From nobody Mon Dec 4 08:23:20 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 848A0127005 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 08:23:19 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.234 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.234 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aWBx72n-lyTE for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 08:23:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from p-mail1.rd.orange.com (p-mail1.rd.orange.com [161.106.1.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4D60124239 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 08:23:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from p-mail1.rd.orange.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id E3D627CC058; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 17:23:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from FTRDCH01.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.194.32.11]) by p-mail1.rd.orange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D79CE7CC052; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 17:23:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.193.71.63] (10.193.71.63) by FTRDCH01.rd.francetelecom.fr (10.194.32.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.361.1; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 17:23:16 +0100 References: To: Ina Minei , "Siva Sivabalan (msiva)" CC: "pce@ietf.org" From: Julien Meuric Organization: Orange X-Forwarded-Message-Id: Message-ID: <2d118314-00a7-5bda-5a92-5b36d9e2af6b@orange.com> Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 17:23:16 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Archived-At: Subject: [Pce] Fwd: Final IPR Check for draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 16:23:19 -0000 Ina, Siva, I cannot find your response to this IPR poll. Please send your feedback to the list as soon as possible. Thanks, Julien -------- Forwarded Message -------- Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 09:55:23 +0200 From: Julien Meuric Dear authors, Could you please send an email to the PCE mailing list saying whether you are aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type and, if so, if it has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules? (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details.) If you are not aware of any IPR that applies, please reply saying "I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft". A reply is required from each of you before we can proceed. Many thanks, Julien _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce From nobody Mon Dec 4 08:34:35 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 056E3127868 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 08:34:35 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.521 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ljyWCp4SDb_L for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 08:34:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51F3312717E for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 08:34:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1290; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1512405273; x=1513614873; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=wiCUtSD0+LFLoSlw7JHCvgL9BRTln1y76ZdShKDyXRk=; b=M86jbaNYAV7pb9MX6fljV5uBcTbUand6pgmofsEoEdqnmIYHMhdMhEfI H0+Y7WL0qGbWCuL+sQGvBzi3wV9ltcvxt0OxGHgo74C73rUUjIWJJbUyN XUIh42fffkqkgJ4KLpyxTQoJaBWWEEvygRCIXEG53f2vF7uXWqDNeM1Z3 8=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DXAAAEeCVa/5tdJa1cGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQcBAQEBAYM8Zm4nB44YjnqBfZcBFIEiA1wKGAuFGAKFND8YAQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BayiFIgEBAQEDAQE4NAsMBAIBCBEDAQEBHwkHJwsUCQgCBAENBQiKGhCpd4pZA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGAWFUYZqhGkFARIBhhcFomwClQaCH4YRiy+?= =?us-ascii?q?WIAIRGQGBOQEfOTMubG8VOoIphFV4h2KBJIEUAQEB?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,359,1508803200"; d="scan'208";a="39524404" Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Dec 2017 16:34:32 +0000 Received: from XCH-RCD-013.cisco.com (xch-rcd-013.cisco.com [173.37.102.23]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vB4GYWrT028810 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 4 Dec 2017 16:34:32 GMT Received: from xch-aln-011.cisco.com (173.36.7.21) by XCH-RCD-013.cisco.com (173.37.102.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 10:34:31 -0600 Received: from xch-aln-011.cisco.com ([173.36.7.21]) by XCH-ALN-011.cisco.com ([173.36.7.21]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 10:34:31 -0600 From: "Siva Sivabalan (msiva)" To: Julien Meuric , Ina Minei CC: "pce@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Pce] Final IPR Check for draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type Thread-Index: AQHSzhpSWt9U1Yqnl02fLUPC3PVJnqM1AMEA//+ebmA= Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 16:34:31 +0000 Message-ID: <754d00b1b2eb45cb97ac715e12884fe3@XCH-ALN-011.cisco.com> References: <2d118314-00a7-5bda-5a92-5b36d9e2af6b@orange.com> In-Reply-To: <2d118314-00a7-5bda-5a92-5b36d9e2af6b@orange.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.86.240.29] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Pce] Final IPR Check for draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 16:34:35 -0000 I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft. Thanks, Siva -----Original Message----- From: Julien Meuric [mailto:julien.meuric@orange.com]=20 Sent: Monday, December 4, 2017 11:23 AM To: Ina Minei ; Siva Sivabalan (msiva) Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: Fwd: [Pce] Final IPR Check for draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type Ina, Siva, I cannot find your response to this IPR poll. Please send your feedback to = the list as soon as possible. Thanks, Julien -------- Forwarded Message -------- Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 09:55:23 +0200 From: Julien Meuric Dear authors, Could you please send an email to the PCE mailing list saying whether you a= re aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type and, if s= o, if it has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules? (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details.) If you are not awar= e of any IPR that applies, please reply saying "I am not aware of any IPR t= hat applies to this draft". A reply is required from each of you before we can proceed. Many thanks, Julien _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce From nobody Tue Dec 5 07:32:22 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42684129549 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 07:32:21 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.618 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.618 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nAIyoGIRl1rM for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 07:32:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from orange.com (mta241.mail.business.static.orange.com [80.12.66.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82D23129541 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 07:32:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from opfedar02.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.4]) by opfedar27.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 5E8F260B9D for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 16:32:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.31.60]) by opfedar02.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 485DE180084 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 16:32:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.193.71.63] (10.168.234.4) by OPEXCLILM7F.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup (10.114.31.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 16:32:17 +0100 From: To: References: <12ce495e-8ca4-ebaf-67b9-289c3ffe289a@orange.com> Organization: Orange Message-ID: <11675_1512487938_5A26BC02_11675_418_1_c13cc1fa-ebce-4ff9-c4ff-71c8cecdf12d@orange.com> Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 16:32:17 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <12ce495e-8ca4-ebaf-67b9-289c3ffe289a@orange.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.168.234.4] Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Pce] Second WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 15:32:21 -0000 Hi all, This LC has now ended. Authors, please publish a revision including the comments addressed on the list. Thanks, Julien Nov. 20, 2017 - Julien Meuric: > Dear PCE WG, > > Considering the concerns discussed on the list after the 1st WG Last > Call, especially about the backward compatibility of the additional TLV > (please see Jon's change list), this message starts a 2nd LC on > draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-06. It will end on Monday December 4. > > Thanks for your careful reviews, > > Julien > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. From nobody Thu Dec 7 02:21:12 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43F7B128D40 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 02:21:11 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w3yNdn0BtXGQ for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 02:21:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wm0-x236.google.com (mail-wm0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C316612706D for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 02:21:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm0-x236.google.com with SMTP id i11so11860924wmf.4 for ; Thu, 07 Dec 2017 02:21:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/3HvVXl601UE8gkDKS/lH+SX5+ZQQRVxuT9X3s9AYU8=; b=D7LQkPQHX4+Imim+cyQN6cvZK5mfZTHxQufZN2mRlRKgiog+SGHOZZF7hdJEa09UzI MfMMboOK6Sp5p+EDyLujMojrffAro1FxZRMOmB1Eqsk/wNS7atT22HH3oqi0Z/8IZaYb PsoGSetKbp5/cjiHRrX6ZpgMcxsj2ynMv6oI4pL6/b7BfyJXChDXTt5QvNN8n7j9mkpe hNXKPQluSY9+GhDxSTk0vYvNrtb1uMy1BhP8T1nNS7U5H/bxIUdnu/453miQjCl+g67D S76mPaC9I+NerfBbgCy4VawSnc3zJWm7jUnT8L/qJYwnYK5C082uZaWiO3iKVb216PLR /9sA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/3HvVXl601UE8gkDKS/lH+SX5+ZQQRVxuT9X3s9AYU8=; b=mpsdYh42QQRj/V2EEgkL1v7eZ0mUCUXnf7S+YFB/BYDCMzK9csrV8h/6Y/i8EC9feb +VDMbLi3cRS4O5VouP6eys5HMT8NrG/oF9tRwj69klg+o9xCASUvKRSvIYJ/V5QIM3jf xaC9iUFXdN+4bWF4taoF/GSIQc+Rchg393lwAq/SEA4ut5gg+Uu8EUcPc2wVd+Jt0KG2 e8tIEszLbTSL5es8gOFAlwfzFR2DS0aSKFKcExV9iVvjeT8xX6IfgopJjOBoI81ocBWu h7DGluB8wvAjPFGHPCPRuWeGxn+E2HtTNxFmGV268kPSVyKaS/elid7WEWQwj8jxYxek Jypw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX7hbAsCjv1eUjlQPqd048f53yecwSwLRPIQAba5l7slX1/tjXPT V++jQZnRJkTZeoOXCkFfCSWyRrSvsIrAJ0XbvtMncGZ9 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMbRyAHRvuPVlSaVNV+HBZp7FeMGzoBIUVD9cDih5GxwYaKfVnugRZgDmAdJZvamRXWJMN+1wO9BoKodz7gDSvw= X-Received: by 10.80.146.77 with SMTP id j13mr44472362eda.298.1512642067058; Thu, 07 Dec 2017 02:21:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.80.185.37 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 02:21:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <754d00b1b2eb45cb97ac715e12884fe3@XCH-ALN-011.cisco.com> References: <2d118314-00a7-5bda-5a92-5b36d9e2af6b@orange.com> <754d00b1b2eb45cb97ac715e12884fe3@XCH-ALN-011.cisco.com> From: Ina Minei Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 11:21:06 +0100 Message-ID: To: "Siva Sivabalan (msiva)" Cc: Julien Meuric , "pce@ietf.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0c3a56152264055fbd6d50" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Pce] Final IPR Check for draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2017 10:21:11 -0000 --94eb2c0c3a56152264055fbd6d50 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft. Ina On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Siva Sivabalan (msiva) wrote: > I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft. > > Thanks, > Siva > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Julien Meuric [mailto:julien.meuric@orange.com] > Sent: Monday, December 4, 2017 11:23 AM > To: Ina Minei ; Siva Sivabalan (msiva) < > msiva@cisco.com> > Cc: pce@ietf.org > Subject: Fwd: [Pce] Final IPR Check for draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type > > Ina, Siva, > > I cannot find your response to this IPR poll. Please send your feedback to > the list as soon as possible. > > Thanks, > > Julien > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 09:55:23 +0200 > From: Julien Meuric > > > Dear authors, > > Could you please send an email to the PCE mailing list saying whether you > are aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type and, if > so, if it has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules? > (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details.) If you are not > aware of any IPR that applies, please reply saying "I am not aware of any > IPR that applies to this draft". > > A reply is required from each of you before we can proceed. > > Many thanks, > > Julien > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > > --94eb2c0c3a56152264055fbd6d50 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft.=C2=A0
Ina

On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Siva Sivabalan (msiva) <msiva@= cisco.com> wrote:
I am not= aware of any IPR related to this draft.

Thanks,
Siva




-----Original Message-----
From: Julien Meuric [mailto:jul= ien.meuric@orange.com]
Sent: Monday, December 4, 2017 11:23 AM
To: Ina Minei <inaminei@google.co= m>; Siva Sivabalan (msiva) <ms= iva@cisco.com>
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: Fwd: [Pce] Final IPR Check for draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type

Ina, Siva,

I cannot find your response to this IPR poll. Please send your feedback to = the list as soon as possible.

Thanks,

Julien


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Date:=C2=A0 =C2=A0Tue, 16 May 2017 09:55:23 +0200
From:=C2=A0 =C2=A0Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>


Dear authors,

Could you please send an email to the PCE mailing list saying whether you a= re aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type and, if s= o, if it has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules?
(See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details.)=C2=A0 If you are not= aware of any IPR that applies, please reply saying "I am not aware of= any IPR that applies to this draft".

A reply is required from each of you before we can proceed.

Many thanks,

Julien

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce


--94eb2c0c3a56152264055fbd6d50-- From nobody Tue Dec 12 13:33:01 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D9E3128A32; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 13:32:54 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZR99_jThnFJ2; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 13:32:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D148A127444; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 13:32:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id D27B9B80A8E; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 13:32:27 -0800 (PST) To: housley@vigilsec.com, diego.r.lopez@telefonica.com, oscar.gonzalezdedios@telefonica.com, sunseawq@huawei.com, dhruv.ietf@gmail.com X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php From: RFC Errata System Cc: db3546@att.com, iesg@ietf.org, pce@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Message-Id: <20171212213227.D27B9B80A8E@rfc-editor.org> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 13:32:27 -0800 (PST) Archived-At: Subject: [Pce] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8253 (5180) X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 21:32:54 -0000 The following errata report has been held for document update for RFC8253, "PCEPS: Usage of TLS to Provide a Secure Transport for the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5180 -------------------------------------- Status: Held for Document Update Type: Editorial Reported by: Russ Housley Date Reported: 2017-11-06 Held by: Deborah Brungard (IESG) Section: 3.4 Original Text ------------- * PCEPS implementations MUST, at a minimum, support negotiation of the TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 [RFC6460] and SHOULD support TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 as well. ... Corrected Text -------------- * PCEPS implementations MUST, at a minimum, support negotiation of the TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 [RFC5289] and SHOULD support TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 as well. ... Notes ----- RFC 6460 makes reference to the TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 and TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 ciphersuites, but it does not define them. These ciphersuites are defined in RFC 5289. -------------------------------------- RFC8253 (draft-ietf-pce-pceps-18) -------------------------------------- Title : PCEPS: Usage of TLS to Provide a Secure Transport for the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Publication Date : October 2017 Author(s) : D. Lopez, O. Gonzalez de Dios, Q. Wu, D. Dhody Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Path Computation Element Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG From nobody Thu Dec 14 14:04:41 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietf.org Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B69C5126B7E; Thu, 14 Dec 2017 14:04:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: "IETF-Announce" X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.67.1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk CC: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints@ietf.org, db3546@att.com, Jonathan Hardwick , pce@ietf.org, pce-chairs@ietf.org, jonathan.hardwick@metaswitch.com Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Sender: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <151328907470.30423.18271804890623144304.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 14:04:34 -0800 Archived-At: Subject: [Pce] Last Call: (Experimental Codepoint Allocation for the Path Computation Element communication Protocol (PCEP)) to Proposed Standard X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 22:04:35 -0000 The IESG has received a request from the Path Computation Element WG (pce) to consider the following document: - 'Experimental Codepoint Allocation for the Path Computation Element communication Protocol (PCEP)' as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2017-12-28. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract IANA assigns values to the Path Computation Element (PCE) communication Protocol (PCEP) parameters (messages, objects, TLVs). IANA established a top-level registry to contain all PCEP codepoints and sub-registries. This top-level registry contains sub-registries for PCEP message, object and TLV types. The allocation policy for each of these sub-registries is IETF Review. This document updates RFC 5440 by changing the allocation policies for these three registries to mark some of the code points as assigned for Experimental Use. The file can be obtained via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints/ IESG discussion can be tracked via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. From nobody Tue Dec 19 05:41:22 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietf.org Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D21F126579; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 05:41:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: Cc: pce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.68.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <151369088153.7431.16297622462768385351@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 05:41:21 -0800 Archived-At: Subject: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-07.txt X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 13:41:21 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element WG of the IETF. Title : Conveying path setup type in PCEP messages Authors : Siva Sivabalan Jeff Tantsura Ina Minei Robert Varga Jon Hardwick Filename : draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-07.txt Pages : 10 Date : 2017-12-19 Abstract: A Path Computation Element can compute Traffic Engineering paths (TE paths) through a network that are subject to various constraints. Currently, TE paths are Label Switched Paths (LSPs) which are set up using the RSVP-TE signaling protocol. However, other TE path setup methods are possible within the PCE architecture. This document proposes an extension to PCEP to allow support for different path setup methods over a given PCEP session. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-07 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-07 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-07 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Tue Dec 19 05:45:30 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15F10126579 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 05:45:29 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.02 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.02 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=metaswitch.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ckK1kevvfLJ3 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 05:45:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from NAM03-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam03on0095.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.42.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC2D9120727 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 05:45:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=metaswitch.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=4sdADEvidDy96CPS4xUusf+Kd+8v4b7KESTTyEolypA=; b=qwtCuw1DHAWJt5eBVAIrbFEkMbXZ61424RF7NLL5tnC95M8arp4NvxMXVyKCnTFTAx/Q5zq1XZ6GaC2PG/0p6x1IGE2f569Y5cyQ5FtnTWR1/21n8BNto5Y713XGteHFcMTABbH1QpQI+QwhHuaeZ36qE26QM+2DBIb4VQVc44s= Received: from MWHPR0201MB3609.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.167.162.34) by MWHPR0201MB3609.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.167.162.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.345.14; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 13:45:25 +0000 Received: from MWHPR0201MB3609.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9101:5e5e:cbd3:6c5b]) by MWHPR0201MB3609.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9101:5e5e:cbd3:6c5b%13]) with mapi id 15.20.0345.013; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 13:45:25 +0000 From: Jonathan Hardwick To: "julien.meuric@orange.com" , "pce@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-07.txt Thread-Index: AQHTeM8SnscCmkc+b0mJ7SFq50IC1KNKrWCQ Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 13:45:25 +0000 Message-ID: References: <151369088153.7431.16297622462768385351@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <151369088153.7431.16297622462768385351@ietfa.amsl.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com; x-originating-ip: [86.132.77.25] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; MWHPR0201MB3609; 6:eU/qN7gn7tdlbdZpiDenk4w0OnWKCYwYhUb8oTWAiBbgPBoReFXttJK2M3ou7ioPJ9t+50lo5pfPXZRLTmpESGPKrkfSD6wGhwjEUvuNaicrEj6pc3XMJuux0/byaLWcX1jNOSzWL4+6ZefklYgRJGqUzZrom+eXzGqEOo6Hasr/4MVJvpVeNs0KFz7Vr98mWkXNfjm4PnqHUyuzFI9m/xpzB0xUZOKDRXaDHXUGFAdeZyJR+nVA65H1xQXRBbGBurzNWY33m4II1PDPUGmqpJkTWRr3fdglEIWfgTyJgp990xpbOG2HGDjBXbcOHmorRIG5pBDCTpQiL+qWZnjsrKOeRMb6Rt/VZ7PtR4NHA/Y=; 5:xgxmAKZPUNRYOJYpKqH9rAqwv5oVvr23/ekbm9xdEVYEViKvRUQ9WGwmdzMyYA7MpqVfB3minL77PPLd6bUgLL4rTELqf7vfV/vpxNW7v5TR81JPMkiNc0Vy/Jcd8NpgPGPF0lDd3n7MQSx0IZtV3V6P2FjPKM+8q2wPeBPezgc=; 24:OxSnhLwGkJM2CssoN8R7fDnnzKwecABtZFJ8yrHUC4IFMjmOYpKDW3HeEB148LCcG6hR2EJc2+SJp0OXGEC4lo4+F2OUsJsRJNg5W+SDZpI=; 7:10nXMMc6YtQtLTkj8hlMWbpLuOvjMdn1rZgxx8r2KTsE9hn2vGBKtPFs6gFGT5V6rhCGteVFT5o/bAuOGUGgGL6CCuO5mX/CVVGYyINnIP53YWVoReAxmP4T7vuy3i1RB/fZg/thbE8Tb0GfJyly1uScQFWdVuDqJD4A3+cQYdaV9Mzbbi0+m3Fkn8huwaXzVO+dJTtm1AGVlR/KPyFNSbqYOdeXDefwSR8SMwxsg8L+HydgxGPB7s2wvGLGZCam x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS; x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 285fcbb9-487d-4198-9b1f-08d546e6c1ea x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(5600026)(4604075)(4534020)(4602075)(4627115)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(2017052603307); SRVR:MWHPR0201MB3609; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MWHPR0201MB3609: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(120809045254105); x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040450)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3231023)(3002001)(93006095)(93001095)(6041248)(20161123558100)(20161123560025)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123555025)(20161123564025)(20161123562025)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:MWHPR0201MB3609; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000803101)(100110400095); SRVR:MWHPR0201MB3609; x-forefront-prvs: 052670E5A4 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(346002)(376002)(396003)(39860400002)(366004)(13464003)(189003)(199004)(53754006)(377424004)(37854004)(8936002)(3846002)(6506007)(6116002)(102836003)(53546011)(76176011)(86362001)(74316002)(3280700002)(229853002)(68736007)(2900100001)(2906002)(230783001)(7736002)(305945005)(25786009)(3660700001)(55016002)(6436002)(66066001)(6306002)(105586002)(2501003)(106356001)(33656002)(9686003)(2473003)(53936002)(5250100002)(7696005)(5660300001)(97736004)(99286004)(316002)(110136005)(2950100002)(81156014)(72206003)(966005)(8676002)(478600001)(14454004)(81166006)(4001150100001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:MWHPR0201MB3609; H:MWHPR0201MB3609.namprd02.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: metaswitch.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: metaswitch.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 285fcbb9-487d-4198-9b1f-08d546e6c1ea X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 19 Dec 2017 13:45:25.1499 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 9d9e56eb-f613-4ddb-b27b-bfcdf14b2cdb X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MWHPR0201MB3609 Archived-At: Subject: [Pce] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-07.txt X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 13:45:29 -0000 Hi All This version addresses the comments Julien made in his shepherd's review du= ring the 2nd WGLC. Cheers Jon -----Original Message----- From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.o= rg Sent: 19 December 2017 13:41 To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-07.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element WG of the IETF. Title : Conveying path setup type in PCEP messages Authors : Siva Sivabalan Jeff Tantsura Ina Minei Robert Varga Jon Hardwick Filename : draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-07.txt Pages : 10 Date : 2017-12-19 Abstract: A Path Computation Element can compute Traffic Engineering paths (TE paths) through a network that are subject to various constraints. Currently, TE paths are Label Switched Paths (LSPs) which are set up using the RSVP-TE signaling protocol. However, other TE path setup methods are possible within the PCE architecture. This document proposes an extension to PCEP to allow support for different path setup methods over a given PCEP session. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-07 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-07 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-07 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submissio= n until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce From nobody Tue Dec 19 06:56:43 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietf.org Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76760129516; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 06:56:41 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Julien Meuric To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.68.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Cc: iesg-secretary@ietf.org, pce@ietf.org, Julien Meuric , pce-chairs@ietf.org, julien.meuric@orange.com Message-ID: <151369540147.7464.5699602033664890616.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 06:56:41 -0800 Archived-At: Subject: [Pce] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-07 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 14:56:41 -0000 Julien Meuric has requested publication of draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-07 as Proposed Standard on behalf of the PCE working group. Please verify the document's state at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type/ From nobody Thu Dec 21 15:49:09 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1230212D7E5; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 15:49:02 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.21 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xp9aL8tC_esn; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 15:49:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23893126E01; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 15:49:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id EC7D7B81AEC; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 15:48:56 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, pce@ietf.org Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Message-Id: <20171221234856.EC7D7B81AEC@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 15:48:56 -0800 (PST) Archived-At: Subject: [Pce] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8281_on_Path_Computation_Element_Communicatio?= =?utf-8?q?n_Protocol_=28PCEP=29_Extensions_for_PCE-Initiated_LSP_Setup_in?= =?utf-8?q?_a_Stateful_PCE_Model?= X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 23:49:02 -0000 A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8281 Title: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for PCE-Initiated LSP Setup in a Stateful PCE Model Author: E. Crabbe, I. Minei, S. Sivabalan, R. Varga Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: December 2017 Mailbox: edward.crabbe@gmail.com, inaminei@google.com, msiva@cisco.com, robert.varga@pantheon.tech Pages: 20 Characters: 41108 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-11.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8281 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8281 The Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) provides mechanisms for Path Computation Elements (PCEs) to perform path computations in response to Path Computation Client (PCC) requests. The extensions for stateful PCE provide active control of Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths (TE LSPs) via PCEP, for a model where the PCC delegates control over one or more locally configured LSPs to the PCE. This document describes the creation and deletion of PCE-initiated LSPs under the stateful PCE model. This document is a product of the Path Computation Element Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC From nobody Thu Dec 21 15:49:34 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D526012DA11; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 15:49:25 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.21 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V7nbIki4yOKD; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 15:49:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B108012DA00; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 15:49:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 659E2B81AF8; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 15:49:11 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, pce@ietf.org Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Message-Id: <20171221234911.659E2B81AF8@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 15:49:11 -0800 (PST) Archived-At: Subject: [Pce] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8282_on_Extensions_to_the_Path_Computation_El?= =?utf-8?q?ement_Communication_Protocol_=28PCEP=29_for_Inter-Layer_MPLS_an?= =?utf-8?q?d_GMPLS_Traffic_Engineering?= X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 23:49:26 -0000 A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8282 Title: Extensions to the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) for Inter-Layer MPLS and GMPLS Traffic Engineering Author: E. Oki, T. Takeda, A. Farrel, F. Zhang Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: December 2017 Mailbox: oki@i.kyoto-u.ac.jp, tomonori.takeda@ntt.com, afarrel@juniper.net, zhangfatai@huawei.com Pages: 22 Characters: 47899 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-pce-inter-layer-ext-12.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8282 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8282 The Path Computation Element (PCE) provides path computation functions in support of traffic engineering in Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) and Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) networks. MPLS and GMPLS networks may be constructed from layered service networks. It is advantageous for overall network efficiency to provide end-to-end traffic engineering across multiple network layers through a process called inter-layer traffic engineering. PCE is a candidate solution for such requirements. The PCE Communication Protocol (PCEP) is designed as a communication protocol between Path Computation Clients (PCCs) and PCEs. This document presents PCEP extensions for inter-layer traffic engineering. This document is a product of the Path Computation Element Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC From nobody Fri Dec 22 01:00:26 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietf.org Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B660F120227; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 01:00:23 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: IETF Meeting Session Request Tool To: Cc: pce@ietf.org, db3546@att.com, pce-chairs@ietf.org, julien.meuric@orange.com X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.68.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <151393322368.28066.754540599760012085.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 01:00:23 -0800 Archived-At: Subject: [Pce] pce - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 101 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 09:00:24 -0000 A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Julien Meuric, a Chair of the pce working group. --------------------------------------------------------- Working Group Name: Path Computation Element Area Name: Routing Area Session Requester: Julien Meuric Number of Sessions: 1 Length of Session(s): 1.5 Hours Number of Attendees: 100 Conflicts to Avoid: First Priority: ccamp mpls teas Second Priority: isis ospf idr spring rtgarea Third Priority: sfc pals detnet rtgwg People who must be present: Deborah Brungard Julien Meuric Jonathan Hardwick Resources Requested: Special Requests: --------------------------------------------------------- From nobody Fri Dec 22 16:54:43 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietf.org Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 885D2126E01; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 16:54:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Brian Carpenter To: Cc: pce@ietf.org, draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints.all@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.68.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <151399047747.30010.9137589938000821863@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 16:54:37 -0800 Archived-At: Subject: [Pce] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints-04 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 00:54:37 -0000 Reviewer: Brian Carpenter Review result: Ready Reviewer: Brian Carpenter Review Date: 2017-12-23 IETF LC End Date: 2017-12-28 IESG Telechat date: 2018-01-11 Summary: Ready -------- Comment: -------- fwiw, I agree with this: [RFC3692] asserts that the existence of experimental code points introduce no new security considerations. However, implementations accepting experimental codepoints need to take care in how they parse and process the messages, objects, and TLVs in case they come, accidentally, from another experiment. There are a few words in https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6709#section-5 that might also be relevant. An experimental code point is in effect a protocol extension with unknown security properties. From nobody Fri Dec 22 18:51:44 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F4381243FE; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 18:51:43 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.23 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.23 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c3ygwSajcPcJ; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 18:51:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04E1B124319; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 18:51:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 7782D941E81B; Sat, 23 Dec 2017 02:51:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML414-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.75) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Sat, 23 Dec 2017 02:51:37 +0000 Received: from NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.57]) by nkgeml414-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Sat, 23 Dec 2017 10:51:34 +0800 From: Xuxiaohu To: Jeff Tantsura CC: "pce@ietf.org" , "isis-wg@ietf.org" , "ospf@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Regarding the relationship between MSD and MSD (type 1) Thread-Index: AQHTe5jxgtLouyh5yEyLK22Wd/ZSOQ== Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 02:51:34 +0000 Message-ID: <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE304A78A4@NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com> References: <254873F7-39C8-461F-B69F-8B68842181E3@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <254873F7-39C8-461F-B69F-8B68842181E3@gmail.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.184.181] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Subject: [Pce] Regarding the relationship between MSD and MSD (type 1) X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 02:51:43 -0000 SGkgSmVmZiwNCg0KKGNjZWQgdG8gUENFIGFuZCBPU1BGIFdHcyBhY2NvcmRpbmdseSkNCg0KSW4g bXkgdW5kZXJzdGFuZGluZywgdGhlIHNlbWFudGljcyBvZiB0aGUgTVNEIHRlcm1pbm9sb2d5IGFz IGRlZmluZWQgaW4gUENFLVNSIGRyYWZ0IGFuZCB0aGUgc2VtYW50aWNzIG9mIHRoZSBNU0QgKHR5 cGUgMSkgdGVybWlub2xvZ3kgYXMgZGVmaW5lZCBpbiBJR1AtTVNEIGRyYWZ0IGFyZSBhY3R1YWxs eSBpbmRpY2F0aW5nIHRoZSBzYW1lIGNhcGFiaWxpdHkgKGkuZS4sIG1heGltdW0gbGFiZWwgc3Rh Y2sgaW1wb3NpdGlvbiBkZXB0aCkgYW5kIHRoZXJlZm9yZSBzdWNoIGNhcGFiaWxpdHkgc2hvdWxk IGJlIHByb3RvY29sLWFnbm9zdGljIGFuZCBjb3VsZCBiZSBhZHZlcnRpc2VkIHZpYSBhbnkgcHJv dG9jb2wgaW5jbHVkaW5nIGJ1dCBsaW1pdGVkIHRvIFBDRVAsIElTLUlTLCBPU1BGIGFuZCBCR1At TFMuIEl0IGp1c3QgaGFwcGVucyB0aGF0IFBDRVAgb25seSBhbm5vdW5jZXMgcGVyLW5vZGUgTVNE IGNhcGFiaWxpdHkgd2hpbGUgSUdQIGFubm91bmNlcyBib3RoIHBlci1ub2RlIGFuZCBwZXItbGlu ayBNU0QgY2FwYWJpbGl0eS4gVGhlcmVmb3JlLCBpdCBzZWVtcyB3b3J0aHdoaWxlIHRvIGlyb24g b3V0IHRoZSB0ZXJtaW5vbG9neSBpbmNvbnNpc3RlbmN5IGJldHdlZW4gTVNEIGFuZCBNU0QgKHR5 cGUgMSksIElNSE8uIFBsZWFzZSBmZWVsIGZyZWUgdG8gY29ycmVjdCBtZSBpZiBteSB1bmRlcnN0 YW5kaW5nIGlzIHdyb25nLg0KDQpCeSB0aGUgd2F5LCBJJ20gdG90YWxseSBub3QgaW50ZW5kaW5n IHRvIG9iamVjdCBhbnl0aGluZzopIEkganVzdCBob3BlIHRvIGVsaW1pbmF0ZSB0aGUgcG90ZW50 aWFsIGNvbmZ1c2lvbiBhYm91dCB0aGVzZSB0d28gdGVybWlub2xvZ2llcyAoZS5nLiwgTVNEIGFu ZCBNU0QodHlwZTEpKSBvciBhdCBsZWFzdCBteSBjb25mdXNpb24uIA0KDQpCZXN0IHJlZ2FyZHMs DQpYaWFvaHUNCg0KPiAtLS0tLemCruS7tuWOn+S7ti0tLS0tDQo+IOWPkeS7tuS6ujogSmVmZiBU YW50c3VyYSBbbWFpbHRvOmplZmZ0YW50LmlldGZAZ21haWwuY29tXQ0KPiDlj5HpgIHml7bpl7Q6 IDIwMTflubQxMuaciDIz5pelIDI6NTANCj4g5pS25Lu25Lq6OiBYdXhpYW9odTsgTGVzIEdpbnNi ZXJnIChnaW5zYmVyZyk7IEtldGFuIFRhbGF1bGlrYXIgKGtldGFudCk7IENocmlzdGlhbg0KPiBI b3BwczsgaXNpcy13Z0BpZXRmLm9yZw0KPiDmioTpgIE6IGlzaXMtYWRzQGlldGYub3JnOyBkcmFm dC1pZXRmLWlzaXMtc2VnbWVudC1yb3V0aW5nLW1zZEBpZXRmLm9yZw0KPiDkuLvpopg6IFJlOiDn rZTlpI06IOetlOWkjTogW0lzaXMtd2ddIFdHIExhc3QgQ2FsbCBmb3INCj4gZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1p c2lzLXNlZ21lbnQtcm91dGluZy1tc2QtMDcNCj4gDQo+IFhpYW9odSwNCj4gDQo+IFBDRVAgYW5k IElTSVMoT1NQRikgYXJlIHF1aXRlIGRpZmZlcmVudCBpbiB0aGVpciBmdW5jdGlvbmFsaXR5IGFu ZCBub3QgbWVhbnQgdG8NCj4gZG8gdGhlIHNhbWUgdGhpbmcuIFdydCBTUiBlY29zeXN0ZW0sIFBD RVAgaXMgb3B0aW9uYWwsIHdoaWxlIElHUOKAmXMgYXJlDQo+IG1hbmRhdG9yeS4NCj4gV2hlbiBp dCBjb21lcyB0byBhIG5vZGUgY2FwYWJpbGl0eSwgUENFUCBhbmQgSUdQ4oCZcyBwcm92aWRlIHNh bWUgaW5mb3JtYXRpb24NCj4gYW5kIGZ1bGx5IGFsaWduZWQsIGhvd2V2ZXIgbW9yZSBncmFudWxh ciwgcGVyIGxpbmsgaW5mb3JtYXRpb24gaXMgb25seSBhdmFpbGFibGUNCj4gaW4gSUdQcywgYW5k IHRoaXMgaXMgYXMgcGVyIGRlc2lnbiAobm90IGEgYnVnKS4NCj4gUENFUCBTUiBkcmFmdCAod2hp Y2ggSeKAmW0gY28tYXV0aG9yIG9mKSB3aWxsIGJlIGxhc3QgY2FsbGVkIHNvb24sIHBsZWFzZSBt YWtlDQo+IHN1cmUgeW91IHByb3ZpZGUgeW91ciBjb21tZW50cyB0byB0aGUgUENFIFdHLg0KPiAN Cj4gVGhlIGludGVudGlvbiBvZiB0aGlzIHRocmVhZCBpcyB0byBsYXN0IGNhbGwgZHJhZnQtaWV0 Zi1pc2lzLXNlZ21lbnQtcm91dGluZy1tc2QsDQo+IHRoYXQgaGFzIFR5cGUgMSBkZWZpbmVkIGFu ZCBjcmVhdGVzIElBTkEgcmVnaXN0cnkgZm9yIHRoZSBmdXR1cmUgVHlwZXMuDQo+IEnigJlkIGFw cHJlY2lhdGUgeW91ciBjb21tZW50cyBzcGVjaWZpY2FsbHkgdG8gdGhlIGRyYWZ0LCBhbmQgaWYg eW91IGhhdmUgZ290IGFueQ0KPiB0ZWNobmljYWwgb2JqZWN0aW9uLCB3b3VsZCBiZSBoYXBweSB0 byBhZGRyZXNzIHRoZW0uDQo+IA0KPiBUaGFua3MhDQo+IA0KPiBDaGVlcnMsDQo+IEplZmYNCj4g DQo+IC0tLS0tT3JpZ2luYWwgTWVzc2FnZS0tLS0tDQo+IEZyb206IFh1eGlhb2h1IDx4dXhpYW9o dUBodWF3ZWkuY29tPg0KPiBEYXRlOiBUaHVyc2RheSwgRGVjZW1iZXIgMjEsIDIwMTcgYXQgMTY6 NDINCj4gVG86IEplZmYgVGFudHN1cmEgPGplZmZ0YW50LmlldGZAZ21haWwuY29tPiwgIkxlcyBH aW5zYmVyZyAoZ2luc2JlcmcpIg0KPiA8Z2luc2JlcmdAY2lzY28uY29tPiwgIktldGFuIFRhbGF1 bGlrYXIgKGtldGFudCkiIDxrZXRhbnRAY2lzY28uY29tPiwNCj4gQ2hyaXN0aWFuIEhvcHBzIDxj aG9wcHNAY2hvcHBzLm9yZz4sICJpc2lzLXdnQGlldGYub3JnIiA8aXNpcy13Z0BpZXRmLm9yZz4N Cj4gQ2M6ICJpc2lzLWFkc0BpZXRmLm9yZyIgPGlzaXMtYWRzQGlldGYub3JnPiwNCj4gImRyYWZ0 LWlldGYtaXNpcy1zZWdtZW50LXJvdXRpbmctbXNkQGlldGYub3JnIg0KPiA8ZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1p c2lzLXNlZ21lbnQtcm91dGluZy1tc2RAaWV0Zi5vcmc+DQo+IFN1YmplY3Q6IOetlOWkjTog562U 5aSNOiBbSXNpcy13Z10gV0cgTGFzdCBDYWxsIGZvcg0KPiBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLWlzaXMtc2VnbWVu dC1yb3V0aW5nLW1zZC0wNw0KPiANCj4gICAgIEplZmYsDQo+IA0KPiAgICAgSU1ITywgdGhlIE1T RCBvciB0aGUgTVNEKHR5cGUgMSkganVzdCBpbmRpY2F0ZXMgYSBjZXJ0YWluIGxhYmVsIGltcG9z aXRpb24NCj4gY2FwYWJpbGl0eSB3aGljaCBzaG91bGQgYmUgc2lnbmFsaW5nLWFnbm9zdGljLiBN b3JlIHNwZWNpYWxseSwgdGhlIE1TRCBvcg0KPiBNU0QodHlwZTEpIGNhcGFiaWxpdHkgY291bGQg YmUgc2lnbmFsZWQgdmlhIElHUCwgQkdQIG9yIFBDRVAuDQo+IA0KPiAgICAgSWYgdGhlIHNlbWFu dGljIG9mIE1TRCAodHlwZSAxKSBhcyBkZWZpbmVkIGluIHlvdXIgSUdQLU1TRCBkcmFmdCBlcXVh bHMgdGhlDQo+IHNlbWFudGljcyBvZiBNU0QgYXMgZGVmaW5lZCBpbiBQQ0VQLVNSIGRyYWZ0LCBJ IGJlbGlldmUgaXQnZCBiZXR0ZXIgdG8gaXJvbiBvdXQNCj4gc3VjaCB0ZXJtaW5vbG9neSBpbmNv bnNpc3RlbmN5IEFTQVAuDQo+IA0KPiAgICAgQmVzdCByZWdhcmRzLA0KPiAgICAgWGlhb2h1DQo+ IA0KPiAgICAgPiAtLS0tLemCruS7tuWOn+S7ti0tLS0tDQo+ICAgICA+IOWPkeS7tuS6ujogSmVm ZiBUYW50c3VyYSBbbWFpbHRvOmplZmZ0YW50LmlldGZAZ21haWwuY29tXQ0KPiAgICAgPiDlj5Hp gIHml7bpl7Q6IDIwMTflubQxMuaciDIy5pelIDU6MjINCj4gICAgID4g5pS25Lu25Lq6OiBYdXhp YW9odTsgTGVzIEdpbnNiZXJnIChnaW5zYmVyZyk7IEtldGFuIFRhbGF1bGlrYXIgKGtldGFudCk7 DQo+IENocmlzdGlhbg0KPiAgICAgPiBIb3BwczsgaXNpcy13Z0BpZXRmLm9yZw0KPiAgICAgPiDm ioTpgIE6IGlzaXMtYWRzQGlldGYub3JnOyBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLWlzaXMtc2VnbWVudC1yb3V0aW5n LW1zZEBpZXRmLm9yZw0KPiAgICAgPiDkuLvpopg6IFJlOiDnrZTlpI06IFtJc2lzLXdnXSBXRyBM YXN0IENhbGwgZm9yDQo+IGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtaXNpcy1zZWdtZW50LXJvdXRpbmctbXNkLTA3DQo+ ICAgICA+DQo+ICAgICA+IFh1eGlhb2h1LA0KPiAgICAgPg0KPiAgICAgPiBUbyBjbGFyaWZ5Og0K PiAgICAgPiBUaGUgY29uY2VwdCBoYWQgYmVlbiBkZXZlbG9wZWQgaW4gYm90aCwgaW4gcGFyYWxs ZWwsIGhvd2V2ZXIgUENFUA0KPiAgICAgPiBpbXBsZW1lbnRhdGlvbiBpcyBsaW1pdGVkIChub2Rl IG9ubHksIFBDQyBpbiBxdWVzdGlvbiBoYXMgdG8gaGF2ZSBQQ0VQDQo+IHNlc3Npb25zDQo+ICAg ICA+IHdpdGggdGhlIFBDRSksIGFuZCB0aGlzIGlzIGNsZWFybHkgc3RhdGVkIGluIHRoZSBkcmFm dCDigJMgaWYgTVNEIGlzIGtub3duDQo+IGZyb20gYm90aA0KPiAgICAgPiBzb3VyY2VzIChQQ0VQ IGFuZCBJR1AvQkdQLUxTKSB0aGUgbGF0ZXIgdGFrZXMgcHJlY2VkZW5jZS4gSUdQIGRyYWZ0cyBh cmUNCj4gdGhlDQo+ICAgICA+IHNvdXJjZSBvZiB0cnV0aCB3aGVuIGl0IGNvbWVzIHRvIHNlbWFu dGljcyBkZWZpbml0aW9ucy4NCj4gDQo+IA0KPiANCj4gICAgID4gUGVyc29uYWxseSwgSSBkb27i gJl0IHNlZSBhbnkgY29uZnVzaW9uIHdydCBuYW1lLCBhbGwgZHJhZnRzIGhhdmUgYmVlbg0KPiBh cm91bmQgZm9yDQo+ICAgICA+IHF1aXRlIHNvbWUgdGltZSwgcmV2aWV3ZWQgYnkgbWFueSBwZW9w bGUsIHByZXNlbnRlZCBpbiBhY2FkZW1pYSBhbmQNCj4gICAgID4gbmV0d29ya2luZyBldmVudHMs IG5vb25lIHdhcyBldmVyIGNvbmZ1c2Vk4oCmDQo+ICAgICA+DQo+ICAgICA+IEnigJltIG5vdCBz dXJlIGFib3V0IHZhbHVlIG9mIHlvdXIgcHJvcG9zYWwgZWl0aGVyLCBhbmQgSeKAmWQgbGVhdmUg dGhlDQo+IGRlY2lzaW9uDQo+ICAgICA+IHdoYXQgdG8gdXNlIHRvIHBlb3BsZSB3aG8gYXJlIHRo ZSBjb25zdW1lcnMgb2YgdGhlIHRlY2hub2xvZ3ksIHRob3NlDQo+IHdobyBhcmUNCj4gICAgID4g Z29pbmcgdG8gaW1wbGVtZW50IGl0IChhdCBsZWFzdCAzIE1TRCBpbXBsZW1lbnRhdGlvbnMgYXJl IG9uIHRoZWlyDQo+IHdheXMpLg0KPiAgICAgPg0KPiAgICAgPiBBcyB0aGUgbGFzdCBwb2ludCDi gJMgd2UgYXJlIG5vdCDigJxjb25zaWRlcmluZ+KAnSBleHBhbmRpbmcsIHRoZSBkcmFmdCBpcyBj bGVhcg0KPiBhYm91dA0KPiAgICAgPiB0aGUgZnV0dXJlIGV4dGVuc2lvbnMgdG8gY29tZSBhbmQg ZW5jb2RpbmcgaXMgZG9uZSBpbiBhIHdheSB0byBmYWNpbGl0YXRlDQo+IHN1Y2gNCj4gICAgID4g ZXh0ZW5zaW9ucy4NCj4gICAgID4gVGhpcyBpcyB0aGUgd29ya2luZyBncm91cCBsYXN0IGNhbGwg Zm9yIHRoZSBkcmFmdCwgbm90IGEgZGlzY3Vzc2lvbiB3aGV0aGVyDQo+IHdlDQo+ICAgICA+IHNo b3VsZCBwcm9jZWVkIHdpdGggdGhlIHRlY2hub2xvZ3k6DQo+ICAgICA+IElmIHlvdSBzZWUgYW55 IHRlY2huaWNhbCBwcm9ibGVtcyB3aXRoIHRoZSBzb2x1dGlvbiBwcm9wb3NlZCDigJMgSeKAmWQg YmUNCj4gdGhlIGZpcnN0DQo+ICAgICA+IHRvIGxpc3RlbiB0byB5b3UgYW5kIGFkZHJlc3MgdGhl bSENCj4gICAgID4NCj4gICAgID4gSGFwcHkgaG9saWRheXMhDQo+ICAgICA+DQo+ICAgICA+IENo ZWVycywNCj4gICAgID4gSmVmZg0KPiAgICAgPg0KPiAgICAgPiAtLS0tLU9yaWdpbmFsIE1lc3Nh Z2UtLS0tLQ0KPiAgICAgPiBGcm9tOiBYdXhpYW9odSA8eHV4aWFvaHVAaHVhd2VpLmNvbT4NCj4g ICAgID4gRGF0ZTogV2VkbmVzZGF5LCBEZWNlbWJlciAyMCwgMjAxNyBhdCAxODo0MA0KPiAgICAg PiBUbzogIkxlcyBHaW5zYmVyZyAoZ2luc2JlcmcpIiA8Z2luc2JlcmdAY2lzY28uY29tPiwgIktl dGFuIFRhbGF1bGlrYXINCj4gKGtldGFudCkiDQo+ICAgICA+IDxrZXRhbnRAY2lzY28uY29tPiwg Q2hyaXN0aWFuIEhvcHBzIDxjaG9wcHNAY2hvcHBzLm9yZz4sDQo+ICJpc2lzLXdnQGlldGYub3Jn Ig0KPiAgICAgPiA8aXNpcy13Z0BpZXRmLm9yZz4NCj4gICAgID4gQ2M6ICJpc2lzLWFkc0BpZXRm Lm9yZyIgPGlzaXMtYWRzQGlldGYub3JnPiwNCj4gICAgID4gImRyYWZ0LWlldGYtaXNpcy1zZWdt ZW50LXJvdXRpbmctbXNkQGlldGYub3JnIg0KPiAgICAgPiA8ZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1pc2lzLXNlZ21l bnQtcm91dGluZy1tc2RAaWV0Zi5vcmc+DQo+ICAgICA+IFN1YmplY3Q6IOetlOWkjTogW0lzaXMt d2ddIFdHIExhc3QgQ2FsbCBmb3INCj4gZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1pc2lzLXNlZ21lbnQtcm91dGluZy1t c2QtMDcNCj4gICAgID4gUmVzZW50LUZyb206IDxhbGlhcy1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3JnPg0KPiAg ICAgPiBSZXNlbnQtVG86IDxqZWZmdGFudC5pZXRmQGdtYWlsLmNvbT4sIDx1bWEuY2h1bmR1cmlA aHVhd2VpLmNvbT4sDQo+ICAgICA+IDxhbGRyaW4uaWV0ZkBnbWFpbC5jb20+LCA8Z2luc2JlcmdA Y2lzY28uY29tPg0KPiAgICAgPiBSZXNlbnQtRGF0ZTogV2VkLCAyMCBEZWMgMjAxNyAxODo0MDox NiAtMDgwMCAoUFNUKQ0KPiAgICAgPg0KPiAgICAgPiAgICAgSGkgTGVzLA0KPiAgICAgPg0KPiAg ICAgPiAgICAgSWYgSSB1bmRlcnN0YW5kIGl0IGNvcnJlY3RseSwgdGhlIE1TRCBjb25jZXB0IHdh cyBvcmlnaW5hdGVkIGZyb20NCj4gICAgID4gKGh0dHBzOi8vdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmcvaHRtbC9k cmFmdC1pZXRmLXBjZS1zZWdtZW50LXJvdXRpbmctMTEjcGFnZS03KSBhcw0KPiAgICAgPiBkZXNj cmliZWQgYmVsb3c6DQo+ICAgICA+DQo+ICAgICA+ICAgICAiVGhlICJNYXhpbXVtIFNJRCBEZXB0 aCIgKDENCj4gICAgID4gICAgICAgIG9jdGV0KSBmaWVsZCAoTVNEKSBzcGVjaWZpZXMgdGhlIG1h eGltdW0gbnVtYmVyIG9mIFNJRHMgKE1QTFMNCj4gbGFiZWwNCj4gICAgID4gICAgICAgIHN0YWNr IGRlcHRoIGluIHRoZSBjb250ZXh0IG9mIHRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQpIHRoYXQgYSBQQ0MgaXMNCj4g Y2FwYWJsZSBvZg0KPiAgICAgPiAgICAgICAgaW1wb3Npbmcgb24gYSBwYWNrZXQuIg0KPiAgICAg Pg0KPiAgICAgPiAgICAgQmVmb3JlIGNvbnNpZGVyaW5nIGV4cGFuZGluZyB0aGUgc2VtYW50aWNz IG9mIHRoZSBNU0QgY29uY2VwdCBhcw0KPiBkZWZpbmVkDQo+ICAgICA+IGluIHRoZSBhYm92ZSBQ Q0UtU1IgZHJhZnQsIGhvdyBhYm91dCBmaXJzdCBjb25zaWRlcmluZyByZW5hbWluZyB0aGUNCj4g Y2FwYWJpbGl0eQ0KPiAgICAgPiBvZiBpbXBvc2luZyB0aGUgbWF4aW11bSBudW1iZXIgb2YgbGFi ZWxzIHNvIGFzIHRvIGVsaW1pbmF0ZSBwb3NzaWJsZQ0KPiAgICAgPiBjb25mdXNpb25zLCBlLmcu LCBXcml0YWJsZSBMYWJlbC1zdGFjayBEZXB0aCAoV0xEKSBhcyBvcHBvc2VkIHRvIHRoZQ0KPiBS ZWFkYWJsZQ0KPiAgICAgPiBMYWJlbC1zdGFjayBEZXB0aCAoUkxEKSBhcyBkZWZpbmVkIGluDQo+ ICAgICA+IChodHRwczovL3Rvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnL2h0bWwvZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1vc3BmLW1wbHMt ZWxjKSBhbmQNCj4gICAgID4gKGh0dHBzOi8vdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmcvaHRtbC9kcmFmdC1pZXRm LWlzaXMtbXBscy1lbGMpID8NCj4gICAgID4NCj4gICAgID4gICAgIEJlc3QgcmVnYXJkcywNCj4g ICAgID4gICAgIFhpYW9odQ0KPiAgICAgPg0KPiAgICAgPiAgICAgPiAtLS0tLemCruS7tuWOn+S7 ti0tLS0tDQo+ICAgICA+ICAgICA+IOWPkeS7tuS6ujogSXNpcy13ZyBbbWFpbHRvOmlzaXMtd2ct Ym91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZ10g5Luj6KGoIExlcw0KPiBHaW5zYmVyZw0KPiAgICAgPiAoZ2luc2Jl cmcpDQo+ICAgICA+ICAgICA+IOWPkemAgeaXtumXtDogMjAxN+W5tDEy5pyIMjHml6UgNDowMg0K PiAgICAgPiAgICAgPiDmlLbku7bkuro6IEtldGFuIFRhbGF1bGlrYXIgKGtldGFudCk7IENocmlz dGlhbiBIb3BwczsNCj4gaXNpcy13Z0BpZXRmLm9yZw0KPiAgICAgPiAgICAgPiDmioTpgIE6IGlz aXMtYWRzQGlldGYub3JnOw0KPiBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLWlzaXMtc2VnbWVudC1yb3V0aW5nLW1zZEBp ZXRmLm9yZw0KPiAgICAgPiAgICAgPiDkuLvpopg6IFJlOiBbSXNpcy13Z10gV0cgTGFzdCBDYWxs IGZvcg0KPiBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLWlzaXMtc2VnbWVudC1yb3V0aW5nLW1zZC0wNw0KPiAgICAgPiAg ICAgPg0KPiAgICAgPiAgICAgPiBLZXRhbiAtDQo+ICAgICA+ICAgICA+DQo+ICAgICA+ICAgICA+ IFRoYW54IGZvciB0aGUgY29tbWVudHMuDQo+ICAgICA+ICAgICA+IEkgdGhpbmsgd2UgZG8gd2Fu dCB0byBhbGxvdyBNU0Qgc3VwcG9ydCBmb3IgdmFsdWVzIG90aGVyIHRoYW4NCj4gaW1wb3NpdGlv bg0KPiAgICAgPiAgICAgPiB2YWx1ZXMuIFdlIHdpbGwgcmV2aXNlIHRoZSB0ZXh0IHNvIHdlIGFy ZSBub3QgcmVzdHJpY3RlZCB0byBvbmx5DQo+IGltcG9zaXRpb24NCj4gICAgID4gY2FzZXMuDQo+ ICAgICA+ICAgICA+DQo+ICAgICA+ICAgICA+ICAgTGVzDQo+ICAgICA+ICAgICA+DQo+ICAgICA+ ICAgICA+DQo+ICAgICA+ICAgICA+ID4gLS0tLS1PcmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCj4gICAg ID4gICAgID4gPiBGcm9tOiBLZXRhbiBUYWxhdWxpa2FyIChrZXRhbnQpDQo+ICAgICA+ICAgICA+ ID4gU2VudDogV2VkbmVzZGF5LCBEZWNlbWJlciAyMCwgMjAxNyAxOjUxIEFNDQo+ICAgICA+ICAg ICA+ID4gVG86IENocmlzdGlhbiBIb3BwcyA8Y2hvcHBzQGNob3Bwcy5vcmc+OyBpc2lzLXdnQGll dGYub3JnDQo+ICAgICA+ICAgICA+ID4gQ2M6IGlzaXMtYWRzQGlldGYub3JnOw0KPiBkcmFmdC1p ZXRmLWlzaXMtc2VnbWVudC1yb3V0aW5nLW1zZEBpZXRmLm9yZw0KPiAgICAgPiAgICAgPiA+IFN1 YmplY3Q6IFJFOiBbSXNpcy13Z10gV0cgTGFzdCBDYWxsIGZvcg0KPiAgICAgPiAgICAgPiA+IGRy YWZ0LWlldGYtaXNpcy1zZWdtZW50LXJvdXRpbmctbXNkLTA3DQo+ICAgICA+ICAgICA+ID4NCj4g ICAgID4gICAgID4gPiBIZWxsbywNCj4gICAgID4gICAgID4gPg0KPiAgICAgPiAgICAgPiA+IEkg c3VwcG9ydCB0aGlzIGRvY3VtZW50IGFuZCB3b3VsZCBsaWtlIHRvIGFzayB0aGUgYXV0aG9ycyBh bmQNCj4gV0cgdG8NCj4gICAgID4gICAgID4gPiBjb25zaWRlciBpZiB3ZSBjYW4gZXhwYW5kIHRo ZSBzY29wZSBvZiB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0IHRvIG5vdCBqdXN0DQo+ICAgICA+ICAgICA+ID4gImltcG9z aXRpb24iIG9mIHRoZSBTSUQgc3RhY2sgYnV0IGFsc28gb3RoZXIgc2ltaWxhciBsaW1pdHMgcmVs YXRlZA0KPiB0bw0KPiAgICAgPiBvdGhlcg0KPiAgICAgPiAgICAgPiBhY3Rpb25zIChlLmcuDQo+ ICAgICA+ICAgICA+ID4gcmVhZGluZywgcHJvY2Vzc2luZywgZXRjLikuIFdpdGggU2VnbWVudCBS b3V0aW5nLCB3ZSBhcmUgY29taW5nDQo+IGFjcm9zcw0KPiAgICAgPiAgICAgPiA+IHZhcmlvdXMg YWN0aW9ucyB0aGF0IG5vZGVzIG5lZWQgdG8gZG8gd2l0aCB0aGUgU0lEIHN0YWNrIGZvcg0KPiBk aWZmZXJlbnQNCj4gICAgID4gICAgID4gPiBwdXJwb3NlcyBhbmQgSU1ITyBpdCB3b3VsZCBiZSB1 c2VmdWwgdG8gZXh0ZW5kIHRoZSBNU0QgYWJpbGl0eQ0KPiB0bw0KPiAgICAgPiAgICAgPiA+IGNv dmVyIHRob3NlIGFzIHRoZXkgYXJpc2UuDQo+ICAgICA+ICAgICA+ID4NCj4gICAgID4gICAgID4g PiBUaGFua3MsDQo+ICAgICA+ICAgICA+ID4gS2V0YW4NCj4gICAgID4gICAgID4gPg0KPiAgICAg PiAgICAgPiA+IC0tLS0tT3JpZ2luYWwgTWVzc2FnZS0tLS0tDQo+ICAgICA+ICAgICA+ID4gRnJv bTogSXNpcy13ZyBbbWFpbHRvOmlzaXMtd2ctYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZ10gT24gQmVoYWxmIE9m DQo+IENocmlzdGlhbg0KPiAgICAgPiAgICAgPiA+IEhvcHBzDQo+ICAgICA+ICAgICA+ID4gU2Vu dDogMjAgRGVjZW1iZXIgMjAxNyAxNDowMw0KPiAgICAgPiAgICAgPiA+IFRvOiBpc2lzLXdnQGll dGYub3JnDQo+ICAgICA+ICAgICA+ID4gQ2M6IGlzaXMtYWRzQGlldGYub3JnOw0KPiBkcmFmdC1p ZXRmLWlzaXMtc2VnbWVudC1yb3V0aW5nLW1zZEBpZXRmLm9yZw0KPiAgICAgPiAgICAgPiA+IFN1 YmplY3Q6IFtJc2lzLXdnXSBXRyBMYXN0IENhbGwgZm9yDQo+ICAgICA+ICAgICA+ID4gZHJhZnQt aWV0Zi1pc2lzLXNlZ21lbnQtcm91dGluZy1tc2QtMDcNCj4gICAgID4gICAgID4gPg0KPiAgICAg PiAgICAgPiA+DQo+ICAgICA+ICAgICA+ID4gVGhlIGF1dGhvcnMgaGF2ZSBhc2tlZCBmb3IgYW5k IHdlIGFyZSBzdGFydGluZyBhIFdHIExhc3QgQ2FsbCBvbg0KPiAgICAgPiAgICAgPiA+DQo+ICAg ICA+ICAgICA+ID4NCj4gaHR0cHM6Ly9kYXRhdHJhY2tlci5pZXRmLm9yZy9kb2MvZHJhZnQtaWV0 Zi1pc2lzLXNlZ21lbnQtcm91dGluZy1tc2QvDQo+ICAgICA+ICAgICA+ID4NCj4gICAgID4gICAg ID4gPiB3aGljaCB3aWxsIGxhc3QgYW4gZXh0ZW5kZWQgNCB3ZWVrcyB0byBhbGxvdyBmb3IgeWVh ci1lbmQgUFRPDQo+IHBhdHRlcm5zLg0KPiAgICAgPiAgICAgPiA+DQo+ICAgICA+ICAgICA+ID4g QW4gSVBSIHN0YXRlbWVudCBleGlzdHM6DQo+ICAgICA+ICAgICA+ID4NCj4gICAgID4gICAgID4g Pg0KPiAgICAgPiAgICAgPiA+DQo+IGh0dHBzOi8vZGF0YXRyYWNrZXIuaWV0Zi5vcmcvaXByL3Nl YXJjaC8/c3VibWl0PWRyYWZ0JmlkPWRyYWZ0LWlldGYtaXMNCj4gICAgID4gICAgID4gPiBpcy0N Cj4gICAgID4gICAgID4gPiBzZWdtZW50LXJvdXRpbmctbXNkDQo+ICAgICA+ICAgICA+ID4NCj4g ICAgID4gICAgID4gPiBBdXRob3JzIHBsZWFzZSByZXBseSB0byB0aGUgbGlzdCBpbmRpY2F0aW5n IHdoZXRoZXIgeW91IGFyZSBhd2FyZQ0KPiBvZg0KPiAgICAgPiAgICAgPiA+IGFueQ0KPiAgICAg PiAgICAgPiA+ICpuZXcqIElQUi4NCj4gICAgID4gICAgID4gPg0KPiAgICAgPiAgICAgPiA+IFRo YW5rcywNCj4gICAgID4gICAgID4gPiBDaHJpcy4NCj4gICAgID4gICAgID4gPg0KPiAgICAgPiAg ICAgPiA+IF9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQo+ ICAgICA+ICAgICA+ID4gSXNpcy13ZyBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QNCj4gICAgID4gICAgID4gPiBJc2lz LXdnQGlldGYub3JnDQo+ICAgICA+ICAgICA+ID4gaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1h bi9saXN0aW5mby9pc2lzLXdnDQo+ICAgICA+ICAgICA+DQo+ICAgICA+ICAgICA+IF9fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQo+ICAgICA+ICAgICA+IElz aXMtd2cgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0DQo+ICAgICA+ICAgICA+IElzaXMtd2dAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCj4gICAg ID4gICAgID4gaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9pc2lzLXdnDQo+ ICAgICA+DQo+ICAgICA+DQo+IA0KPiANCj4gDQoNCg== From nobody Wed Dec 27 02:46:29 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6114C1270A0; Wed, 27 Dec 2017 02:46:23 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.231 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.231 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WfgQ_2WN9Wrk; Wed, 27 Dec 2017 02:46:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9F77126D46; Wed, 27 Dec 2017 02:46:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from lhreml703-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id D9E17ADBA3819; Wed, 27 Dec 2017 10:46:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from BLREML405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.20.4.41) by lhreml703-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.44) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Wed, 27 Dec 2017 10:46:17 +0000 Received: from BLREML503-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.9.219]) by BLREML405-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.20.4.41]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Wed, 27 Dec 2017 16:16:03 +0530 From: Dhruv Dhody To: Brian Carpenter , "gen-art@ietf.org" CC: "pce@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints.all@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Pce] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints-04 Thread-Index: AQHTe4imLfGh9AGhpEe/YDzuTGT0NqNW+tlg Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 10:46:03 +0000 Message-ID: <23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B8D5FBE65@BLREML503-MBX.china.huawei.com> References: <151399047747.30010.9137589938000821863@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <151399047747.30010.9137589938000821863@ietfa.amsl.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.18.149.39] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Pce] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints-04 X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 10:46:23 -0000 Hi Brian,=20 Thanks for your review.=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian Carpenter > Sent: 23 December 2017 06:25 > To: gen-art@ietf.org > Cc: pce@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints.all@ietf.org > Subject: [Pce] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pce-pcep-exp- > codepoints-04 >=20 > Reviewer: Brian Carpenter > Review result: Ready >=20 > Reviewer: Brian Carpenter > Review Date: 2017-12-23 > IETF LC End Date: 2017-12-28 > IESG Telechat date: 2018-01-11 >=20 > Summary: Ready > -------- >=20 > Comment: > -------- >=20 > fwiw, I agree with this: >=20 > [RFC3692] asserts that the existence of experimental code points > introduce no new security considerations. However, implementations > accepting experimental codepoints need to take care in how they parse > and process the messages, objects, and TLVs in case they come, > accidentally, from another experiment. >=20 > There are a few words in https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6709#section-5 > that might also be relevant. An experimental code point is in effect a > protocol extension with unknown security properties. >=20 [[Dhruv Dhody]] We could add this text as per your suggestion - =20 Further, an implementation accepting experimental code points needs to consider the security aspects of the experimental extensions. [RFC6709] provide various design considerations for protocol extensions (including those designated as experimental). Thanks!=20 Dhruv > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce From nobody Fri Dec 29 10:08:56 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD71F12D775 for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 10:08:54 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.62 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GPm4dhVXMYqM for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 10:08:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (asmtp1.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.248]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81A57126DFB for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 10:08:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id vBTI8ngX020082 for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 18:08:49 GMT Received: from 950129200 ([193.56.242.126]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id vBTI8lTG020062 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2017 18:08:48 GMT Reply-To: From: "Adrian Farrel" To: Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 18:08:50 -0000 Message-ID: <009801d380d0$15818900$40849b00$@olddog.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AdOA0BKuZov6aC+UQlqqWm9PfujIgQ== Content-Language: en-gb X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1679-8.2.0.1013-23562.002 X-TM-AS-Result: No--16.136-10.0-31-10 X-imss-scan-details: No--16.136-10.0-31-10 X-TMASE-MatchedRID: SOu9lCwgpT6TT50vRhVUoPW4u6dw4YBZI0ZIn3NG5Q3jsTquy0JRi83q hpIE26kvwAbihnyeD/BSFJg1tzrrohNKnD37eC8/SEQN/D/3cG696iJ9CCuHwsGQEnQwhjvzf/b TCoZRptJNYvDaO9t+nPE/T9QKeKEbyDB9HAjqDp2VUcz8XpiS9HJrB0Cu3DDnRjHvrQ40NxZZ11 ijMqwnmry+K0fDzPdzXGDsFfPF2wJRYoxf6NUOycWUKBjERoYTMMr4GuNHX1qsafcFLFlU1CzyX B0IS0ld7LAHNqUbR+yoVGBXm1c2KYWDz7mPxd0pJYOiNDWD6sF6PxDI06UtHcj0QMA/92m2DJtp S9qt+hgM60Cmg6+iOu3hgE8lR8EHH6jxW2TDeuSdVNZaI2n6/4N12XKYbuJLDO+DX+rUwfZncpG Qs7S9GTRzIRIo4G/0Bc5l05FO6qvk18JBpE0OqjAoNxJKRrVrfS0Ip2eEHny+qryzYw2E8M8943 oc3p3sq7rFUcuGp/Hfd+P6wwCt84RtqopBKUBlN9slGu+P3f6TCh2RnyTmUSn78susVj0KBAHhP HWPy8jkFFV6SJfFEQ== Archived-At: Subject: [Pce] Update and request for adoption : draft-li-pce-pcep-flowspec-03.txt X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Path Computation Element List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 18:08:54 -0000 Hi PCE, This is mainly a keep-alive revision with a little housekeeping (it's amazing how much of the referenced work has been published as RFCs in the last few months). Chatting with Dhruv and our recollection is that there was general support for this work (specifically for a PCE to be able to tell a headend what traffic to put on an LSP or SR path). Since we have implementations "in the pipe", now would be a really good time for the WG to think about adopting the work. Over to the chairs for a decision/action. Thanks, Adrian > -----Original Message----- > From: I-D-Announce [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > internet-drafts@ietf.org > Sent: 29 December 2017 18:02 > To: i-d-announce@ietf.org > Subject: I-D Action: draft-li-pce-pcep-flowspec-03.txt > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. > > > Title : PCEP Extension for Flow Specification > Authors : Dhruv Dhody > Adrian Farrel > Zhenbin Li > Filename : draft-li-pce-pcep-flowspec-03.txt > Pages : 25 > Date : 2017-12-29 > > Abstract: > The Path Computation Element (PCE) is a functional component capable > of selecting the paths through a traffic engineered network. These > paths may be supplied in response to requests for computation, or may > be unsolicited directions issued by the PCE to network elements. > Both approaches use the PCE Communication Protocol (PCEP) to convey > the details of the computed path. > > Traffic flows may be categorized and described using "Flow > Specifications". RFC 5575 defines the Flow Specification and > describes how it may be distributed in BGP to allow specific traffic > flows to be associated with routes. > > This document specifies a set of extensions to PCEP to support > dissemination of Flow Specifications. This allows a PCE to indicate > what traffic should be placed on each path that it is aware of. > > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-pce-pcep-flowspec/ > > There are also htmlized versions available at: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-pce-pcep-flowspec-03 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-li-pce-pcep-flowspec-03 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-li-pce-pcep-flowspec-03 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > I-D-Announce mailing list > I-D-Announce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce > Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html > or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt