Subject: S-BFD Use Cases Document Request

From: "Nobo Akiya (nobo)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 19:45:53 +0000

Hi draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case Authors,

Number of WG members feel that it is appropriate to take following action.

1) Take Section 2 from draft-akiya-bfd-seamless-alert-discrim-03, and incorporate into draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case.
2) Once (1) is done, remove Section 2 in draft-akiya-bfd-seamless-alert-discrim and reference draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case.
3) Once (1) is done, attempt to progress draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case document forward.

See http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-bfd/current/msg02407.html for email which initially stemmed this discussion.
See http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-bfd/current/msg02425.html for email which converged the direction.

If Authors of draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case have no objections, I'd like to ask the Authors of draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case to initiate the changes for (1).

Thanks!

-Nobo

---

From: Marc Binderberger <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 22:17:27 -0800

Hello Nobo et al.,

erm ... it's great to see so much energy and "drive" but can we discuss this 
a little bit further?

As I said in my reply, moving section 2 into the use-case document does make 
the alert-discrim draft less readable in my opinion.

Thanks & Regards,
Marc

On Sat, 15 Nov 2014 19:45:53 +0000, Nobo Akiya (nobo) wrote:
> 1) Take Section 2 from draft-akiya-bfd-seamless-alert-discrim-03, and 
> incorporate into draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case.
> 2) Once (1) is done, remove Section 2 in 
> draft-akiya-bfd-seamless-alert-discrim and reference 
> draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case.
> See http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-bfd/current/msg02407.html for 
> email which initially stemmed this discussion.
> If Authors of draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case have no objections, I'd like 
> to ask the Authors of draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case to initiate the 
> changes for (1).
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -Nobo
>