From d3e3e3@gmail.com Tue May 8 14:53:43 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5687A21F84F8 for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 14:53:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -103.705 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.705 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.106, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lK7VriGhdfVK for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 14:53:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-yw0-f44.google.com (mail-yw0-f44.google.com [209.85.213.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB38A21F84F3 for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 14:53:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by yhq56 with SMTP id 56so7070648yhq.31 for ; Tue, 08 May 2012 14:53:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RLbftTc4UrnLjUoQDtFBc+VLUTdba0ln5Kg9ywTXa0E=; b=nhA5nHGXCA5U8UZqiQ/INI3+FX7EY1IpSouD9qi2BFEbLu9H1M+95F6YcExOFdR7FP JTsLulMplsw3/bFb6WCLMFQaHgjNEf6d/E+xbsA8gGEmVJfGZkK8/TIOdLUc+S6br+qg 44DyMohQig6JAjRERgoE2i7e+1yWBh36NN8widZjuwZ20Ku1o+HOLHl3MT6ZqfTddnqU xE43zlf2qVjc5JMb/DPZnN51N6E74tm5vQ/pNnTnoGAo2Pq4J0zsotrc0Rit6oh1RO7x soHe5DKL1CmpqLS6WN1zEgzDzXNj8ZbZ/1kqlwhsA7qxgJqqti0H76N4KGhrwGUeJB+O 4niQ== Received: by 10.50.41.165 with SMTP id g5mr677061igl.13.1336514022254; Tue, 08 May 2012 14:53:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.59.201 with HTTP; Tue, 8 May 2012 14:53:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FA9805F.6070602@innovationslab.net> References: <4FA9805F.6070602@innovationslab.net> From: Donald Eastlake Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 17:53:22 -0400 Message-ID: To: IETF PPP Extensions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Pppext] Errata classification X-BeenThere: pppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: PPP Extensions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 21:53:43 -0000 Hi, The following errata sounds reasonable but could people give me their opini= on? http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=3D1924 Thanks, Donald =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D =A0Donald E. Eastlake 3rd=A0=A0 +1-508-333-2270 (cell) =A0155 Beaver Street,=A0Milford, MA 01757 USA =A0d3e3e3@gmail.com From carlsonj@workingcode.com Wed May 9 03:53:19 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A17621F85A4 for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 03:53:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XR0BnexBkIeX for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 03:53:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from carlson.workingcode.com (carlsonj-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1d9::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DC7B21F859F for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 03:53:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.50.23.149] (gate.abinitio.com [65.170.40.132]) (authenticated bits=0) by carlson.workingcode.com (8.14.2+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q49Ar9B7025555 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 9 May 2012 06:53:10 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4FAA4C95.70500@workingcode.com> Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 06:53:09 -0400 From: James Carlson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Donald Eastlake References: <4FA9805F.6070602@innovationslab.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DCC--Metrics: carlson; whitelist Cc: IETF PPP Extensions Subject: Re: [Pppext] Errata classification X-BeenThere: pppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: PPP Extensions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 10:53:19 -0000 Donald Eastlake wrote: > Hi, > > The following errata sounds reasonable but could people give me their opinion? > > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=1924 At Sun, I worked on an implementation of RFC 2759, and verified the resulting compatibility with Microsoft RAS. The erratum is correct. The password is indeed hashed using UTF-16-LE encoding. (I suspect, but cannot prove, that it was originally defined on NT using UCS-2-LE rather than UTF-16-LE. But the distinction almost certainly doesn't matter.) -- James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W From d3e3e3@gmail.com Wed May 9 06:45:05 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: pppext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: pppext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81E0C21F85FC for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 06:45:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -103.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.101, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ckc49ZsId5kv for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 06:45:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-yx0-f172.google.com (mail-yx0-f172.google.com [209.85.213.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 026BA21F8604 for ; Wed, 9 May 2012 06:44:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by yenq13 with SMTP id q13so358462yen.31 for ; Wed, 09 May 2012 06:44:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1EdAUmckxrCHPJLnPuSpDcT6AkrPjUbS9pusrh8lrkM=; b=0yoZMx2hmFPIL34IC3ZJHNcTj+IuNIxVVbg3pqnxV/OtzBoG5kC5RZEs5Lpqtwrq+I 6Mh5VHLlFZkDb0QT5qVaNXgdfN9zG6ehI3n+6otyXuuLaEerQDEFdR8lEwS0L8r7tDXG 3j0RWFY4K18cfx2u0Y9Mv4boy8heZjhZmY0QVjZUHa56/DsVRhgXGWA8JepLkxExWjy1 HR3vXg0CCUA3FpNOSnW3XZ1UlFOUeH3OHHHs5kyfdp1lbrxX6PSKbG0Y5EiUoTHZet7b Athgh8FY57g5AoSehYyCpl4Avini5p+fc4Tu4u1F+Is5FCTEh/BAbI5EyjhY/y72HxwQ QLww== Received: by 10.42.176.6 with SMTP id bc6mr32883icb.49.1336571092233; Wed, 09 May 2012 06:44:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.59.201 with HTTP; Wed, 9 May 2012 06:44:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FAA4C95.70500@workingcode.com> References: <4FA9805F.6070602@innovationslab.net> <4FAA4C95.70500@workingcode.com> From: Donald Eastlake Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 09:44:31 -0400 Message-ID: To: James Carlson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: IETF PPP Extensions Subject: Re: [Pppext] Errata classification X-BeenThere: pppext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: PPP Extensions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 13:45:05 -0000 Thanks, Donald =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D =A0Donald E. Eastlake 3rd=A0=A0 +1-508-333-2270 (cell) =A0155 Beaver Street,=A0Milford, MA 01757 USA =A0d3e3e3@gmail.com On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 6:53 AM, James Carlson wr= ote: > Donald Eastlake wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The following errata sounds reasonable but could people give me their op= inion? >> >> =A0 =A0 http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=3D1924 > > At Sun, I worked on an implementation of RFC 2759, and verified the > resulting compatibility with Microsoft RAS. =A0The erratum is correct. > The password is indeed hashed using UTF-16-LE encoding. =A0(I suspect, bu= t > cannot prove, that it was originally defined on NT using UCS-2-LE rather > than UTF-16-LE. =A0But the distinction almost certainly doesn't matter.) > > -- > James Carlson =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 42.703N 71.076W =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0