Subject: Re: Draft-kpmpella-ppvpn-vpls-01

From: "Hector Avalos" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 19:07:53 +0200

I think that this question should be asked to all SPs regadless of the
draft they support. 

And if they plan to use vpls to deliver p2p eth services. 

Thanks
Hector
--------------------------
Sent from my Wireless Handheld

-----Original Message-----
From: Ali Sajassi <[email-masked]>
To: Andrea Ferrarese <[email-masked]>;
[email-masked] <[email-masked]>
Sent: Wed Apr 23 01:58:38 2003
Subject: Re: Draft-kpmpella-ppvpn-vpls-01

I'd like to know how many of the service providers who support this
draft, 
only plan to offer multi-point Ethernet service (VPLS) and do NOT plan
to 
offer point-to-point Ethernet service?

If a service provider plans to offer both types of services, then do
they 
plan to use BGP for PW signaling of PtP Ethernet service ?

Thanks,
Ali

At 06:15 PM 4/22/2003 +0200, Andrea Ferrarese wrote:
>We support draft-kompella-ppvpn-vpls-01
>
>We found that BGP control plane give scalability and flexibility. We
>like
>the possibility to maintain the actual config and VPN infrastructure
>for
>both l2 and l3 VPN.
>
>Thank you