Subject: [Roll] Fwd: Ticket # 25 - Tracking the MUST requirement

From: JP Vasseur <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 14:38:26 +0200

To be updated, as soon as the revision -08 will be out.

Thanks.

JP.

Begin forwarded message:

> From: JP Vasseur <[email-masked]>
> Date: March 30, 2010 12:21:28 AM CEDT
> To: Thomas Heide Clausen <[email-masked]>
> Cc: ROLL WG <[email-masked]>
> Subject: Re: [Roll] Ticket # 25 - Tracking the MUST requirement
>
> Here you are:
>
>
>
> On Mar 30, 2010, at 12:14 AM, Thomas Heide Clausen wrote:
>
>> Any chance of getting that in a format that we can read without  
>> spending several KUSD on special-purpose software?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Thomas
>> On Mar 29, 2010, at 21:31 PM, JP Vasseur wrote:
>>
>>> Dear WG,
>>>
>>> I put together a spreadsheet to track the "MUST requirements"  
>>> spelled out in our four requirements documents.
>>>
>>> To that end, I listed all MUST and used the following color code:
>>>
>>> GREEN: Satisfied requirement
>>>
>>> YELLOW: the requirement is partially satisfied and the WG thinks  
>>> that the requirement is not sufficiently satisfied.
>>>
>>> For example:
>>> Support of Point-to-Point: "The routing protocol MUST provide  
>>> routes between arbitrary hosts within the appropriate
>>> administrative domain". Strictly speaking RPL supports P2P but the  
>>> WG thinks that more work is required, thus the
>>> Yellow color
>>>
>>> RED: the requirement is not satisfied (e.g. additional mechanisms  
>>> required) or not yet done (e.g. security)
>>>
>>> PINK: the requirement is partially satisfied or non satisfied but  
>>> the WG decided that this was acceptable. It may
>>> be wise to document it.
>>>
>>> GREY: Evaluation is differed (not a show stopper for LC). For  
>>> example, it may take time to deploy a network with
>>> few dozens of thousands of nodes. Note that in this case,  
>>> simulations may help.
>>>
>>> Let's continue to work on our opened tickets and update that  
>>> spreadsheet accordingly.
>>>
>>> Note that in both the YELLOW and RED cases, RPL could not be last  
>>> called until they turn GREEN.
>>>
>>> Comments very welcome of course.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> JP.
>>>
>>> <RPL-MUST.xlsx>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Roll mailing list
>>> [email-masked]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll