From internet-drafts@ietf.org Wed May 2 02:46:13 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3101021F8845; Wed, 2 May 2012 02:46:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wdi1N1dqLAnx; Wed, 2 May 2012 02:46:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B087A21F8838; Wed, 2 May 2012 02:46:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.02 Message-ID: <20120502094612.22300.86203.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 02:46:12 -0700 Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures-02.txt X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 09:46:13 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element Working Grou= p of the IETF. Title : PCE-based Computation Procedure To Compute Shortest Cons= trained P2MP Inter-domain Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths Author(s) : Quintin Zhao Dhruv Dhody Zafar Ali Tarek Saad Siva Sivabalan Daniel King Ramon Casellas Filename : draft-ietf-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-procedures-02.txt Pages : 26 Date : 2012-05-02 The ability to compute paths for constrained point-to-multipoint (P2MP) Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths (TE LSPs) across multiple domains has been identified as a key requirement for the deployment of P2MP services in MPLS and GMPLS networks. The Path Computation Element (PCE) has been recognized as an appropriate technology for the determination of inter-domain paths of P2MP TE LSPs. This document describes the procedures and extensions to the PCE communication Protocol (PCEP) to handle requests and responses for the computation of inter-domain paths for P2MP TE LSPs. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-p= rocedures-02.txt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-pr= ocedures-02.txt The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-inter-domain-p2mp-proc= edures/ From julien.meuric@orange.com Wed May 2 03:11:49 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAB1611E8074 for ; Wed, 2 May 2012 03:11:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.249 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6HMDdo5BFbUD for ; Wed, 2 May 2012 03:11:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from r-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com (r-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com [217.108.152.41]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BB2921F868A for ; Wed, 2 May 2012 03:11:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from r-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 96441A4423D for ; Wed, 2 May 2012 12:13:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.47]) by r-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DA6DA4423B for ; Wed, 2 May 2012 12:13:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ftrdmel10.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.44]) by ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 2 May 2012 12:11:47 +0200 Received: from [10.193.71.162] ([10.193.71.162]) by ftrdmel10.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 2 May 2012 12:11:47 +0200 Message-ID: <4FA10862.8060707@orange.com> Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 12:11:46 +0200 From: Julien Meuric Organization: France Telecom User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120410 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "pce@ietf.org" References: <20120430162717.27050.41652.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20120430162717.27050.41652.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20120430162717.27050.41652.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 May 2012 10:11:47.0592 (UTC) FILETIME=[FBCF0880:01CD284B] Subject: [Pce] Fwd: Last Call: (Promoting Compliance with Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Disclosure Rules) to Informational RFC X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 10:11:50 -0000 FYI -------- Message original -------- From: The IESG The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the following document: - 'Promoting Compliance with Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Disclosure Rules' as Informational RFC The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2012-05-28. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract The disclosure process for intellectual property rights (IPR) in documents produced within the IETF stream is essential to the accurate development of community consensus. However, this process is not always followed by participants during IETF standardization. Regardless of the cause or motivation, noncompliance with IPR disclosure rules can derail or delay completion of standards documents. This document describes strategies for promoting compliance with the IPR disclosure rules. The strategies are primarily intended for area directors, working group chairs, and working group secretaries. The file can be obtained via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-polk-ipr-disclosure/ IESG discussion can be tracked via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-polk-ipr-disclosure/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. From cyril.margaria@nsn.com Wed May 2 04:43:42 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 733BD21F89DF for ; Wed, 2 May 2012 04:43:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fq0fQBzcbUkw for ; Wed, 2 May 2012 04:43:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (demumfd001.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.32]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07C9821F89DD for ; Wed, 2 May 2012 04:43:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.56]) by demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id q42BhZvm007614 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 2 May 2012 13:43:35 +0200 Received: from demuexc022.nsn-intra.net (demuexc022.nsn-intra.net [10.150.128.35]) by demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id q42BhUIu024444; Wed, 2 May 2012 13:43:34 +0200 Received: from DEMUEXC012.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.128.23]) by demuexc022.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 2 May 2012 13:43:29 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 13:43:26 +0200 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Remark/Question on RFC5440 IRO Object. Thread-Index: Ac0oWMmLShRwuau6SIWiQ5TRDqQ7dA== From: "Margaria, Cyril (NSN - DE/Munich)" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 May 2012 11:43:29.0158 (UTC) FILETIME=[CAFF6260:01CD2858] X-purgate-type: clean X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de X-purgate: clean X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information) X-purgate-size: 1787 X-purgate-ID: 151667::1335959015-0000052D-3E174C13/0-0/0-0 Cc: jpv@cisco.com Subject: [Pce] Remark/Question on RFC5440 IRO Object. X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 11:43:43 -0000 Dear PCEers In RFC5440 the IRO is defined as reusing the RSVP ERO subobject = definition, the PCEP ERO does the same but additionally ties both=20 Spaces ("PCEP ERO sub-object types correspond to RSVP-TE ERO sub-object = types.")=20 I suppose that the same applies to the PCEP IRO object, so that IRO = subobjects definition must be done first in CCAMP, yet a clarification = from the WG would be appreciated.=20 As the content of the object is relevant for the PCE, new ERO subobject = would need an additional definition in PCEP tin order to specify its = processing, so the following text would be true: " Any RSVP-TE ERO sub-object already defined or that could be defined in the future for use in the RSVP-TE ERO should = be additionally defined in PCEP IRO=20 PCEP IRO sub-object types correspond to RSVP-TE ERO sub-object types." Best Regards Cyril Margaria Nokia Siemens Networks GmbH & Co. KG NWS DWDM RD St.Martin-Str. 76 D-81541 M=FCnchen Germany mailto:cyril.margaria@nsn.com Phone: +49-89-5159-16934 Fax: +49-89-5159-44-16934 ---------------------------------------------------------------- Nokia Siemens Networks GmbH & Co. KG=20 Sitz der Gesellschaft: M=FCnchen / Registered office: Munich=20 Registergericht: M=FCnchen / Commercial registry: Munich, HRA 88537=20 WEEE-Reg.-Nr.: DE 52984304=20 Pers=F6nlich haftende Gesellschafterin / General Partner: Nokia Siemens = Networks Management GmbH=20 Gesch=E4ftsleitung / Board of Directors: Dr. Hermann Rodler, Lydia = Sommer, Olaf Horsthemke=20 Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats / Chairman of supervisory board: Herbert = Merz=20 Sitz der Gesellschaft: M=FCnchen / Registered office: Munich=20 Registergericht: M=FCnchen / Commercial registry: Munich, HRB 163416=20 From jpv@cisco.com Wed May 2 08:44:59 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4344F21F85B4 for ; Wed, 2 May 2012 08:44:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -110.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LPHAfLU7pHUD for ; Wed, 2 May 2012 08:44:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bgl-iport-1.cisco.com (bgl-iport-1.cisco.com [72.163.197.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3350421F85AE for ; Wed, 2 May 2012 08:44:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=jpv@cisco.com; l=264; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1335973498; x=1337183098; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id: cc:to:mime-version; bh=0ZEGZWesb+2h0e8F+NIX+oRyO+CDVwcfr9wNYrhndLY=; b=hnaz5xWnQXmWDKdJrVpNbE3+Ec7kMOO3mvSkRB0gA4jnJrFzoBIo8gh0 ZjXAJLYwcJA++zP3VpcVwUzLtV3/97hpmpGElK5CXdZtz2+1CFRdlcUYu 9rYWdlBexwpnct3JPc62emkuFTzTh/LC5tcFrcoO68PTXlj7vZbh25GxP M=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhAFAGhVoU9Io8UY/2dsb2JhbABEgx6xBYIiAWaBc4drmnigEY1jgkJjBJV+hXaIY4Fpgmo X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,516,1330905600"; d="scan'208";a="11332223" Received: from vla196-nat.cisco.com (HELO bgl-core-2.cisco.com) ([72.163.197.24]) by bgl-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 May 2012 15:44:56 +0000 Received: from xbh-hkg-411.apac.cisco.com (xbh-hkg-411.cisco.com [64.104.123.72]) by bgl-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q42FiuAw028478; Wed, 2 May 2012 15:44:56 GMT Received: from xfe-hkg-411.apac.cisco.com ([64.104.123.70]) by xbh-hkg-411.apac.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 2 May 2012 23:44:55 +0800 Received: from [10.60.114.231] ([10.60.114.231]) by xfe-hkg-411.apac.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 2 May 2012 23:44:55 +0800 From: JP Vasseur Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 17:44:52 +0200 Message-Id: To: pce@ietf.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 May 2012 15:44:55.0361 (UTC) FILETIME=[85728B10:01CD287A] Subject: [Pce] New PCE WG document: draft-pouyllau-pce-enhanced-errors-03.txt X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 15:44:59 -0000 Dear all, We have a good consensus to adopt = draft-pouyllau-pce-enhanced-errors-03.txt as a new PCE WG document. Authors could you please post draft-ietf-pce-enhanced-errors-00.txt = without any change other than the date, title, =85 ? Thanks. JP. From julien.meuric@orange.com Fri May 4 08:12:20 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3743E21F861B for ; Fri, 4 May 2012 08:12:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.249 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kbx4jZH1EIyt for ; Fri, 4 May 2012 08:12:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com [195.101.245.16]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F85721F85F6 for ; Fri, 4 May 2012 08:12:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 62BFBE30476 for ; Fri, 4 May 2012 17:12:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.47]) by p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E5ADE30475 for ; Fri, 4 May 2012 17:12:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ftrdmel10.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.44]) by ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 4 May 2012 17:12:18 +0200 Received: from [10.193.71.162] ([10.193.71.162]) by ftrdmel10.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 4 May 2012 17:12:18 +0200 Message-ID: <4FA3F1D1.8010001@orange.com> Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 17:12:17 +0200 From: Julien Meuric Organization: France Telecom User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120410 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pce@ietf.org References: <5B30AA9C-FB42-4216-8B3B-854F13A0B93D@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <5B30AA9C-FB42-4216-8B3B-854F13A0B93D@cisco.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 May 2012 15:12:18.0251 (UTC) FILETIME=[4BBEC1B0:01CD2A08] Subject: Re: [Pce] Adopting draft-dhody-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-02 as a new PCE WG X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 15:12:20 -0000 Hi all. Even though some issues need to be to addressed in the next steps, it looks like there is good support to adopt draft-dhody-pce-pcep-domain-sequence as a PCE WG document. One item is still on hold. Most authors agreed to move forwards with an experimental document. Has the WG any concern with this? Thanks, JP & Julien Le 29/03/2012 18:29, JP Vasseur a écrit : > Dear all, > > We had a pretty strong support for adopting > draft-dhody-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-02 a PCE Working Group during our > PCE WG meeting but > as usual we'd like to confirm on the mailing list. > > Could you please let us know if you are in favor/opposed to adopting > draft-dhody-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-02 as a PCE WG Document ? > > Thanks. > > JP and Julien. > From julien.meuric@orange.com Wed May 9 01:08:48 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2CDA21F85A8 for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 01:08:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.249 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pMzOcAjgU5mX for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 01:08:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com [195.101.245.16]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1449221F85A5 for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 01:08:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 193FD1074002 for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 10:09:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.46]) by p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 130361074001 for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 10:09:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ftrdmel10.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.44]) by ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 9 May 2012 10:08:47 +0200 Received: from [10.193.71.162] ([10.193.71.162]) by ftrdmel10.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 9 May 2012 10:08:47 +0200 Message-ID: <4FAA260E.1030302@orange.com> Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 10:08:46 +0200 From: Julien Meuric Organization: France Telecom User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120410 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "pce@ietf.org" References: <20120507215610.10679.15815.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20120507215610.10679.15815.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20120507215610.10679.15815.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 May 2012 08:08:47.0085 (UTC) FILETIME=[F59349D0:01CD2DBA] Subject: [Pce] Fwd: Last Call: (Sanctions Available for Application to Violators of IETF IPR Policy) to Informational RFC X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 08:08:48 -0000 FYI -------- Message original -------- From: The IESG The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the following document: - 'Sanctions Available for Application to Violators of IETF IPR Policy' as Informational RFC The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2012-06-04. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract The IETF has developed and documented policies that govern the behavior of all IETF participants with respect to Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) about which they might reasonably be aware. The IETF takes conformance to these IPR policies very seriously. However, there has been some ambiguity as to what the appropriate sanctions are for the violation of these policies, and how and by whom those sanctions are to be applied. This document discusses these issues and provides a suite of potential actions that may be taken within the IETF community. The file can be obtained via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farrresnickel-ipr-sanctions/ IESG discussion can be tracked via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farrresnickel-ipr-sanctions/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. From internet-drafts@ietf.org Thu May 10 08:21:08 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC8721F86E1; Thu, 10 May 2012 08:21:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.441 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.441 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.159, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FruTNYPfq13f; Thu, 10 May 2012 08:21:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63A2121F86B8; Thu, 10 May 2012 08:21:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.02 Message-ID: <20120510152107.16654.17528.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 08:21:07 -0700 Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-fwk-02.txt X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 15:21:08 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element Working Grou= p of the IETF. Title : The Application of the Path Computation Element Architec= ture to the Determination of a Sequence of Domains in MPLS and GMPLS Author(s) : Daniel King Adrian Farrel Filename : draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-fwk-02.txt Pages : 31 Date : 2012-05-10 Computing optimum routes for Label Switched Paths (LSPs) across multiple domains in MPLS Traffic Engineering (MPLS-TE) and GMPLS networks presents a problem because no single point of path computation is aware of all of the links and resources in each domain. A solution may be achieved using the Path Computation Element (PCE) architecture. Where the sequence of domains is known a priori, various techniques can be employed to derive an optimum path. If the domains are simply-connected, or if the preferred points of interconnection are also known, the Per-Domain Path Computation technique can be used. Where there are multiple connections between domains and there is no preference for the choice of points of interconnection, the Backward Recursive Path Computation Procedure (BRPC) can be used to derive an optimal path. This document examines techniques to establish the optimum path when the sequence of domains is not known in advance. The document shows how the PCE architecture can be extended to allow the optimum sequence of domains to be selected, and the optimum end-to-end path to be derived through the use of a hierarchical relationship between domains. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-fwk-02.txt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-fwk-02.txt The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-fwk/ From daniel@olddog.co.uk Thu May 10 08:37:07 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0169821F86C5 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 08:37:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gQtL0Tp4qfrI for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 08:37:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (asmtp3.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.159]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 110E421F86EB for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 08:37:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q4AFb0YL009707; Thu, 10 May 2012 16:37:02 +0100 Received: from Serenity (88-97-23-122.dsl.zen.co.uk [88.97.23.122]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q4AFarkn009631 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 10 May 2012 16:36:59 +0100 From: "Daniel King" To: "'Julien Meuric'" , "'JP Vasseur'" Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 16:36:50 +0100 Message-ID: <000001cd2ec2$bbc5fbe0$3351f3a0$@olddog.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: Ac0uwUByF5RNF3OsTL22U+A3cZFDlQ== Content-Language: en-us Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-fwk-02.txt X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 15:37:07 -0000 Dear Co-Chairs, The authors of H-PCE recently submitted a new version of the document. This version contains very minor NIT fixes. As per the discussion at IETF 83 (Paris) we feel the document is ready for WG Last Call, at your convenience. Br, Dan. -----Original Message----- From: i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 4:21 PM To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-fwk-02.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element Working Group of the IETF. Title : The Application of the Path Computation Element Architecture to the Determination of a Sequence of Domains in MPLS and GMPLS Author(s) : Daniel King Adrian Farrel Filename : draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-fwk-02.txt Pages : 31 Date : 2012-05-10 Computing optimum routes for Label Switched Paths (LSPs) across multiple domains in MPLS Traffic Engineering (MPLS-TE) and GMPLS networks presents a problem because no single point of path computation is aware of all of the links and resources in each domain. A solution may be achieved using the Path Computation Element (PCE) architecture. Where the sequence of domains is known a priori, various techniques can be employed to derive an optimum path. If the domains are simply-connected, or if the preferred points of interconnection are also known, the Per-Domain Path Computation technique can be used. Where there are multiple connections between domains and there is no preference for the choice of points of interconnection, the Backward Recursive Path Computation Procedure (BRPC) can be used to derive an optimal path. This document examines techniques to establish the optimum path when the sequence of domains is not known in advance. The document shows how the PCE architecture can be extended to allow the optimum sequence of domains to be selected, and the optimum end-to-end path to be derived through the use of a hierarchical relationship between domains. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-fwk-02.txt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-fwk-02.txt The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-fwk/ _______________________________________________ I-D-Announce mailing list I-D-Announce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt From julien.meuric@orange.com Mon May 21 07:09:00 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39A2521F860F for ; Mon, 21 May 2012 07:09:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.249 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fWPv1md9hzs0 for ; Mon, 21 May 2012 07:08:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com [195.101.245.16]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 981DA21F8597 for ; Mon, 21 May 2012 07:08:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 1518D107402E for ; Mon, 21 May 2012 16:09:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.47]) by p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 106A6107402C for ; Mon, 21 May 2012 16:09:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ftrdmel10.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.44]) by ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 21 May 2012 16:08:58 +0200 Received: from [10.193.71.162] ([10.193.71.162]) by ftrdmel10.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 21 May 2012 16:08:58 +0200 Message-ID: <4FBA4C79.1060302@orange.com> Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 16:08:57 +0200 From: Julien Meuric Organization: France Telecom User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pce@ietf.org References: <5B30AA9C-FB42-4216-8B3B-854F13A0B93D@cisco.com> <4FA3F1D1.8010001@orange.com> In-Reply-To: <4FA3F1D1.8010001@orange.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 May 2012 14:08:58.0238 (UTC) FILETIME=[43C889E0:01CD375B] Subject: Re: [Pce] Adopting draft-dhody-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-02 as a new PCE WG X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 14:09:00 -0000 Hi WG. I have not seen any comment on the proposal below, nor on the existing IPR. As a result, authors, could you please submit draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-00 as an experimental I-D? Thanks, Julien Le 04/05/2012 17:12, Julien Meuric a écrit : > Hi all. > > Even though some issues need to be to addressed in the next steps, it > looks like there is good support to adopt > draft-dhody-pce-pcep-domain-sequence as a PCE WG document. > > One item is still on hold. Most authors agreed to move forwards with > an experimental document. Has the WG any concern with this? > > Thanks, > > JP & Julien > > > Le 29/03/2012 18:29, JP Vasseur a écrit : >> Dear all, >> >> We had a pretty strong support for adopting >> draft-dhody-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-02 a PCE Working Group during >> our PCE WG meeting but >> as usual we'd like to confirm on the mailing list. >> >> Could you please let us know if you are in favor/opposed to adopting >> draft-dhody-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-02 as a PCE WG Document ? >> >> Thanks. >> >> JP and Julien. >> > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > From internet-drafts@ietf.org Tue May 22 05:23:16 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DE2321F860D; Tue, 22 May 2012 05:23:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.27 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.27 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.329, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 78eRRw4Spicj; Tue, 22 May 2012 05:23:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5848C21F846C; Tue, 22 May 2012 05:23:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.02 Message-ID: <20120522122315.19412.52361.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 05:23:15 -0700 Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-00.txt X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 12:23:16 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element Working Grou= p of the IETF. Title : Standard Representation Of Domain Sequence Author(s) : Dhruv Dhody Udayasree Palle Ramon Casellas Filename : draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-00.txt Pages : 22 Date : 2012-05-21 The ability to compute shortest constrained Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths (TE LSPs) in Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) and Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) networks across multiple domains has been identified as a key requirement for P2P and P2MP scenarios. In this context, a domain is a collection of network elements within a common sphere of address management or path computational responsibility such as an IGP area or an Autonomous Systems. This document specifies a standard representation and encoding of a domain sequence, which is defined as an ordered sequence of domains traversed to reach the destination domain. This document also defines new sub-objects to be used to encode domain identifiers. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-00.= txt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-00.t= xt The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence/