Subject: [Roll] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-hui-6man-rpl-option-00.txt

From: JP Vasseur <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 10:01:25 +0200

Sane comment here:

If you have any comment on that simple draft, let us know by end of  
this week. Then in the absence of opposition
I'll close the ticket #21, since the draft will be discussed in 6man  
WG and will only be reference in the RPL specification.

Begin forwarded message:

> From: JP Vasseur <[email-masked]>
> Date: May 17, 2010 3:18:24 PM CEDT
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-hui-6man-rpl- 
> option-00.txt
>
> Dear all,
>
> This is to re-activate our discussion during the last IETF meetings.  
> Feed-back are very welcome since we would like to move forward as  
> soon as possible, this proposed extension is indeed critical for RPL  
> to move forward.
>
> Many Thanks.
>
> JP and Jonathan.
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: Jonathan Hui <[email-masked]>
>> Date: March 12, 2010 6:39:40 PM CEST
>> To: [email-masked]
>> Cc: "JP Vasseur (jvasseur)" <[email-masked]>
>> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-hui-6man-rpl- 
>> option-00.txt
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We are working on a new routing protocol (called RPL) within the  
>> ROLL WG targeted at low-power and lossy networks (LLNs).  Designed  
>> to operate within resource constraints typical to LLNs, RPL uses a  
>> slow proactive process to construct and maintain a routing topology  
>> but a reactive and dynamic approach to resolving routing  
>> inconsistencies.  In short, RPL is designed to utilize routing  
>> information placed within data-plane datagrams to detect routing  
>> inconsistencies.  To carry RPL routing information within a RPL  
>> routing domain, we would like to define a new IPv6 Option to be  
>> carried within the IPv6 Hop-by-Hop Option header.
>>
>> Any comments are appreciated.
>>
>>
>> Filename:	 draft-hui-6man-rpl-option
>> Revision:	 00
>> Title:		 RPL Option for Carrying RPL Information in Data-Plane  
>> Datagrams
>> Creation_date:	 2010-03-01
>> WG ID:		 Independent Submission
>> Number_of_pages: 6
>>
>> Abstract:
>> The RPL protocol requires data-plane datagrams to carry RPL routing  
>> information that is processed by RPL routers when forwarding those  
>> datagrams. This document describes the RPL option for use within a  
>> RPL domain.
>>
>> --
>> Jonathan Hui
>>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> [email-masked]
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------