From hartmans@painless-security.com Sun Apr 1 01:11:05 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 723B821F8680; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 01:11:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.334 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.334 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xkTk7EdEoKkT; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 01:11:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from permutation-city.suchdamage.org (permutation-city.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.28]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB8FF21F867F; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 01:10:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.suchdamage.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 011652024B; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 04:10:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id BAC104766; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 04:10:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Sam Hartman To: Alan DeKok References: <4F76C4D8.9080804@deployingradius.com> Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 04:10:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4F76C4D8.9080804@deployingradius.com> (Alan DeKok's message of "Sat, 31 Mar 2012 10:48:24 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "radext@ietf.org" , "abfab@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [radext] Fragmentation in RADIUS X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 08:11:05 -0000 >>>>> "Alan" == Alan DeKok writes: Alan> The draft proposes that the proxies obtain *all* of the data Alan> before re-writing it. This involves no changes to RADIUS. It Alan> does, however, require changes to implementations. These Alan> changes are documented, so that everyone is aware of the costs Alan> and benefits of the solution. And, so that the Alan> implementations are guided to a method that works. Alan, I want to confirm my understanding. Am I correct in believing that you only need to implement these complex changes if you want to rewrite these new fragmented packets? --Sam From radext-bounces@ietf.org Sun Apr 1 01:11:10 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@lists.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A165621F864C; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 01:11:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1333267869; bh=hteTOqk/kR42hhPqkD0Bc13bDqLTpYGsmjkDBoCbZVA=; h=From:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Cc: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=YsOYnqIXtchqf50tQ8jDSTsHpg/cbqGwa8l99EIYcMklX/59kpHGbB6yfxvhHRZeK mvXiOB/KV50ohS6qe2/FCpdqAt28QW/An19I8RfAhfzLnBlqk8A/5R8QkgeR+p3PA4 aKl0tTr6EDEJxMB8auKQWjftTTQslFXK4inauad8= X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 723B821F8680; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 01:11:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.334 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.334 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xkTk7EdEoKkT; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 01:11:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from permutation-city.suchdamage.org (permutation-city.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.28]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB8FF21F867F; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 01:10:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.suchdamage.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 011652024B; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 04:10:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id BAC104766; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 04:10:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Sam Hartman To: Alan DeKok References: <4F76C4D8.9080804@deployingradius.com> Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 04:10:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4F76C4D8.9080804@deployingradius.com> (Alan DeKok's message of "Sat, 31 Mar 2012 10:48:24 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "radext@ietf.org" , "abfab@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [radext] Fragmentation in RADIUS X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: radext-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: radext-bounces@ietf.org >>>>> "Alan" == Alan DeKok writes: Alan> The draft proposes that the proxies obtain *all* of the data Alan> before re-writing it. This involves no changes to RADIUS. It Alan> does, however, require changes to implementations. These Alan> changes are documented, so that everyone is aware of the costs Alan> and benefits of the solution. And, so that the Alan> implementations are guided to a method that works. Alan, I want to confirm my understanding. Am I correct in believing that you only need to implement these complex changes if you want to rewrite these new fragmented packets? --Sam _______________________________________________ radext mailing list radext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext From aland@deployingradius.com Sun Apr 1 02:42:24 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9066621F86A2; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 02:42:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K1ep79l-3297; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 02:42:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from liberty.deployingradius.com (liberty.deployingradius.com [88.191.76.128]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1525321F8681; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 02:42:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F7822E2.5050308@deployingradius.com> Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 11:41:54 +0200 From: Alan DeKok User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sam Hartman References: <4F76C4D8.9080804@deployingradius.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "radext@ietf.org" , "abfab@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [radext] Fragmentation in RADIUS X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 09:42:24 -0000 Sam Hartman wrote: > Alan, I want to confirm my understanding. Am I correct in believing > that you only need to implement these complex changes if you want to > rewrite these new fragmented packets? Yes. Alan DeKok. From radext-bounces@ietf.org Sun Apr 1 02:42:26 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@lists.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44A4421F86A2; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 02:42:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1333273346; bh=C2PD0M1N6jRNULW9dv6xriQF/EoFk/RRFNAqBFijjmg=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:References:In-Reply-To:Cc: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=dKpCeNCH63BejaNQ0Vvl+5OV58uQ47HrV+A8bB52os5Gdjy+KV9sOf1rGK5JS9pUA 2g4RthojXNEr3/v+RRA5fy9qGOXChopDFH+j41ihs24sFwpwsqKk1FLjipsBtsAajb FvwLXJazKBKEyPTL5/89DzXHHEbGqrm52s/YGtso= X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9066621F86A2; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 02:42:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K1ep79l-3297; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 02:42:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from liberty.deployingradius.com (liberty.deployingradius.com [88.191.76.128]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1525321F8681; Sun, 1 Apr 2012 02:42:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F7822E2.5050308@deployingradius.com> Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 11:41:54 +0200 From: Alan DeKok User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sam Hartman References: <4F76C4D8.9080804@deployingradius.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Cc: "radext@ietf.org" , "abfab@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [radext] Fragmentation in RADIUS X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: radext-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: radext-bounces@ietf.org Sam Hartman wrote: > Alan, I want to confirm my understanding. Am I correct in believing > that you only need to implement these complex changes if you want to > rewrite these new fragmented packets? Yes. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ radext mailing list radext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext From internet-drafts@ietf.org Mon Apr 2 07:36:26 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19FC521F854C; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 07:36:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.541 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.541 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.058, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dk0mPo3zthSO; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 07:36:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE45A21F84D6; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 07:36:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.00 Message-ID: <20120402143625.5761.66362.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 07:36:25 -0700 Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: [radext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext-00.txt X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 14:36:26 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the RADIUS EXTensions Working Group of th= e IETF. Title : RADIUS Attributes for IEEE 802 Networks Author(s) : Bernard Aboba Jouni Malinen Paul Congdon Joseph Salowey Filename : draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext-00.txt Pages : 18 Date : 2012-04-02 RFC 3580 provides guidelines for the use of the Remote Authentication Dialin User Service (RADIUS) within IEEE 802 local area networks (LANs). This document proposes additional attributes for use within IEEE 802 networks, as well as providing clarifications on the usage of the EAP-Key-Name attribute, updating RFC 4072. The attributes defined in this document are usable both within RADIUS and Diameter. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext-00.txt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext-00.txt From radext-bounces@ietf.org Mon Apr 2 07:36:28 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@lists.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7ECC21F8539; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 07:36:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1333377387; bh=bDC+WxhQQ4ZEJiKohhW19BMVdB6GR6owhX9BjwGveKw=; h=MIME-Version:From:To:Message-ID:Date:Cc:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=cG6q6cctIslQI5uzTxa2xqLa1zmJHVtrn2J9fkeAzfsxtf37G2maEEypqaZaQBmcV Zke3YWngKT2GJc/fO9/r2IRuDsioNOlBRwsBGh7gc0q+hfr+lAOH/Xt7vVZQE9Gr4N bmbBQ4tDXWmqf4aoFJtP9kIql70ZRAa+Gr05OSzg= X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19FC521F854C; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 07:36:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.541 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.541 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.058, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dk0mPo3zthSO; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 07:36:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE45A21F84D6; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 07:36:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.00 Message-ID: <20120402143625.5761.66362.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 07:36:25 -0700 Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: [radext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext-00.txt X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: radext-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: radext-bounces@ietf.org A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the RADIUS EXTensions Working Group of the IETF. Title : RADIUS Attributes for IEEE 802 Networks Author(s) : Bernard Aboba Jouni Malinen Paul Congdon Joseph Salowey Filename : draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext-00.txt Pages : 18 Date : 2012-04-02 RFC 3580 provides guidelines for the use of the Remote Authentication Dialin User Service (RADIUS) within IEEE 802 local area networks (LANs). This document proposes additional attributes for use within IEEE 802 networks, as well as providing clarifications on the usage of the EAP-Key-Name attribute, updating RFC 4072. The attributes defined in this document are usable both within RADIUS and Diameter. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext-00.txt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext-00.txt _______________________________________________ radext mailing list radext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext From bernard_aboba@hotmail.com Mon Apr 2 13:03:10 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88BD221F8603 for ; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 13:03:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 46h+lh+39ncN for ; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 13:03:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blu0-omc2-s8.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc2-s8.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.83]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 463C321F8565 for ; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 13:03:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from BLU169-DS42 ([65.55.111.73]) by blu0-omc2-s8.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 2 Apr 2012 13:03:06 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [24.16.96.166] X-Originating-Email: [bernard_aboba@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: Bernard Aboba To: Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 13:03:14 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0358_01CD10D0.F7577B80" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: Ac0RC4pwwssq48B0SFeZl0ug/eqgHA== Content-Language: en-us X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Apr 2012 20:03:06.0685 (UTC) FILETIME=[9E9A7ED0:01CD110B] Subject: [radext] 802.11u attributes for inclusion in draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 20:03:10 -0000 ------=_NextPart_000_0358_01CD10D0.F7577B80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Find enclosed attributes that have been proposed for inclusion in the next revision of draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext. Comments? ------=_NextPart_000_0358_01CD10D0.F7577B80 Content-Type: text/plain; name="aaa-attributes-for-802-11u.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="aaa-attributes-for-802-11u.txt" 3. RADIUS attributes The RADIUS attributes associated with 802.11u WLAN access. 3.1. WLAN-SSID Description The WLAN-SSID attribute contains the Service Set Identifier (SSID) which identifies a specific 802.11 extended service set (ESS). 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type | Length | String... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Code TBD Length 3 to 34 String The String field is between 1 and 32 octets in length. The actual format of the information is site or application specific, and a robust implementation SHOULD support the field as undistinguished octets. 3.2. WLAN-HESSID Description The WLAN-HESSID attribute contains a 6-octet MAC address that identifies the Homogenous Extended Service Set. The HESSID is a globally unique identifier that in conjunction with the WLAN-SSID, may be used to provide network identification for a subscription service provider networks (SSPN). 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type | Length | String... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Code TBD Length 19 String: The String field is encoded in upper-case ASCII characters with the octet values separated by dash characters, as described in RFC3580 [RFC3580]. Example: "00-10-A4-23-19-C0". 3.3. WLAN-Venue-Info Description The WLAN-Venue-Info attribute identifies the category of venue hosting the WLAN and consists of the Venue Group and Venue Type subfields. 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type | Length | Venue-Group | Venue-Type | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Code TBD Length 4 Venue-Group The Venue-Group field is a single octet and describes the broad category of the venue, e.g. "Assembly". See IEEE 802.11u [IEEE-802.11u] for Venue-Group codes and descriptions. Venue-Type The Venue-Type field is a single octet and describes the venue in a finer granularity within the Venue-Group, e.g. "Library". See IEEE 802.11u [IEEE-802.11u] for Venue-Type codes and descriptions. 3.4. WLAN-Venue-Language Description The WLAN-Venue-Language attribute is an ISO-14962-1997 [ISO-14962-1997] encoded string that defines the language used in the WLAN-Venue-Name attribute. Zero or more WLAN-Venue-Language attributes may be included in an Access-Request and each one indicates the language of the WLAN-Venue-Name attribute that follows it. 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type | Length | String... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ String (cont) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Code TBD Length 5 String: The String field is a two or three character language code selected from ISO-639 [ISO-639]. A two character language code has a zero ("null" in ISO-14962-1997) appended to make it 3 octets in length. 3.5. WLAN-Venue-Name Description The WLAN-Venue-Name attribute provides additional metadata on the BSS. For example, this information may be used to assist a user in selecting the appropriate BSS with which to associate. Zero or more WLAN-Venue-Name attributes may be included in an Access- Request in the same or different languages. 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type | Length | String... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Code TBD Length >=3 String: The String field is a UTF-8 formatted field containing the venue's name. The maximum length of this field is 252 octets. --- 8. Normative References [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [RFC3588] Calhoun, P., Loughney, J., Guttman, E., Zorn, G., and J. Arkko, "Diameter Base Protocol", RFC 3588, September 2003. [RFC2865] Rigney, C., Willens, S., Rubens, A., and W. Simpson, "Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS)", RFC 2865, June 2000. [RFC3580] Congdon, P., Aboba, B., Smith, A., Zorn, G., and J. Roese, "IEEE 802.1X Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS) Usage Guidelines", RFC 3580, September 2003. [IEEE-802.11] IEEE, "Information technology - Telecommunications and information exchange between systems - Local and metropolitan area networks - Specific Requirements Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications, IEEE Std. 802.11-2007", 2007. [IEEE-802.11u] IEEE, "IEEE Standard for Information technology, Telecommunications and information exchange between systems, Local and metropolitan area networks, Specific requirements, Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control(MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications, Amendment 9: Interworking with External Networks", 2011. [ISO-639] ISO, "Codes for the Representation of Names of Languages". [ISO-14962-1997] ISO, "Space data and information transfer systems - ASCII encoded English", 1997. ---- Author's Address Mark Jones Amdocs Email: mark@azu.ca ------=_NextPart_000_0358_01CD10D0.F7577B80-- From radext-bounces@ietf.org Mon Apr 2 13:03:11 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@lists.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2F221F8603; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 13:03:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1333396991; bh=forB/xG8E4vpGnl3Q6aLwU7PR57egTpbUjZXtU0f03E=; h=Message-ID:From:To:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Sender; b=E/0TePey74IZGuV5aMkNzYybf/c+sdYo78odWxP7hV8+Q+gnYewQwJ/g8Vo1CHQay Z0gEy/tIzUiT4ALvranwedJ6Lpd8hhbphInwjhD1vD58zInoaSgf/ZUSDVAw+6+GTR sqCjjf8IvGKn1jGUWrGMmU58IKENrAc7qUBRsASE= X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88BD221F8603 for ; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 13:03:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 46h+lh+39ncN for ; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 13:03:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blu0-omc2-s8.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc2-s8.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.83]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 463C321F8565 for ; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 13:03:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from BLU169-DS42 ([65.55.111.73]) by blu0-omc2-s8.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 2 Apr 2012 13:03:06 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [24.16.96.166] X-Originating-Email: [bernard_aboba@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: Bernard Aboba To: Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 13:03:14 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0358_01CD10D0.F7577B80" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: Ac0RC4pwwssq48B0SFeZl0ug/eqgHA== Content-Language: en-us X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Apr 2012 20:03:06.0685 (UTC) FILETIME=[9E9A7ED0:01CD110B] Subject: [radext] 802.11u attributes for inclusion in draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: radext-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: radext-bounces@ietf.org ------=_NextPart_000_0358_01CD10D0.F7577B80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Find enclosed attributes that have been proposed for inclusion in the next revision of draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext. Comments? ------=_NextPart_000_0358_01CD10D0.F7577B80 Content-Type: text/plain; name="aaa-attributes-for-802-11u.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="aaa-attributes-for-802-11u.txt" 3. RADIUS attributes The RADIUS attributes associated with 802.11u WLAN access. 3.1. WLAN-SSID Description The WLAN-SSID attribute contains the Service Set Identifier (SSID) which identifies a specific 802.11 extended service set (ESS). 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type | Length | String... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Code TBD Length 3 to 34 String The String field is between 1 and 32 octets in length. The actual format of the information is site or application specific, and a robust implementation SHOULD support the field as undistinguished octets. 3.2. WLAN-HESSID Description The WLAN-HESSID attribute contains a 6-octet MAC address that identifies the Homogenous Extended Service Set. The HESSID is a globally unique identifier that in conjunction with the WLAN-SSID, may be used to provide network identification for a subscription service provider networks (SSPN). 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type | Length | String... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Code TBD Length 19 String: The String field is encoded in upper-case ASCII characters with the octet values separated by dash characters, as described in RFC3580 [RFC3580]. Example: "00-10-A4-23-19-C0". 3.3. WLAN-Venue-Info Description The WLAN-Venue-Info attribute identifies the category of venue hosting the WLAN and consists of the Venue Group and Venue Type subfields. 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type | Length | Venue-Group | Venue-Type | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Code TBD Length 4 Venue-Group The Venue-Group field is a single octet and describes the broad category of the venue, e.g. "Assembly". See IEEE 802.11u [IEEE-802.11u] for Venue-Group codes and descriptions. Venue-Type The Venue-Type field is a single octet and describes the venue in a finer granularity within the Venue-Group, e.g. "Library". See IEEE 802.11u [IEEE-802.11u] for Venue-Type codes and descriptions. 3.4. WLAN-Venue-Language Description The WLAN-Venue-Language attribute is an ISO-14962-1997 [ISO-14962-1997] encoded string that defines the language used in the WLAN-Venue-Name attribute. Zero or more WLAN-Venue-Language attributes may be included in an Access-Request and each one indicates the language of the WLAN-Venue-Name attribute that follows it. 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type | Length | String... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ String (cont) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Code TBD Length 5 String: The String field is a two or three character language code selected from ISO-639 [ISO-639]. A two character language code has a zero ("null" in ISO-14962-1997) appended to make it 3 octets in length. 3.5. WLAN-Venue-Name Description The WLAN-Venue-Name attribute provides additional metadata on the BSS. For example, this information may be used to assist a user in selecting the appropriate BSS with which to associate. Zero or more WLAN-Venue-Name attributes may be included in an Access- Request in the same or different languages. 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type | Length | String... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Code TBD Length >=3 String: The String field is a UTF-8 formatted field containing the venue's name. The maximum length of this field is 252 octets. --- 8. Normative References [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [RFC3588] Calhoun, P., Loughney, J., Guttman, E., Zorn, G., and J. Arkko, "Diameter Base Protocol", RFC 3588, September 2003. [RFC2865] Rigney, C., Willens, S., Rubens, A., and W. Simpson, "Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS)", RFC 2865, June 2000. [RFC3580] Congdon, P., Aboba, B., Smith, A., Zorn, G., and J. Roese, "IEEE 802.1X Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS) Usage Guidelines", RFC 3580, September 2003. [IEEE-802.11] IEEE, "Information technology - Telecommunications and information exchange between systems - Local and metropolitan area networks - Specific Requirements Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications, IEEE Std. 802.11-2007", 2007. [IEEE-802.11u] IEEE, "IEEE Standard for Information technology, Telecommunications and information exchange between systems, Local and metropolitan area networks, Specific requirements, Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control(MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications, Amendment 9: Interworking with External Networks", 2011. [ISO-639] ISO, "Codes for the Representation of Names of Languages". [ISO-14962-1997] ISO, "Space data and information transfer systems - ASCII encoded English", 1997. ---- Author's Address Mark Jones Amdocs Email: mark@azu.ca ------=_NextPart_000_0358_01CD10D0.F7577B80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ radext mailing list radext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext ------=_NextPart_000_0358_01CD10D0.F7577B80-- From lionel.morand@orange.com Mon Apr 2 13:14:06 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2714521F86C7 for ; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 13:14:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.249 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nZA13H12xwGa for ; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 13:14:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com (p-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com [195.101.245.15]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B0321F86BA for ; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 13:14:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 1FAD7411064; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 22:14:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.46]) by p-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18F8A411063; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 22:14:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ftrdmel1.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.40]) by ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 2 Apr 2012 22:14:04 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 22:14:03 +0200 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [radext] 802.11u attributes for inclusion indraft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext Thread-Index: Ac0RC4pwwssq48B0SFeZl0ug/eqgHAAAPyew References: From: To: , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Apr 2012 20:14:04.0120 (UTC) FILETIME=[26771D80:01CD110D] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 13:15:03 -0700 Subject: Re: [radext] 802.11u attributes for inclusion indraft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 20:14:06 -0000 +1 for addition of these attributes in the draft. One minor question: even if straightforward, should we find a reference = to the IEEE spec also for SSID, HESSID, Venue-Language, Venue-Name, in = order to see the direct mapping between these attributes and the 802.11u = parameters? Lionel -----Message d'origine----- De=A0: radext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:radext-bounces@ietf.org] De la = part de Bernard Aboba Envoy=E9=A0: lundi 2 avril 2012 22:03 =C0=A0: radext@ietf.org Objet=A0: [radext] 802.11u attributes for inclusion = indraft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext Find enclosed attributes that have been proposed for inclusion in the = next revision of draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext.=20 Comments?=20 From radext-bounces@ietf.org Mon Apr 2 13:15:06 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@lists.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D67C921F871E; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 13:15:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1333397705; bh=Wl8/3mRrX0YXJ9HDu3N4ocOTrW3B+PnR0PTbZLjKUA4=; h=MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:From:To: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=BMzKGUttRD3iZLK+k3u4VkfyR0wZRLwM0vNppt/bblk2ruGPfJ4JoYCtD+HSNVjAv nK/eG/s2K74nBc1+6s3fKBXhXLLi9l5JjpK0X2K6HcJVjSlidVISjVni2G34u8lJ2q 0ey0JE4pPU2tnzeiCWZfvF07VhGhs8dId5G/h5m0= X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2714521F86C7 for ; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 13:14:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.249 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nZA13H12xwGa for ; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 13:14:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com (p-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com [195.101.245.15]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B0321F86BA for ; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 13:14:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 1FAD7411064; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 22:14:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.46]) by p-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18F8A411063; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 22:14:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ftrdmel1.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.40]) by ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 2 Apr 2012 22:14:04 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 22:14:03 +0200 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [radext] 802.11u attributes for inclusion indraft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext Thread-Index: Ac0RC4pwwssq48B0SFeZl0ug/eqgHAAAPyew References: From: To: , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Apr 2012 20:14:04.0120 (UTC) FILETIME=[26771D80:01CD110D] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 13:15:03 -0700 Subject: Re: [radext] 802.11u attributes for inclusion indraft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: radext-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: radext-bounces@ietf.org +1 for addition of these attributes in the draft. One minor question: even if straightforward, should we find a reference to = the IEEE spec also for SSID, HESSID, Venue-Language, Venue-Name, in order t= o see the direct mapping between these attributes and the 802.11u parameter= s? Lionel -----Message d'origine----- De=A0: radext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:radext-bounces@ietf.org] De la part = de Bernard Aboba Envoy=E9=A0: lundi 2 avril 2012 22:03 =C0=A0: radext@ietf.org Objet=A0: [radext] 802.11u attributes for inclusion indraft-ietf-radext-iee= e802ext Find enclosed attributes that have been proposed for inclusion in the next = revision of draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext. = Comments? = _______________________________________________ radext mailing list radext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext From jouni.nospam@gmail.com Mon Apr 2 23:36:55 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C9BD21F86AF for ; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 23:36:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.98 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.98 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hxtvSHhLoQoc for ; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 23:36:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA2321F86AA for ; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 23:36:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obbtb4 with SMTP id tb4so3111020obb.31 for ; Mon, 02 Apr 2012 23:36:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=RZpSDBHX63rAm9nK13gYggdLy/NgCaYRFuAeqiSrnP4=; b=n1JHlJ1AY3YzdyJCaNcXtecey95c/niMnhXlp0Yj19zGhlBY/cINx8SeTO4PRYVj46 gACCCDC+9vPkYTY4oH0UhtHNAG+Fokiw6lwJtm0+cpAiWIeSMH2h7DLXvQ+50s864jn1 jSUxFVdlaTZimoPYMSSZxGAPMgnZSXzmFlfaIfet4CozfrtJBftLnoUJZQptPRIroUES Gum+sPKCY69ABwvnChrCUP9dcbBrOowLA421RsQY+HM8MrARbCTJR0fvEAtApzWC12Wl oDiZZsP3xadIbrOqdvP0Mka6rdt01Pg3Dqn94vKc/4zMdYU0ztd8rbFsgoEj1eH7tVrv mocA== Received: by 10.182.147.99 with SMTP id tj3mr16249021obb.40.1333435014545; Mon, 02 Apr 2012 23:36:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.255.135.226] ([192.100.123.77]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n10sm20681312obu.23.2012.04.02.23.36.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 02 Apr 2012 23:36:53 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) From: jouni korhonen In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 09:36:50 +0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8477CB59-315D-49CE-997D-5967ABE198F2@gmail.com> References: To: radext@ietf.org, Bernard Aboba X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Subject: Re: [radext] 802.11u attributes for inclusion in draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 06:36:55 -0000 I am in favor of adding these attributes into the = draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext. - Jouni On Apr 2, 2012, at 11:03 PM, Bernard Aboba wrote: > Find enclosed attributes that have been proposed for inclusion in the = next > revision of draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext.=20 >=20 > Comments?=20 > = __________________________________________= _____ > radext mailing list > radext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext From radext-bounces@ietf.org Mon Apr 2 23:36:57 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@lists.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C39D421F86AF; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 23:36:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1333435017; bh=aP++JMzFnDrCNk5ta0Sz3oBLCFQVY1DzHbFxj1KQgsg=; h=Mime-Version:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Message-Id:References:To: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=uHrubcJoxQu5t3VqwEkdwScPP+LsGn+tXau8P+MIoX8XeU4HZa9H1QKdNb9e7uJu0 U3pUfGgAiLQZzEXEoYoXGLmdhVZowyzTUfw92Wh2GzM58BVY1FDiNXQ1rfT09cGfLT 2LEp7QtrwDdGPJmcTk0BqMSHAmH4/ainkEkncimU= X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C9BD21F86AF for ; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 23:36:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.98 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.98 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hxtvSHhLoQoc for ; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 23:36:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA2321F86AA for ; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 23:36:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obbtb4 with SMTP id tb4so3111020obb.31 for ; Mon, 02 Apr 2012 23:36:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=RZpSDBHX63rAm9nK13gYggdLy/NgCaYRFuAeqiSrnP4=; b=n1JHlJ1AY3YzdyJCaNcXtecey95c/niMnhXlp0Yj19zGhlBY/cINx8SeTO4PRYVj46 gACCCDC+9vPkYTY4oH0UhtHNAG+Fokiw6lwJtm0+cpAiWIeSMH2h7DLXvQ+50s864jn1 jSUxFVdlaTZimoPYMSSZxGAPMgnZSXzmFlfaIfet4CozfrtJBftLnoUJZQptPRIroUES Gum+sPKCY69ABwvnChrCUP9dcbBrOowLA421RsQY+HM8MrARbCTJR0fvEAtApzWC12Wl oDiZZsP3xadIbrOqdvP0Mka6rdt01Pg3Dqn94vKc/4zMdYU0ztd8rbFsgoEj1eH7tVrv mocA== Received: by 10.182.147.99 with SMTP id tj3mr16249021obb.40.1333435014545; Mon, 02 Apr 2012 23:36:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.255.135.226] ([192.100.123.77]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n10sm20681312obu.23.2012.04.02.23.36.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 02 Apr 2012 23:36:53 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) From: jouni korhonen In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 09:36:50 +0300 Message-Id: <8477CB59-315D-49CE-997D-5967ABE198F2@gmail.com> References: To: radext@ietf.org, Bernard Aboba X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Subject: Re: [radext] 802.11u attributes for inclusion in draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: radext-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: radext-bounces@ietf.org I am in favor of adding these attributes into the draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext. - Jouni On Apr 2, 2012, at 11:03 PM, Bernard Aboba wrote: > Find enclosed attributes that have been proposed for inclusion in the next > revision of draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext. > > Comments? > _______________________________________________ > radext mailing list > radext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext _______________________________________________ radext mailing list radext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext From j@w1.fi Tue Apr 3 01:45:38 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCC7921F8570 for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 01:45:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.046 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.046 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TCPm3NoOufyN for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 01:45:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jmaline2.user.openhosting.com (kvm.w1.fi [128.177.28.162]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1896D21F852A for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 01:45:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jm (a91-155-81-182.elisa-laajakaista.fi [91.155.81.182]) (authenticated bits=0) by jmaline2.user.openhosting.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q338dOMq010584 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 3 Apr 2012 04:39:26 -0400 Received: by jm (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 03 Apr 2012 11:45:25 +0300 Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 11:45:25 +0300 From: Jouni Malinen To: Bernard Aboba Message-ID: <20120403084525.GA4332@w1.fi> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [radext] 802.11u attributes for inclusion in draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 08:45:38 -0000 On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 01:03:14PM -0700, Bernard Aboba wrote: > Find enclosed attributes that have been proposed for inclusion in the next > revision of draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext. > 3. RADIUS attributes > > The RADIUS attributes associated with 802.11u WLAN access. 802.11u does not really exist anymore as an amendment since IEEE Std 802.11-2012 has now been published with that amendment included in the main standard. All 802.11u references should be replaced with a reference to IEEE Std 802.11-2012. > 3.1. WLAN-SSID > > Description > > The WLAN-SSID attribute contains the Service Set Identifier (SSID) > which identifies a specific 802.11 extended service set (ESS). > > 0 1 2 3 > 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > | Type | Length | String... > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > The String field is between 1 and 32 octets in length. The actual > format of the information is site or application specific, and a > robust implementation SHOULD support the field as undistinguished > octets. It could be useful to be able to indicate the encoding of the SSID since IEEE Std 802.11-2012 added a mechanism for indicating that the SSID is encoded as UTF-8. This could be done, e.g., by adding a new integer attribute for this with following values defined for now: 0 - Unspecified SSID encoding 1 - SSID encoded in UTF-8 > 8. Normative References > [IEEE-802.11] > IEEE, "Information technology - Telecommunications and > information exchange between systems - Local and > metropolitan area networks - Specific Requirements Part > 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical > Layer (PHY) Specifications, IEEE Std. 802.11-2007", 2007. This should be update to IEEE Std 802.11-2012. > [IEEE-802.11u] And this replaced with references to IEEE Std 802.11-2012. -- Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA From radext-bounces@ietf.org Tue Apr 3 01:45:40 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@lists.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0359821F858A; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 01:45:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1333442740; bh=lpommF6fFG1ushDUX56y/A3iqiKAxz0b0VqZXcIgdgg=; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Cc: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=pkvCbUYx/wkNY8dFIOLmnC8LEsfuyVcGwXFA/J4sFpdDLPxaRNnMkYV71YPyU272v 4D65r/jGsVu5HkmT4Xbq/aQtBh4ce1BhMhvVwC1rlwatZxU/YzgriQcy3ItU+kex57 cUv+Lagw/q4Mdq6cjKf2DOQtiAk9pswpSwD3WviQ= X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCC7921F8570 for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 01:45:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.046 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.046 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TCPm3NoOufyN for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 01:45:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jmaline2.user.openhosting.com (kvm.w1.fi [128.177.28.162]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1896D21F852A for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 01:45:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jm (a91-155-81-182.elisa-laajakaista.fi [91.155.81.182]) (authenticated bits=0) by jmaline2.user.openhosting.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q338dOMq010584 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 3 Apr 2012 04:39:26 -0400 Received: by jm (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 03 Apr 2012 11:45:25 +0300 Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 11:45:25 +0300 From: Jouni Malinen To: Bernard Aboba Message-ID: <20120403084525.GA4332@w1.fi> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [radext] 802.11u attributes for inclusion in draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: radext-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: radext-bounces@ietf.org On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 01:03:14PM -0700, Bernard Aboba wrote: > Find enclosed attributes that have been proposed for inclusion in the next > revision of draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext. > 3. RADIUS attributes > > The RADIUS attributes associated with 802.11u WLAN access. 802.11u does not really exist anymore as an amendment since IEEE Std 802.11-2012 has now been published with that amendment included in the main standard. All 802.11u references should be replaced with a reference to IEEE Std 802.11-2012. > 3.1. WLAN-SSID > > Description > > The WLAN-SSID attribute contains the Service Set Identifier (SSID) > which identifies a specific 802.11 extended service set (ESS). > > 0 1 2 3 > 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > | Type | Length | String... > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > The String field is between 1 and 32 octets in length. The actual > format of the information is site or application specific, and a > robust implementation SHOULD support the field as undistinguished > octets. It could be useful to be able to indicate the encoding of the SSID since IEEE Std 802.11-2012 added a mechanism for indicating that the SSID is encoded as UTF-8. This could be done, e.g., by adding a new integer attribute for this with following values defined for now: 0 - Unspecified SSID encoding 1 - SSID encoded in UTF-8 > 8. Normative References > [IEEE-802.11] > IEEE, "Information technology - Telecommunications and > information exchange between systems - Local and > metropolitan area networks - Specific Requirements Part > 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical > Layer (PHY) Specifications, IEEE Std. 802.11-2007", 2007. This should be update to IEEE Std 802.11-2012. > [IEEE-802.11u] And this replaced with references to IEEE Std 802.11-2012. -- Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA _______________________________________________ radext mailing list radext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext From dromasca@avaya.com Tue Apr 3 03:20:54 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6EE621F869D for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 03:20:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -103.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24HhzxU0DLdH for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 03:20:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com (de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.71.100]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7558321F864E for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 03:20:52 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAFALrNek/GmAcF/2dsb2JhbABDt3mBB4IJAQEBAQMBAQEPHgo0FwQCAQgNBAQBAQEKBgwLAQYBJh8JCAEBBAESCBqHZwujHZQwBJADYwSbdYoegmk X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,362,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="300199823" Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.5]) by de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 03 Apr 2012 06:20:50 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO 307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.140.13]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP; 03 Apr 2012 06:19:32 -0400 x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 12:20:47 +0200 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <8477CB59-315D-49CE-997D-5967ABE198F2@gmail.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [radext] 802.11u attributes for inclusion indraft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext Thread-Index: Ac0RZC3nCoG+sfcySd+F7RBR8ZMKxQAHkpIg References: <8477CB59-315D-49CE-997D-5967ABE198F2@gmail.com> From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" To: "jouni korhonen" , , "Bernard Aboba" Subject: Re: [radext] 802.11u attributes for inclusion indraft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 10:20:55 -0000 I also support this work and I would re-iterate the need to share information about the development of this work (if it will be approved) with the IEEE 802.1 and IEEE 802.11 WGs - including sending them an announcement when the work will be adopted, and sending them the document for review at WGLC.=20 Regards, Dan =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: radext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:radext-bounces@ietf.org] On > Behalf Of jouni korhonen > Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 9:37 AM > To: radext@ietf.org; Bernard Aboba > Subject: Re: [radext] 802.11u attributes for inclusion indraft-ietf- > radext-ieee802ext >=20 >=20 > >=20 > I am in favor of adding these attributes into the draft-ietf-radext- > ieee802ext. >=20 > - Jouni >=20 >=20 > On Apr 2, 2012, at 11:03 PM, Bernard Aboba wrote: >=20 > > Find enclosed attributes that have been proposed for inclusion in the > next > > revision of draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext. > > > > Comments? > > 11u.txt>_______________________________________________ > > radext mailing list > > radext@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext >=20 > _______________________________________________ > radext mailing list > radext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext From radext-bounces@ietf.org Tue Apr 3 03:20:57 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@lists.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF5B821F869D; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 03:20:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1333448456; bh=OsWnYGBNFm1IVuNKu8kpA2knkTVmb7pRX6H54C+TaZ8=; h=MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:From:To: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=OhRosDSn6oLStbMaFjDneDyS2cqrZQjFRW+/QpeB0idd42pzzNEgNDgKRMkBRbegd ObSKgC2bM/j5b28OrsOD2xT2AXmVPjcN8mAPe03KPHz1vEEZrsIUTFuxS3MNwRsxCc bIrUrAy18B82LLP7Hx7bxDKxi9iIyOyMvJKSzFHA= X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6EE621F869D for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 03:20:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -103.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24HhzxU0DLdH for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 03:20:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com (de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.71.100]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7558321F864E for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 03:20:52 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAFALrNek/GmAcF/2dsb2JhbABDt3mBB4IJAQEBAQMBAQEPHgo0FwQCAQgNBAQBAQEKBgwLAQYBJh8JCAEBBAESCBqHZwujHZQwBJADYwSbdYoegmk X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,362,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="300199823" Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.5]) by de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 03 Apr 2012 06:20:50 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO 307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.140.13]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP; 03 Apr 2012 06:19:32 -0400 x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 12:20:47 +0200 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <8477CB59-315D-49CE-997D-5967ABE198F2@gmail.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [radext] 802.11u attributes for inclusion indraft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext Thread-Index: Ac0RZC3nCoG+sfcySd+F7RBR8ZMKxQAHkpIg References: <8477CB59-315D-49CE-997D-5967ABE198F2@gmail.com> From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" To: "jouni korhonen" , , "Bernard Aboba" Subject: Re: [radext] 802.11u attributes for inclusion indraft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: radext-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: radext-bounces@ietf.org I also support this work and I would re-iterate the need to share information about the development of this work (if it will be approved) with the IEEE 802.1 and IEEE 802.11 WGs - including sending them an announcement when the work will be adopted, and sending them the document for review at WGLC. Regards, Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: radext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:radext-bounces@ietf.org] On > Behalf Of jouni korhonen > Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 9:37 AM > To: radext@ietf.org; Bernard Aboba > Subject: Re: [radext] 802.11u attributes for inclusion indraft-ietf- > radext-ieee802ext > > > > > I am in favor of adding these attributes into the draft-ietf-radext- > ieee802ext. > > - Jouni > > > On Apr 2, 2012, at 11:03 PM, Bernard Aboba wrote: > > > Find enclosed attributes that have been proposed for inclusion in the > next > > revision of draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext. > > > > Comments? > > 11u.txt>_______________________________________________ > > radext mailing list > > radext@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext > > _______________________________________________ > radext mailing list > radext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext _______________________________________________ radext mailing list radext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext From internet-drafts@ietf.org Wed Apr 4 22:43:06 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6B3421F87D0; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 22:43:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.461 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.461 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.138, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xp442i9eeOFo; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 22:43:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23A3D21F875C; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 22:43:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.00 Message-ID: <20120405054306.10552.65579.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 22:43:06 -0700 Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: [radext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext-01.txt X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 05:43:06 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the RADIUS EXTensions Working Group of th= e IETF. Title : RADIUS Attributes for IEEE 802 Networks Author(s) : Bernard Aboba Jouni Malinen Paul Congdon Joseph Salowey Mark Jones Filename : draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext-01.txt Pages : 22 Date : 2012-04-04 RFC 3580 provides guidelines for the use of the Remote Authentication Dialin User Service (RADIUS) within IEEE 802 local area networks (LANs). This document proposes additional attributes for use within IEEE 802 networks, as well as providing clarifications on the usage of the EAP-Key-Name attribute, updating RFC 4072. The attributes defined in this document are usable both within RADIUS and Diameter. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext-01.txt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext-01.txt From radext-bounces@ietf.org Wed Apr 4 22:43:10 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@lists.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6DFB21F87DC; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 22:43:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1333604590; bh=6BBqKbHzun5fQmEreWOB43WexNdPKXrxusw2K9wtyfQ=; h=MIME-Version:From:To:Message-ID:Date:Cc:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=p7MPBh1dwBVvHBxM/q5GxxV7UtocTG7J4+wDkpBNC6g6F42ijK3w8H/NGbm+Ymi8n NV/q+tXLigkPxCaBrDr2KiZqLoRfcj/nbcJlZsm4v5pUi6XC+YK03ZU4q717DOfnRf SLD45BhslLCHyY5XTldkePYNNFtP10SU9HgCM6To= X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6B3421F87D0; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 22:43:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.461 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.461 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.138, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xp442i9eeOFo; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 22:43:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23A3D21F875C; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 22:43:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.00 Message-ID: <20120405054306.10552.65579.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 22:43:06 -0700 Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: [radext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext-01.txt X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: radext-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: radext-bounces@ietf.org A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the RADIUS EXTensions Working Group of the IETF. Title : RADIUS Attributes for IEEE 802 Networks Author(s) : Bernard Aboba Jouni Malinen Paul Congdon Joseph Salowey Mark Jones Filename : draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext-01.txt Pages : 22 Date : 2012-04-04 RFC 3580 provides guidelines for the use of the Remote Authentication Dialin User Service (RADIUS) within IEEE 802 local area networks (LANs). This document proposes additional attributes for use within IEEE 802 networks, as well as providing clarifications on the usage of the EAP-Key-Name attribute, updating RFC 4072. The attributes defined in this document are usable both within RADIUS and Diameter. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext-01.txt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-radext-ieee802ext-01.txt _______________________________________________ radext mailing list radext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext From radext-bounces@ietf.org Sun Apr 22 21:10:03 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@lists.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E495521E8018; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 21:10:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1335154202; bh=iqel3+SI6HOFgzeljj59P3hgK6I0Fp+0oqWPHOb/cJI=; h=From:To:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Cc: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=Nr8+9XBzUT4+zAze7TZF0V/iPiiz9NbU6u7s32TzpgLrwZ5YhokrC6OHZwuUwRfrd g+nNRKpwsxkb2v9X+4HOIwcNXjP5vntRHOadBcnQs2Q6wKb7rIv2HVEtzcjXNrDa7I HlMeOMxzeTbGiscW1nq3XCXncLFLGSZJq57mW66c= X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 215EE21E8018 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 21:10:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wlx9niB7Gy0y for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 21:10:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dfwrgout.huawei.com (dfwrgout.huawei.com [206.16.17.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E3A621E8013 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 21:10:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO dfweml201-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.9.243]) by dfwrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.2.3-GA FastPath) with ESMTP id AFD16331; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 00:09:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from DFWEML408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.134) by dfweml201-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.9.107) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 21:06:13 -0700 Received: from SZXEML418-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.157) by dfweml408-hub.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.134) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 21:06:14 -0700 Received: from SZXEML510-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.29]) by szxeml418-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.157]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:06:10 +0800 From: Leaf yeh To: "Sanchez, Mauricio (HP Networking)" Thread-Topic: [radext] RADEXT recharter Thread-Index: Ac0KiJZp1Yuc0eVmQz2NbKgzj34oNQWfLUKQ Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 04:06:09 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.70.39.132] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Cc: "radext@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [radext] RADEXT recharter X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: radext-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: radext-bounces@ietf.org Per the RADEXT recharter of Mar. (below) about the 'Goals and Milestones' on the ML, Apr 2012 IPv6 Access I-D submitted as a Proposed Standard RFC Apr 2012 Extended Attributes I-D submitted as a Proposed Standard RFC I guess the above 2 items have not done the LC (Last Call) on the ML yet. Would we need a quick update on the formal RADEXT Recharter now? Best Regards, Leaf Yeh -----Original Message----- From: radext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:radext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sanchez, Mauricio (HP Networking) Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2012 9:10 PM To: radext@ietf.org Subject: [radext] RADEXT recharter This past January we discussed on the list proposed re-charter text. At this time, I would like to restart the discussions based on the updated version that came out of January's discussions. Please review and respond with feedback, either negative or positive. We will be discussing this topic on Friday. Thanks, Mauricio and Jouni ------------- Description of Working Group The RADIUS Extensions Working Group will focus on extensions to the RADIUS protocol required to expand and enrich the standard attribute space, address cryptographic algorithm agility, use of new secure transports and clarify its usage and definition. In order to enable interoperation of heterogeneous RADIUS/Diameter deployments, all RADEXT WG work items MUST contain a Diameter compatibility section, outlining how interoperability with Diameter will be maintained. Furthermore, to ensure backward compatibility with existing RADIUS implementations, as well as compatibility between RADIUS and Diameter, the following restrictions are imposed on extensions considered by the RADEXT WG: - All documents produced MUST specify means of interoperation with legacy RADIUS and, if possible, be backward compatible with existing RADIUS RFCs, including RFCs 2865-2869, 3162, 3575, 3579, 3580, 4668-4673,4675, 5080, 5090, 5176 and 6158. Transport profiles should, if possible, be compatible with RFC 3539. - All RADIUS work MUST be compatible with equivalent facilities in Diameter. Where possible, new attributes should be defined so that the same attribute can be used in both RADIUS and Diameter without translation. In other cases a translation considerations section should be included in the specification. Work Items The immediate goals of the RADEXT working group are to address the following issues: -RADIUS attribute space extension. The standard RADIUS attribute space is currently being depleted. This document will provide additional standard attribute space, while maintaining backward compatibility with existing attributes. -IEEE 802 attributes. New attributes have been proposed to support IEEE 802 standards for wired and wireless LANs. This work item will support authentication, authorization and accounting attributes needed by IEEE 802 groups including IEEE 802.1, IEEE 802.11 and IEEE 802.16. - New RADIUS transports. A reliable transport profile for RADIUS will be developed, as well as specifications for Secure transports, including TCP/TLS (RADSEC) and UDP/DTLS. - Update and clarification of Network Access Identifiers (RFC4282).This work item will correct and clarify issues present with RFC4282 in two phases. In first phase, RFC4282bis will be issued to eliminate fundamental incompatibilities with RADIUS around character encoding and NAI modifications by proxies. In second phase, a fresh review of NAI internationalization requirements and behavior will be undertaken with a clear goal of maintaining compatibility with RADIUS. -RADIUS Accounting Extensions for Traffic Statistics. This work item will specify RADIUS accounting attributes for differentiated accounting polices and traffic recording. Goals and Milestones Done Updates to RFC 2618-2621 RADIUS MIBs submitted for publication Done SIP RADIUS authentication draft submitted as a Proposed Standard RFC Done RFC 2486bis submitted as a Proposed Standard RFC Done RFC 3576 MIBs submitted as an Informational RFC Done RADIUS VLAN and Priority Attributes draft submitted as a Proposed Standard RFC (reduced in scope) Done RADIUS Implementation Issues and Fixes draft submitted as an Informational RFC Done RADIUS Filtering Attributes draft submitted as a Proposed Standard RFC (split out from VLAN & Priority draft) Done RFC 3576bis submitted as an Informational RFC (split out from Issues & Fixes draft) Done RADIUS Redirection Attributes draft submitted as a Proposed Standard RFC (split out from VLAN & Priority draft) Done RADIUS Design Guidelines submitted as a Best Current Practice RFC Done RADIUS Management Authorization I-D submitted as a Proposed Standard RFC Done Reliable Transport Profile for RADIUS I-D submitted as a Proposed Standard RFC Done Status-Server I-D submitted as a Proposed Standard RFC Done RADIUS Crypto-agility Requirements submitted as an Informational RFC Mar 2012 RADSEC (RADIUS over TCP/TLS) draft submitted as an Experimental RFC Apr 2012 IPv6 Access I-D submitted as a Proposed Standard RFC Apr 2012 IEEE 802 Attributes I-D submitted as a Proposed Standard RFC Apr 2012 Extended Attributes I-D submitted as a Proposed Standard RFC Jun 2012 RFC 4282bis submitted as a Proposed Standard RFC Jun 2012 RADIUS over DTLS I-D submitted as an Experimental RFC Jun 2012 Dynamic Discovery I-D submitted as a Proposed Standard RFC Oct 2012 RADIUS support for NAI Internationalization I-D submitted as a Proposed Standard RFC Dec 2012 Traffic Statistics Attribute I-D submitted as a Proposed Standard RFC _______________________________________________ radext mailing list radext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext _______________________________________________ radext mailing list radext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext From leaf.y.yeh@huawei.com Sun Apr 22 21:10:01 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 215EE21E8018 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 21:10:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wlx9niB7Gy0y for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 21:10:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dfwrgout.huawei.com (dfwrgout.huawei.com [206.16.17.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E3A621E8013 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 21:10:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO dfweml201-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.9.243]) by dfwrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.2.3-GA FastPath) with ESMTP id AFD16331; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 00:09:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from DFWEML408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.134) by dfweml201-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.9.107) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 21:06:13 -0700 Received: from SZXEML418-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.157) by dfweml408-hub.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.134) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 21:06:14 -0700 Received: from SZXEML510-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.29]) by szxeml418-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.157]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:06:10 +0800 From: Leaf yeh To: "Sanchez, Mauricio (HP Networking)" Thread-Topic: [radext] RADEXT recharter Thread-Index: Ac0KiJZp1Yuc0eVmQz2NbKgzj34oNQWfLUKQ Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 04:06:09 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.70.39.132] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Cc: "radext@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [radext] RADEXT recharter X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 04:10:01 -0000 UGVyIHRoZSBSQURFWFQgcmVjaGFydGVyIG9mIE1hci4gKGJlbG93KSBhYm91dCB0aGUgJ0dvYWxz IGFuZCBNaWxlc3RvbmVzJyBvbiB0aGUgTUwsDQoNCkFwciAyMDEyIElQdjYgQWNjZXNzIEktRCBz dWJtaXR0ZWQgYXMgYSBQcm9wb3NlZCBTdGFuZGFyZCBSRkMNCkFwciAyMDEyIEV4dGVuZGVkIEF0 dHJpYnV0ZXMgSS1EIHN1Ym1pdHRlZCBhcyBhIFByb3Bvc2VkIFN0YW5kYXJkIFJGQw0KDQpJIGd1 ZXNzIHRoZSBhYm92ZSAyIGl0ZW1zIGhhdmUgbm90IGRvbmUgdGhlIExDIChMYXN0IENhbGwpIG9u IHRoZSBNTCB5ZXQuDQoNCldvdWxkIHdlIG5lZWQgYSBxdWljayB1cGRhdGUgb24gdGhlIGZvcm1h bCBSQURFWFQgUmVjaGFydGVyIG5vdz8NCg0KDQpCZXN0IFJlZ2FyZHMsDQpMZWFmIFllaA0KDQoN Ci0tLS0tT3JpZ2luYWwgTWVzc2FnZS0tLS0tDQpGcm9tOiByYWRleHQtYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9y ZyBbbWFpbHRvOnJhZGV4dC1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3JnXSBPbiBCZWhhbGYgT2YgU2FuY2hleiwg TWF1cmljaW8gKEhQIE5ldHdvcmtpbmcpDQpTZW50OiBTdW5kYXksIE1hcmNoIDI1LCAyMDEyIDk6 MTAgUE0NClRvOiByYWRleHRAaWV0Zi5vcmcNClN1YmplY3Q6IFtyYWRleHRdIFJBREVYVCByZWNo YXJ0ZXINCg0KVGhpcyBwYXN0IEphbnVhcnkgd2UgZGlzY3Vzc2VkIG9uIHRoZSBsaXN0IHByb3Bv c2VkIHJlLWNoYXJ0ZXIgdGV4dC4gIEF0IHRoaXMgdGltZSwgSSB3b3VsZCBsaWtlIHRvIHJlc3Rh cnQgdGhlIGRpc2N1c3Npb25zIGJhc2VkIG9uIHRoZSB1cGRhdGVkIHZlcnNpb24gdGhhdCBjYW1l IG91dCBvZiBKYW51YXJ5J3MgZGlzY3Vzc2lvbnMuICAgUGxlYXNlIHJldmlldyBhbmQgcmVzcG9u ZCB3aXRoIGZlZWRiYWNrLCBlaXRoZXIgbmVnYXRpdmUgb3IgcG9zaXRpdmUuICAgV2Ugd2lsbCBi ZSBkaXNjdXNzaW5nIHRoaXMgdG9waWMgb24gRnJpZGF5Lg0KDQpUaGFua3MsDQpNYXVyaWNpbyBh bmQgSm91bmkNCg0KDQotLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tDQpEZXNjcmlwdGlvbiBvZiBXb3JraW5nIEdyb3Vw DQoNClRoZSBSQURJVVMgRXh0ZW5zaW9ucyBXb3JraW5nIEdyb3VwIHdpbGwgZm9jdXMgb24gZXh0 ZW5zaW9ucyB0byB0aGUgUkFESVVTIHByb3RvY29sIHJlcXVpcmVkIHRvIGV4cGFuZCBhbmQgZW5y aWNoIHRoZSBzdGFuZGFyZCBhdHRyaWJ1dGUgc3BhY2UsIGFkZHJlc3MgY3J5cHRvZ3JhcGhpYyBh bGdvcml0aG0gYWdpbGl0eSwgdXNlIG9mIG5ldyBzZWN1cmUgdHJhbnNwb3J0cyBhbmQgY2xhcmlm eSBpdHMgdXNhZ2UgYW5kIGRlZmluaXRpb24uDQoNCkluIG9yZGVyIHRvIGVuYWJsZSBpbnRlcm9w ZXJhdGlvbiBvZiBoZXRlcm9nZW5lb3VzIFJBRElVUy9EaWFtZXRlciBkZXBsb3ltZW50cywgYWxs IFJBREVYVCBXRyB3b3JrIGl0ZW1zIE1VU1QgY29udGFpbiBhIERpYW1ldGVyIGNvbXBhdGliaWxp dHkgc2VjdGlvbiwgb3V0bGluaW5nIGhvdyBpbnRlcm9wZXJhYmlsaXR5IHdpdGggRGlhbWV0ZXIg d2lsbCBiZSBtYWludGFpbmVkLg0KRnVydGhlcm1vcmUsIHRvIGVuc3VyZSBiYWNrd2FyZCBjb21w YXRpYmlsaXR5IHdpdGggZXhpc3RpbmcgUkFESVVTIGltcGxlbWVudGF0aW9ucywgYXMgd2VsbCBh cyBjb21wYXRpYmlsaXR5IGJldHdlZW4gUkFESVVTIGFuZCBEaWFtZXRlciwgdGhlIGZvbGxvd2lu ZyByZXN0cmljdGlvbnMgYXJlIGltcG9zZWQgb24gZXh0ZW5zaW9ucyBjb25zaWRlcmVkIGJ5IHRo ZSBSQURFWFQgV0c6DQoNCi0gQWxsIGRvY3VtZW50cyBwcm9kdWNlZCBNVVNUIHNwZWNpZnkgbWVh bnMgb2YgaW50ZXJvcGVyYXRpb24gd2l0aCBsZWdhY3kgUkFESVVTIGFuZCwgaWYgcG9zc2libGUs IGJlIGJhY2t3YXJkIGNvbXBhdGlibGUgd2l0aCBleGlzdGluZyBSQURJVVMgUkZDcywgaW5jbHVk aW5nIFJGQ3MgMjg2NS0yODY5LCAzMTYyLCAzNTc1LCAzNTc5LCAzNTgwLCA0NjY4LTQ2NzMsNDY3 NSwgNTA4MCwgNTA5MCwgNTE3NiBhbmQgNjE1OC4gVHJhbnNwb3J0IHByb2ZpbGVzIHNob3VsZCwg aWYgcG9zc2libGUsIGJlIGNvbXBhdGlibGUgd2l0aCBSRkMgMzUzOS4NCg0KLSBBbGwgUkFESVVT IHdvcmsgTVVTVCBiZSBjb21wYXRpYmxlIHdpdGggZXF1aXZhbGVudCBmYWNpbGl0aWVzIGluIERp YW1ldGVyLiBXaGVyZSBwb3NzaWJsZSwgbmV3IGF0dHJpYnV0ZXMgc2hvdWxkIGJlIGRlZmluZWQg c28gdGhhdCB0aGUgc2FtZSBhdHRyaWJ1dGUgY2FuIGJlIHVzZWQgaW4gYm90aCBSQURJVVMgYW5k IERpYW1ldGVyIHdpdGhvdXQgdHJhbnNsYXRpb24uIEluIG90aGVyIGNhc2VzIGEgdHJhbnNsYXRp b24gY29uc2lkZXJhdGlvbnMgc2VjdGlvbiBzaG91bGQgYmUgaW5jbHVkZWQgaW4gdGhlIHNwZWNp ZmljYXRpb24uDQoNCldvcmsgSXRlbXMNClRoZSBpbW1lZGlhdGUgZ29hbHMgb2YgdGhlIFJBREVY VCB3b3JraW5nIGdyb3VwIGFyZSB0byBhZGRyZXNzIHRoZSBmb2xsb3dpbmcgaXNzdWVzOg0KLVJB RElVUyBhdHRyaWJ1dGUgc3BhY2UgZXh0ZW5zaW9uLiBUaGUgc3RhbmRhcmQgUkFESVVTIGF0dHJp YnV0ZSBzcGFjZSBpcyBjdXJyZW50bHkgYmVpbmcgZGVwbGV0ZWQuIFRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQgd2ls bCBwcm92aWRlIGFkZGl0aW9uYWwgc3RhbmRhcmQgYXR0cmlidXRlIHNwYWNlLCB3aGlsZSBtYWlu dGFpbmluZyBiYWNrd2FyZCBjb21wYXRpYmlsaXR5IHdpdGggZXhpc3RpbmcgYXR0cmlidXRlcy4N Cg0KLUlFRUUgODAyIGF0dHJpYnV0ZXMuIE5ldyBhdHRyaWJ1dGVzIGhhdmUgYmVlbiBwcm9wb3Nl ZCB0byBzdXBwb3J0IElFRUUgODAyIHN0YW5kYXJkcyBmb3Igd2lyZWQgYW5kIHdpcmVsZXNzIExB TnMuIFRoaXMgd29yayBpdGVtIHdpbGwgc3VwcG9ydCBhdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiwgYXV0aG9yaXph dGlvbiBhbmQgYWNjb3VudGluZyBhdHRyaWJ1dGVzIG5lZWRlZCBieSBJRUVFIDgwMiBncm91cHMg aW5jbHVkaW5nIElFRUUgODAyLjEsIElFRUUgODAyLjExIGFuZCBJRUVFIDgwMi4xNi4NCg0KLSBO ZXcgUkFESVVTIHRyYW5zcG9ydHMuIEEgcmVsaWFibGUgdHJhbnNwb3J0IHByb2ZpbGUgZm9yIFJB RElVUyB3aWxsIGJlIGRldmVsb3BlZCwgYXMgd2VsbCBhcyBzcGVjaWZpY2F0aW9ucyBmb3IgU2Vj dXJlIHRyYW5zcG9ydHMsIGluY2x1ZGluZyBUQ1AvVExTIChSQURTRUMpIGFuZCBVRFAvRFRMUy4N Cg0KLSBVcGRhdGUgYW5kIGNsYXJpZmljYXRpb24gb2YgTmV0d29yayBBY2Nlc3MgSWRlbnRpZmll cnMgKFJGQzQyODIpLlRoaXMgd29yayBpdGVtIHdpbGwgY29ycmVjdCBhbmQgY2xhcmlmeSBpc3N1 ZXMgcHJlc2VudCB3aXRoIFJGQzQyODIgaW4gdHdvIHBoYXNlcy4gIEluIGZpcnN0IHBoYXNlLCBS RkM0MjgyYmlzIHdpbGwgYmUgaXNzdWVkIHRvIGVsaW1pbmF0ZSBmdW5kYW1lbnRhbCBpbmNvbXBh dGliaWxpdGllcyB3aXRoIFJBRElVUyBhcm91bmQgY2hhcmFjdGVyIGVuY29kaW5nIGFuZCBOQUkg bW9kaWZpY2F0aW9ucyBieSBwcm94aWVzLiAgSW4gc2Vjb25kIHBoYXNlLCBhIGZyZXNoIHJldmll dyBvZiBOQUkgaW50ZXJuYXRpb25hbGl6YXRpb24gcmVxdWlyZW1lbnRzIGFuZCBiZWhhdmlvciB3 aWxsIGJlIHVuZGVydGFrZW4gd2l0aCBhIGNsZWFyIGdvYWwgb2YgbWFpbnRhaW5pbmcgY29tcGF0 aWJpbGl0eSB3aXRoIFJBRElVUy4NCg0KLVJBRElVUyBBY2NvdW50aW5nIEV4dGVuc2lvbnMgZm9y IFRyYWZmaWMgU3RhdGlzdGljcy4gVGhpcyB3b3JrIGl0ZW0gd2lsbCBzcGVjaWZ5IFJBRElVUyBh Y2NvdW50aW5nIGF0dHJpYnV0ZXMgZm9yIGRpZmZlcmVudGlhdGVkIGFjY291bnRpbmcgcG9saWNl cyBhbmQgdHJhZmZpYyByZWNvcmRpbmcuDQoNCg0KR29hbHMgYW5kIE1pbGVzdG9uZXMNCkRvbmUg VXBkYXRlcyB0byBSRkMgMjYxOC0yNjIxIFJBRElVUyBNSUJzIHN1Ym1pdHRlZCBmb3IgcHVibGlj YXRpb24NCkRvbmUgU0lQIFJBRElVUyBhdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBkcmFmdCBzdWJtaXR0ZWQgYXMg YSBQcm9wb3NlZCBTdGFuZGFyZCBSRkMNCkRvbmUgUkZDIDI0ODZiaXMgc3VibWl0dGVkIGFzIGEg UHJvcG9zZWQgU3RhbmRhcmQgUkZDDQpEb25lIFJGQyAzNTc2IE1JQnMgc3VibWl0dGVkIGFzIGFu IEluZm9ybWF0aW9uYWwgUkZDDQpEb25lIFJBRElVUyBWTEFOIGFuZCBQcmlvcml0eSBBdHRyaWJ1 dGVzIGRyYWZ0IHN1Ym1pdHRlZCBhcyBhIFByb3Bvc2VkIFN0YW5kYXJkIFJGQyAocmVkdWNlZCBp biBzY29wZSkNCkRvbmUgUkFESVVTIEltcGxlbWVudGF0aW9uIElzc3VlcyBhbmQgRml4ZXMgZHJh ZnQgc3VibWl0dGVkIGFzIGFuIEluZm9ybWF0aW9uYWwgUkZDDQpEb25lIFJBRElVUyBGaWx0ZXJp bmcgQXR0cmlidXRlcyBkcmFmdCBzdWJtaXR0ZWQgYXMgYSBQcm9wb3NlZCBTdGFuZGFyZCBSRkMg KHNwbGl0IG91dCBmcm9tIFZMQU4gJiBQcmlvcml0eSBkcmFmdCkNCkRvbmUgUkZDIDM1NzZiaXMg c3VibWl0dGVkIGFzIGFuIEluZm9ybWF0aW9uYWwgUkZDIChzcGxpdCBvdXQgZnJvbSBJc3N1ZXMg JiBGaXhlcyBkcmFmdCkNCkRvbmUgUkFESVVTIFJlZGlyZWN0aW9uIEF0dHJpYnV0ZXMgZHJhZnQg c3VibWl0dGVkIGFzIGEgUHJvcG9zZWQgU3RhbmRhcmQgUkZDIChzcGxpdCBvdXQgZnJvbSBWTEFO ICYgUHJpb3JpdHkgZHJhZnQpDQpEb25lIFJBRElVUyBEZXNpZ24gR3VpZGVsaW5lcyBzdWJtaXR0 ZWQgYXMgYSBCZXN0IEN1cnJlbnQgUHJhY3RpY2UgUkZDDQpEb25lIFJBRElVUyBNYW5hZ2VtZW50 IEF1dGhvcml6YXRpb24gSS1EIHN1Ym1pdHRlZCBhcyBhIFByb3Bvc2VkIFN0YW5kYXJkIFJGQw0K RG9uZSBSZWxpYWJsZSBUcmFuc3BvcnQgUHJvZmlsZSBmb3IgUkFESVVTIEktRCBzdWJtaXR0ZWQg YXMgYSBQcm9wb3NlZCBTdGFuZGFyZCBSRkMNCkRvbmUgU3RhdHVzLVNlcnZlciBJLUQgc3VibWl0 dGVkIGFzIGEgUHJvcG9zZWQgU3RhbmRhcmQgUkZDDQpEb25lIFJBRElVUyBDcnlwdG8tYWdpbGl0 eSBSZXF1aXJlbWVudHMgc3VibWl0dGVkIGFzIGFuIEluZm9ybWF0aW9uYWwgUkZDDQpNYXIgMjAx MiBSQURTRUMgKFJBRElVUyBvdmVyIFRDUC9UTFMpIGRyYWZ0IHN1Ym1pdHRlZCBhcyBhbiBFeHBl cmltZW50YWwgUkZDDQpBcHIgMjAxMiBJUHY2IEFjY2VzcyBJLUQgc3VibWl0dGVkIGFzIGEgUHJv cG9zZWQgU3RhbmRhcmQgUkZDDQpBcHIgMjAxMiBJRUVFIDgwMiBBdHRyaWJ1dGVzIEktRCBzdWJt aXR0ZWQgYXMgYSBQcm9wb3NlZCBTdGFuZGFyZCBSRkMNCkFwciAyMDEyIEV4dGVuZGVkIEF0dHJp YnV0ZXMgSS1EIHN1Ym1pdHRlZCBhcyBhIFByb3Bvc2VkIFN0YW5kYXJkIFJGQw0KSnVuIDIwMTIg UkZDIDQyODJiaXMgc3VibWl0dGVkIGFzIGEgUHJvcG9zZWQgU3RhbmRhcmQgUkZDDQpKdW4gMjAx MiBSQURJVVMgb3ZlciBEVExTIEktRCBzdWJtaXR0ZWQgYXMgYW4gRXhwZXJpbWVudGFsIFJGQw0K SnVuIDIwMTIgRHluYW1pYyBEaXNjb3ZlcnkgSS1EIHN1Ym1pdHRlZCBhcyBhIFByb3Bvc2VkIFN0 YW5kYXJkIFJGQw0KT2N0IDIwMTIgUkFESVVTIHN1cHBvcnQgZm9yIE5BSSBJbnRlcm5hdGlvbmFs aXphdGlvbiBJLUQgc3VibWl0dGVkIGFzIGEgUHJvcG9zZWQgU3RhbmRhcmQgUkZDDQpEZWMgMjAx MiBUcmFmZmljIFN0YXRpc3RpY3MgQXR0cmlidXRlIEktRCBzdWJtaXR0ZWQgYXMgYSBQcm9wb3Nl ZCBTdGFuZGFyZCBSRkMNCg0KX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX18NCnJhZGV4dCBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QNCnJhZGV4dEBpZXRmLm9yZw0KaHR0cHM6Ly93 d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9yYWRleHQNCg== From aland@deployingradius.com Sun Apr 22 23:16:59 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EFBC21F8564 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 23:16:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.214 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.214 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.385, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3F+8kjFjXBGX for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 23:16:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from liberty.deployingradius.com (liberty.deployingradius.com [88.191.76.128]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4862B21F8562 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 23:16:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F94F3BB.40506@deployingradius.com> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 08:16:27 +0200 From: Alan DeKok User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Leaf yeh References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "radext@ietf.org" , "Sanchez, Mauricio \(HP Networking\)" Subject: Re: [radext] RADEXT recharter X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 06:17:00 -0000 Leaf yeh wrote: > Per the RADEXT recharter of Mar. (below) about the 'Goals and Milestones' on the ML, > > Apr 2012 IPv6 Access I-D submitted as a Proposed Standard RFC > Apr 2012 Extended Attributes I-D submitted as a Proposed Standard RFC > > I guess the above 2 items have not done the LC (Last Call) on the ML yet. The Extended attributes draft has had a last call. See the list archives. Alan DeKok. From radext-bounces@ietf.org Sun Apr 22 23:17:02 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@lists.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6707121F8565; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 23:17:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1335161822; bh=1jwofVSmjuwu16s8x6gRg6yuV2hSnVH/nnp/yVpEKGM=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:References:In-Reply-To:Cc: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=Hb43ft+Ra4LWYjiyniJNjSWShL0qishzo0PxRDdf5ubtsQ48tt+6N7cPEZtcvNh3J ZHUwnWoRAiaksEnOo19ahGwnuMFJaL59BX8aFWxZ5xqFwdOx1EwHXd7dsIBp1nPcin Q/zI/Oi+72Qfd5RQe0+1zUckQRLwW/honlIzXeLg= X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EFBC21F8564 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 23:16:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.214 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.214 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.385, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3F+8kjFjXBGX for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 23:16:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from liberty.deployingradius.com (liberty.deployingradius.com [88.191.76.128]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4862B21F8562 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 23:16:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F94F3BB.40506@deployingradius.com> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 08:16:27 +0200 From: Alan DeKok User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Leaf yeh References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Cc: "radext@ietf.org" , "Sanchez, Mauricio \(HP Networking\)" Subject: Re: [radext] RADEXT recharter X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: radext-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: radext-bounces@ietf.org Leaf yeh wrote: > Per the RADEXT recharter of Mar. (below) about the 'Goals and Milestones' on the ML, > > Apr 2012 IPv6 Access I-D submitted as a Proposed Standard RFC > Apr 2012 Extended Attributes I-D submitted as a Proposed Standard RFC > > I guess the above 2 items have not done the LC (Last Call) on the ML yet. The Extended attributes draft has had a last call. See the list archives. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ radext mailing list radext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext From leaf.y.yeh@huawei.com Mon Apr 23 01:33:51 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B87621F8636 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 01:33:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r8kJgo2WyGad for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 01:33:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dfwrgout.huawei.com (dfwrgout.huawei.com [206.16.17.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AF5721F8638 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 01:33:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO dfweml201-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.9.243]) by dfwrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.2.3-GA FastPath) with ESMTP id AFD31929; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 04:33:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from DFWEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.151) by dfweml201-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.9.107) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 01:30:52 -0700 Received: from SZXEML440-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.72.61.75) by dfweml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 01:30:40 -0700 Received: from SZXEML510-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.29]) by SZXEML440-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.72.61.75]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:30:48 +0800 From: Leaf yeh To: Alan DeKok Thread-Topic: [radext] RADEXT recharter Thread-Index: Ac0KiJZp1Yuc0eVmQz2NbKgzj34oNQWfLUKQ//+gh4D//1VSQA== Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 08:30:49 +0000 Message-ID: References: <4F94F3BB.40506@deployingradius.com> In-Reply-To: <4F94F3BB.40506@deployingradius.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.70.39.132] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Cc: "radext@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [radext] RADEXT recharter X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 08:33:51 -0000 QWxhbiAtIFRoZSBFeHRlbmRlZCBhdHRyaWJ1dGVzIGRyYWZ0IGhhcyBoYWQgYSBsYXN0IGNhbGwu DQoNCkJ1dCBpbiBteSBtZW1vcnksIHlvdSBzdGlsbCB3YW50IHNvbWUgdGV4dCB1cGRhdGVkIGFi b3V0IHRoZSAnZGlhbWV0ZXIgY29uc2lkZXJhdGlvbicsIHJpZ2h0Pw0KDQoNCkJlc3QgUmVnYXJk cywNCkxlYWYgWWVoDQoNCg0KLS0tLS1PcmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCkZyb206IHJhZGV4 dC1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3JnIFttYWlsdG86cmFkZXh0LWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmddIE9uIEJl aGFsZiBPZiBBbGFuIERlS29rDQpTZW50OiBNb25kYXksIEFwcmlsIDIzLCAyMDEyIDI6MTYgUE0N ClRvOiBMZWFmIHllaA0KQ2M6IHJhZGV4dEBpZXRmLm9yZzsgU2FuY2hleiwgTWF1cmljaW8gKEhQ IE5ldHdvcmtpbmcpDQpTdWJqZWN0OiBSZTogW3JhZGV4dF0gUkFERVhUIHJlY2hhcnRlcg0KDQpM ZWFmIHllaCB3cm90ZToNCj4gUGVyIHRoZSBSQURFWFQgcmVjaGFydGVyIG9mIE1hci4gKGJlbG93 KSBhYm91dCB0aGUgJ0dvYWxzIGFuZCBNaWxlc3RvbmVzJyBvbiB0aGUgTUwsDQo+IA0KPiBBcHIg MjAxMiBJUHY2IEFjY2VzcyBJLUQgc3VibWl0dGVkIGFzIGEgUHJvcG9zZWQgU3RhbmRhcmQgUkZD DQo+IEFwciAyMDEyIEV4dGVuZGVkIEF0dHJpYnV0ZXMgSS1EIHN1Ym1pdHRlZCBhcyBhIFByb3Bv c2VkIFN0YW5kYXJkIFJGQw0KPiANCj4gSSBndWVzcyB0aGUgYWJvdmUgMiBpdGVtcyBoYXZlIG5v dCBkb25lIHRoZSBMQyAoTGFzdCBDYWxsKSBvbiB0aGUgTUwgeWV0Lg0KDQogIFRoZSBFeHRlbmRl ZCBhdHRyaWJ1dGVzIGRyYWZ0IGhhcyBoYWQgYSBsYXN0IGNhbGwuICBTZWUgdGhlIGxpc3QgYXJj aGl2ZXMuDQoNCiAgQWxhbiBEZUtvay4NCl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQpyYWRleHQgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0DQpyYWRleHRAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCmh0 dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vcmFkZXh0DQo= From radext-bounces@ietf.org Mon Apr 23 01:33:53 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@lists.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D063F21F8638; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 01:33:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1335170032; bh=ZLDpDLVLBODjL/NH5Bhyuhjw0eTirsyZpe7Suc5d0dY=; h=From:To:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Cc: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=p2Tck/gM9RSV00ZusJrh8PZjcKVoMERzzabup+vyelWvEtEFo7mMm2iYJcJoVL/Ev KGIztBZqdsAiclw+4LkO1kNcMumRZnKBd6fIoQ07G8GFYpj5HhT+AJpEtW51mGhm3h iHUh0plPQJ7HjJopwGYodp+g18v+R651jHMZbUVQ= X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B87621F8636 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 01:33:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r8kJgo2WyGad for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 01:33:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dfwrgout.huawei.com (dfwrgout.huawei.com [206.16.17.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AF5721F8638 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 01:33:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO dfweml201-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.9.243]) by dfwrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.2.3-GA FastPath) with ESMTP id AFD31929; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 04:33:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from DFWEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.151) by dfweml201-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.9.107) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 01:30:52 -0700 Received: from SZXEML440-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.72.61.75) by dfweml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 01:30:40 -0700 Received: from SZXEML510-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.29]) by SZXEML440-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.72.61.75]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:30:48 +0800 From: Leaf yeh To: Alan DeKok Thread-Topic: [radext] RADEXT recharter Thread-Index: Ac0KiJZp1Yuc0eVmQz2NbKgzj34oNQWfLUKQ//+gh4D//1VSQA== Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 08:30:49 +0000 Message-ID: References: <4F94F3BB.40506@deployingradius.com> In-Reply-To: <4F94F3BB.40506@deployingradius.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.70.39.132] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Cc: "radext@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [radext] RADEXT recharter X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: radext-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: radext-bounces@ietf.org Alan - The Extended attributes draft has had a last call. But in my memory, you still want some text updated about the 'diameter consideration', right? Best Regards, Leaf Yeh -----Original Message----- From: radext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:radext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alan DeKok Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 2:16 PM To: Leaf yeh Cc: radext@ietf.org; Sanchez, Mauricio (HP Networking) Subject: Re: [radext] RADEXT recharter Leaf yeh wrote: > Per the RADEXT recharter of Mar. (below) about the 'Goals and Milestones' on the ML, > > Apr 2012 IPv6 Access I-D submitted as a Proposed Standard RFC > Apr 2012 Extended Attributes I-D submitted as a Proposed Standard RFC > > I guess the above 2 items have not done the LC (Last Call) on the ML yet. The Extended attributes draft has had a last call. See the list archives. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ radext mailing list radext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext _______________________________________________ radext mailing list radext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext From aland@deployingradius.com Mon Apr 23 05:02:18 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A686521F84D6 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 05:02:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.31 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.31 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.289, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QeLBM+behioQ for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 05:02:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from liberty.deployingradius.com (liberty.deployingradius.com [88.191.76.128]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3AA321F84C5 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 05:02:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F9544B3.6020003@deployingradius.com> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:01:55 +0200 From: Alan DeKok User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Leaf yeh , "radext@ietf.org" References: <4F94F3BB.40506@deployingradius.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [radext] RADEXT recharter X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:02:18 -0000 Leaf yeh wrote: > Alan - The Extended attributes draft has had a last call. > > But in my memory, you still want some text updated about the 'diameter consideration', right? The suggested text was discussed on the list and in the last WG meeting. There were no objections, only positive comments. Alan DeKok. From radext-bounces@ietf.org Mon Apr 23 05:02:19 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@lists.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8396821F84D6; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 05:02:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1335182539; bh=TEHZtQuy0K8hXS8HcPrbwxcko/hbhdzuPB2kLIrDcqQ=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:References:In-Reply-To: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=OTxMduwTiUpoOjkGep13NbM4MHTeQMK2ZhrzXCTImY2ubsk3FN8Gjmps4taCzPelx rnh+J4iDb68BycqYP1tftJ4fxtbSIbTl6+NVivVZtLNiRVGh6XYXbhdqbT54r+28Sa bhYD/0LBFjExjZi3kLlPx2ZDCZ3HO0vlLnPpJ/sQ= X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A686521F84D6 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 05:02:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.31 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.31 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.289, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QeLBM+behioQ for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 05:02:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from liberty.deployingradius.com (liberty.deployingradius.com [88.191.76.128]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3AA321F84C5 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 05:02:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F9544B3.6020003@deployingradius.com> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:01:55 +0200 From: Alan DeKok User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Leaf yeh , "radext@ietf.org" References: <4F94F3BB.40506@deployingradius.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Subject: Re: [radext] RADEXT recharter X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: radext-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: radext-bounces@ietf.org Leaf yeh wrote: > Alan - The Extended attributes draft has had a last call. > > But in my memory, you still want some text updated about the 'diameter consideration', right? The suggested text was discussed on the list and in the last WG meeting. There were no objections, only positive comments. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ radext mailing list radext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext From wdec@cisco.com Tue Apr 24 07:02:58 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E45E021F875E for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 07:02:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -110.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gM0yE4KFBKp1 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 07:02:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 678C721F86EE for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 07:02:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=wdec@cisco.com; l=6203; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1335276177; x=1336485777; h=date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=F3Zx1o1hQtKJblvMI5ugfnKa34JtD1wbMjsrmncpwPE=; b=Nu+ZsaCeoqiUj9SNJIr9yIGEYwYywu2aEQ5Hj3e74YGG6KbfY40Rak1V IN1xZ4MX75x67JgXEg0lAFVQRo5gYLobihVn3l2hoZNytg6o/nC8qZhw6 fbpPh3H6SdgY2P7xFr0D/PHIIRkAbBOyypchwRhXx/oNHA5wycOgf4/ck w=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAECxlk+Q/khN/2dsb2JhbABEsXeBB4IJAQEBAwEBAQEPAScCATELBQ0BCBEBAwEBAU8GIgYIAgQBDQUih18DBgULmkaWdA2JU4lnEodYBJV6gRGKLIMYgWmCaw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,473,1330905600"; d="scan'208";a="136079719" Received: from ams-core-4.cisco.com ([144.254.72.77]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Apr 2012 14:02:54 +0000 Received: from xbh-ams-201.cisco.com (xbh-ams-201.cisco.com [144.254.75.7]) by ams-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q3OE2q97011428; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:02:53 GMT Received: from xmb-ams-112.cisco.com ([144.254.74.87]) by xbh-ams-201.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:02:52 +0200 Received: from 10.61.82.188 ([10.61.82.188]) by XMB-AMS-112.cisco.com ([144.254.74.87]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:02:51 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.32.0.111121 Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:02:48 +0200 From: Wojciech Dec To: Leaf yeh , jouni korhonen Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [radext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-radext-ipv6-access-06.txt Thread-Index: AQHMom90WDU7kboiIkWUJSus5ElNy5Y+VmzA//+S3oCAAAUXAIACDmRggAyRBA+AFMwWfYAHUyOAgAEaCwCAAH0UAIAAAumAgABPAACAAZbXuYA+1Bu3 In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Apr 2012 14:02:52.0765 (UTC) FILETIME=[F0CA88D0:01CD2222] Cc: Bernard Aboba , "radext@ietf.org" , "Sanchez, Mauricio \(HP Networking\)" , Peter Deacon Subject: Re: [radext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-radext-ipv6-access-06.txt X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:02:59 -0000 Hi, On 16/03/2012 03:46, "Leaf yeh" wrote: > If the format of 'Route-IPv6-Information' is designed as follows: > > 0 1 2 3 > 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > | Type | Length | Reserved | Prefix-Length | > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > | | > . Prefix (variable) . > . . > | | > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > which is quoted from > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-radext-ipv6-access-04.txt, it sounds we > only care to the corresponding route sent to the user hosts through RA. > > Then I begin to doubt the necessity of the network scenario, where the RG or > host are expected to be multi-homed to both NASes, which shows as: > > +-----+ > (Radius) | AAA | > ...........>| | > . +--+--+ > v ^ > +---+---+ . > | NAS | .(Radius) > | | . > +---+---+ v > +------+ | +---+---+ > +------+ | AN | | | NAS | > | RG/ +-------| +-----------+----------+ | > | host | | | | | > +------+ (DSL) +------+ (Ethernet) +-------+ > > Figure 1 > > I guess Figure 1 could be simplified as: > > +-----+ > | AAA | > | | > +--+--+ > ^ > . > .(Radius) > . > v > +------+ +---+---+ > +------+ | AN | | NAS | > | RG/ +-------| +-----------+----------+ | > | host | | | | | > +------+ (DSL) +------+ (Ethernet) +-------+ > > Otherwise, we might need some text for the reasons or description why we keep > the information of 'Route Preference' (or even 'Router Lifetime') to meet the > requirement from RFC4191. Right? Well, the route preference can, and following RA semantics will among other parameters like timers, still be there, applied to the RA through means that are beyond the scope of this document, eg a default config. I'll add text to that effect. Regards, Woj. > > I am interested in the value of multi-home connecting to the NASes in the > network architecture originally shown in Figure 1, I guess the 'Route > Preference' for the default router of the user host might be useful in this > case. > > > Best Regards, > Leaf > > > ________________________________________ > From: radext-bounces@ietf.org [radext-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of jouni > korhonen [jouni.nospam@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 6:19 > To: Wojciech Dec > Cc: Bernard Aboba; radext@ietf.org; Sanchez, Mauricio (HP Networking); Peter > Deacon > Subject: Re: [radext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-radext-ipv6-access-06.txt > > On Mar 14, 2012, at 7:36 PM, Wojciech Dec wrote: >> >> On 14/03/2012 18:26, "Peter Deacon" wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012, Wojciech Dec (wdec) wrote: >>> >>>> Personally, I'm ok either way, but perhaps in the wider interest of >>>> closing off on the draft sooner rather than later I'd vote for (1). What >>>> about the rest of the WG? >>> >>> What is the purpose of signaling lifetime and preference via RADIUS? >>> Could the NAS better handle these parameters intelligently and or with >>> local configuration? >> >> That was the original idea... Countered with the argument that the fuller >> parameters should also be exposed, since they all relate to info sent in a >> RA. >> Looking at it from another angle, that of a dhcp-pd, we see that while the >> prefix has its own attribute it does not expose any/all dhcp timers, values >> etc in radius. Ie the equivalent of the -04 version. > > RFC3162 Framed-IPv6-Prefix content that gets put into PIO does not either > have anything else but the prefix and its length. > >>> >>> If necessary it seems the NAS would have the capability to issue zero >>> lifetime advertisements to invalidate current routes in order to effect >>> routing changes as a result of session reauthorization. >>> >>> Currently I prefer -04 version as I'm not seeing the value justify cost of >>> another custom packet format for one attribute. >> >> Given that the fix to go back to -04 is also trivial, I'd be happy with >> that. > > I would be happy to go back to -04 with this specific attribute as well. > > - Jouni > > > > > >> >> -Woj. >>> >>> regards, >>> Peter >> > > _______________________________________________ > radext mailing list > radext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext > _______________________________________________ > radext mailing list > radext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext From radext-bounces@ietf.org Tue Apr 24 07:03:00 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@lists.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A321F21F875E; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 07:03:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1335276180; bh=5nc9wF98CfY+AMZNbRAd07cFZjVg2R9baic9j0KtfzA=; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Mime-version:Cc:Subject: List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=dRNnebvX3g36tBmYujSWO3B4+kaY9QARcp2Cd88JFetOXIzrbAMAn1LdAmEQ1Iwve eayLlbJelJT5PVJiMEtoCeUAduDg5aEd0AtmptO0vaWk5pGIqLT5RkPbs+KCTJTC3x zTQEf3mn/eNV9q0A+HR4FvvwVMmK3nSM6DPOf4Tc= X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E45E021F875E for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 07:02:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -110.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gM0yE4KFBKp1 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 07:02:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 678C721F86EE for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 07:02:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=wdec@cisco.com; l=6203; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1335276177; x=1336485777; h=date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=F3Zx1o1hQtKJblvMI5ugfnKa34JtD1wbMjsrmncpwPE=; b=Nu+ZsaCeoqiUj9SNJIr9yIGEYwYywu2aEQ5Hj3e74YGG6KbfY40Rak1V IN1xZ4MX75x67JgXEg0lAFVQRo5gYLobihVn3l2hoZNytg6o/nC8qZhw6 fbpPh3H6SdgY2P7xFr0D/PHIIRkAbBOyypchwRhXx/oNHA5wycOgf4/ck w=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAECxlk+Q/khN/2dsb2JhbABEsXeBB4IJAQEBAwEBAQEPAScCATELBQ0BCBEBAwEBAU8GIgYIAgQBDQUih18DBgULmkaWdA2JU4lnEodYBJV6gRGKLIMYgWmCaw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,473,1330905600"; d="scan'208";a="136079719" Received: from ams-core-4.cisco.com ([144.254.72.77]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Apr 2012 14:02:54 +0000 Received: from xbh-ams-201.cisco.com (xbh-ams-201.cisco.com [144.254.75.7]) by ams-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q3OE2q97011428; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:02:53 GMT Received: from xmb-ams-112.cisco.com ([144.254.74.87]) by xbh-ams-201.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:02:52 +0200 Received: from 10.61.82.188 ([10.61.82.188]) by XMB-AMS-112.cisco.com ([144.254.74.87]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:02:51 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.32.0.111121 Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:02:48 +0200 From: Wojciech Dec To: Leaf yeh , jouni korhonen Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [radext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-radext-ipv6-access-06.txt Thread-Index: AQHMom90WDU7kboiIkWUJSus5ElNy5Y+VmzA//+S3oCAAAUXAIACDmRggAyRBA+AFMwWfYAHUyOAgAEaCwCAAH0UAIAAAumAgABPAACAAZbXuYA+1Bu3 In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Apr 2012 14:02:52.0765 (UTC) FILETIME=[F0CA88D0:01CD2222] Cc: Bernard Aboba , "radext@ietf.org" , "Sanchez, Mauricio \(HP Networking\)" , Peter Deacon Subject: Re: [radext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-radext-ipv6-access-06.txt X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: radext-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: radext-bounces@ietf.org Hi, On 16/03/2012 03:46, "Leaf yeh" wrote: > If the format of 'Route-IPv6-Information' is designed as follows: > > 0 1 2 3 > 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > | Type | Length | Reserved | Prefix-Length | > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > | | > . Prefix (variable) . > . . > | | > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > which is quoted from > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-radext-ipv6-access-04.txt, it sounds we > only care to the corresponding route sent to the user hosts through RA. > > Then I begin to doubt the necessity of the network scenario, where the RG or > host are expected to be multi-homed to both NASes, which shows as: > > +-----+ > (Radius) | AAA | > ...........>| | > . +--+--+ > v ^ > +---+---+ . > | NAS | .(Radius) > | | . > +---+---+ v > +------+ | +---+---+ > +------+ | AN | | | NAS | > | RG/ +-------| +-----------+----------+ | > | host | | | | | > +------+ (DSL) +------+ (Ethernet) +-------+ > > Figure 1 > > I guess Figure 1 could be simplified as: > > +-----+ > | AAA | > | | > +--+--+ > ^ > . > .(Radius) > . > v > +------+ +---+---+ > +------+ | AN | | NAS | > | RG/ +-------| +-----------+----------+ | > | host | | | | | > +------+ (DSL) +------+ (Ethernet) +-------+ > > Otherwise, we might need some text for the reasons or description why we keep > the information of 'Route Preference' (or even 'Router Lifetime') to meet the > requirement from RFC4191. Right? Well, the route preference can, and following RA semantics will among other parameters like timers, still be there, applied to the RA through means that are beyond the scope of this document, eg a default config. I'll add text to that effect. Regards, Woj. > > I am interested in the value of multi-home connecting to the NASes in the > network architecture originally shown in Figure 1, I guess the 'Route > Preference' for the default router of the user host might be useful in this > case. > > > Best Regards, > Leaf > > > ________________________________________ > From: radext-bounces@ietf.org [radext-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of jouni > korhonen [jouni.nospam@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 6:19 > To: Wojciech Dec > Cc: Bernard Aboba; radext@ietf.org; Sanchez, Mauricio (HP Networking); Peter > Deacon > Subject: Re: [radext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-radext-ipv6-access-06.txt > > On Mar 14, 2012, at 7:36 PM, Wojciech Dec wrote: >> >> On 14/03/2012 18:26, "Peter Deacon" wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012, Wojciech Dec (wdec) wrote: >>> >>>> Personally, I'm ok either way, but perhaps in the wider interest of >>>> closing off on the draft sooner rather than later I'd vote for (1). What >>>> about the rest of the WG? >>> >>> What is the purpose of signaling lifetime and preference via RADIUS? >>> Could the NAS better handle these parameters intelligently and or with >>> local configuration? >> >> That was the original idea... Countered with the argument that the fuller >> parameters should also be exposed, since they all relate to info sent in a >> RA. >> Looking at it from another angle, that of a dhcp-pd, we see that while the >> prefix has its own attribute it does not expose any/all dhcp timers, values >> etc in radius. Ie the equivalent of the -04 version. > > RFC3162 Framed-IPv6-Prefix content that gets put into PIO does not either > have anything else but the prefix and its length. > >>> >>> If necessary it seems the NAS would have the capability to issue zero >>> lifetime advertisements to invalidate current routes in order to effect >>> routing changes as a result of session reauthorization. >>> >>> Currently I prefer -04 version as I'm not seeing the value justify cost of >>> another custom packet format for one attribute. >> >> Given that the fix to go back to -04 is also trivial, I'd be happy with >> that. > > I would be happy to go back to -04 with this specific attribute as well. > > - Jouni > > > > > >> >> -Woj. >>> >>> regards, >>> Peter >> > > _______________________________________________ > radext mailing list > radext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext > _______________________________________________ > radext mailing list > radext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext _______________________________________________ radext mailing list radext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext From leaf.y.yeh@huawei.com Tue Apr 24 09:06:30 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D1DC11E80B1 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:06:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SAVDgoHK3Osj for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:06:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dfwrgout.huawei.com (dfwrgout.huawei.com [206.16.17.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90C3911E80A5 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:06:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.9.243]) by dfwrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.2.3-GA FastPath) with ESMTP id AFM45485; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:06:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from DFWEML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.131) by dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.9.108) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:04:09 -0700 Received: from SZXEML414-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.153) by dfweml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.131) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:04:08 -0700 Received: from SZXEML510-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.29]) by SZXEML414-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.153]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:04:05 +0800 From: Leaf yeh To: "radext@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [radext] RADEXT recharter Thread-Index: Ac0KiJZp1Yuc0eVmQz2NbKgzj34oNQWfLUKQ//+gh4D//1VSQIABCzSAgAJbZgr///8yNA== Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:04:04 +0000 Message-ID: <2AC0F73A-DB95-448C-9B0A-6C6DCBC6A521@mimectl> References: <4F94F3BB.40506@deployingradius.com> , <4F9544B3.6020003@deployingradius.com> In-Reply-To: <4F9544B3.6020003@deployingradius.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.24.1.70] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2AC0F73ADB95448C9B0A6C6DCBC6A521mimectl_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Cc: Alan DeKok Subject: Re: [radext] RADEXT recharter X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:06:30 -0000 --_000_2AC0F73ADB95448C9B0A6C6DCBC6A521mimectl_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Anyway, we'd like to see the updated RADEXT re-charter could be published A= SAP. Best Regards, Leaf ________________________________ From: Alan DeKok [aland@deployingradius.com] Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 20:01 To: Leaf yeh; radext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [radext] RADEXT recharter Leaf yeh wrote: > Alan - The Extended attributes draft has had a last call. > > But in my memory, you still want some text updated about the 'diameter co= nsideration', right? The suggested text was discussed on the list and in the last WG meeting. There were no objections, only positive comments. Alan DeKok. --_000_2AC0F73ADB95448C9B0A6C6DCBC6A521mimectl_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-ID: <3C0578833FF0A049A6B53581ACA16D09@huawei.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Anyway, we'd like to see the updated RADEXT re-charter could be publishe= d ASAP.

 

 

Best Regards,

Leaf

 
 
From: Alan DeKok [aland@deployingradius.com]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 20:01
To: Leaf yeh; radext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [radext] RADEXT recharter

Leaf yeh wrote:
> Alan - The Extended attributes draft has had a last call.
>
> But in my memory, you still want some text updated about the 'diameter= consideration', right?

  The suggested text was discussed on the list and in the last WG
meeting.  There were no objections, only positive comments.

  Alan DeKok.
--_000_2AC0F73ADB95448C9B0A6C6DCBC6A521mimectl_-- From radext-bounces@ietf.org Tue Apr 24 09:06:31 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@lists.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2473321E801C; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:06:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1335283591; bh=BFk5gfCEHSEMeU6ZSZcb8FwwyHlHFn2dHC9lCeaT7W4=; h=From:To:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Cc: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Sender; b=Zt0yFNdNLS/vZqQGojVrGrI8Slehyc5niURhNcFLARo1ckVxfvef6F0Bn11mo55Jz dsjyAyJHsC8hvxlZyiBgHpQCZNMBtbPh86ldhPbP9Y2qbXQ67WSxQ9wfZooqbDtzGV Uk4h02oTL/6eYl0vnCFgGV+L0X0AnG7FADK+2phg= X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D1DC11E80B1 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:06:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SAVDgoHK3Osj for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:06:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dfwrgout.huawei.com (dfwrgout.huawei.com [206.16.17.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90C3911E80A5 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:06:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.9.243]) by dfwrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.2.3-GA FastPath) with ESMTP id AFM45485; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:06:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from DFWEML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.131) by dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.9.108) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:04:09 -0700 Received: from SZXEML414-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.153) by dfweml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.131) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:04:08 -0700 Received: from SZXEML510-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.29]) by SZXEML414-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.153]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:04:05 +0800 From: Leaf yeh To: "radext@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [radext] RADEXT recharter Thread-Index: Ac0KiJZp1Yuc0eVmQz2NbKgzj34oNQWfLUKQ//+gh4D//1VSQIABCzSAgAJbZgr///8yNA== Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:04:04 +0000 Message-ID: <2AC0F73A-DB95-448C-9B0A-6C6DCBC6A521@mimectl> References: <4F94F3BB.40506@deployingradius.com> , <4F9544B3.6020003@deployingradius.com> In-Reply-To: <4F9544B3.6020003@deployingradius.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.24.1.70] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Cc: Alan DeKok Subject: Re: [radext] RADEXT recharter X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2156376389314266271==" Sender: radext-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: radext-bounces@ietf.org --===============2156376389314266271== Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2AC0F73ADB95448C9B0A6C6DCBC6A521mimectl_" --_000_2AC0F73ADB95448C9B0A6C6DCBC6A521mimectl_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Anyway, we'd like to see the updated RADEXT re-charter could be published A= SAP. Best Regards, Leaf ________________________________ From: Alan DeKok [aland@deployingradius.com] Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 20:01 To: Leaf yeh; radext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [radext] RADEXT recharter Leaf yeh wrote: > Alan - The Extended attributes draft has had a last call. > > But in my memory, you still want some text updated about the 'diameter co= nsideration', right? The suggested text was discussed on the list and in the last WG meeting. There were no objections, only positive comments. Alan DeKok. --_000_2AC0F73ADB95448C9B0A6C6DCBC6A521mimectl_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-ID: <3C0578833FF0A049A6B53581ACA16D09@huawei.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Anyway, we'd like to see the updated RADEXT re-charter could be publishe= d ASAP.

 

 

Best Regards,

Leaf

 
 
From: Alan DeKok [aland@deployingradius.com]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 20:01
To: Leaf yeh; radext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [radext] RADEXT recharter

Leaf yeh wrote:
> Alan - The Extended attributes draft has had a last call.
>
> But in my memory, you still want some text updated about the 'diameter= consideration', right?

  The suggested text was discussed on the list and in the last WG
meeting.  There were no objections, only positive comments.

  Alan DeKok.
--_000_2AC0F73ADB95448C9B0A6C6DCBC6A521mimectl_-- --===============2156376389314266271== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ radext mailing list radext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext --===============2156376389314266271==-- From internet-drafts@ietf.org Thu Apr 26 07:14:46 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6C5A21F86FE; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:14:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.506 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.506 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.093, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gJz6h3x3kq4W; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:14:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 703A421F86EE; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:14:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.01p1 Message-ID: <20120426141446.16063.59386.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:14:46 -0700 Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: [radext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-radext-radius-extensions-05.txt X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:14:47 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the RADIUS EXTensions Working Group of th= e IETF. Title : Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS) Prot= ocol Extensions Author(s) : Alan DeKok Avi Lior Filename : draft-ietf-radext-radius-extensions-05.txt Pages : 64 Date : 2012-04-26 The Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS) protocol is nearing exhaustion of its current 8-bit Attribute Type space. In addition, experience shows a growing need for complex grouping, along with attributes which can carry more than 253 octets of data. This document defines changes to RADIUS which address all of the above problems. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-radext-radius-extensions-05.= txt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-radext-radius-extensions-05.t= xt The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-radius-extensions/ From radext-bounces@ietf.org Thu Apr 26 07:14:50 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@lists.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0007121F8718; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:14:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1335449690; bh=e1zsr2D0IrGkkkfc9HP1e8bKAONH1mvF3kKV7Tmh2i0=; h=MIME-Version:From:To:Message-ID:Date:Cc:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=rro5i/h7GFze2aK1z0ZswmxGs314Px9LfMhdPkihePHIVv9/k+ANRXbJO8Oq5Jvbo hA4KXIyN+9lRGeu0PfJHo3v76g6x9DAJyh/0/GHuUZOSX178Cw8Ryv0I4ZGg8+CASS /l0p4HpkE1Jh2SnwFMvfADVGIOR2LLhXcSOUPh3M= X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6C5A21F86FE; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:14:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.506 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.506 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.093, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gJz6h3x3kq4W; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:14:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 703A421F86EE; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:14:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.01p1 Message-ID: <20120426141446.16063.59386.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:14:46 -0700 Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: [radext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-radext-radius-extensions-05.txt X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: radext-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: radext-bounces@ietf.org A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the RADIUS EXTensions Working Group of the IETF. Title : Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS) Protocol Extensions Author(s) : Alan DeKok Avi Lior Filename : draft-ietf-radext-radius-extensions-05.txt Pages : 64 Date : 2012-04-26 The Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS) protocol is nearing exhaustion of its current 8-bit Attribute Type space. In addition, experience shows a growing need for complex grouping, along with attributes which can carry more than 253 octets of data. This document defines changes to RADIUS which address all of the above problems. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-radext-radius-extensions-05.txt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-radext-radius-extensions-05.txt The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-radius-extensions/ _______________________________________________ radext mailing list radext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext From aland@deployingradius.com Thu Apr 26 07:18:55 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB75021E808B for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:18:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.368 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.368 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.231, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xjae-l+LT2zZ for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:18:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from liberty.deployingradius.com (liberty.deployingradius.com [88.191.76.128]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA12521E8087 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:18:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F995930.9070201@deployingradius.com> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:18:24 +0200 From: Alan DeKok User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: radext@ietf.org References: <20120426141446.16063.59386.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20120426141446.16063.59386.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [radext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-radext-radius-extensions-05.txt X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:18:55 -0000 internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the RADIUS EXTensions Working Group of the IETF. That should be all the changes necessary before publication. I've made the changes as suggested on this list: - added a diameter considerations section "don't do anything" - changed "flags" to "reserved" Since there are no flags, the format name needs to be changed. "Extended Type with Flags" is now "Long Extended Type". This change makes the document flow better. There are no issues open in the tracker, or raised on the list. I think that the document is ready for publication. Alan DeKok. From radext-bounces@ietf.org Thu Apr 26 07:18:57 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@lists.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D38021E8086; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:18:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1335449937; bh=TG6k+xYQv1IOC0gCmaRbY1z7g+KK/eX5DYKCKGBceZc=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:References:In-Reply-To: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=NuCPT3NWz56Z2yqn6XMXnF7P5Rg5Xc+EyOqESajzsfeLOYhVROcJb0+h6A1BXx/9i PJWTwvYQp2/nz5J9iuekpXtmd/PT5z9XmfznntC6jpQhXjDLsnsddsDbiScDI1sW+z xpvxM/yYqK0mELVbAXxGmE3SC3Hb50JEzYhMvSsE= X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB75021E808B for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:18:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.368 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.368 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.231, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xjae-l+LT2zZ for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:18:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from liberty.deployingradius.com (liberty.deployingradius.com [88.191.76.128]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA12521E8087 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:18:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F995930.9070201@deployingradius.com> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:18:24 +0200 From: Alan DeKok User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: radext@ietf.org References: <20120426141446.16063.59386.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20120426141446.16063.59386.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Subject: Re: [radext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-radext-radius-extensions-05.txt X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: radext-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: radext-bounces@ietf.org internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the RADIUS EXTensions Working Group of the IETF. That should be all the changes necessary before publication. I've made the changes as suggested on this list: - added a diameter considerations section "don't do anything" - changed "flags" to "reserved" Since there are no flags, the format name needs to be changed. "Extended Type with Flags" is now "Long Extended Type". This change makes the document flow better. There are no issues open in the tracker, or raised on the list. I think that the document is ready for publication. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ radext mailing list radext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext From trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Thu Apr 26 07:20:13 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1382821E80A3 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:20:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6hXlcMKW-M-h for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:20:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gamay.tools.ietf.org (gamay.tools.ietf.org [208.66.40.242]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B30021E809B for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:20:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=gamay.tools.ietf.org) by gamay.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SNPYB-0000zW-QK; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 10:20:03 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.2 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.2, by Edgewall Software To: bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, aland@deployingradius.com X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:20:03 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/16#comment:1 Message-ID: <081.f9446c7dd5b27ff59da4a724730fada8@trac.tools.ietf.org> References: <066.156cac5eb7c39ab5a09af51fc9c2d216@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 16 In-Reply-To: <066.156cac5eb7c39ab5a09af51fc9c2d216@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, aland@deployingradius.com, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on gamay.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [radext] #16: Diameter and IANA considerations X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:20:13 -0000 #16: Diameter and IANA considerations Changes (by aland@…): * status: new => closed * resolution: => fixed Comment: fixed in -05 -- --------------------------------+------------------------------ Reporter: bernard_aboba@… | Owner: bernard_aboba@… Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: milestone1 Component: Extended | Version: 1.0 Severity: Active WG Document | Resolution: fixed Keywords: | --------------------------------+------------------------------ Ticket URL: radext From radext-bounces@ietf.org Thu Apr 26 07:20:14 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@lists.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60B3A21E80A3; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:20:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1335450014; bh=ya7A49ug+Ih5Qryc92fuqT6wOUPOvjw7MB2s0+Rqmlk=; h=MIME-Version:From:To:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Cc: Subject:Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Help:List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Sender; b=NBC0FcHtTPYA0EhrWyMbGRHfjrxqX1i0xy/05geniPnEBPujQEMK5ZZD1wvdftaj7 MvkRZ5egRqf7dwqlxxN0WRRjaiN67caP+TUWiokwwDUdVp3SEn3k5F7G2XS223kT84 wPBpPLL86jehoqxm34BJncmBReOgXqD3h0lGgkNw= X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1382821E80A3 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:20:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6hXlcMKW-M-h for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:20:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gamay.tools.ietf.org (gamay.tools.ietf.org [208.66.40.242]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B30021E809B for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:20:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=gamay.tools.ietf.org) by gamay.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SNPYB-0000zW-QK; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 10:20:03 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.2 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.2, by Edgewall Software To: bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, aland@deployingradius.com X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:20:03 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/16#comment:1 Message-ID: <081.f9446c7dd5b27ff59da4a724730fada8@trac.tools.ietf.org> References: <066.156cac5eb7c39ab5a09af51fc9c2d216@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 16 In-Reply-To: <066.156cac5eb7c39ab5a09af51fc9c2d216@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, aland@deployingradius.com, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on gamay.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [radext] #16: Diameter and IANA considerations X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Sender: radext-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: radext-bounces@ietf.org IzE2OiBEaWFtZXRlciBhbmQgSUFOQSBjb25zaWRlcmF0aW9ucwoKQ2hhbmdlcyAoYnkgYWxhbmRA 4oCmKToKCiAqIHN0YXR1czogIG5ldyA9PiBjbG9zZWQKICogcmVzb2x1dGlvbjogICA9PiBmaXhl ZAoKCkNvbW1lbnQ6CgogZml4ZWQgaW4gLTA1CgotLSAKLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0rLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tCiBSZXBvcnRlcjogIGJlcm5h cmRfYWJvYmFA4oCmICAgICB8ICAgICAgIE93bmVyOiAgYmVybmFyZF9hYm9iYUDigKYKICAgICBU eXBlOiAgZGVmZWN0ICAgICAgICAgICAgICB8ICAgICAgU3RhdHVzOiAgY2xvc2VkCiBQcmlvcml0 eTogIG1ham9yICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgIE1pbGVzdG9uZTogIG1pbGVzdG9uZTEKQ29tcG9u ZW50OiAgRXh0ZW5kZWQgICAgICAgICAgICB8ICAgICBWZXJzaW9uOiAgMS4wCiBTZXZlcml0eTog IEFjdGl2ZSBXRyBEb2N1bWVudCAgfCAgUmVzb2x1dGlvbjogIGZpeGVkCiBLZXl3b3JkczogICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgfAotLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLSstLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0KClRpY2tldCBVUkw6IDxodHRwOi8vdHJhYy50b29s cy5pZXRmLm9yZy93Zy9yYWRleHQvdHJhYy90aWNrZXQvMTYjY29tbWVudDoxPgpyYWRleHQgPGh0 dHA6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9yYWRleHQvPgoKX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KcmFkZXh0IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApyYWRleHRAaWV0Zi5vcmcK aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9yYWRleHQK From trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Thu Apr 26 07:21:14 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 450B221F85ED for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:21:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J-ROakzIX3gw for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:21:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gamay.tools.ietf.org (gamay.tools.ietf.org [208.66.40.242]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9036321F85E5 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:21:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=gamay.tools.ietf.org) by gamay.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SNPZI-0004BJ-9f; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 10:21:12 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.2 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.2, by Edgewall Software To: bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, aland@deployingradius.com X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:21:12 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/17#comment:1 Message-ID: <081.b9e44fbf4ea5b79185f6684cae8c98be@trac.tools.ietf.org> References: <066.51f90db0bf073a987ff93d1d95bd29c3@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 17 In-Reply-To: <066.51f90db0bf073a987ff93d1d95bd29c3@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, aland@deployingradius.com, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on gamay.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [radext] #17: 4005bis Dependency X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:21:14 -0000 #17: 4005bis Dependency Changes (by aland@…): * status: new => closed * resolution: => fixed Comment: no longer applicable to the new document. -- --------------------------------+------------------------------ Reporter: bernard_aboba@… | Owner: bernard_aboba@… Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: milestone1 Component: Extended | Version: 1.0 Severity: Active WG Document | Resolution: fixed Keywords: | --------------------------------+------------------------------ Ticket URL: radext From radext-bounces@ietf.org Thu Apr 26 07:21:16 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@lists.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BD9021F85ED; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:21:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1335450076; bh=9pS6l8XtpifQnV59MUHiqXIpdi99AaHiilA2FnIHOVQ=; h=MIME-Version:From:To:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Cc: Subject:Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Help:List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Sender; b=e4u4soa3mImRggk/U6NX/dAom9XbynPp9saNgtT5xj1ddjpsZl9ew/U+t5N0hjFnD 9bPpOn7TaEeit4hKCqTSvwZb7sM3pNJdjNEW1L8Vi2vRtn+JMr8VV92LCjbDW4jF3M /Q/733THvMk6yxo20QtcjuAIggGbYQukl6aY4NVI= X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 450B221F85ED for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:21:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J-ROakzIX3gw for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:21:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gamay.tools.ietf.org (gamay.tools.ietf.org [208.66.40.242]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9036321F85E5 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:21:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=gamay.tools.ietf.org) by gamay.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SNPZI-0004BJ-9f; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 10:21:12 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.2 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.2, by Edgewall Software To: bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, aland@deployingradius.com X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:21:12 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/17#comment:1 Message-ID: <081.b9e44fbf4ea5b79185f6684cae8c98be@trac.tools.ietf.org> References: <066.51f90db0bf073a987ff93d1d95bd29c3@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 17 In-Reply-To: <066.51f90db0bf073a987ff93d1d95bd29c3@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, aland@deployingradius.com, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on gamay.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [radext] #17: 4005bis Dependency X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Sender: radext-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: radext-bounces@ietf.org IzE3OiA0MDA1YmlzIERlcGVuZGVuY3kKCkNoYW5nZXMgKGJ5IGFsYW5kQOKApik6CgogKiBzdGF0 dXM6ICBuZXcgPT4gY2xvc2VkCiAqIHJlc29sdXRpb246ICAgPT4gZml4ZWQKCgpDb21tZW50OgoK IG5vIGxvbmdlciBhcHBsaWNhYmxlIHRvIHRoZSBuZXcgZG9jdW1lbnQuCgotLSAKLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0rLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tCiBS ZXBvcnRlcjogIGJlcm5hcmRfYWJvYmFA4oCmICAgICB8ICAgICAgIE93bmVyOiAgYmVybmFyZF9h Ym9iYUDigKYKICAgICBUeXBlOiAgZGVmZWN0ICAgICAgICAgICAgICB8ICAgICAgU3RhdHVzOiAg Y2xvc2VkCiBQcmlvcml0eTogIG1ham9yICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgIE1pbGVzdG9uZTogIG1p bGVzdG9uZTEKQ29tcG9uZW50OiAgRXh0ZW5kZWQgICAgICAgICAgICB8ICAgICBWZXJzaW9uOiAg MS4wCiBTZXZlcml0eTogIEFjdGl2ZSBXRyBEb2N1bWVudCAgfCAgUmVzb2x1dGlvbjogIGZpeGVk CiBLZXl3b3JkczogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgfAotLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLSstLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0KClRpY2tldCBVUkw6IDxo dHRwOi8vdHJhYy50b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy93Zy9yYWRleHQvdHJhYy90aWNrZXQvMTcjY29tbWVu dDoxPgpyYWRleHQgPGh0dHA6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9yYWRleHQvPgoKX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KcmFkZXh0IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApy YWRleHRAaWV0Zi5vcmcKaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9yYWRl eHQK From trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Thu Apr 26 07:24:53 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2800E21F865B for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:24:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7a46pjb+Jlkv for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:24:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gamay.tools.ietf.org (gamay.tools.ietf.org [208.66.40.242]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4E2C21F865A for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:24:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=gamay.tools.ietf.org) by gamay.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SNPcf-0007O2-4n; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 10:24:41 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.2 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.2, by Edgewall Software To: bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, aland@deployingradius.com X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:24:41 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/18#comment:1 Message-ID: <081.6751c69531125e6ffc5ff369413660ac@trac.tools.ietf.org> References: <066.4165c733227ea9097b1b384ad5407f9e@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 18 In-Reply-To: <066.4165c733227ea9097b1b384ad5407f9e@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, aland@deployingradius.com, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on gamay.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [radext] #18: Extended Attribute Restrictions X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:24:54 -0000 #18: Extended Attribute Restrictions Changes (by aland@…): * status: new => closed * resolution: => fixed Comment: no longer applicable for the new extended attribute document. -- --------------------------------+------------------------------ Reporter: bernard_aboba@… | Owner: bernard_aboba@… Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: milestone1 Component: Extended | Version: 1.0 Severity: Active WG Document | Resolution: fixed Keywords: | --------------------------------+------------------------------ Ticket URL: radext From radext-bounces@ietf.org Thu Apr 26 07:25:01 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@lists.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 704F121F865B; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:25:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1335450300; bh=UPztDHFl7iTuGV1OLXDV2/LNz7QYU1figcIqH3uMqXo=; h=MIME-Version:From:To:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Cc: Subject:Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Help:List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Sender; b=Rch3RnADm7Tc3ll+YJnyImdN6azOKCBqQknwQ3OL8mtkJEpCCcQTyNkNwniDp5PN/ kn+dqc5VpZH3a5bS/TFGcDgblCZMwWKoCGLQ3z+Xiiy1TXYYhZMrNWMHDeDnpcFEbH 6U/9vrWlN+XgYnttziCpc9MpEtwx1NYzrOYxMGtQ= X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2800E21F865B for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:24:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7a46pjb+Jlkv for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:24:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gamay.tools.ietf.org (gamay.tools.ietf.org [208.66.40.242]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4E2C21F865A for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:24:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=gamay.tools.ietf.org) by gamay.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SNPcf-0007O2-4n; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 10:24:41 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.2 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.2, by Edgewall Software To: bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, aland@deployingradius.com X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:24:41 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/18#comment:1 Message-ID: <081.6751c69531125e6ffc5ff369413660ac@trac.tools.ietf.org> References: <066.4165c733227ea9097b1b384ad5407f9e@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 18 In-Reply-To: <066.4165c733227ea9097b1b384ad5407f9e@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, aland@deployingradius.com, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on gamay.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [radext] #18: Extended Attribute Restrictions X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Sender: radext-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: radext-bounces@ietf.org IzE4OiBFeHRlbmRlZCBBdHRyaWJ1dGUgUmVzdHJpY3Rpb25zCgpDaGFuZ2VzIChieSBhbGFuZEDi gKYpOgoKICogc3RhdHVzOiAgbmV3ID0+IGNsb3NlZAogKiByZXNvbHV0aW9uOiAgID0+IGZpeGVk CgoKQ29tbWVudDoKCiBubyBsb25nZXIgYXBwbGljYWJsZSBmb3IgdGhlIG5ldyBleHRlbmRlZCBh dHRyaWJ1dGUgZG9jdW1lbnQuCgotLSAKLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0r LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tCiBSZXBvcnRlcjogIGJlcm5hcmRfYWJvYmFA 4oCmICAgICB8ICAgICAgIE93bmVyOiAgYmVybmFyZF9hYm9iYUDigKYKICAgICBUeXBlOiAgZGVm ZWN0ICAgICAgICAgICAgICB8ICAgICAgU3RhdHVzOiAgY2xvc2VkCiBQcmlvcml0eTogIG1ham9y ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgIE1pbGVzdG9uZTogIG1pbGVzdG9uZTEKQ29tcG9uZW50OiAgRXh0 ZW5kZWQgICAgICAgICAgICB8ICAgICBWZXJzaW9uOiAgMS4wCiBTZXZlcml0eTogIEFjdGl2ZSBX RyBEb2N1bWVudCAgfCAgUmVzb2x1dGlvbjogIGZpeGVkCiBLZXl3b3JkczogICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgfAotLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLSstLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0KClRpY2tldCBVUkw6IDxodHRwOi8vdHJhYy50b29scy5pZXRmLm9y Zy93Zy9yYWRleHQvdHJhYy90aWNrZXQvMTgjY29tbWVudDoxPgpyYWRleHQgPGh0dHA6Ly90b29s cy5pZXRmLm9yZy9yYWRleHQvPgoKX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX18KcmFkZXh0IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApyYWRleHRAaWV0Zi5vcmcKaHR0cHM6Ly93 d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9yYWRleHQK From aland@deployingradius.com Sun Apr 29 04:22:52 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 455F621F851B for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 04:22:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.134 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.134 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.135, BAYES_50=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id io4ECAi22Zdc for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 04:22:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from liberty.deployingradius.com (liberty.deployingradius.com [88.191.76.128]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB48121F84F1 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 04:22:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F9D246E.9060709@deployingradius.com> Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:22:22 +0200 From: Alan DeKok User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "radext@ietf.org" X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [radext] MIB Updates? X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 11:22:52 -0000 RFC 4669 et al. defined the various counters as "counter32". For a loaded system (5K packets/s), the counters will wrap about every 10 days or so. For a highly loaded system (50K packets/s), the counters will wrap once a day. Is it time to update the MIBs to use "Counter64"? Alan DeKok. From radext-bounces@ietf.org Sun Apr 29 04:22:54 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@lists.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D6821F851B; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 04:22:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1335698573; bh=S5lIjREX92TL0y2ivtykaTBvRQro9cveRfYH95L9m2U=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=mhIsJd1hZLCdyRKavA+D8sOx9zXmE5lBsu3DaQeoBbZPkv1T5Mw1mNcFqhn9JnGZj lS60UyHFbjCsWZcaqtBAQXWrFP3USAlg6UxA0GKPI1JILXjUik4mikhyAvVVZl/o8s niRUpPafZmeqmR+8MbwCsDmL82rWyPwsialXM3nw= X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 455F621F851B for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 04:22:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.134 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.134 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.135, BAYES_50=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id io4ECAi22Zdc for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 04:22:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from liberty.deployingradius.com (liberty.deployingradius.com [88.191.76.128]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB48121F84F1 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 04:22:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F9D246E.9060709@deployingradius.com> Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:22:22 +0200 From: Alan DeKok User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "radext@ietf.org" X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Subject: [radext] MIB Updates? X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: radext-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: radext-bounces@ietf.org RFC 4669 et al. defined the various counters as "counter32". For a loaded system (5K packets/s), the counters will wrap about every 10 days or so. For a highly loaded system (50K packets/s), the counters will wrap once a day. Is it time to update the MIBs to use "Counter64"? Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ radext mailing list radext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext From dromasca@avaya.com Sun Apr 29 04:43:04 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0FA021F851B for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 04:43:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -103.302 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.297, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XpkTCf79KuHX for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 04:43:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com (de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.71.100]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A247B21F84AA for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 04:42:59 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EADconU/GmAcF/2dsb2JhbABEsheBB4IJAQEBAQMBAQEPHgo0FwQCAQgNBAQBAQsGDAsBBgEmHwkIAQEEARIIGodrC5wRnCUEkD9jBJwWiiqCag X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,500,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="304134600" Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.5]) by de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 29 Apr 2012 07:42:56 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO 307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.140.13]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP; 29 Apr 2012 07:40:12 -0400 x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:42:54 +0200 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4F9D246E.9060709@deployingradius.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [radext] MIB Updates? Thread-Index: Ac0l+m4yfleYAu6dSMWVI6Radjum6wAAogtQ References: <4F9D246E.9060709@deployingradius.com> From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" To: "Alan DeKok" , Subject: Re: [radext] MIB Updates? X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 11:43:05 -0000 There is no strict threshold when such an update is required. The rule of thumb is that Counter64 becomes important when the wrap-up of Counter32 objects may happen at intervals less than one hour. It looks like we are not yet there.=20 Regards, Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: radext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:radext-bounces@ietf.org] On > Behalf Of Alan DeKok > Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2012 2:22 PM > To: radext@ietf.org > Subject: [radext] MIB Updates? >=20 >=20 > RFC 4669 et al. defined the various counters as "counter32". For a > loaded system (5K packets/s), the counters will wrap about every 10 > days > or so. For a highly loaded system (50K packets/s), the counters will > wrap once a day. >=20 > Is it time to update the MIBs to use "Counter64"? >=20 > Alan DeKok. > _______________________________________________ > radext mailing list > radext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext From radext-bounces@ietf.org Sun Apr 29 04:43:07 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@lists.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-radext-archive-IeZ9sae2@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 015BF21F84F1; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 04:43:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1335699787; bh=Rx8iXNozVz7DMGPdYdWup6bWFCXNlWjFk1RazW7VjEc=; h=MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:From:To: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=nzwKS8W9Hcpbej1NLUEqRHOYcmpZXkvf8sbJfNN/MoTpqzn0BW7sTaBoK446cl212 YLrXTTA0RnBdxrCw5CNqqfDzdQyOhvB7phxIKLOuIvqFy4Wqf7U9oexO42OHL37fTE vGV7BwjY2+dUwUcqY9OCCimarkt8gqvmoCWAKPZA= X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0FA021F851B for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 04:43:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -103.302 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.297, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XpkTCf79KuHX for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 04:43:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com (de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.71.100]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A247B21F84AA for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 04:42:59 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EADconU/GmAcF/2dsb2JhbABEsheBB4IJAQEBAQMBAQEPHgo0FwQCAQgNBAQBAQsGDAsBBgEmHwkIAQEEARIIGodrC5wRnCUEkD9jBJwWiiqCag X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,500,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="304134600" Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.5]) by de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 29 Apr 2012 07:42:56 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO 307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.140.13]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP; 29 Apr 2012 07:40:12 -0400 x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:42:54 +0200 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4F9D246E.9060709@deployingradius.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [radext] MIB Updates? Thread-Index: Ac0l+m4yfleYAu6dSMWVI6Radjum6wAAogtQ References: <4F9D246E.9060709@deployingradius.com> From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" To: "Alan DeKok" , Subject: Re: [radext] MIB Updates? X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: radext-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: radext-bounces@ietf.org There is no strict threshold when such an update is required. The rule of thumb is that Counter64 becomes important when the wrap-up of Counter32 objects may happen at intervals less than one hour. It looks like we are not yet there. Regards, Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: radext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:radext-bounces@ietf.org] On > Behalf Of Alan DeKok > Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2012 2:22 PM > To: radext@ietf.org > Subject: [radext] MIB Updates? > > > RFC 4669 et al. defined the various counters as "counter32". For a > loaded system (5K packets/s), the counters will wrap about every 10 > days > or so. For a highly loaded system (50K packets/s), the counters will > wrap once a day. > > Is it time to update the MIBs to use "Counter64"? > > Alan DeKok. > _______________________________________________ > radext mailing list > radext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext _______________________________________________ radext mailing list radext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext