Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pouyllau-pce-enhanced-errors-03.txt

From: "POUYLLAU, HELIA (HELIA)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 21:25:25 +0200

Support (as co-author ^^)

Btw, default values are indicated (sorry that I did not have that in mind during the meeting) but it solely appear in the text and could be emphasized

Regards
Helia

-----Message d'origine-----
De : [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] De la part de Leeyoung
Envoyé : jeudi 29 mars 2012 19:05
À : JP Vasseur; [email-masked]
Objet : Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pouyllau-pce-enhanced-errors-03.txt

Support

- With specifying the default value for new TLV's defined

Young

-----Original Message-----
From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 11:28 AM
To: [email-masked]
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pouyllau-pce-enhanced-errors-03.txt

Dear all,

We had a pretty strong support for adopting draft-pouyllau-pce-enhanced-errors a PCE Working Group during our PCE WG meeting but
as usual we'd like to confirm on the mailing list.

Could you please let us know if you are in favor/opposed to adopting draft-pouyllau-pce-enhanced-errors as a PCE WG Document ?

Thanks.

JP and Julien.
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce