From gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk Sat Oct 13 02:30:30 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rsvp-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rsvp-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB55521F853B for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 02:30:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.528 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.528 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.071, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ctM8auBVzbWK for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 02:30:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spey.erg.abdn.ac.uk (spey.erg.abdn.ac.uk [139.133.204.173]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D6F221F84F0 for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 02:30:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.erg.abdn.ac.uk (blake.erg.abdn.ac.uk [139.133.210.30]) by spey.erg.abdn.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EFC1A2B44BF; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 10:30:28 +0100 (BST) Received: from 212.159.18.54 (SquirrelMail authenticated user gorry) by www.erg.abdn.ac.uk with HTTP; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 10:30:28 +0100 Message-ID: Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 10:30:28 +0100 From: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk To: rsvp-dir@ietf.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.22 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: raft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-pcn@tools.ietf.org, carlberg@g11.org.uk Subject: [rsvp-dir] RSVP-DIR review needed - draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-pcn-03.txt X-BeenThere: rsvp-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RSVP directorate List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 09:30:31 -0000 RSVP-DIR, It would be great to have some RSVP-DIR reviews of the draft below. The author has tried to update the text to reflect the things discussed in Vancouver and it would be good to now know what still needs to be addressed from an RSVP perspective. All comments welcome. Best wishes, Gorry Fairhurst ________________________________________ http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-pcn-03.txt The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-pcn/ Diff from previous version: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-pcn-03 IETF Secretariat. From gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk Sat Oct 13 02:36:23 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rsvp-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rsvp-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E763421F842C for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 02:36:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.53 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.53 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.069, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zGNfiZAbwe3Q for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 02:36:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spey.erg.abdn.ac.uk (spey.erg.abdn.ac.uk [139.133.204.173]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A1421F8427 for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 02:36:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by spey.erg.abdn.ac.uk (Postfix, from userid 5001) id 8A9542B45EE; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 10:36:22 +0100 (BST) Received: from Gorry.local (ra-gorry.erg.abdn.ac.uk [139.133.204.42]) by spey.erg.abdn.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 70B5F2B44BF; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 10:36:21 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <50793614.4080402@erg.abdn.ac.uk> Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 10:36:20 +0100 From: Gorry Fairhurst Organization: The University of Aberdeen is a charity registered in Scotland, No SC013683. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsvp-dir@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: carlberg@g11.org.uk, draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-pcn@tools.ietf.org Subject: [rsvp-dir] RSVP-DIR review needed - draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-pcn-03.txt X-BeenThere: rsvp-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk List-Id: RSVP directorate List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 09:36:24 -0000 RSVP-DIR, It would be great to have some RSVP-DIR reviews of the draft below. The author has tried to update the text to reflect the things discussed in Vancouver and it would be good to now know what still needs to be addressed from an RSVP perspective. All comments welcome. Best wishes, Gorry Fairhurst ________________________________________ http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-pcn-03.txt The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-pcn/ Diff from previous version: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-pcn-03 From lixia@cs.ucla.edu Sat Oct 13 19:54:07 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rsvp-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rsvp-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29B6021F846C for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 19:54:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DnrWofDUsidS for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 19:54:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu (smtp.cs.ucla.edu [131.179.128.62]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F22621F846B for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 19:54:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28CAFA60014; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 19:54:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp.cs.ucla.edu Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XWsIphNalnh4; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 19:54:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.5] (cpe-98-154-13-152.socal.res.rr.com [98.154.13.152]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 10C0FA60001; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 19:54:05 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Lixia Zhang In-Reply-To: <50793614.4080402@erg.abdn.ac.uk> Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 19:54:04 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <60ADAD7D-15B6-40DD-A9A8-22588393A75B@cs.ucla.edu> References: <50793614.4080402@erg.abdn.ac.uk> To: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) Cc: carlberg@g11.org.uk, rsvp-dir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-pcn@tools.ietf.org Subject: Re: [rsvp-dir] RSVP-DIR review needed - draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-pcn-03.txt X-BeenThere: rsvp-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: RSVP directorate List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 02:54:07 -0000 On Oct 13, 2012, at 2:36 AM, Gorry Fairhurst wrote: > RSVP-DIR, >=20 > It would be great to have some RSVP-DIR reviews of the draft below. >=20 > The author has tried to update the text to reflect the things = discussed in > Vancouver and it would be good to now know what still needs to be > addressed from an RSVP perspective. All comments welcome. >=20 > Best wishes, >=20 > Gorry Fairhurst I'm between trips (home for 1 day only). Had a super quick look of the = draft and did not dive into tech details (it seems to claim "using the = procedures described in [RFC4860]" for most places anyway). I missed = Vancouver IETF, thus do not know what were the issues raised there. I = looked the diff but did not see specific tech changes. Sorry this msg is = not what you are asking for (tech issues from rsvp perspective) I assume this one is heading to experimental? I have not followed PCN work: is this type of reservation needed = anywhere? One quick (not critical) comment is that the writing seems wordy and way = long than needed. For example it does not get to exactly what is the = goal of this draft till page 3.=20 Lixia >=20 > ________________________________________ >=20 > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-pcn-03.txt >=20 >=20 > The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-pcn/ >=20 > Diff from previous version: > http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-pcn-03 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > rsvp-dir mailing list > rsvp-dir@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rsvp-dir