Subject: RE: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-bfd-intervals (ending July15)

From: Binny Jeshan <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 08:43:37 +0530

Yes, in that context I would.

Regards,
Binny.

Sent from Nokia Lumia.

-----Original Message-----
From: "Jeffrey Haas" <[email-masked]>
Sent: ‎07-‎07-‎2014 08:01 PM
To: "Binny Jeshan" <[email-masked]>
Cc: "Jeffrey Haas" <[email-masked]>; "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-bfd-intervals (ending July15)

Binny,

On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 01:07:54PM +0530, Binny Jeshan wrote:
> However, as i see that its an Informational Document, and i do remember a
> discussion about an year back to make it so.

It is.

> So, you may keep this as a guide of operators to set requirements to
> Vendors. That's it what i would look at it.

And given that context, would you support the document?

-- Jeff