Subject: [Fwd: Re: Response Request: COPS PIBs standardization due-diligence feedback]

From: "Krishna Prasad Akkineni" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 13:30:53 +0530

Hi,
    I would like to construct a policy for which the condition attribute
is a range of IP addresses.
e.g., 192.168.143.100 to 192.168.143.157. How can we represent this in
PIB.
Regards
Krishna Prasad.A

>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kulkarni, Amol [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 10:30 PM
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: FW: Response Request: COPS PIBs standardization due-diligence
>
> fe edback
>
> Dear subscribers,
>
> The COPS-PR PIB standardization process is at a crucial stage. It is
> important for the IESG to receive feedback from people interested in
> these
> PIBs.
>
> In case your work involves COPS/COPS-PR and PIBs, please send your
> feedback
> as mentioned below.
>
> Thanks,
> Amol
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hahn, Scott [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2002 9:44 PM
> To: [email-masked]'
> Subject: Response Request: COPS PIBs standardization due-diligence
> feedba ck
>
> Subject: Response  Request: COPS PIBs standardization due-diligence
> feedback
>
> Greetings,
>
> Just a note to let you know the first of the COPS-PR PIBs are about to
> reach
> IETF RFC standards-track status. Before the IESG (The IETF's Internet
> Engineering Steering Group) makes their decision on how to proceed
> with PIB
> standardization, they are collecting feedback about who in the
> industry is
> interested in the COPS-PR PIBs.
>
> We would like to make sure your input will be considered as part of
> this
> due-diligence process. This can be done by sending Brian Carpenter
> <[email-masked]>, chair of the DiffServ WG, an email saying
> that you
> are interested in the COPS standards and COPS-PR PIBs (e.g. the
> Framework,
> DiffServ, IPSec, Access Control, or Accounting PIB).
>
> Thanks very much,
>         -Scott Hahn
>         RAP WG co-chair