Subject: [quicwg/load-balancers] 3148cb: Ian's Editorial Nits

From: martinduke <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2021 09:01:41 -0800

Branch: refs/heads/master
  Home:   https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers
  Commit: 3148cbdf457a7e732fb354bfc0a5db036363f5b8
      https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/commit/3148cbdf457a7e732fb354bfc0a5db036363f5b8
  Author: ianswett <[email-masked]>
  Date:   2021-02-04 (Thu, 04 Feb 2021)

  Changed paths:
    M draft-ietf-quic-load-balancers.md

  Log Message:
  -----------
  Ian's Editorial Nits

Here are some suggestions from my first pass, but overall I think the static vs dynamic server ID allocation idea works nicely.

2 Q's:
- Is the definition of non-compliant different at LB and server in some cases?
- Might non-routable be a better term than non-compliant?

  Commit: 710f916f4a6f41071e0ca64665a6a3975bd0e3d4
      https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/commit/710f916f4a6f41071e0ca64665a6a3975bd0e3d4
  Author: martinduke <[email-masked]>
  Date:   2021-03-05 (Fri, 05 Mar 2021)

  Changed paths:
    M draft-ietf-quic-load-balancers.md

  Log Message:
  -----------
  Merge pull request #95 from ianswett/patch-2

Ian's Editorial Nits

Compare: https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/compare/6d83e802c85d...710f916f4a6f