Subject: Re: [OSPF] WG Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extensions to Support Maximally Redundant Trees" - draft-atlas-ospf-mrt-03

From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:23:21 +0000

We will accept the OSPF MRT extensions as a WG document. Progression will
parallel that of the base documents in the RTG WG.
Thanks,
Acee 

On 11/3/14, 9:20 AM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <[email-masked]> wrote:

>The base MRT specifications are rtgwg WG documents. Additionally, this
>document now uses the OSPFv2 link extensions that we have converged upon
>for OSPFv2 protocol extension. Hence, the chairs believe this document is
>ready for a WG adoption poll.
>
>Please indicate your support (or concerns) for adopting this as a WG
>Document.
>
>Regards,
>-Abhay
>
>_______________________________________________
>OSPF mailing list
>[email-masked]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf