Subject: Re: [RAM] Different approaches for different protocols

From: [email-masked] (Noel Chiappa)
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 22:19:46 -0500 (EST)

> From: RJ Atkinson <[email-masked]>

    > (A) I'd encourage keeping your concepts (1) and (2) separate, in
    > separate drafts and ideally with separate names, at least for now.
    > (B) Separately, modularity and clean architecture would argue for
    > keeping the mapping database structure separately specified from any
    > other bits of protocol design.
    > ...
    > keeping things separate and modular seems beneficial all around for
    > now.

Not just for now - it's even more valuable in the long run.

Modularity is your friend when it comes to archiectural lifetime.

	Noel

_______________________________________________
RAM mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ram