From nobody Fri Feb 6 19:36:40 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ppsp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3083A1A040B for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 19:36:38 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -104.21 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p6N8QmdyeIxm for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 19:36:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 051FF1A0390 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 19:36:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BSI65353; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 03:36:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.37) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 03:36:33 +0000 Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.146]) by nkgeml406-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.37]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 11:36:25 +0800 From: Zongning To: ppsp Thread-Topic: Conclusion of WGLC for Base Tracker Protocol Thread-Index: AdBChz9rkGFoCet0SomIhAb3b0dg9A== Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 03:36:24 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.138.41.140] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B0D29E0424F2DE47A0B36779EC66677966256A90nkgeml501mbschi_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Subject: [ppsp] Conclusion of WGLC for Base Tracker Protocol X-BeenThere: ppsp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: discussing to draw up peer to peer streaming protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 03:36:38 -0000 --_000_B0D29E0424F2DE47A0B36779EC66677966256A90nkgeml501mbschi_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, all, We have started WGLC for the latest(-08) version of base tracker protocol h= ttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol since= 3.5 week ago, and received several positive review feedback. Therefore we conclude that the base tracker protocol has passed WGLC, witho= ut pending issues to be addressed. Yunfei and I will help moving this draft forward to IESG process! Thanks. -Ning --_000_B0D29E0424F2DE47A0B36779EC66677966256A90nkgeml501mbschi_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi, all,

We have started WGLC for the la= test(-08) version of base tracker protocol https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ppsp-base-tracker-protocol = since 3.5 week ago, and received several positive review feedback.

Therefore we conclude that the = base tracker protocol has passed WGLC, without pending issues to be address= ed.

Yunfei and I will help moving t= his draft forward to IESG process!

Thanks.

-Ning

--_000_B0D29E0424F2DE47A0B36779EC66677966256A90nkgeml501mbschi_--