Subject: Policy Target Comments for PCIM/QPIM ...

From: Mahadevan Iyer <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 20:41:56 -0800 (PST)

These comments are related to "policy targets" as
defined in "draft-mahon-policy-use-00.txt".

The association of a policy target to the policy rule
seems to be implicit based on the network nodes
referenced in the policy. One could also add policy
conditions to a policy rule to make this association
more explicit.

The draft points to some reasons why the mention
should be more explicit. I can think of some
reasons(primarily distribution related) where it would
be useful to have explicit references to the targets.

Would it make sense to formalize the reference of a
policyGroup or policyRule to policy targets?

Thanks

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/