Subject: [Pce] Remark/Question on RFC5440 IRO Object.

From: "Margaria, Cyril (NSN - DE/Munich)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 13:43:26 +0200

Dear PCEers

In RFC5440 the IRO is defined as reusing the RSVP ERO subobject definition, the PCEP ERO does the same but additionally ties both 
Spaces ("PCEP ERO sub-object types correspond to RSVP-TE ERO sub-object types.") 

I suppose that the same applies to the PCEP IRO object, so that IRO subobjects definition must be done first in CCAMP, yet a clarification from the WG would be appreciated. 

As the content of the object is relevant for the PCE, new ERO subobject would need an additional definition in PCEP tin order to specify its processing, so the following text would be true:

" Any RSVP-TE ERO sub-object already defined or
  that could be defined in the future for use in the RSVP-TE ERO should be additionally defined in PCEP IRO 

  PCEP IRO sub-object types correspond to RSVP-TE ERO sub-object types."

Best Regards
Cyril Margaria

Nokia Siemens Networks GmbH & Co. KG
NWS DWDM RD
St.Martin-Str. 76
D-81541 München
Germany
mailto:[email-masked]
Phone: +49-89-5159-16934
Fax:   +49-89-5159-44-16934
----------------------------------------------------------------
Nokia Siemens Networks GmbH & Co. KG 
Sitz der Gesellschaft: München / Registered office: Munich 
Registergericht: München / Commercial registry: Munich, HRA 88537 
WEEE-Reg.-Nr.: DE 52984304 
Persönlich haftende Gesellschafterin / General Partner: Nokia Siemens Networks Management GmbH 
Geschäftsleitung / Board of Directors: Dr. Hermann Rodler, Lydia Sommer, Olaf Horsthemke 
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats / Chairman of supervisory board: Herbert Merz 
Sitz der Gesellschaft: München / Registered office: Munich 
Registergericht: München / Commercial registry: Munich, HRB 163416