
From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Fri Jan  6 13:03:45 2017
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C3A6129EEB for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri,  6 Jan 2017 13:03:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20acYYwZVSzf for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri,  6 Jan 2017 13:03:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE197129EDC for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Fri,  6 Jan 2017 13:03:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C332CB80104; Fri,  6 Jan 2017 13:03:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 909D0B80103; Fri,  6 Jan 2017 13:03:41 -0800 (PST)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20170106210341.909D0B80103@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri,  6 Jan 2017 13:03:41 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8021 on Generation of IPv6 Atomic Fragments Considered Harmful
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, ipv6@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8021

        Title:      Generation of IPv6 Atomic Fragments 
                    Considered Harmful 
        Author:     F. Gont, W. Liu, T. Anderson
        Status:     Informational
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       January 2017
        Mailbox:    fgont@si6networks.com, 
                    liushucheng@huawei.com, 
                    tore@redpill-linpro.com
        Pages:      12
        Characters: 25686
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-6man-deprecate-atomfrag-generation-08.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8021

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8021

This document discusses the security implications of the generation
of IPv6 atomic fragments and a number of interoperability issues
associated with IPv6 atomic fragments.  It concludes that the
aforementioned functionality is undesirable and thus documents the
motivation for removing this functionality from an upcoming revision
of the core IPv6 protocol specification (RFC 2460).

This document is a product of the IPv6 Maintenance Working Group of the IETF.


INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community.
It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Fri Jan  6 13:04:17 2017
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12017129ED5 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri,  6 Jan 2017 13:04:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TcUTIYbQaPTR for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri,  6 Jan 2017 13:04:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AE54129EFA for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Fri,  6 Jan 2017 13:04:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A56DB80115; Fri,  6 Jan 2017 13:04:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 063A4B80112; Fri,  6 Jan 2017 13:04:00 -0800 (PST)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20170106210400.063A4B80112@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri,  6 Jan 2017 13:04:00 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8043 on Source-Address-Dependent Routing and Source Address Selection for IPv6 Hosts: Overview of the Problem Space
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8043

        Title:      Source-Address-Dependent Routing and Source Address 
                    Selection for IPv6 Hosts: Overview of 
                    the Problem Space 
        Author:     B. Sarikaya, M. Boucadair
        Status:     Informational
        Stream:     Independent
        Date:       January 2017
        Mailbox:    sarikaya@ieee.org, 
                    mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
        Pages:      16
        Characters: 35213
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-sarikaya-6man-sadr-overview-12.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8043

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8043

This document presents the source-address-dependent routing (SADR)
problem space from the host's perspective.  Both multihomed hosts and
hosts with multiple interfaces are considered.  Several network
architectures are presented to illustrate why source address
selection and next-hop resolution are needed in view of
source-address-dependent routing.

The document is scoped on identifying a set of scenarios for
source-address-dependent routing from the host's perspective and
analyzing a set of solutions to mitigate encountered issues.  The
document does not make any solution recommendations.


INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community.
It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Fri Jan  6 13:04:22 2017
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2A03129EFE for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri,  6 Jan 2017 13:04:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mhlFkL6Phu-S for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri,  6 Jan 2017 13:04:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BB58129EF4 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Fri,  6 Jan 2017 13:04:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D2BB8011E; Fri,  6 Jan 2017 13:04:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id D1E45B8011F; Fri,  6 Jan 2017 13:04:18 -0800 (PST)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20170106210418.D1E45B8011F@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri,  6 Jan 2017 13:04:18 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8051 on Applicability of a Stateful Path Computation Element (PCE)
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, pce@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8051

        Title:      Applicability of a Stateful Path 
                    Computation Element (PCE) 
        Author:     X. Zhang, Ed.,
                    I. Minei, Ed.
        Status:     Informational
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       January 2017
        Mailbox:    zhang.xian@huawei.com, 
                    inaminei@google.com
        Pages:      24
        Characters: 58011
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-app-08.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8051

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8051

A stateful Path Computation Element (PCE) maintains information about
Label Switched Path (LSP) characteristics and resource usage within a
network in order to provide traffic-engineering calculations for its
associated Path Computation Clients (PCCs).  This document describes
general considerations for a stateful PCE deployment and examines its
applicability and benefits, as well as its challenges and
limitations, through a number of use cases.  PCE Communication
Protocol (PCEP) extensions required for stateful PCE usage are
covered in separate documents.

This document is a product of the Path Computation Element Working Group of the IETF.


INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community.
It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Thu Jan 12 15:33:41 2017
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DB641294F1 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 15:33:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tPCZWhQ-QXPc for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 15:33:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D53BB129434 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 15:33:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF2DFB81007; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 15:33:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id EEA68B81001; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 15:33:36 -0800 (PST)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20170112233336.EEA68B81001@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 15:33:36 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8001 on RSVP-TE Extensions for Collecting Shared Risk Link Group (SRLG) Information
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, teas@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8001

        Title:      RSVP-TE Extensions for Collecting Shared 
                    Risk Link Group (SRLG) Information 
        Author:     F. Zhang, Ed.,
                    O. Gonzalez de Dios, Ed.,
                    C. Margaria, M. Hartley,
                    Z. Ali
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       January 2017
        Mailbox:    zhangfatai@huawei.com, 
                    oscar.gonzalezdedios@telefonica.com, 
                    cmargaria@juniper.net, 
                    mhartley@cisco.com, 
                    zali@cisco.com
        Pages:      16
        Characters: 34732
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-08.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8001

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8001

This document provides extensions for Resource Reservation
Protocol - Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE), including GMPLS, to support
automatic collection of Shared Risk Link Group (SRLG) information for
the TE link formed by a Label Switched Path (LSP).

This document is a product of the Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Thu Jan 12 15:34:07 2017
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19B97129555 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 15:34:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fBhjkCxurNAS for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 15:34:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0DFF129434 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 15:33:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76EE7B81012; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 15:33:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 2A23AB8100D; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 15:33:50 -0800 (PST)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20170112233350.2A23AB8100D@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 15:33:50 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8041 on Use Cases and Operational Experience with Multipath TCP
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: multipathtcp@ietf.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8041

        Title:      Use Cases and Operational Experience 
                    with Multipath TCP 
        Author:     O. Bonaventure, C. Paasch, G. Detal
        Status:     Informational
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       January 2017
        Mailbox:    Olivier.Bonaventure@uclouvain.be, 
                    cpaasch@apple.com, 
                    gregory.detal@tessares.net
        Pages:      30
        Characters: 75260
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-mptcp-experience-07.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8041

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8041

This document discusses both use cases and operational experience
with Multipath TCP (MPTCP) in real networks.  It lists several
prominent use cases where Multipath TCP has been considered and is
being used.  It also gives insight to some heuristics and decisions
that have helped to realize these use cases and suggests possible
improvements.

This document is a product of the Multipath TCP Working Group of the IETF.


INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community.
It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Thu Jan 12 16:24:06 2017
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C6B412956B for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 16:24:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oBm_54E20Mh7 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 16:24:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 570E112956A for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 16:24:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 671AEB80F78; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 16:24:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 08926B80F77; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 16:24:03 -0800 (PST)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20170113002403.08926B80F77@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 16:24:03 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8036 on Applicability Statement for the Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks (RPL) in Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Networks
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, roll@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8036

        Title:      Applicability Statement for the Routing 
                    Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks 
                    (RPL) in Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) 
                    Networks 
        Author:     N. Cam-Winget, Ed.,
                    J. Hui, D. Popa
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       January 2017
        Mailbox:    ncamwing@cisco.com, 
                    jonhui@nestlabs.com, 
                    daniel.popa@itron.com
        Pages:      24
        Characters: 58383
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-roll-applicability-ami-15.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8036

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8036

This document discusses the applicability of the Routing Protocol for
Low-Power and Lossy Networks (RPL) in Advanced Metering
Infrastructure (AMI) networks.

This document is a product of the Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Tue Jan 17 13:59:27 2017
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9676E1295D1 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 13:59:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ufpNHf5jtrfD for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 13:59:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 879A21295CE for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 13:59:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC37B80154; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 13:59:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 7289EB80150; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 13:59:23 -0800 (PST)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20170117215923.7289EB80150@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 13:59:23 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8010 on Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Encoding and Transport
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8010

        Title:      Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: 
                    Encoding and Transport 
        Author:     M. Sweet, I. McDonald
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       January 2017
        Mailbox:    msweet@apple.com, 
                    blueroofmusic@gmail.com
        Pages:      51
        Characters: 115605
        Obsoletes:  RFC 2910, RFC 3382

        I-D Tag:    draft-sweet-rfc2910bis-10.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8010

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8010

The Internet Printing Protocol (IPP) is an application-level protocol
for distributed printing using Internet tools and technologies.  This
document defines the rules for encoding IPP operations, attributes,
and values into the Internet MIME media type called "application/ipp".  It
also defines the rules for transporting a message body
whose Content-Type is "application/ipp" over HTTP and/or HTTPS.  The
IPP data model and operation semantics are described in "Internet
Printing Protocol/1.1: Model and Semantics" (RFC 8011).

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Tue Jan 17 13:59:49 2017
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 092911295D9 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 13:59:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 89uUSIkLFZjt for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 13:59:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97BF91295D7 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 13:59:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38EECB80160; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 13:59:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 2FF23B8015F; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 13:59:39 -0800 (PST)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20170117215939.2FF23B8015F@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 13:59:39 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8011 on Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Model and Semantics
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8011

        Title:      Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Model and 
                    Semantics 
        Author:     M. Sweet, I. McDonald
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       January 2017
        Mailbox:    msweet@apple.com, 
                    blueroofmusic@gmail.com
        Pages:      221
        Characters: 535490
        Obsoletes:  RFC 2911, RFC 3381, RFC 3382

        I-D Tag:    draft-sweet-rfc2911bis-11.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8011

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8011

The Internet Printing Protocol (IPP) is an application-level protocol
for distributed printing using Internet tools and technologies.  This
document describes a simplified model consisting of abstract objects,
attributes, and operations that is independent of encoding and
transport.  The model consists of several objects, including Printers
and Jobs.  Jobs optionally support multiple Documents.

IPP semantics allow End Users and Operators to query Printer
capabilities; submit Print Jobs; inquire about the status of Print
Jobs and Printers; and cancel, hold, and release Print Jobs.  IPP
semantics also allow Operators to pause and resume Jobs and Printers.

Security, internationalization, and directory issues are also
addressed by the model and semantics.  The IPP message encoding and
transport are described in "Internet Printing Protocol/1.1: Encoding
and Transport" (RFC 8010).

This document obsoletes RFCs 2911, 3381, and 3382.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Tue Jan 17 14:00:10 2017
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 004D41295E7 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 14:00:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 49hXNZbhuYr1 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 14:00:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 135FF1295E1 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 14:00:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B44B0B8016A; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 14:00:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 09E96B8016A; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 13:59:59 -0800 (PST)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20170117215959.09E96B8016A@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 13:59:59 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8056 on Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) and Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Status Mapping
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, regext@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8056

        Title:      Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) and 
                    Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) Status 
                    Mapping 
        Author:     J. Gould
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       January 2017
        Mailbox:    jgould@verisign.com
        Pages:      11
        Characters: 22084
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-regext-epp-rdap-status-mapping-04.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8056

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8056

This document describes the mapping of the Extensible Provisioning
Protocol (EPP) statuses with the statuses registered for use in the
Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP).  This document identifies
gaps in the mapping, and registers RDAP statuses to fill those gaps
to ensure that all of the EPP statuses specified in RFCs are
supported in RDAP.

This document is a product of the Registration Protocols Extensions Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Fri Jan 20 08:17:36 2017
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9A7C129487 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 08:17:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kbLfSk0DvJo7 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 08:17:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 573D21296EA for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 08:17:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73990B8126E; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 08:17:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 46E44B81266; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 08:17:33 -0800 (PST)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20170120161733.46E44B81266@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 08:17:33 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8057 on Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespaces for Broadband Forum
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8057

        Title:      Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespaces 
                    for Broadband Forum 
        Author:     B. Stark, D. Sinicrope, W. Lupton
        Status:     Informational
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       January 2017
        Mailbox:    barbara.stark@att.com, 
                    david.sinicrope@ericsson.com, 
                    wlupton@broadband-forum.org
        Pages:      11
        Characters: 17889
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-bbf-bbf-urn-04.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8057

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8057

This document describes the Namespace Identifiers (NIDs) "bbf",
"broadband-forum-org", and "dslforum-org" for Uniform Resource Names
(URNs) used to identify resources published by Broadband Forum (BBF).
BBF specifies and manages resources that utilize these three URN
identification models.  Management activities for these and other
resource types are handled by BBF.


INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community.
It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Fri Jan 20 08:18:01 2017
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6EFD129C25 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 08:18:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IeuIm2PwlSdi for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 08:17:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD5FE129C1E for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 08:17:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0A58B8127B; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 08:17:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id E1653B81279; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 08:17:49 -0800 (PST)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20170120161749.E1653B81279@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 08:17:49 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8059 on PIM Join Attributes for Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) Environments
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, pim@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8059

        Title:      PIM Join Attributes for Locator/ID 
                    Separation Protocol (LISP) Environments 
        Author:     J. Arango, S. Venaas,
                    I. Kouvelas, D. Farinacci
        Status:     Experimental
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       January 2017
        Mailbox:    jearango@cisco.com, 
                    stig@cisco.com, 
                    kouvelas@arista.com, 
                    farinacci@gmail.com
        Pages:      9
        Characters: 19562
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-pim-join-attributes-for-lisp-06.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8059

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8059

This document defines two PIM Join/Prune attributes that support the
construction of multicast distribution trees where the root and
receivers are located in different Locator/ID Separation Protocol
(LISP) sites.  These attributes allow the receiver site to select
between unicast and multicast underlying transport and to convey the
RLOC (Routing Locator) address of the receiver ETR (Egress Tunnel
Router) to the control plane of the root ITR (Ingress Tunnel Router).

This document is a product of the Protocols for IP Multicast Working Group of the IETF.


EXPERIMENTAL: This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the
Internet community.  It does not specify an Internet standard of any
kind. Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested.
Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Mon Jan 23 23:06:39 2017
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6969412957A for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 23:06:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Oshq4HBIM7Z1 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 23:06:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43649129570 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 23:06:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53005B802E5; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 23:06:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 8F0A1B802B2; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 23:06:35 -0800 (PST)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20170124070635.8F0A1B802B2@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 23:06:35 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8058 on Signaling One-Click Functionality for List Email Headers
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8058

        Title:      Signaling One-Click Functionality for List 
                    Email Headers 
        Author:     J. Levine, T. Herkula
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       January 2017
        Mailbox:    standards@taugh.com, 
                    t.herkula@optivo.com
        Pages:      9
        Characters: 18219
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-levine-herkula-oneclick-10.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8058

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8058

This document describes a method for signaling a one-click function
for the List-Unsubscribe email header field.  The need for this
arises out of the actuality that mail software sometimes fetches URLs
in mail header fields, and thereby accidentally triggers
unsubscriptions in the case of the List-Unsubscribe header field.


This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Tue Jan 24 16:47:46 2017
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66DAC1295E6 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:47:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B9InIstQTB3q for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:47:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED3F01295DA for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:47:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21EAFB810F5; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:47:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 6A829B810F3; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:47:42 -0800 (PST)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20170125004742.6A829B810F3@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:47:42 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8018 on PKCS #5: Password-Based Cryptography Specification Version 2.1
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8018

        Title:      PKCS #5: Password-Based Cryptography Specification 
                    Version 2.1 
        Author:     K. Moriarty, Ed.,
                    B. Kaliski, 
                    A. Rusch
        Status:     Informational
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       January 2017
        Mailbox:    Kathleen.Moriarty@Dell.com, 
                    bkaliski@verisign.com, 
                    andreas.rusch@rsa.com
        Pages:      40
        Characters: 80887
        Obsoletes:  RFC 2898

        I-D Tag:    draft-moriarty-pkcs5-v2dot1-04.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8018

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8018

This document provides recommendations for the implementation of
password-based cryptography, covering key derivation functions,
encryption schemes, message authentication schemes, and ASN.1 syntax
identifying the techniques.

This document represents a republication of PKCS #5 v2.1 from RSA
Laboratories' Public-Key Cryptography Standards (PKCS) series.  By
publishing this RFC, change control is transferred to the IETF.

This document also obsoletes RFC 2898.


INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community.
It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Tue Jan 24 16:48:06 2017
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B729C1295FD for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:48:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KmEGPXKHbGgT for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:48:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BFDC1295F2 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:48:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9AF1B81107; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:47:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id D41B7B81105; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:47:58 -0800 (PST)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org, irtf-announce@irtf.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20170125004758.D41B7B81105@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:47:58 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8032 on Edwards-Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (EdDSA)
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, cfrg@irtf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8032

        Title:      Edwards-Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (EdDSA) 
        Author:     S. Josefsson, I. Liusvaara
        Status:     Informational
        Stream:     IRTF
        Date:       January 2017
        Mailbox:    simon@josefsson.org, 
                    ilariliusvaara@welho.com
        Pages:      60
        Characters: 103210
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-irtf-cfrg-eddsa-08.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8032

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8032

This document describes elliptic curve signature scheme Edwards-curve
Digital Signature Algorithm (EdDSA).  The algorithm is instantiated
with recommended parameters for the edwards25519 and edwards448
curves.  An example implementation and test vectors are provided.

This document is a product of the Crypto Forum Research Group of the IRTF.


INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community.
It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce, rfc-dist and IRTF-Announce lists.  To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
  https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/irtf-announce

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Tue Jan 24 16:48:24 2017
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29BB8129607 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:48:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dQKcKqlFKwkG for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:48:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BACB31295FD for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:48:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AD8DB8111C; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:48:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 004A6B8111C; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:48:14 -0800 (PST)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20170125004815.004A6B8111C@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:48:14 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8037 on CFRG Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman (ECDH) and Signatures in JSON Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE)
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, jose@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8037

        Title:      CFRG Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman (ECDH) 
                    and Signatures in JSON Object Signing 
                    and Encryption (JOSE) 
        Author:     I. Liusvaara
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       January 2017
        Mailbox:    ilariliusvaara@welho.com
        Pages:      14
        Characters: 24333
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-jose-cfrg-curves-06.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8037

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8037

This document defines how to use the Diffie-Hellman algorithms
"X25519" and "X448" as well as the signature algorithms "Ed25519" and
"Ed448" from the IRTF CFRG elliptic curves work in JSON Object
Signing and Encryption (JOSE).

This document is a product of the Javascript Object Signing and Encryption Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Tue Jan 24 17:16:46 2017
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 627DF1295F8 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 17:16:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JhG20ua_u2qZ for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 17:16:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 492EF1295F5 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 17:16:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7536AB81BF0; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 17:16:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id E666CB81BEF; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 17:16:43 -0800 (PST)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20170125011643.E666CB81BEF@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 17:16:43 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [rfc-dist] BCP 97, RFC 8067 on Updating When Standards Track Documents May Refer Normatively to Documents at a Lower Level
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        BCP 97        
        RFC 8067

        Title:      Updating When Standards Track Documents 
                    May Refer Normatively to Documents at 
                    a Lower Level 
        Author:     B. Leiba
        Status:     Best Current Practice
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       January 2017
        Mailbox:    barryleiba@computer.org
        Pages:      3
        Characters: 6215
        Updates:    RFC 3967
        See Also:   BCP 97

        I-D Tag:    draft-leiba-3967upd-downref-03.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8067

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8067

RFC 3967 specifies a process for allowing normative references to
documents at lower maturity levels ("downrefs"), which involves
calling out the downref explicitly in the Last Call notice.  That
requirement has proven to be unnecessarily strict, and this document
updates RFC 3967, allowing the IESG more flexibility in accepting
downrefs in Standards Track documents.


BCP: This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the
Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for 
improvements. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Wed Jan 25 17:29:21 2017
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63081129444 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:29:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xY57rzn6BZpf for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:29:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A97EF129439 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:29:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF6DBB80F6F; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:29:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id BFE39B80F6C; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:29:16 -0800 (PST)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20170126012916.BFE39B80F6C@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:29:16 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8044 on Data Types in RADIUS
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, radext@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8044

        Title:      Data Types in RADIUS 
        Author:     A. DeKok
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       January 2017
        Mailbox:    aland@freeradius.org
        Pages:      35
        Characters: 63324
        Updates:    RFC 2865, RFC 3162, RFC 6158, RFC 6572, RFC 7268

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-radext-datatypes-08.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8044

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8044

RADIUS specifications have used data types for two decades without
defining them as managed entities.  During this time, RADIUS
implementations have named the data types and have used them in
attribute definitions.  This document updates the specifications to
better follow established practice.  We do this by naming the data
types defined in RFC 6158, which have been used since at least the
publication of RFC 2865.  We provide an IANA registry for the data
types and update the "RADIUS Attribute Types" registry to include a
Data Type field for each attribute.  Finally, we recommend that
authors of RADIUS specifications use these types in preference to
existing practice.  This document updates RFCs 2865, 3162, 4072,
6158, 6572, and 7268.

This document is a product of the RADIUS EXTensions Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Wed Jan 25 17:29:45 2017
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A5C129445 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:29:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rqaBE8vojuAG for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:29:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B862D129448 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:29:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A7F6B80F76; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:29:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 0D98BB80F76; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:29:33 -0800 (PST)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20170126012933.0D98BB80F76@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:29:33 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8045 on RADIUS Extensions for IP Port Configuration and Reporting
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, radext@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8045

        Title:      RADIUS Extensions for IP Port 
                    Configuration and Reporting 
        Author:     D. Cheng, J. Korhonen,
                    M. Boucadair, S. Sivakumar
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       January 2017
        Mailbox:    dean.cheng@huawei.com, 
                    jouni.nospam@gmail.com, 
                    mohamed.boucadair@orange.com,
                    ssenthil@cisco.com
        Pages:      43
        Characters: 84193
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-17.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8045

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8045

This document defines three new RADIUS attributes.  For devices that
implement IP port ranges, these attributes are used to communicate
with a RADIUS server in order to configure and report IP transport
ports as well as mapping behavior for specific hosts.  This mechanism
can be used in various deployment scenarios such as Carrier-Grade
NAT, IPv4/IPv6 translators, Provider WLAN gateway, etc.  This
document defines a mapping between some RADIUS attributes and IP Flow
Information Export (IPFIX) Information Element identifiers.

This document is a product of the RADIUS EXTensions Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Wed Jan 25 17:30:13 2017
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C591129459 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:30:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f-INGDztcwOp for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:30:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF8BB129447 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:29:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3BB6B80F7E; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:29:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id A60D4B80F7D; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:29:47 -0800 (PST)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20170126012947.A60D4B80F7D@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:29:47 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8053 on HTTP Authentication Extensions for Interactive Clients
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, http-auth@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8053

        Title:      HTTP Authentication Extensions for 
                    Interactive Clients 
        Author:     Y. Oiwa, H. Watanabe,
                    H. Takagi, K. Maeda,
                    T. Hayashi, Y. Ioku
        Status:     Experimental
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       January 2017
        Mailbox:    y.oiwa@aist.go.jp, 
                    h-watanabe@aist.go.jp, 
                    takagi.hiromitsu@aist.go.jp,
                    maeda@lepidum.co.jp, 
                    hayashi@lepidum.co.jp,
                    mutual-work@ioku.org
        Pages:      28
        Characters: 62530
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-httpauth-extension-09.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8053

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8053

This document specifies extensions for the HTTP authentication
framework for interactive clients.  Currently, fundamental features
of HTTP-level authentication are insufficient for complex
requirements of various Web-based applications.  This forces these
applications to implement their own authentication frameworks by
means such as HTML forms, which becomes one of the hurdles against
introducing secure authentication mechanisms handled jointly by
servers and user agents.  The extended framework fills gaps between
Web application requirements and HTTP authentication provisions to
solve the above problems, while maintaining compatibility with
existing Web and non-Web uses of HTTP authentication.

This document is a product of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol Authentication Working Group of the IETF.


EXPERIMENTAL: This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the
Internet community.  It does not specify an Internet standard of any
kind. Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested.
Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Wed Jan 25 17:30:49 2017
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 929A612945F for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:30:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GjsiN17E-0Zu for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:30:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64294129457 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:30:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DED3B80F85; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:30:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 9C886B80F86; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:30:04 -0800 (PST)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20170126013004.9C886B80F86@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:30:04 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8054 on Network News Transfer Protocol (NNTP) Extension for Compression
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8054

        Title:      Network News Transfer Protocol (NNTP) 
                    Extension for Compression 
        Author:     K. Murchison, J. Elie
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       January 2017
        Mailbox:    murch@andrew.cmu.edu, 
                    julien@trigofacile.com
        Pages:      23
        Characters: 46113
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-murchison-nntp-compress-06.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8054

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8054

This document defines an extension to the Network News Transport
Protocol (NNTP) that allows a connection to be effectively and
efficiently compressed between an NNTP client and server.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Tue Jan 31 17:45:04 2017
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEBFB1296F4 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:45:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pHtdc31TV_5p for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:45:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C893A1296DC for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:45:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA288B81C3A; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:45:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 52CD8B81C39; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:45:01 -0800 (PST)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20170201014501.52CD8B81C39@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:45:01 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8040 on RESTCONF Protocol
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, netconf@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8040

        Title:      RESTCONF Protocol 
        Author:     A. Bierman, 
                    M. Bjorklund,
                    K. Watsen
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       January 2017
        Mailbox:    andy@yumaworks.com, 
                    mbj@tail-f.com, 
                    kwatsen@juniper.net
        Pages:      137
        Characters: 238832
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-18.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8040

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8040

This document describes an HTTP-based protocol that provides a
programmatic interface for accessing data defined in YANG, using the
datastore concepts defined in the Network Configuration Protocol
(NETCONF).

This document is a product of the Network Configuration Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Tue Jan 31 17:46:01 2017
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15D251296F5 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:46:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FXfbLzbFKMsl for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:46:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C000912970A for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:45:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E56BB81C48; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:45:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 1C5D1B81C45; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:45:19 -0800 (PST)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20170201014519.1C5D1B81C45@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:45:19 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8055 on Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Via Header Field Parameter to Indicate Received Realm
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8055

        Title:      Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Via 
                    Header Field Parameter to Indicate Received 
                    Realm 
        Author:     C. Holmberg, Y. Jiang
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       January 2017
        Mailbox:    christer.holmberg@ericsson.com, 
                    jiangyi@chinamobile.com
        Pages:      13
        Characters: 25117
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-holmberg-dispatch-received-realm-12.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8055

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8055

This specification defines a new Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
Via header field parameter, 'received-realm', which allows a SIP
entity acting as an entry point to a transit network to indicate from
which adjacent upstream network a SIP request is received by using a
network realm value associated with the adjacent network.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org
