From carlsonj@workingcode.com Mon Feb 7 08:15:57 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pppext@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: pppext@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 279CD3A6E14 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 08:15:57 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VM4ac+AcgOvE for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 08:15:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from carlson.workingcode.com (carlsonj-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1d9::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AE053A6E02 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 08:15:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.50.23.149] (gate.abinitio.com [65.170.40.132]) (authenticated bits=0) by carlson.workingcode.com (8.14.2+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p17GFx4A023225 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 11:16:00 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4D501ABD.1050103@workingcode.com> Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 11:15:57 -0500 From: James Carlson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PPP Extensions Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------000108090408020708060200" X-DCC-SIHOPE-DCC-3-Metrics: carlson; whitelist Subject: [Pppext] [Fwd: Re: [rbridge] proposed TRILL IS-IS System ID text] X-BeenThere: pppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: PPP Extensions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 16:15:57 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000108090408020708060200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit This message was somehow lost in the ether. I've contacted ietf-action to see if they can dig up any information. In any event, sorry, Anoop, for the inadvertent delay. -- James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W --------------000108090408020708060200 Content-Type: message/rfc822; name="Re: [rbridge] [Pppext] proposed TRILL IS-IS System ID text.eml" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename*0="Re: [rbridge] [Pppext] proposed TRILL IS-IS System ID text.e"; filename*1="ml" Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on carlson.workingcode.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.4 Received: from mail-gy0-f175.google.com (mail-gy0-f175.google.com [209.85.160.175]) by carlson.workingcode.com (8.14.2+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p153rcLi003347 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 22:53:38 -0500 (EST) Received: by gyd8 with SMTP id 8so1200393gyd.6 for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 19:53:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=4lX+DodPWi3qohRuOpyfq9mmzwJTMQ+wTiLNJ4ZJCRc=; b=PmbZ0eKcxdxXhD49HtgX1vHBMSVaBTGW89djBLGepP0pTCGIz9vtwdkfUvDwUKmtE+ 9YRf7yGCdQWkz1g7+nyhq2fl5YVKA4a45OfPCBhpycENkS4n0EdfEKeb/G5Q7zPjdVBv LHnwhhBhYxArKoNcYbM46Vg3/qs+6Nrmdujgg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=IBBSUS9wmQhl8l+6+fh1T+tmF6UBsJguxTs79HU/fHs1ghvgigeSOdoHvl3tCjxGoj C2djNAiZ70Jl/upzZmFtKyfKovQmo8ZFTv/PvZU0MYh9pZ4E7BxKgdttcFRkB662vTVc ydiu61iCbd3JM4JcEr2U9/di0dNjpSbDa6vJc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.147.170.19 with SMTP id x19mr764633yao.3.1296867695403; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 17:01:35 -0800 (PST) Sender: ghanwani@gmail.com Received: by 10.147.167.20 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 17:01:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D41D6DC.2040406@workingcode.com> References: <4D415111.4010009@gmail.com> <4D41ABED.5070308@gmail.com> <4D41D6DC.2040406@workingcode.com> Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 17:01:35 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9D-GR1pbi0MGR-lA8-irvf6MF6E Message-ID: Subject: Re: [rbridge] [Pppext] proposed TRILL IS-IS System ID text From: Anoop Ghanwani To: James Carlson Cc: William Allen Simpson , pppext@ietf.org, rbridge@postel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-DCC-x.dcc-servers-Metrics: carlson 104; Body=0 Fuz1=0 Fuz2=0 On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:34 PM, James Carlson wrote: > At a minimum, I want to hear from IS-IS and TRILL experts before I go > ahead with proposing any new random-number-based System ID mechanism. > If they sign on, then I'll go ahead with it. > > But my off-the-cuff guess is that they'll have objections, and more > objections probably aren't helpful in getting to consensus. Coming from the TRILL part of the world, I don't think this is a problem that needs to be addressed in this draft. Generating a unique System ID for IS-IS is an IS-IS problem, and as such should be addressed in the IS-IS working group. Anoop --------------000108090408020708060200--