Subject: RE: [Policy] QPIM

From: "Ron Cohen" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 10:06:59 +0200

Randy,

I would prefer we leave OO as is. I truly think that the model is oo,
but my main argument is that we need consistency with the documents QPIM
is based on.

The "Policy Core Information Model" - RFC 3060 abstract reads:

"This document presents the object-oriented information model for
representing policy information developed jointly in the IETF Policy
Framework WG and as extensions to the Common Information Model (CIM)
activity in the Distributed Management Task Force (DMTF)."

It would be wrong for QPIM, that heavily relies on PCIM to say
otherwise.

Thanks
Ron

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Randy Bush [mailto:[email-masked]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 8:10 PM
> To: Yoram Snir (ysnir)
> Cc: Joel M. Halpern; [email-masked]; Ron Cohen; Yoram 
> Ramberg (yramberg); [email-masked]
> Subject: RE: [Policy] QPIM
> 
> 
> > Assuming we drop the "object oriented", any other issues / comments 
> > before we submit a final version.
> 
> nope
> 

_______________________________________________
Policy mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/policy