Subject: Re: [RAM] what we should be working on

From: [email-masked]
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 10:46:58 EDT

In einer eMail vom 15.03.2007 14:28:15 Westeuropäische Normalzeit schreibt  
[email-masked]:

Finally,  I hope that the research community (RRG, HIPRG,
everyone else) will keep  working on designs that go beyond
what is presented above, including  clean-slate identifier-locator
split architectures, new routing paradigms  such as compact
routing, etc.

Jari

These lines remind me of heaving read "Toward Compact inter-domain routing"  
by Dmitri Krioukov and kc claffy a while ago, where it is explained (?)/  
asserted (?) "4 Why hierarchical routing will not work". 
I hope this point of view (from  August 2005) is not the latest.   Stating 
that  hierarchical routing  would stretch the routes needs to  add some excuse: 
hierarchical routing as understood by the authors. 
 
Another word about IPv6:
Isn't shim6 itself a best proof that the IPv6-header can't be the solution  
for the future ? 
 
Heiner

_______________________________________________
RAM mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram