Subject: Re: [precis] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-precis-7700bis-07

From: Peter Saint-Andre - Filament <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 14:51:20 -0600

Hi Russ, thanks for your review and my apologies for the delayed reply.

On 5/31/17 2:10 PM, Russ Housley wrote:
> Reviewer: Russ Housley
> Review result: Ready
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
> document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-precis-7700bis-07
> Reviewer: Russ Housley
> Review Date: 2017-05-31
> IETF LC End Date: 2017-06-13
> IESG Telechat date: 2017-07-06
> 
> Summary: Ready
> 
> Major Concerns: None
> 
> Minor Concerns: None
> 
> Nits:
> 
> Section 2.3 includes this note:
> 
>    Note: An entity SHOULD NOT apply the Case Mapping Rule during
>    enforcement, because typically it is appropriate only during
>    comparison.
> 
> I question the inclusion of "typically" in this note.  Can you simply
> say that the Case Mapping Rule SHOULD only be used during comparison?

That seems better, yes!

Peter