
From slblake@petri-meat.com  Wed May  2 06:40:47 2012
Return-Path: <slblake@petri-meat.com>
X-Original-To: pcn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C40F621F85D3 for <pcn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed,  2 May 2012 06:40:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.74
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.74 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QUqXL25-77N9 for <pcn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed,  2 May 2012 06:40:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elom.tchmachines.com (elom.tchmachines.com [208.76.80.198]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0728721F84F1 for <pcn@ietf.org>; Wed,  2 May 2012 06:40:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=petri-meat.com; s=default;  h=Mime-Version:Message-ID:Content-Type:Date:To:From:Subject; bh=hFy9Sfsjj72i+5189gxmMvmrKfr+Tp9Q7bt8bwHb5LE=;  b=lm4XYidlqhnJxXGg6BjMgYV4gywzYgERS4rscMOev1w+8WMJH7jtMw2PGIjZL8ikCV4CQ7SoBoA6qou5NBU6qLf2xrijlymy+a3v3ye1cxiKlGfcpyQy8i6rw9Zr+f0h;
Received: from cpe-174-097-233-186.nc.res.rr.com ([174.97.233.186]:46995) by elom.tchmachines.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from <slblake@petri-meat.com>) id 1SPZnO-0007qo-RM for pcn@ietf.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 09:40:43 -0400
From: Steven Blake <slblake@petri-meat.com>
To: pcn <pcn@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 09:40:46 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-qpQOHvePoqpFblRV/XYa"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.3 (3.0.3-1.fc15) 
Message-ID: <1335966046.12731.7.camel@tachyon>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - elom.tchmachines.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - petri-meat.com
Subject: [PCN] **DRAFT** PCN IETF 83 minutes
X-BeenThere: pcn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCN WG list <pcn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcn>, <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcn>
List-Post: <mailto:pcn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn>, <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 13:40:47 -0000

--=-qpQOHvePoqpFblRV/XYa
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

PCN,

Apologies for taking so long to get these posted.  Please review ASAP.


Regards,
 
// Steve

--=-qpQOHvePoqpFblRV/XYa
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="pcn-ietf85-minutes.draft.txt"
Content-Type: text/plain; name="pcn-ietf85-minutes.draft.txt"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

=EF=BB=BFCongestion and Pre-Congestion Notification WG (pcn)
IETF 83 (Paris) Meeting **DRAFT** Minutes

CHAIRs: Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>
        Steven Blake  <slblake@petri-meat.com>


WEDNESDAY, March 28, 2012
1510-1610 Afternoon Session II
212/213


Steve Blake opened the meeting at 3:10 PM, presented the Note Well slide,
provided the meeting agenda, and a WG status update.

1/ Bob Briscoe =E2=80=93 3-in-1 coding ID
	IESG requested WG review of new section on ingress behavior=20
	PS =E2=80=93 obsoletes baseline encoding RFC 5696
	reviewed behavior & changes to ID
		added check for case of PCN and ECN capable & moved behavior
		from appendix
	change policing if packet arrived with PCN marking =E2=80=93 remark to non=
-PCN
		recommended hardware default marking is 000000

Tom Taylor =E2=80=93 why =E2=80=9CSHOULD log=E2=80=9D if policing remarks a=
 packet ?

Bob =E2=80=93 change =E2=80=9CSHOULD=E2=80=9D to =E2=80=9CMAY=E2=80=9D  ?

Tom - OK

Ruediger Geib =E2=80=93 that case is actually one that should not happen =
=E2=80=93 only=20
misconfiguration or attack =E2=80=93 thus SHOULD is better

Georgios Karagiannis =E2=80=93 PCN ingress behavior =E2=80=93 what happens =
if flow rejected?

Bob =E2=80=93 local option =E2=80=93 also refer to edge behavior ID

Bob =E2=80=93 things to be added to 3-in-1
	need to take into account MPLS =E2=80=93 tunneling could be IP-in-IP or MP=
LS

Ruediger =E2=80=93 not sure if it will work if penultimate hop popping is i=
n use =E2=80=93=20
needs more thought

Georgios =E2=80=93 bullet two on slide 3 =E2=80=93 deals with remarking pac=
ket =E2=80=93 needs more
clarity in draft for the case where the border is remarking packets and=20
remarking needs to be done before logic in Bob=E2=80=99s slide

Steve =E2=80=93 Bob to send note to PCN list on changes he will make then d=
o a new ID &
we will last call it before letting IESG know discusses responsed to


2/ Tom Taylor =E2=80=93 on edge behavior IDs
	change reference in IDs from baseline to 3-in-1?

Steve =E2=80=93 hum in room =E2=80=93 consensus to change the reference

Tom =E2=80=93 current IP bias =E2=80=93 should he do a review to see if MPL=
S OK?

Ruediger =E2=80=93 leave it as it is =E2=80=93 MPLS can come later

Bob =E2=80=93 only section on internal node behavior needs to be changed =
=E2=80=93 just note=20
that the text should note an IP assumption?

Tom =E2=80=93 will read through and report to list

Tom =E2=80=93 known cut & paste error in SM ID =E2=80=93 will fix

Tom =E2=80=93 took out a MUST in response to IESG comment =E2=80=93 propose=
 to restore MUST
	to guarantee deployability =20

Steve =E2=80=93 will revise IDs & provide to IESG=20
	WG will be closed after documents are published


3/ Georgios =E2=80=93 noted RSVP ID being discussed in tsvwg =E2=80=93 good=
 support


Meeting adjourned at 3:55 pm.

--=-qpQOHvePoqpFblRV/XYa--


From tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com  Wed May  2 12:48:10 2012
Return-Path: <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pcn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6AB021F84FB for <pcn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed,  2 May 2012 12:48:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.455
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.455 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.144,  BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xe2WsLiVdP6k for <pcn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed,  2 May 2012 12:48:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D5721F84F8 for <pcn@ietf.org>; Wed,  2 May 2012 12:48:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lagj5 with SMTP id j5so845842lag.31 for <pcn@ietf.org>; Wed, 02 May 2012 12:48:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-antivirus :x-antivirus-status; bh=rSsODv6QXNnQYNxwlZR8wJj3cP1OSU2oUfQUnIY+r1A=; b=MjP4oTYebXbEtKu9fCvKIav/VMH/EwPriNv2i5QJ5zviZI6ALtZObb5y5E/P8Zzvdk lRgHairTpjsGOitQB+Bx8sphQyYlhH+J4PW90kBtWRqYcyXLpTlk6XH9JIzp/ZWUMGhf vdBxkRE4PRJeA2Pyj2VaTLfcVtx5FDqUJRKM27o+guJaXNhbLHVTIvWjonTuBk9YOwqR FJ+0lpzG2Qg7XOvnnnYYWhZhIpblvGqL1NXY0OIHl1dZih1CxpLWRx7mjyC+ChEd0TTB P2iC160bulvjKhWPO2CkvvAhV0CDgEJDIItE+ByYkXhxhTo9S/EzWKDi3IqbN4dRB76K gghw==
Received: by 10.152.133.144 with SMTP id pc16mr28451752lab.0.1335988089135; Wed, 02 May 2012 12:48:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (dsl-207-112-91-137.tor.primus.ca. [207.112.91.137]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gw17sm2942882lab.11.2012.05.02.12.48.05 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 02 May 2012 12:48:07 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4FA18F74.5090606@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 15:48:04 -0400
From: Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pcn@ietf.org
References: <1335966046.12731.7.camel@tachyon>
In-Reply-To: <1335966046.12731.7.camel@tachyon>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120502-0, 02/05/2012), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Subject: Re: [PCN] **DRAFT** PCN IETF 83 minutes
X-BeenThere: pcn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCN WG list <pcn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcn>, <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcn>
List-Post: <mailto:pcn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn>, <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 19:48:11 -0000

Looks good to me.

On 02/05/2012 9:40 AM, Steven Blake wrote:
> PCN,
>
> Apologies for taking so long to get these posted.  Please review ASAP.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> // Steve
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PCN mailing list
> PCN@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn

From karagian@cs.utwente.nl  Thu May  3 02:24:28 2012
Return-Path: <karagian@cs.utwente.nl>
X-Original-To: pcn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E59B21F85D3 for <pcn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu,  3 May 2012 02:24:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.241
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.241 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.745,  BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GwRBDhfM3R5g for <pcn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu,  3 May 2012 02:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXEDGE02.ad.utwente.nl (exedge02.ad.utwente.nl [130.89.5.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56F3C21F85CF for <pcn@ietf.org>; Thu,  3 May 2012 02:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXHUB02.ad.utwente.nl (130.89.4.229) by EXEDGE02.ad.utwente.nl (130.89.5.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.339.1; Thu, 3 May 2012 11:24:26 +0200
Received: from EXMBX04.ad.utwente.nl ([169.254.4.44]) by EXHUB02.ad.utwente.nl ([130.89.4.229]) with mapi id 14.01.0339.001; Thu, 3 May 2012 11:24:25 +0200
From: <karagian@cs.utwente.nl>
To: <pcn@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [PCN] **DRAFT** PCN IETF 83 minutes
Thread-Index: AQHNKGkzoPAnSDyYCkS6UPj+1oAhz5a2xqAAgAEFa6A=
Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 09:24:24 +0000
Message-ID: <FF1A9612A94D5C4A81ED7DE1039AB80F26C5256B@EXMBX04.ad.utwente.nl>
References: <1335966046.12731.7.camel@tachyon> <4FA18F74.5090606@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FA18F74.5090606@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: nl-NL, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [130.89.12.129]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [PCN] **DRAFT** PCN IETF 83 minutes
X-BeenThere: pcn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCN WG list <pcn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcn>, <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcn>
List-Post: <mailto:pcn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn>, <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 09:24:28 -0000

Hi Steve,

It looks good to me too!

Best regards,
Georgios

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pcn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pcn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Tom Taylor
> Sent: woensdag 2 mei 2012 21:48
> To: pcn@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [PCN] **DRAFT** PCN IETF 83 minutes
>=20
> Looks good to me.
>=20
> On 02/05/2012 9:40 AM, Steven Blake wrote:
> > PCN,
> >
> > Apologies for taking so long to get these posted.  Please review ASAP.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > // Steve
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > PCN mailing list
> > PCN@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn
> _______________________________________________
> PCN mailing list
> PCN@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn

From Ruediger.Geib@telekom.de  Fri May  4 00:12:22 2012
Return-Path: <Ruediger.Geib@telekom.de>
X-Original-To: pcn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C7ED21F8702 for <pcn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri,  4 May 2012 00:12:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.248
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.248 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000,  BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zN8rodMzzvCp for <pcn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri,  4 May 2012 00:12:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tcmail53.telekom.de (tcmail53.telekom.de [217.5.214.110]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55EB021F867A for <pcn@ietf.org>; Fri,  4 May 2012 00:12:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from he113443.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([10.134.93.103]) by tcmail51.telekom.de with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 04 May 2012 09:11:31 +0200
Received: from HE113656.emea1.cds.t-internal.com (10.134.99.16) by HE113443.emea1.cds.t-internal.com (10.134.93.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.245.1; Fri, 4 May 2012 09:11:30 +0200
Received: from HE111648.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([169.254.5.136]) by HE113656.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([::1]) with mapi; Fri, 4 May 2012 09:11:30 +0200
From: <Ruediger.Geib@telekom.de>
To: <slblake@petri-meat.com>, <pcn@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 09:11:29 +0200
Thread-Topic: [PCN] **DRAFT** PCN IETF 83 minutes
Thread-Index: Ac0oaU1UQEswY4gtSdClx/LnrRMdFwBW7wUg
Message-ID: <580BEA5E3B99744AB1F5BFF5E9A3C67D13DF15C5F8@HE111648.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
References: <1335966046.12731.7.camel@tachyon>
In-Reply-To: <1335966046.12731.7.camel@tachyon>
Accept-Language: en-US, de-DE
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
acceptlanguage: en-US, de-DE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [PCN] **DRAFT** PCN IETF 83 minutes
X-BeenThere: pcn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCN WG list <pcn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcn>, <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcn>
List-Post: <mailto:pcn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn>, <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 07:12:22 -0000

Hi Steve,

thanks for the notes, I've got  no comments.

Regards,

Ruediger

-----Original Message-----
From: pcn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pcn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Steve=
n Blake
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 3:41 PM
To: pcn
Subject: [PCN] **DRAFT** PCN IETF 83 minutes

PCN,

Apologies for taking so long to get these posted.  Please review ASAP.


Regards,

// Steve

From slblake@petri-meat.com  Sat May  5 23:29:48 2012
Return-Path: <slblake@petri-meat.com>
X-Original-To: pcn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07D1521F84AF for <pcn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat,  5 May 2012 23:29:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.463
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.463 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.277, BAYES_40=-0.185, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wn4UIyp3-1GA for <pcn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat,  5 May 2012 23:29:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elom.tchmachines.com (elom.tchmachines.com [208.76.80.198]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6425121F84A6 for <pcn@ietf.org>; Sat,  5 May 2012 23:29:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=petri-meat.com; s=default;  h=Mime-Version:Message-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:To:From:Subject; bh=HYKDztazzpHPBsMHBR+/IsjFNL4aAz0st4MIjcujd94=;  b=kxz2KFyGQn8ZziwaUvHNZOuYf8OpolkeYqKWihr3eIMiOTzaCmfiQcYoVUCRC1RvcEhtGKqhvJNAeYTbBTB8p1ZXG8MlN6N9Wjldm0Ly5/w6zw2aQUzBNWO3mbCad4kJ;
Received: from cpe-174-097-233-186.nc.res.rr.com ([174.97.233.186]:48597) by elom.tchmachines.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from <slblake@petri-meat.com>) id 1SQuyW-0002Lp-Ml for pcn@ietf.org; Sun, 06 May 2012 02:29:44 -0400
From: Steven Blake <slblake@petri-meat.com>
To: pcn <pcn@ietf.org>
Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 02:29:46 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1335966046.12731.7.camel@tachyon>
References: <1335966046.12731.7.camel@tachyon>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.3 (3.0.3-1.fc15) 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <1336285786.2674.22.camel@tachyon>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - elom.tchmachines.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - petri-meat.com
Subject: Re: [PCN] **DRAFT** PCN IETF 83 minutes
X-BeenThere: pcn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCN WG list <pcn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcn>, <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcn>
List-Post: <mailto:pcn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn>, <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 06:29:48 -0000

On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 09:40 -0400, Steven Blake wrote:

> PCN,
> 
> Apologies for taking so long to get these posted.  Please review ASAP.

I have uploaded these minutes.  Thanks for the fast review.


Regards,

// Steve


From internet-drafts@ietf.org  Fri May 11 10:53:53 2012
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: pcn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D387321F86EE; Fri, 11 May 2012 10:53:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.44
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.44 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.159, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IBjGSydXdPbu; Fri, 11 May 2012 10:53:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 634E521F86DE; Fri, 11 May 2012 10:53:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.02
Message-ID: <20120511175353.16280.14572.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 10:53:53 -0700
Cc: pcn@ietf.org
Subject: [PCN] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pcn-cl-edge-behaviour-15.txt
X-BeenThere: pcn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCN WG list <pcn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcn>, <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcn>
List-Post: <mailto:pcn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn>, <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 17:53:54 -0000

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director=
ies. This draft is a work item of the Congestion and Pre-Congestion Notific=
ation Working Group of the IETF.

	Title           : PCN Boundary Node Behaviour for the Controlled Load (CL)=
 Mode of Operation
	Author(s)       : Anna Charny
                          Fortune Huang
                          Georgios Karagiannis
                          Michael Menth
                          Tom Taylor
	Filename        : draft-ietf-pcn-cl-edge-behaviour-15.txt
	Pages           : 34
	Date            : 2012-05-11

   Pre-congestion notification (PCN) is a means for protecting the
   quality of service for inelastic traffic admitted to a Diffserv
   domain.  The overall PCN architecture is described in RFC 5559.  This
   memo is one of a series describing possible boundary node behaviours
   for a PCN-domain.  The behaviour described here is that for a form of
   measurement-based load control using three PCN marking states, not-
   marked, threshold-marked, and excess-traffic-marked.  This behaviour
   is known informally as the Controlled Load (CL) PCN-boundary-node
   behaviour.


A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pcn-cl-edge-behaviour-15.txt

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pcn-cl-edge-behaviour-15.txt

The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pcn-cl-edge-behaviour/


From frank.wetzels@cwi.nl  Fri May 18 13:13:33 2012
Return-Path: <frank.wetzels@cwi.nl>
X-Original-To: pcn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A833921F85F1 for <pcn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 May 2012 13:13:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.742
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.742 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.387,  BAYES_20=-0.74, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E4oco3E1koF2 for <pcn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 May 2012 13:13:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hera.cwi.nl (hera.cwi.nl [192.16.191.8]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E148521F8611 for <pcn@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 May 2012 13:13:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hera.cwi.nl (hera.cwi.nl [192.16.191.8]) by hera.cwi.nl with ESMTP id q4IKDPNn003287 for <pcn@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 May 2012 22:13:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bigwappel.vlambloem.net (twin.xs4all.nl [80.101.159.93]) (authenticated bits=0) by hera.cwi.nl (8.13.6/8.12.3) with ESMTP id q4IKDP3p003285 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <pcn@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 May 2012 22:13:25 +0200 (CEST)
From: Frank Wetzels <Frank.Wetzels@cwi.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 22:13:25 +0200
Message-Id: <3F7B3D15-4D18-4E32-811D-3F7FEC931BA5@cwi.nl>
To: pcn@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Subject: [PCN] PCN simulations in NS2
X-BeenThere: pcn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCN WG list <pcn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcn>, <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcn>
List-Post: <mailto:pcn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn>, <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 20:15:31 -0000

All,

I am new to this list. For give me my possible trivial question.

I searched the archives, but couldn't find anything on possible =
simulation code for NS2.
In the NS2 mailing list (not IETF :-)) there was no awareness of any =
deployment in NS2 as well.

Has any of you pointers in that direction? Or does the NS2 deployment =
need to be started?
Any plans to start such simulation or development in NS2?

Regards,
Frank



From menth@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de  Fri May 18 13:56:08 2012
Return-Path: <menth@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
X-Original-To: pcn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACD2321F8595 for <pcn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 May 2012 13:56:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.058
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.058 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HELO_MISMATCH_DE=1.448]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 83mJ-w1lLvRo for <pcn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 May 2012 13:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx3.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (mx3.Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De [134.2.12.26]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8FD2B21F857A for <pcn@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 May 2012 13:56:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx3.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B3452F8; Fri, 18 May 2012 22:55:57 +0200 (MEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
Received: from mx3.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx3.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mqxeov-zuvQ9; Fri, 18 May 2012 22:55:51 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from zcs-pu.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (zcs-pu.Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De [134.2.12.61]) by mx3.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84F4552ED; Fri, 18 May 2012 22:55:51 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from [192.168.1.100] (HSI-KBW-37-49-35-184.hsi14.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de [37.49.35.184]) by zcs-pu.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACC1D1A0F1CD; Fri, 18 May 2012 22:55:50 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4FB6B759.6080300@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 22:55:53 +0200
From: Michael Menth <menth@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Frank Wetzels <Frank.Wetzels@cwi.nl>
References: <3F7B3D15-4D18-4E32-811D-3F7FEC931BA5@cwi.nl>
In-Reply-To: <3F7B3D15-4D18-4E32-811D-3F7FEC931BA5@cwi.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: pcn@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [PCN] PCN simulations in NS2
X-BeenThere: pcn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCN WG list <pcn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcn>, <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcn>
List-Post: <mailto:pcn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn>, <mailto:pcn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 20:56:08 -0000

Hi Frank,

we have simulated a lot but used our own customized simulator written in 
Java. I am not aware of any NS2 deployment.

Regards,

     Michael

Am 18.05.2012 22:13, schrieb Frank Wetzels:
> All,
>
> I am new to this list. For give me my possible trivial question.
>
> I searched the archives, but couldn't find anything on possible simulation code for NS2.
> In the NS2 mailing list (not IETF :-)) there was no awareness of any deployment in NS2 as well.
>
> Has any of you pointers in that direction? Or does the NS2 deployment need to be started?
> Any plans to start such simulation or development in NS2?
>
> Regards,
> Frank
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PCN mailing list
> PCN@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcn

-- 
Prof. Dr. habil. Michael Menth
University of Tuebingen
Faculty of Science
Department of Computer Science
Chair of Communication Networks
Sand 13, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
phone: (+49)-7071/29-70505
fax: (+49)-7071/29-5220
mailto:menth@uni-tuebingen.de
http://kn.inf.uni-tuebingen.de

