gFEK2XzG7+UOVpJoC+LsJaZxVunyA Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 20:50:12 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.204] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="euc-kr" Content-ID: <5C0B44CF704FAF4EB30EE74C19CB32E8@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/wrtnHvLtWmm_4vrp_y5NJ01mgio Subject: Re: [OSPF] Security Extension for OSPFv2 when using Manual Key Management X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 20:50:16 -0000 SSBndWVzcyBldmVyeW9uZSBhZ3JlZSB3aXRoIHRoaXMgZHJhZnQgY2hhbmdlPw0KVGhhbmtzLA0K QWNlZSANCg0KT24gMTEvMy8xNCwgMTI6NTcgUE0sICJBY2VlIExpbmRlbSAoYWNlZSkiIDxhY2Vl QGNpc2NvLmNvbT4gd3JvdGU6DQoNCj5BcmUgdGhlcmUgYW55IGltcGxlbWVudGF0aW9ucyBvZiB0 aGlzIGRyYWZ0PyBUaGVyZSBpcywgd2hhdCBJIGNvbnNpZGVyLCBhDQo+bWlzdGFrZSBpbiB0aGUg c291cmNlIGFkZHJlc3MgcHJvdGVjdGlvbi4gSan2ZCBsaWtlIHRvIG1ha2UgaXQgY29uc2lzdGVu dA0KPndpdGggUkZDIDcxNjYuIFJhdGhlciB0aGFuIHJlcGVhdGluZyB0aGUgSVAgU291cmNlIEFk ZHJlc3MgKEwvNCkgdGltZXMgaW4NCj5BcGFkLCBpdCBpcyBpbmNsdWRlZCBvbmNlIHRoZSBzYW1l IGFzIGlzIGRvbmUgd2l0aCB0aGUgSVB2NiBhZGRyZXNzIGluIFJGQw0KPjcxNjYuIERvZXMgdGhp cyBjYXVzZSBhbnlvbmUgYW55IGluY29tcGF0aWJpbGl0aWVzIHdpdGggZGVwbG95ZWQNCj5pbXBs ZW1lbnRhdGlvbnM/IA0KPg0KPiAgIE9MRDoNCj4gICAgIE9TUEYgcm91dGVycyBzZW5kaW5nIE9T UEYgcGFja2V0cyBtdXN0IGluaXRpYWxpemUgQXBhZCB0byB0aGUgdmFsdWUNCj4gICAgIG9mIHRo ZSBJUCBzb3VyY2UgYWRkcmVzcyB0aGF0IHdvdWxkIGJlIHVzZWQgd2hlbiBzZW5kaW5nIGFuIE9T UEZ2Mg0KPiAgICAgcGFja2V0LCByZXBlYXRlZCBMLzQgdGltZXMsIHdoZXJlIEwgaXMgdGhlIGxl bmd0aCBvZiB0aGUgaGFzaCwNCj4gICAgIG1lYXN1cmVkIGluIG9jdGV0cy4gIFRoZSBiYXNpYyBp ZGVhIGlzIHRvIGluY29ycG9yYXRlIHRoZSBJUCBzb3VyY2UNCj4gICAgIGFkZHJlc3MgZnJvbSB0 aGUgSVAgaGVhZGVyIGluIHRoZSBjcnlwdG9ncmFwaGljIGF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uDQo+ICAgICBj b21wdXRhdGlvbiBzbyB0aGF0IGFueSBjaGFuZ2Ugb2YgSVAgc291cmNlIGFkZHJlc3MgaW4gYSBy ZXBsYXllZA0KPiAgICAgcGFja2V0IGNhbiBiZSBkZXRlY3RlZC4NCj4NCj4gICBORVc6DQo+ICAg ICBPU1BGIHJvdXRlcnMgc2VuZGluZyBPU1BGIHBhY2tldHMgbXVzdCBpbml0aWFsaXplIHRoZSBm aXJzdCA0IG9jdGV0cw0KPiAgICAgb2YgQXBhZCB0byB0aGUgdmFsdWUgb2YgdGhlIElQIHNvdXJj ZSBhZGRyZXNzIHRoYXQgd291bGQgYmUgdXNlZCB3aGVuDQo+ICAgICBzZW5kaW5nIHRoZSBPU1BG djIgcGFja2V0LiAgVGhlIHJlbWFpbmRlciBvZiBBcGFkIHdpbGwgY29udGFpbg0KPiAgICAgdGhl IHZhbHVlIG9mIDB4ODc4RkUxRjMgcmVwZWF0ZWQgKEwgLSA0KS80IHRpbWVzLCB3aGVyZSBMIGlz IHRoZQ0KPiAgICAgbGVuZ3RoIG9mIHRoZSBoYXNoLCBtZWFzdXJlZCBpbiBvY3RldHMuICBUaGUg YmFzaWMgaWRlYSBpcyB0bw0KPiAgICAgaW5jb3Jwb3JhdGUgdGhlIElQIHNvdXJjZSBhZGRyZXNz IGZyb20gdGhlIElQIGhlYWRlciBpbiB0aGUNCj4gICAgIGNyeXB0b2dyYXBoaWMgYXV0aGVudGlj YXRpb24gY29tcHV0YXRpb24gc28gdGhhdCBhbnkgY2hhbmdlIG9mIElQDQo+ICAgICBzb3VyY2Ug YWRkcmVzcyBpbiBhIHJlcGxheWVkIHBhY2tldCBjYW4gYmUgZGV0ZWN0ZWQuDQo+DQo+VGhhbmtz LA0KPg0KPkFjZWUNCj4NCg0K From nobody Fri Nov 7 15:26:32 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8DB01A1A27 for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 15:26:30 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X4IvKEJYDgRo for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 15:26:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from usevmg20.ericsson.net (usevmg20.ericsson.net [198.24.6.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9277C1A0035 for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 15:26:25 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: c618062d-f79206d0000014d2-ef-545cfca30bb3 Received: from EUSAAHC001.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.75]) by usevmg20.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 5A.23.05330.3ACFC545; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 18:08:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from EUSAAMB105.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.122]) by EUSAAHC001.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 18:26:23 -0500 From: Uma Chunduri To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" , OSPF WG List Thread-Topic: [OSPF] Security Extension for OSPFv2 when using Manual Key Management Thread-Index: AQHP94+gFEK2XzG7+UOVpJoC+LsJaZxVunyAgAAXoqA= Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 23:26:23 +0000 Message-ID: <1B502206DFA0C544B7A60469152008633F40A6BE@eusaamb105.ericsson.se> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.9] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrCLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXSPt+7iPzEhBouOqFpMfjuP2aLl3j12 ByaPKb83snosWfKTKYApissmJTUnsyy1SN8ugSvj1rerLAWXhCquXfvF0sB4mq+LkZNDQsBE YteaFkYIW0ziwr31bF2MXBxCAkcYJX6dfMIO4SxjlLhw9Bg7SBWbgJ7Ex6k/wWwRAXeJWSsP M4PYwgIhEm8WrGaBiIdKLH4wiw3CtpJovPITrIZFQEXi+cRbQDYHB6+Ar8SN/miQsJCAp8T1 +0/AyjkFtCXaOuYzgdiMQAd9P7UGzGYWEJe49QQiLiEgILFkz3lmCFtU4uXjf6wQtqLEvv7p 7BD1ehI3pk5hg7C1JZYtfA1WzysgKHFy5hOWCYyis5CMnYWkZRaSlllIWhYwsqxi5CgtTi3L TTcy2MQIjIZjEmy6Oxj3vLQ8xCjAwajEw2t4NDpEiDWxrLgy9xCjNAeLkjjvrNp5wUIC6Ykl qdmpqQWpRfFFpTmpxYcYmTg4pRoYlyjY9POcDNm7Q+JU6f+tFd4zTqeXdu7kfulWUtb5avfL 5FdP1ixesHpX64G/J8v3fNhzLf58w6HdIYZ/vR4U3KxebMspWPeiLdDO4/+xsK6uC1Ntyzs2 rbKrZP3zRywkqb1sLcvXK/993nVXVzioHg//ncAeuo23xKO69tPaRSvn8G3qYrufq8RSnJFo qMVcVJwIAMPhvuFnAgAA Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/7UW1dHOd42t4L6107Q-VowzjmFo Subject: Re: [OSPF] Security Extension for OSPFv2 when using Manual Key Management X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 23:26:30 -0000 Hi Acee, Don't know about any incompatibilities in deployed implementations... But this is a good change and as you said, it is compatible to 7166. -- Uma C. PS: Though off topic (and not specific to OSPF too), but lot of RPs are stuck = to this SHA/apad stuff=20 but ideally algorithms and their details SHOULD be totally agnostic to t= he protocols. -----Original Message----- From: OSPF [mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Friday, November 07, 2014 12:50 PM To: OSPF WG List Subject: Re: [OSPF] Security Extension for OSPFv2 when using Manual Key Man= agement I guess everyone agree with this draft change? Thanks, Acee=20 On 11/3/14, 12:57 PM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" wrote: >Are there any implementations of this draft? There is, what I consider,=20 >a mistake in the source address protection. I=B9d like to make it=20 >consistent with RFC 7166. Rather than repeating the IP Source Address=20 >(L/4) times in Apad, it is included once the same as is done with the=20 >IPv6 address in RFC 7166. Does this cause anyone any incompatibilities=20 >with deployed implementations? > > OLD: > OSPF routers sending OSPF packets must initialize Apad to the value > of the IP source address that would be used when sending an OSPFv2 > packet, repeated L/4 times, where L is the length of the hash, > measured in octets. The basic idea is to incorporate the IP source > address from the IP header in the cryptographic authentication > computation so that any change of IP source address in a replayed > packet can be detected. > > NEW: > OSPF routers sending OSPF packets must initialize the first 4 octets > of Apad to the value of the IP source address that would be used when > sending the OSPFv2 packet. The remainder of Apad will contain > the value of 0x878FE1F3 repeated (L - 4)/4 times, where L is the > length of the hash, measured in octets. The basic idea is to > incorporate the IP source address from the IP header in the > cryptographic authentication computation so that any change of IP > source address in a replayed packet can be detected. > >Thanks, > >Acee > _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list OSPF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf From nobody Fri Nov 7 15:46:34 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BBAE1A0035 for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 15:46:32 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -13.581 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.581 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_RHS_DOB=1.514, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JAa1HZXjShKT for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 15:46:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 487181A0029 for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 15:46:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2723; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1415403991; x=1416613591; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=QlB1BQUAoat4nOQNRgI6slPPDMiYxXhXc3EkcOCUQKI=; b=G2UhDkdeCo1sFSAZHu2yqQuqf4umSEkvXh09aa0GZTFzyLC5gxQN+rjk vR4E8qFXyaXIeU6j8lUKyxcFhIr13t1ONrTePd+94hhNiegC9LrMCRRjQ EX6LbDXhPfQ7BlmcIZArxGXH6wCHCLR1kDgUvRpq6wV23SMsJqEv6XESP I=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhEFAJNYXVStJV2c/2dsb2JhbABbgw5UWQTLUAqHTwKBGhYBAQEBAX2EAgEBAQMBAQEBawsFBwQCAQgRBAEBAScHJwsUCQgCBA4FiDgJDc8uAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBEwSNVIMKMwcGgyeBHgWSJ4tzllyCAR6BWmyBSIEDAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,336,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="370412948" Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Nov 2014 23:46:30 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com [173.36.12.79]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sA7NkTdj003595 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 7 Nov 2014 23:46:29 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.61]) by xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com ([173.36.12.79]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 17:46:29 -0600 From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" To: Uma Chunduri Thread-Topic: [OSPF] Security Extension for OSPFv2 when using Manual Key Management Thread-Index: AQHP+uI/tCe2xwzR102oq+nG4hAXVZxWOKkA Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 23:46:28 +0000 Message-ID: <897DC8BA-5120-4A72-AFA0-B7DF5955F2F1@cisco.com> References: <1B502206DFA0C544B7A60469152008633F40A6BE@eusaamb105.ericsson.se> In-Reply-To: <1B502206DFA0C544B7A60469152008633F40A6BE@eusaamb105.ericsson.se> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.205] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: <22C62A0E40661540A7280624BA8B1D28@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/xsEm0sxluUbAaNm3K-zholOxEkw Cc: OSPF WG List Subject: Re: [OSPF] Security Extension for OSPFv2 when using Manual Key Management X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 23:46:32 -0000 Hi Uma,=20 On Nov 7, 2014, at 6:26 PM, Uma Chunduri wrote: > Hi Acee, >=20 > Don't know about any incompatibilities in deployed implementations... > But this is a good change and as you said, it is compatible to 7166. Thanks for the endorsement.=20 >=20 > -- > Uma C. >=20 > PS: >=20 > Though off topic (and not specific to OSPF too), but lot of RPs are stuc= k to this SHA/apad stuff=20 > but ideally algorithms and their details SHOULD be totally agnostic to = the protocols. I think this would have been possible. However, we=92ve already have gone i= n this direction.=20 Thanks, Acee >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: OSPF [mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) > Sent: Friday, November 07, 2014 12:50 PM > To: OSPF WG List > Subject: Re: [OSPF] Security Extension for OSPFv2 when using Manual Key M= anagement >=20 > I guess everyone agree with this draft change? > Thanks, > Acee=20 >=20 > On 11/3/14, 12:57 PM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" wrote: >=20 >> Are there any implementations of this draft? There is, what I consider,= =20 >> a mistake in the source address protection. I=B9d like to make it=20 >> consistent with RFC 7166. Rather than repeating the IP Source Address=20 >> (L/4) times in Apad, it is included once the same as is done with the=20 >> IPv6 address in RFC 7166. Does this cause anyone any incompatibilities=20 >> with deployed implementations? >>=20 >> OLD: >> OSPF routers sending OSPF packets must initialize Apad to the value >> of the IP source address that would be used when sending an OSPFv2 >> packet, repeated L/4 times, where L is the length of the hash, >> measured in octets. The basic idea is to incorporate the IP source >> address from the IP header in the cryptographic authentication >> computation so that any change of IP source address in a replayed >> packet can be detected. >>=20 >> NEW: >> OSPF routers sending OSPF packets must initialize the first 4 octets >> of Apad to the value of the IP source address that would be used when >> sending the OSPFv2 packet. The remainder of Apad will contain >> the value of 0x878FE1F3 repeated (L - 4)/4 times, where L is the >> length of the hash, measured in octets. The basic idea is to >> incorporate the IP source address from the IP header in the >> cryptographic authentication computation so that any change of IP >> source address in a replayed packet can be detected. >>=20 >> Thanks, >>=20 >> Acee >>=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > OSPF mailing list > OSPF@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf From nobody Fri Nov 7 19:16:13 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71BD51A037C for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 19:16:12 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id heX8qWlgi9Kh for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 19:16:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0107.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.107]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D743A1A0267 for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 19:16:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from BY2PR05MB078.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.38.12) by BY2PR05MB646.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.217.149) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.16.15; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 03:16:09 +0000 Received: from BY2PR05MB079.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.38.16) by BY2PR05MB078.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.38.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.16.15; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 03:16:08 +0000 Received: from BY2PR05MB079.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.8.139]) by BY2PR05MB079.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.8.139]) with mapi id 15.01.0016.006; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 03:16:08 +0000 From: "Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" , OSPF WG List Thread-Topic: [OSPF] WG Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extensions to Support Maximally Redundant Trees" - draft-atlas-ospf-mrt-03 Thread-Index: AQHP93lITbl2EIJRck+C48/Up6ehWpxWFbTg Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2014 03:16:06 +0000 Message-ID: <301ba3a5a248412681116d3fd94db682@BY2PR05MB079.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.11] x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR05MB078;UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR05MB078; x-forefront-prvs: 0389EDA07F x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(377454003)(199003)(51704005)(13464003)(189002)(31966008)(97736003)(40100003)(106116001)(101416001)(54356999)(21056001)(20776003)(2656002)(99286002)(95666004)(76176999)(19580395003)(105586002)(106356001)(33646002)(19580405001)(66066001)(87936001)(122556002)(64706001)(86362001)(46102003)(230783001)(62966003)(77156002)(77096003)(74316001)(108616004)(107886001)(76576001)(120916001)(50986999)(107046002)(92566001)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR05MB078; H:BY2PR05MB079.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR05MB646; X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/HUFiVh88nXGcdsWd-t1zY5Unakc Subject: Re: [OSPF] WG Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extensions to Support Maximally Redundant Trees" - draft-atlas-ospf-mrt-03 X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2014 03:16:12 -0000 Support. > -----Original Message----- > From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:acee@cisco.com] > Sent: Monday, November 03, 2014 9:20 AM > To: OSPF WG List > Subject: [OSPF] WG Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extensions to Support > Maximally Redundant Trees" - draft-atlas-ospf-mrt-03 >=20 > The base MRT specifications are rtgwg WG documents. Additionally, this > document now uses the OSPFv2 link extensions that we have converged upon > for OSPFv2 protocol extension. Hence, the chairs believe this document > is > ready for a WG adoption poll. >=20 > Please indicate your support (or concerns) for adopting this as a WG > Document. >=20 > Regards, > -Abhay >=20 >=20 From nobody Mon Nov 10 11:40:02 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A6C51AC3D0 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:40:00 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.095 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wnz0uuComx6X for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:39:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBDC91A0252 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:39:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=234; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1415648397; x=1416857997; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=rkbAY1WaklyduImMoZbf038li8vkKS2ZdyQnOc4csX0=; b=I2qPE/K6ot/VKURhhuDxbXczLcvWQ51AO/VheLYRGBi1ydj0X7tby2XB S1XeRlJiPBxZ73yXhCJxOcymHDXHrCWtEZ1FJfPwzxrDADuSu2cfWtEcz abZSmhi+zzfxv5UwI5T11e3We99QfjCwy0QR9ZkLXeDEo9khL/JKpGtVx 8=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhQFALITYVStJA2E/2dsb2JhbABcgw6BMY1jxxAWAQEBAQF9hAmBCwGBACcEiFSoMaVGAQEIAgEflWcFi0aGa4t0gTSDT41ThAqDeoI0gQMBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,354,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="370976095" Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Nov 2014 19:39:56 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com [173.36.12.77]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sAAJduae007286 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 19:39:56 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.61]) by xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com ([173.36.12.77]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 13:39:56 -0600 From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" To: OSPF WG List Thread-Topic: OSPF WG Meeting on Wednesday Thread-Index: AQHP/R4aFi43LOkcDUyNQRnojERDTg== Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 19:39:55 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.21.74.183] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-ID: <7FFB06263318D042BF5B7AC2D1BA4C3D@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/Kx3B-ALTqD-CtVsUM0Z_IPckzw4 Subject: [OSPF] OSPF WG Meeting on Wednesday X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 19:40:00 -0000 We have a volunteer to take minutes. Do we have someone who can be the jabber scribe?=20 Also, if you are presenting and have not sent me your slides, please do so ASAP. I=B9m still missing a few slide decks. Thanks, Acee From nobody Mon Nov 10 12:41:38 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1BA31ACE3E for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 12:41:35 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.095 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nw5sOVjpWy_s for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 12:41:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45FC91A70FF for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 12:41:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2432; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1415652094; x=1416861694; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=tTCFnSdB2i8EHu/V0HJKczNeA6gMtoCV+jcVJW7KuB4=; b=cVzMTbYnqLw4yaFgvkm6EJ9z0aoRmxv3ZR7lGBIkTivP1i2KkeqFiNXF FCIDa2bnJA2eUc2lZrsPDKb2jlWUthGcf5+/jBszEkPs8jdYKoQkfXmx3 5lsuhGczeTAAYMosSlkrFliuRlgqy/3SRjA23szL1KqJ/uPBwrfWe6Ybm w=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgEIAG8iYVStJV2a/2dsb2JhbABcgw5UVAUEgwLIfYdNAhyBDBYBAQEBAX2EAgEBAQQ0QxICAQgYBCgCAjAbAQYDAgQTCYg4CAWaL5xXBpYSAQEBAQEBBAEBAQEBARyBJ49TIoJxgVoFkjGEU4chgTQ9gxKRXYICHhaBRGyBSIEDAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,354,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="95258883" Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Nov 2014 20:41:33 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com [173.36.12.89]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sAAKfX15022293 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 20:41:33 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.61]) by xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com ([173.36.12.89]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:41:33 -0600 From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" To: OSPF WG List Thread-Topic: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-ospf-security-extension-manual-keying-11.txt Thread-Index: AQHP/SY2pZ+suXz5A0mq2JcSJwauxpxaEBCA Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 20:41:32 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20141110202726.17718.33086.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.21.74.183] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="euc-kr" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/uPjLulnRXVE1P4VFG3B8h_sFSBo Subject: [OSPF] FW: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-ospf-security-extension-manual-keying-11.txt X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 20:41:36 -0000 Tm90ZSB0aGF0IHRoaXMgdmVyc2lvbiBpbmNsdWRlcyB0aGUgY2xhcmlmaWNhdGlvbiBvZiBBcGFk IGluaXRpYWxpemF0aW9uOg0KDQogICAgIE9TUEYgcm91dGVycyBzZW5kaW5nIE9TUEYgcGFja2V0 cyBtdXN0IGluaXRpYWxpemUgdGhlIGZpcnN0IDQgb2N0ZXRzDQogICAgIG9mIEFwYWQgdG8gdGhl IHZhbHVlIG9mIHRoZSBJUCBzb3VyY2UgYWRkcmVzcyB0aGF0IHdvdWxkIGJlIHVzZWQgd2hlbg0K ICAgICBzZW5kaW5nIHRoZSBPU1BGdjIgcGFja2V0LiAgVGhlIHJlbWFpbmRlciBvZiBBcGFkIHdp bGwgY29udGFpbiB0aGUNCiAgICAgdmFsdWUgMHg4NzhGRTFGMyByZXBlYXRlZCAoTCAtIDQpLzQg dGltZXMsIHdoZXJlIEwgaXMgdGhlIGxlbmd0aCBvZg0KICAgICB0aGUgaGFzaCwgbWVhc3VyZWQg aW4gb2N0ZXRzLiAgVGhlIGJhc2ljIGlkZWEgaXMgdG8gaW5jb3Jwb3JhdGUgdGhlDQogICAgIElQ IHNvdXJjZSBhZGRyZXNzIGZyb20gdGhlIElQIGhlYWRlciBpbiB0aGUgY3J5cHRvZ3JhcGhpYw0K ICAgICBhdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBjb21wdXRhdGlvbiBzbyB0aGF0IGFueSBjaGFuZ2Ugb2YgSVAg c291cmNlIGFkZHJlc3MgaW4NCiAgICAgYSByZXBsYXllZCBwYWNrZXQgY2FuIGJlIGRldGVjdGVk Lg0KDQoNClRoYW5rcywNCkFjZWUNCg0KT24gMTEvMTAvMTQsIDEwOjM3IEFNLCAiQWNlZSBMaW5k ZW0gKGFjZWUpIiA8YWNlZUBjaXNjby5jb20+IHdyb3RlOg0KDQo+SSBiZWxpZXZlIHRoaXMgdmVy c2lvbiBzYXRpc2ZpZXMgYm90aCBBZHJpYW6p9nMgYW5kIFN1cmVzaKn2cyBjb21tZW50cyBtYWRl DQo+ZHVyaW5nIHRoZSBJRVNHIGFuZCBHRU5BUlQgcmV2aWV3LiBJdCBhbHNvIGluY2x1ZGVzIGEg ZWRpdG9yaWFsIGNvcnJlY3Rpb24NCj5mcm9tIEFsaXNzYSBDb29wZXIuDQo+DQo+VGhhbmtzLA0K PkFjZWUNCj4NCj5PbiAxMS8xMC8xNCwgMTA6MjcgQU0sICJpbnRlcm5ldC1kcmFmdHNAaWV0Zi5v cmciDQo+PGludGVybmV0LWRyYWZ0c0BpZXRmLm9yZz4gd3JvdGU6DQo+DQo+Pg0KPj5BIG5ldyB2 ZXJzaW9uICgtMTEpIGhhcyBiZWVuIHN1Ym1pdHRlZCBmb3INCj4+ZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1vc3BmLXNl Y3VyaXR5LWV4dGVuc2lvbi1tYW51YWwta2V5aW5nOg0KPj5odHRwOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL2lu dGVybmV0LWRyYWZ0cy9kcmFmdC1pZXRmLW9zcGYtc2VjdXJpdHktZXh0ZW5zaW9uLW1hDQo+Pm4N Cj4+dWFsLWtleWluZy0xMS50eHQNCj4+DQo+PlN1YiBzdGF0ZSBoYXMgYmVlbiBjaGFuZ2VkIHRv IEFEIEZvbGxvd3VwIGZyb20gUmV2aXNlZCBJRCBOZWVkZWQNCj4+DQo+Pg0KPj5UaGUgSUVURiBk YXRhdHJhY2tlciBwYWdlIGZvciB0aGlzIEludGVybmV0LURyYWZ0IGlzOg0KPj5odHRwczovL2Rh dGF0cmFja2VyLmlldGYub3JnL2RvYy9kcmFmdC1pZXRmLW9zcGYtc2VjdXJpdHktZXh0ZW5zaW9u LW1hbnVhDQo+PmwNCj4+LWtleWluZy8NCj4+DQo+PkRpZmYgZnJvbSBwcmV2aW91cyB2ZXJzaW9u Og0KPj5odHRwOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL3JmY2RpZmY/dXJsMj1kcmFmdC1pZXRmLW9zcGYtc2Vj dXJpdHktZXh0ZW5zaW9uLW1hbnVhDQo+PmwNCj4+LWtleWluZy0xMQ0KPj4NCj4+UGxlYXNlIG5v dGUgdGhhdCBpdCBtYXkgdGFrZSBhIGNvdXBsZSBvZiBtaW51dGVzIGZyb20gdGhlIHRpbWUgb2YN Cj4+c3VibWlzc2lvbg0KPj51bnRpbCB0aGUgaHRtbGl6ZWQgdmVyc2lvbiBhbmQgZGlmZiBhcmUg YXZhaWxhYmxlIGF0IHRvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnLg0KPj4NCj4+SUVURiBTZWNyZXRhcmlhdC4NCj4+ DQo+DQoNCg== From nobody Tue Nov 11 13:30:02 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 951D91ABD39 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 13:30:00 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EC_YZDWDTDoS for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 13:29:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from usevmg20.ericsson.net (usevmg20.ericsson.net [198.24.6.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AA6A1A90E5 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 13:29:59 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: c618062d-f79206d0000014d2-5f-5462272399a8 Received: from EUSAAHC006.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.90]) by usevmg20.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 87.08.05330.32722645; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 16:11:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from EUSAAMB109.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.126]) by EUSAAHC006.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.90]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 16:29:45 -0500 From: Ing-Wher Chen To: "ospf@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ospf-transition-to-ospfv3-00.txt Thread-Index: AQHP/fFomR9Nk/sYLUOlUViwhTfWWZxb8M6w Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 21:29:43 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20141111205220.23637.88787.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20141111205220.23637.88787.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.10] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrJLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXRPlK6KelKIwbwvTBYt9+6xOzB6LFny kymAMYrLJiU1J7MstUjfLoErY9vCT4wF1wQr3k6YzdLAOEewi5GTQ0LAROLVnAlsELaYxIV7 64FsLg4hgSOMEhuubGGGcJYzSmzsXwxWxSZgILHh4xYmEFtEQFliy95+sLiwQLjE56nT2SDi ERLP735mhLCNJO5N+cECYrMIqEp8//OHGcTmFfCWmPl1OSuILSTgKPGrqQMszingJLFu+wWw Xkagi76fWgO2i1lAXOLWk/lMEJcKSCzZc54ZwhaVePn4HyuErSQxaek5IJsDqF5TYv0ufYhW RYkp3Q/ZIdYKSpyc+YRlAqPoLCRTZyF0zELSMQtJxwJGllWMHKXFqWW56UYGmxiBYX9Mgk13 B+Oel5aHGAU4GJV4eA24E0OEWBPLiitzDzFKc7AoifPOqp0XLCSQnliSmp2aWpBaFF9UmpNa fIiRiYNTqoHRNadonv6+kqAz3L4/pcwWPXAKDCs78/CtItf0d0uvTPq3Ys/sNWfSfytumbCM yfjLKoVbmoH/Be4uramMX71BS/v+px2Su8/5iPSlHz6/OeHCd9tdfwNXFl1dd+h06O6pP6ev Xuix8Ul2SVh0YCVz/BOV2XGmnpazivXPBWzRu7El8nan3YUtE5RYijMSDbWYi4oTAa1yKhhc AgAA Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/d6PqFYwCsJ4ve6xEEeT7lQ4eLfw Subject: [OSPF] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ospf-transition-to-ospfv3-00.txt X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 21:30:00 -0000 SGVsbG8sDQoNCkFmdGVyIHdvcmtpbmcgZ3JvdXAgYWRvcHRpb24sIEFjZWUsIFJhbiwgYW5kIEkg cmVzdWJtaXR0ZWQgb3VyIGRyYWZ0IGFzDQpkcmFmdC1pZXRmLW9zcGYtdHJhbnNpdGlvbi10by1v c3BmdjMtMDAgLg0KDQpUaGFua3MsDQpIZWxlbg0KDQotLS0tLU9yaWdpbmFsIE1lc3NhZ2UtLS0t LQ0KRnJvbTogaW50ZXJuZXQtZHJhZnRzQGlldGYub3JnIFttYWlsdG86aW50ZXJuZXQtZHJhZnRz QGlldGYub3JnXSANClNlbnQ6IFR1ZXNkYXksIE5vdmVtYmVyIDExLCAyMDE0IDM6NTIgUE0NClRv OiBBLkxpbmRlbTsgQWNlZSBMaW5kZW07IEluZy1XaGVyIENoZW47IEluZy1XaGVyIENoZW4NClN1 YmplY3Q6IE5ldyBWZXJzaW9uIE5vdGlmaWNhdGlvbiBmb3IgZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1vc3BmLXRyYW5z aXRpb24tdG8tb3NwZnYzLTAwLnR4dA0KDQoNCkEgbmV3IHZlcnNpb24gb2YgSS1ELCBkcmFmdC1p ZXRmLW9zcGYtdHJhbnNpdGlvbi10by1vc3BmdjMtMDAudHh0DQpoYXMgYmVlbiBzdWNjZXNzZnVs bHkgc3VibWl0dGVkIGJ5IEkuIENoZW4gYW5kIHBvc3RlZCB0byB0aGUgSUVURiByZXBvc2l0b3J5 Lg0KDQpOYW1lOgkJZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1vc3BmLXRyYW5zaXRpb24tdG8tb3NwZnYzDQpSZXZpc2lv bjoJMDANClRpdGxlOgkJT1NQRnYzIG92ZXIgSVB2NCBmb3IgSVB2NiBUcmFuc2l0aW9uDQpEb2N1 bWVudCBkYXRlOgkyMDE0LTExLTEwDQpHcm91cDoJCW9zcGYNClBhZ2VzOgkJOQ0KVVJMOiAgICAg ICAgICAgIGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvaW50ZXJuZXQtZHJhZnRzL2RyYWZ0LWlldGYtb3Nw Zi10cmFuc2l0aW9uLXRvLW9zcGZ2My0wMC50eHQNClN0YXR1czogICAgICAgICBodHRwczovL2Rh dGF0cmFja2VyLmlldGYub3JnL2RvYy9kcmFmdC1pZXRmLW9zcGYtdHJhbnNpdGlvbi10by1vc3Bm djMvDQpIdG1saXplZDogICAgICAgaHR0cDovL3Rvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnL2h0bWwvZHJhZnQtaWV0 Zi1vc3BmLXRyYW5zaXRpb24tdG8tb3NwZnYzLTAwDQoNCg0KQWJzdHJhY3Q6DQogICBUaGlzIGRv Y3VtZW50IGRlZmluZXMgYSBtZWNoYW5pc20gdG8gdXNlIElQdjQgdG8gdHJhbnNwb3J0IE9TUEZ2 Mw0KICAgcGFja2V0cywgaW4gb3JkZXIgdG8gZmFjaWxpdGF0ZSB0cmFuc2l0aW9uIGZyb20gSVB2 NC1vbmx5IHRvIElQdjYgYW5kDQogICBkdWFsLXN0YWNrIHdpdGhpbiBhIHJvdXRpbmcgZG9tYWlu LiAgVXNpbmcgT1NQRnYzIG92ZXIgSVB2NCB3aXRoIHRoZQ0KICAgZXhpc3RpbmcgT1NQRnYzIEFk ZHJlc3MgRmFtaWx5IGV4dGVuc2lvbiBjYW4gc2ltcGxpZnkgdHJhbnNpdGlvbiBmcm9tDQogICBh biBPU0ZQdjIgSVB2NC1vbmx5IHJvdXRpbmcgZG9tYWluIHRvIGFuIE9TUEZ2MyBkdWFsLXN0YWNr IHJvdXRpbmcNCiAgIGRvbWFpbi4NCg0KICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIA0KDQoNClBs ZWFzZSBub3RlIHRoYXQgaXQgbWF5IHRha2UgYSBjb3VwbGUgb2YgbWludXRlcyBmcm9tIHRoZSB0 aW1lIG9mIHN1Ym1pc3Npb24gdW50aWwgdGhlIGh0bWxpemVkIHZlcnNpb24gYW5kIGRpZmYgYXJl IGF2YWlsYWJsZSBhdCB0b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy4NCg0KVGhlIElFVEYgU2VjcmV0YXJpYXQNCg0K From nobody Wed Nov 12 12:34:17 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC3F71A8753 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 12:34:16 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yj-nAteVQsiG for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 12:34:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wg0-x22f.google.com (mail-wg0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AC451A8730 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 12:34:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id a1so15202618wgh.20 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 12:34:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=krLNEXegp+IlAvNjlx2ng6Z6eQS1a/YJNlIfg2cBPdw=; b=Oa0VyGawq5Jhd9koS4CYLG7fmv62qhdrzwRtYGghV2QP7V3E6vvLhSaIjQQ3oZ2tny vONMkfn+AACUgOJNmgExn1YalKmqB7rkweP68bB/zj9FEA4Dj8lHa/2Gw3uSjTXz+Btr gtEhIVNjqA1PAcycgwg4iLLeJQb4SIpkehfjcVEA/gqxOOx/bA5Wv8QGNScph2uAfcZP J62NDeIR9MpYNqWF8YQuGiovR06uBr7O2MFHowgTu3gNgoF0kLMooF26bXNL6vNxUffM 5qgIZIyAv1TVR878h16CDhVz9TjvILsICBlK8BNKZxIC6mCJ3AOlKW9gjrHHHoWTL6nn VZFQ== X-Received: by 10.194.3.45 with SMTP id 13mr54817600wjz.47.1415824454045; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 12:34:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from t2001067c037001608cebd2e96df56389.wireless.v6.meeting.ietf.org (t2001067c037001608cebd2e96df56389.wireless.v6.meeting.ietf.org. [2001:67c:370:160:8ceb:d2e9:6df5:6389]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fq1sm22982188wib.12.2014.11.12.12.34.11 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 12 Nov 2014 12:34:13 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_123F68CD-8C8A-4084-8FF8-1E5B656E608D" From: "Sam K. Aldrin" In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 12:34:13 -0800 Message-Id: <605B740D-109C-4C91-A413-2C869A8B2D20@gmail.com> References: To: Acee Lindem (acee) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/_sY1Pxl3WR14-MVQ9frUS-lOe2s Cc: OSPF WG List , Trilok Ranganatha , Manav Bhatia , "Carlos Pignataro \(cpignata\)" Subject: Re: [OSPF] OSPF extensions to advertise S-BFD Target Discriminator Accepted as WG Document X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 20:34:16 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_123F68CD-8C8A-4084-8FF8-1E5B656E608D Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Sorry for the delayed confirmation. There is no IPR which I am aware off, related to this draft. cheers -sam On Sep 24, 2014, at 3:39 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > Authors =96 additionally, please confirm whether or not you are aware = of IPR related to this draft.=20 > Thanks, > Acee >=20 > From: Acee Lindem > Date: Friday, September 19, 2014 at 2:25 PM > To: OSPF WG List , Manav Bhatia = , "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" = , Sam Aldrin , Trilok = Ranganatha > Subject: [OSPF] OSPF extensions to advertise S-BFD Target = Discriminator Accepted as WG Document >=20 > We have received anonymous support for the subject document and it is = required for the Seamless BFD work in the BFD WG. Hence, we are = accepting it as a WG document.=20 >=20 > Authors, please resubmit as draft-ietf-ospf-bfd-descriminator-00.txt.=20= > Thanks, > Acee >=20 --Apple-Mail=_123F68CD-8C8A-4084-8FF8-1E5B656E608D Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Sorry = for the delayed confirmation.
There is no IPR which I am aware off, = related to this = draft.

cheers
-sam
On = Sep 24, 2014, at 3:39 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:

Authors =96 additionally, please confirm whether or not you are = aware of IPR related to this draft. 
Thanks,
Acee

From: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>
Date: Friday, September 19, 2014 = at 2:25 PM
To: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>, Manav Bhatia <manav@ionosnetworks.com>, = "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>, Sam Aldrin <aldrin.ietf@gmail.com>, = Trilok Ranganatha <trilok.ranganatha@alc= atel-lucent.com>
Subject: [OSPF] OSPF extensions = to advertise S-BFD Target Discriminator Accepted as WG Document

We have received anonymous support for the subject document and it = is required for the Seamless BFD work in the BFD WG. Hence, we are = accepting it as a WG document. 

Authors, please resubmit as = draft-ietf-ospf-bfd-descriminator-00.txt. 
Thanks,
Acee

= --Apple-Mail=_123F68CD-8C8A-4084-8FF8-1E5B656E608D-- From nobody Thu Nov 13 18:26:17 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E6E41A019B for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 18:26:15 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.095 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t8XkNDalDzaA for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 18:26:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9C4F1A00F7 for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 18:26:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=828; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1415931973; x=1417141573; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=XFNsoGoh3fjazyMXjjq/65jvwNgpM3jUgDaLoc2Pdrw=; b=FBa89rHuWaITRHPrrW89mC8q21IKOTbQ+VxOo1jHp/cLiRWJcUB37j0e WWLtAis7gQuEpb/s5yCM07b5MBXZ7lY0aw4TVQMCKESd9mF7W2knjpqLC 0qXRxPso52ey/+p555jD8khR/DiXR9ljlmQptL8Cwrt5v1md5NIrXV4he U=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhsFABZnZVStJV2S/2dsb2JhbABbgw5UWQTMbgqHTwKBIRYBAQEBAX2EAgEBAQMBAQEBNzQQCwIBCDYQJwsbAQYDAgQTiDgJDdBXAQEBAQEBAQECAQEBAQEBAQEWBJEbhEsFkjqLd4E0g0+DNY4vg3xtgUiBAwEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,382,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="372089523" Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Nov 2014 02:26:13 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com [173.36.12.84]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sAE2QDPp024916 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 02:26:13 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.61]) by xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com ([173.36.12.84]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 20:26:12 -0600 From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" To: OSPF WG List Thread-Topic: [OSPF] OSPF Cross-Address Family MPLS TE routing Thread-Index: AQHP+PlztPZyk/XI606ElyZZJunnzZxfL7MA Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 02:26:11 +0000 Message-ID: References: <545A2078.4050203@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <545A2078.4050203@cisco.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.21.144.238] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <9159598281949E4186C2B5FB2B1AD804@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/xWelTvRvgmYd5FOvtJfieKuUSWs Subject: [OSPF] FW: OSPF Cross-Address Family MPLS TE routing X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 02:26:15 -0000 Let me summarize this. This draft allows TE endpoints and prefixes of either address family to be advertised in either TE LSAs in either OSPFv2 or OSPFv3.=20 Thanks, Acee=20 On 11/5/14, 8:04 AM, "Anton Smirnov (asmirnov)" wrote: > Hi all, > there is a -02 revision of draft-smirnov-ospf-xaf-te. > > This draft describes technique how OSPFv3 may reliably compute IPv6 >routes over MPLS TE tunnels signaled by OSPFv2 (and vice verse). > > The revision contains only cosmetic editorial changes. Otherwise >this draft is stable for the past few months. > If you haven't had a chance yet to read the draft please do. Thanks. > >--=20 >Anton > >_______________________________________________ >OSPF mailing list >OSPF@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf From nobody Fri Nov 14 20:11:51 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 974A41A00CF for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 20:11:49 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -7.492 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.492 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, URIBL_RED=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BfodwyrUegge for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 20:11:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A35C1A0011 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 20:11:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from us70uusmtp3.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.5.2.65]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id B29DCCEADDC95; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 04:11:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from US70UWXCHHUB02.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (us70uwxchhub02.zam.alcatel-lucent.com [135.5.2.49]) by us70uusmtp3.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id sAF4BfdM006903 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 14 Nov 2014 23:11:41 -0500 Received: from SG70XWXCHHUB01.zap.alcatel-lucent.com (135.253.2.46) by US70UWXCHHUB02.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (135.5.2.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 23:11:41 -0500 Received: from SG70XWXCHMBA03.zap.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.3.2]) by SG70XWXCHHUB01.zap.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.253.2.46]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 12:11:37 +0800 From: "Ranganatha, Trilok (Trilok)" To: Acee Lindem Thread-Topic: [OSPF] OSPF extensions to advertise S-BFD Target Discriminator Accepted as WG Document Thread-Index: AQHP/reMqeIKh7CDKkOwu1bNjr9XiZxhEzwwgAADrTA= Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 04:11:37 +0000 Message-ID: <26E26CC265CF524F9DF52B85C4E50CBB1F64835D@SG70XWXCHMBA03.zap.alcatel-lucent.com> References: <6B9DEB57-86A8-4FB0-BF3D-593ACC3CF193@gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.253.19.18] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_26E26CC265CF524F9DF52B85C4E50CBB1F64835DSG70XWXCHMBA03z_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/tnXlcAOYCd4cTRam6h68YPlu33s Cc: OSPF WG List , Manav Bhatia , "Carlos Pignataro \(cpignata\)" Subject: Re: [OSPF] OSPF extensions to advertise S-BFD Target Discriminator Accepted as WG Document X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 04:11:49 -0000 --_000_26E26CC265CF524F9DF52B85C4E50CBB1F64835DSG70XWXCHMBA03z_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Acee, I am not aware of any IPR related to this document. Sorry for the late reply. Regards, Trilok From: Sam K. Aldrin [mailto:aldrin.ietf@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 2:01 AM To: Acee Lindem Cc: OSPF WG List; Manav Bhatia; Carlos Pignataro (cpignata); Ranganatha, Tr= ilok (Trilok) Subject: Re: [OSPF] OSPF extensions to advertise S-BFD Target Discriminator= Accepted as WG Document Sorry for the delayed confirmation. There is no IPR which I am aware off, related to this draft. cheers -sam On Sep 24, 2014, at 3:39 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: Authors - additionally, please confirm whether or not you are aware of IPR = related to this draft. Thanks, Acee From: Acee Lindem > Date: Friday, September 19, 2014 at 2:25 PM To: OSPF WG List >, Manav Bhatia >, "Carlos Pignataro (cpi= gnata)" >, Sam Aldrin >, Trilok Ranganatha > Subject: [OSPF] OSPF extensions to advertise S-BFD Target Discriminator Acc= epted as WG Document We have received anonymous support for the subject document and it is requi= red for the Seamless BFD work in the BFD WG. Hence, we are accepting it as = a WG document. Authors, please resubmit as draft-ietf-ospf-bfd-descriminator-00.txt. Thanks, Acee --_000_26E26CC265CF524F9DF52B85C4E50CBB1F64835DSG70XWXCHMBA03z_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Acee,

 

I am not aware of any IPR related to this document.&= nbsp;

Sorry for the late reply.

 

Regards,

Trilok

 

 <= /p>

 <= /p>

From: Sam K. A= ldrin [mailto:aldrin.ietf@gmail.co= m]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 2:01 AM
To: Acee Lindem
Cc: OSPF WG List; Manav Bhatia; Carlos Pignataro (cpignata); Rangana= tha, Trilok (Trilok)
Subject: Re: [OSPF] OSPF extensions to advertise S-BFD Target Discri= minator Accepted as WG Document

 

Sorry for the delayed confirmation.

There is no IPR which I am aware off, related to thi= s draft.

 

cheers

-sam

 

 

On Sep 24, 2014, at 3:39 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrot= e:

 

Authors – additionally= , please confirm whether or not you are aware of IPR related to this draft.=  

Thanks,

Acee

 

From: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>
Date: Friday, September 19, 2014 at 2:25 PM
To: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org<= /a>>, Manav Bhatia <manav@= ionosnetworks.com>, "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>, Sam Aldrin <aldrin.ietf@gmail.com<= /a>>, Trilok Ranganatha <trilok.ranganatha@alcatel-lucent.com>
Subject: [OSPF] OSPF extensions to advertise S-BFD Target Discrimina= tor Accepted as WG Document

 

We have received anonymous s= upport for the subject document and it is required for the Seamless BFD wor= k in the BFD WG. Hence, we are accepting it as a WG document. 

 

Authors, please resubmit as = draft-ietf-ospf-bfd-descriminator-00.txt. 

Thanks,

Acee

 

 

--_000_26E26CC265CF524F9DF52B85C4E50CBB1F64835DSG70XWXCHMBA03z_-- From nobody Sun Nov 16 17:53:53 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B511D1A003A for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 17:53:51 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.095 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4os3OePaiY5Z for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 17:53:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E1FE1A0043 for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 17:53:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=241; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1416189228; x=1417398828; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=JRdlFYXgWEXlgf3YRJtP3DVEOKlzRzm/enyNT8h3oXA=; b=GhFko+Xli5PNE1b8wcaptKf+3ctUAGY0PuscJSzWq47xFFvuqS8VvQHS 2zwFnt/fMzG4oQhsA98rX0katQaT1SlB5QAi335uDfFhQXzwQCah+4FSK yOMaqWi3ydR3pt411GpL8CUw5FSV2bp8ITtipXJCruSF9IjvPQ8HcftaG Q=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ag4FANhTaVStJV2Z/2dsb2JhbABbgw5VXcwOh0IKgRgWAQEBAQF9hAk6PxIBPkInBAENiEYN0E8BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBFQSRIoRSBZJHhFuHKoE0g1SRcoN8gjWBAwEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,400,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="97202157" Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 17 Nov 2014 01:53:46 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com [173.37.183.81]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sAH1rkmu017390 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 17 Nov 2014 01:53:46 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.191]) by xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com ([173.37.183.81]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 19:53:46 -0600 From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" To: John E Drake , Spencer Giacalone , "David Ward (wardd)" , "Alia Atlas" , "Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" Thread-Topic: IPR on OSPF TE Metric Extensions Thread-Index: AQHQAglSh9qrWHvH+Ua/JtNuAcVw6w== Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 01:53:40 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <751E98C86C36C3488A5D24D51437B2F0@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/YYedlINsOjbRLjJcV9ZzNv2WjaU Cc: OSPF WG List Subject: [OSPF] IPR on OSPF TE Metric Extensions X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 01:53:51 -0000 Authors please confirm whether or not you know of any IPR other than the two disclosures listed below. https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=3Ddocument_search&id=3Ddraf= t-ie tf-ospf-te-metric-extensions Thanks, Acee=20 From nobody Mon Nov 17 04:05:42 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75D421A1AAA for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 04:05:40 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.095 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3cKvYEXi7yVH for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 04:05:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2F491A1AA6 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 04:05:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=377; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1416225937; x=1417435537; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=EwT6WlmifiDUkHSiZNf8zdCw01qODVrsFDpnqRMd0YI=; b=hg8cT3HEkSHZSvz2PsB8hl4EWwkl747QxDrDuV3VGQKnpf8sCW7SkeJN QnU1cXOvmeRK5mmHnVk0H8AvneYiS2XD6ayWqZ+2VoVA/dlJlO1dQoUWf McfH/jVvCG9BlycEnJ6Bm5OCOfodkgp5Cxg5wgd1kBYNqLbRK/Ml+3JxN k=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhAFADzkaVStJV2Y/2dsb2JhbABbgw5VTg/MG4dMAoEVFgEBAQEBfYQDAQEDATo/BQsCAQg2EDIlAgQOiD0JDdEuAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBEwSQbzMHgy2BHgEEkkeEW4cqgTSDVJFyg3yCNYEDAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,402,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="97309091" Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 17 Nov 2014 12:05:36 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com [173.37.183.82]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sAHC5aHk009136 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 17 Nov 2014 12:05:36 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([169.254.1.182]) by xhc-rcd-x08.cisco.com ([173.37.183.82]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 06:05:36 -0600 From: "Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" Thread-Topic: IPR on OSPF TE Metric Extensions Thread-Index: AQHQAglSh9qrWHvH+Ua/JtNuAcVw65xlHhiA Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 12:05:35 +0000 Message-ID: <502D979D-64E1-412B-B6FD-CE6903194AD2@cisco.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.147.74.79] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <41716F327C1D26438EBA989848E88C50@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/_y1oApdOgx4xSVHZMm-aOUEPLB4 Cc: "David Ward \(wardd\)" , Alia Atlas , OSPF WG List Subject: Re: [OSPF] IPR on OSPF TE Metric Extensions X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 12:05:40 -0000 I'm not aware of any other IPR. thanks. s. On Nov 17, 2014, at 2:53 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > Authors please confirm whether or not you know of any IPR other than the > two disclosures listed below. >=20 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=3Ddocument_search&id=3Ddr= aft-ie > tf-ospf-te-metric-extensions >=20 > Thanks, > Acee=20 >=20 From nobody Mon Nov 17 08:36:05 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C5A51A86EC for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 08:36:03 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZvSCdR8EfSUP for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 08:36:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1on0785.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::785]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C08A1A86EF for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 08:35:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from DM2PR0501MB1582.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.160.133.148) by DM2PR0501MB809.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.115.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.16.15; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 16:34:43 +0000 Received: from BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.202.141) by DM2PR0501MB1582.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.160.133.148) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.16.15; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 16:34:41 +0000 Received: from BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.202.141]) by BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.202.141]) with mapi id 15.01.0016.006; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 16:34:41 +0000 From: John E Drake To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" , Spencer Giacalone , "David Ward (wardd)" , "Alia Atlas" , "Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" Thread-Topic: IPR on OSPF TE Metric Extensions Thread-Index: AQHQAglSh9qrWHvH+Ua/JtNuAcVw65xlBIUA Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 16:34:40 +0000 Message-ID: <300adc6a58d24dd0873bf13964107168@BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.14] x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DM2PR0501MB1582;UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DM2PR0501MB1582; x-forefront-prvs: 03982FDC1D x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(189002)(51704005)(13464003)(377454003)(199003)(164054003)(87936001)(86362001)(19580405001)(19580395003)(92566001)(106356001)(64706001)(2656002)(40100003)(99286002)(66066001)(97736003)(95666004)(76176999)(54356999)(105586002)(33646002)(15975445006)(122556002)(106116001)(50986999)(21056001)(74316001)(77156002)(31966008)(62966003)(108616004)(99396003)(101416001)(107046002)(4396001)(20776003)(76576001)(120916001)(46102003)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DM2PR0501MB1582; H:BLUPR05MB562.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DM2PR0501MB809; X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/q7N6C9Vr-Y2WafTSK9Yl6MJj62s Cc: OSPF WG List Subject: Re: [OSPF] IPR on OSPF TE Metric Extensions X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 16:36:03 -0000 I'm not aware of any. Yours Irrespectively, John > -----Original Message----- > From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:acee@cisco.com] > Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2014 8:54 PM > To: John E Drake; Spencer Giacalone; David Ward (wardd); Alia Atlas; Stef= ano > Previdi (sprevidi) > Cc: OSPF WG List > Subject: IPR on OSPF TE Metric Extensions >=20 > Authors please confirm whether or not you know of any IPR other than the > two disclosures listed below. >=20 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=3Ddocument_search&id=3Ddr= aft > -ie > tf-ospf-te-metric-extensions >=20 > Thanks, > Acee From nobody Mon Nov 17 19:03:10 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C1061A0045 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 19:03:08 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.095 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IWnOfEJ2hjqX for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 19:03:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B9F31A0047 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 19:03:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=253; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1416279786; x=1417489386; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=C0ODBB9jBMVZrzQ6izkUW2fe3FAb/JAZldY8yoCwfzs=; b=REFXDOapGX6BDYOGYlwzycsSsNRT81LltFdeyhVzDIRF0cnGQKGM2S9Y 8HqJ0Ov/Ef4+7GQuoUkS17DuENCtPUEjIBgkje+FTWSf151D6WeB18Edc vwL26YrwjgT0l17bxM7nCL99XwRdS1ZOEawoQ2fmo8Ad0sYrAojPtwjDs o=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqkIADu2alStJA2K/2dsb2JhbABbgw5VGz8DjWO+bYhkFgEBAQEBfYQJOlEBPkInBByIOA2sbqZRlXQFkkeMBZZ6gUeCNYI1gQMBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,407,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="97513310" Received: from alln-core-5.cisco.com ([173.36.13.138]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 18 Nov 2014 03:03:05 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com [173.37.183.79]) by alln-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sAI335EB016596 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 03:03:05 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.191]) by xhc-rcd-x05.cisco.com ([173.37.183.79]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 21:03:05 -0600 From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" To: OSPF WG List Thread-Topic: IETF 91 OSPF WG Minutes Thread-Index: AQHQAtwrFP9MF0jTCkusIUhMYl840Q== Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 03:02:54 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <5A9ED48D25FF5D41B7525DB497D15867@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/gpO14cE7LpXBFNFaPSKFf5i-bhg Subject: [OSPF] IETF 91 OSPF WG Minutes X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 03:03:09 -0000 We had a very good session in Hawaii. Here is a link to the meeting minutes: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/91/minutes/minutes-91-ospf As you can see, we have a lot of drafts to discuss prior to the next meeting in Dallas.=20 Thanks, Acee From nobody Mon Nov 24 14:06:23 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32CE91ACCE9 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 14:06:19 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hFMQF5FOputJ for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 14:06:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CB931ACCE8 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 14:06:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1712; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1416866773; x=1418076373; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=Q9nCktLetYpuQj21yCzSjfEApNiwmePmSxIBzCpLZA8=; b=KCtgkCgksND2jyar9XH9RjXXd4nWOxKXvYs+WIAhO/FITyRXTdb97TNl 68uspjmXNocswpScN3LtWWZDUm9/gFsACwhsN9Jl8cTA0tR0L+HD4PUmR 40mcgvGRVHJULGM/oefTK8xg4yuL5cHyYvq9sRIk4wpUJP3qefDDuKFRP Y=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjkFACSrc1StJV2a/2dsb2JhbABbgw5VVAUEyx6GaAKBEhYBAQEBAX2EAwEBBHcSAgEIRjIbAQYDAgQTCYg4CAXQQQEBAQEBAQQBAQEBAQEBG5EShE4Fi2mGf4RlhzSBND+DGpINg314AYFHgQMBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,451,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="99714548" Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Nov 2014 22:06:11 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x04.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x04.cisco.com [173.36.12.78]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sAOM6BQV023394 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 22:06:11 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.191]) by xhc-aln-x04.cisco.com ([173.36.12.78]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 16:06:10 -0600 From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" To: OSPF WG List Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-05.txt Thread-Index: AQHQCDF8G24TwHRjSUuf7eRjDL9Zr5xwZhMA Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 22:05:28 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20141124215616.18511.15481.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20141124215616.18511.15481.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-ID: <97A27339B409D042A27A2E2A4C3B403E@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/xgODRR44hvbQ4pCZGsC35IjNlGw Subject: [OSPF] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-05.txt X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 22:06:19 -0000 This version incorporates Karsten Thomann=B9s editorial comments. Thanks, Acee=20 On 11/24/14, 4:56 PM, "internet-drafts@ietf.org" wrote: > >A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-05.txt >has been successfully submitted by Acee Lindem and posted to the >IETF repository. > >Name: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend >Revision: 05 >Title: OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility >Document date: 2014-11-24 >Group: ospf >Pages: 36 >URL: =20 >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-05.t >xt >Status: =20 >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend/ >Htmlized: =20 >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-05 >Diff: =20 >http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-05 > >Abstract: > OSPFv3 requires functional extension beyond what can readily be done > with the fixed-format Link State Advertisement (LSA) as described in > RFC 5340. Without LSA extension, attributes associated with OSPFv3 > links and advertised IPv6 prefixes must be advertised in separate > LSAs and correlated to the fixed-format LSAs. This document extends > the LSA format by encoding the existing OSPFv3 LSA information in > Type-Length-Value (TLV) tuples and allowing advertisement of > additional information with additional TLVs. Backward compatibility > mechanisms are also described. > > =20 > =20 > > >Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >submission >until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > >The IETF Secretariat >