From nobody Sat Jul 2 06:47:00 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4646212D742; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 08:38:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.191 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.191 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DZ9rm18Wr_eA; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 08:38:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usplmg21.ericsson.net (usplmg21.ericsson.net [198.24.6.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 420F012D675; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 08:38:46 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c6180641-f796f6d000000e1e-29-57768e4586a2 Received: from EUSAAHC006.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.90]) by usplmg21.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 6E.CD.03614.54E86775; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 17:37:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from EUSAAMB103.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.120]) by EUSAAHC006.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.90]) with mapi id 14.03.0294.000; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 11:38:44 -0400 From: Gregory Mirsky To: "huubatwork@gmail.com" , "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" , "rtgwg@ietf.org" , "sfc@ietf.org" , "BIER (bier@ietf.org)" , "nvo3@ietf.org" Subject: RE: [sfc] New documents published by Overlay OAM DT Thread-Topic: [sfc] New documents published by Overlay OAM DT Thread-Index: AdGEaT578BdMGmKpSI6z+qZCjRGO1hPYO3KAAAcznfA= Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 15:38:44 +0000 Message-ID: <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF11221ABE855@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> References: <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF11221A217BD@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> <57768471.4080707@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <57768471.4080707@gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.11] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF11221ABE855eusaamb103erics_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrGIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXRPlK5rX1m4Qe9NBYtPDy8xWyydsYfJ 4tO7HSwW5yYtY7f4ueoTu8WM2ZdZLT43drJYvJ44lc3iZecGNoun8yUt1jc3MVt8/rON0eLC m9/MFs+ePmK2ePJgK7sDv8eU3xtZPSY2v2P32DnrLrvHkiU/mTyeTT/M5PG0u5klgC2KyyYl NSezLLVI3y6BK2PLiu2MBafiK45cOMfUwDgzpIuRk0NCwETizNKlTBC2mMSFe+vZuhi5OIQE jjJKTJ0yiRXCWcYoMfHnKmaQKjYBI4kXG3vYQRIiAi8ZJRafusAC4jALzGWR2DnhBDtIlbCA jUTjnOtgHSICthKt/zewQNhWEi03HoPZLAIqEvdabgDVcHDwCvhKrPvlDBIWEsiRaDr5jAkk zCmgKXF9lgBImBHouu+n1oBdyiwgLnHryXyoqwUkluw5zwxhi0q8fPyPFcJWkvj4ez47yBhm gXyJDe9UQcK8AoISJ2c+YZnAKDoLyaRZCFWzkFRBlOhILNj9iQ3C1pZYtvA1M4x95sBjJmTx BYzsqxg5SosLcnLTjQw3MQJj/5gEm+MOxr29nocYBTgYlXh4F5wrDRdiTSwrrsw9xCjBwawk wtvTVRYuxJuSWFmVWpQfX1Sak1p8iFGag0VJnFf/pWK4kEB6YklqdmpqQWoRTJaJg1OqgbFv h+g//ZrtNzttv/FMe5XX4mGkcelf7ek+vxmBPF9m/pseW7Bt1ozd39z1rdYK10ssKuzfftz8 5r20Lvf47z4KnUUdtWVZHWU7HrjoW2xUlbn751c3t/ekK8v+5/OlWPndttxY1a/SW/f3maLc iZi9f2vdclOtplmmnI6evC2UeWpJ4ryUj0osxRmJhlrMRcWJAAWTREf5AgAA Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 02 Jul 2016 06:46:59 -0700 Cc: "Ignas Bagdonas \(ibagdona@gmail.com\)" , "Carlos Pignataro \(cpignata\) \(cpignata@cisco.com\)" , "Erik Nordmark \(nordmark@sonic.net\)" , "dekumar@cisco.com" , "Petr Lapukhov \(petr@fb.com\)" , "Alia Atlas \(akatlas@gmail.com\)" , "David Mozes \(davidm@mellanox.com\)" X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 15:38:51 -0000 --_000_7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF11221ABE855eusaamb103erics_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Huub, thank you for your interest in these documents and the questions. Frankly, I don't have an example of passive FM among ITEF-developed OAM too= ls. Distinction between proactive and on-demand may be subjective if we conside= r how a Measurement Agent from LMAP framework executes measurement tasks, i= .e. performs PM operation, based on pre-defined schedule. Is that proactive= or on-demand PM operation? Perhaps such distinction is unnecessary but we = used these categories because traditionally we refer to ping and traceroute= to be on-demand while BFD as proactive OAM. What would you suggest? Regards, Greg From: Huub van Helvoort [mailto:huubatwork@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 01, 2016 7:56 AM To: Gregory Mirsky; rtg-bfd@ietf.org; rtgwg@ietf.org; sfc@ietf.org; BIER (b= ier@ietf.org); nvo3@ietf.org Cc: Ignas Bagdonas (ibagdona@gmail.com); Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) (cpign= ata@cisco.com); Erik Nordmark (nordmark@sonic.net); dekumar@cisco.com; Petr= Lapukhov (petr@fb.com); santosh.pallagatti@gmail.com; Alia Atlas (akatlas@= gmail.com); Nagendra Kumar (naikumar) (naikumar@cisco.com); David Mozes (da= vidm@mellanox.com) Subject: Re: [sfc] New documents published by Overlay OAM DT Dear Greg, You wrote: the design team had published two documents: * Overlay OAM Requirements https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ooamdt= -rtgwg-ooam-requirement-00 * OAM for Overlay Networks: Gap Analysis https://tools.ietf.org/htm= l/draft-ooamdt-rtgwg-oam-gap-analysis-00 Both documents have subsections pro-active and on-demand for FM but active and passive for PM. Why is there no distinction made for active and passive FM, and pro-active and on-demand for PM? Best regards, Huub. -- =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Always remember that you are unique...just like everyone else... --_000_7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF11221ABE855eusaamb103erics_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Huub,

thank you for your int= erest in these documents and the questions.

Frankly, I don’t= have an example of passive FM among ITEF-developed OAM tools.

Distinction between pr= oactive and on-demand may be subjective if we consider how a Measurement Ag= ent from LMAP framework executes measurement tasks, i.e. performs PM operat= ion, based on pre-defined schedule. Is that proactive or on-demand PM operation? Perhaps such distinction is u= nnecessary but we used these categories because traditionally we refer to p= ing and traceroute to be on-demand while BFD as proactive OAM.

What would you suggest= ?

 

   &nbs= p;            Regard= s,

   &nbs= p;            &= nbsp;           &nbs= p;   Greg

 

From: Huub van Helvoort [mailto:huubatwork@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2016 7:56 AM
To: Gregory Mirsky; rtg-bfd@ietf.org; rtgwg@ietf.org; sfc@ietf.org; = BIER (bier@ietf.org); nvo3@ietf.org
Cc: Ignas Bagdonas (ibagdona@gmail.com); Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)= (cpignata@cisco.com); Erik Nordmark (nordmark@sonic.net); dekumar@cisco.co= m; Petr Lapukhov (petr@fb.com); santosh.pallagatti@gmail.com; Alia Atlas (a= katlas@gmail.com); Nagendra Kumar (naikumar) (naikumar@cisco.com); David Mozes (davidm@mellanox.com)
Subject: Re: [sfc] New documents published by Overlay OAM DT

 

Dear Greg,

You wrote:

the design team had published two documents:

·         Overlay OAM Requirements https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ooamdt-rtgwg-ooam-requirement-00=

·         OAM for Overlay Networks: Gap Analysis https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ooamdt-rtgwg-oam-gap-analysis-00=


Both documents have subsections pro-active and on-demand for FM
but active and passive for PM.

Why is there no distinction made for active and passive FM,
and pro-active and on-demand for PM?

Best regards, Huub.



-- 
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Always remember that you are unique...just like everyone else...<=
/o:p>
--_000_7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF11221ABE855eusaamb103erics_-- From nobody Sat Jul 2 06:47:17 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2200412D146; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 07:55:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.976 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.723, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xgtai-gQlPNQ; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 07:55:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wm0-x231.google.com (mail-wm0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7114B12B061; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 07:55:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm0-x231.google.com with SMTP id v199so29912608wmv.0; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 07:55:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:reply-to :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=bNj4hwH8+sxoF0ient0FGt8ID7dQmgSWp7mDJqMSjY4=; b=sYUqST3VpErVdTOEu9xFo17tX60HEOlTcI3N95DvYvGJYv7bT3vfwp6bSIgodDd6lU 54tfVLjbV6xvZpUWw9SbxYEwemMPaxXpxPaLG3J1dr/DJ73usSQw6s+FUZNcOigBEl/5 YnI07yyGAjbq6wC9k2auO+K29W2Gmbe7WnAd9azR2KU3t6y8fhp9/HZ4HGyviBZbTbQ1 rwFEN1fZYh8/+d13H53J8RZWwqT04W0SlCOF8flXRaxC0twQ0sZ+AgEIk0ILLbvHfQvv HnnpjKaCoBL2AOtV/7anfqMXmNUpB+0/xSXUE+GVJLMyHrEca4GpNqLPvP6as9cMTHZy Fs1g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from :reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bNj4hwH8+sxoF0ient0FGt8ID7dQmgSWp7mDJqMSjY4=; b=DS05DHZS3xhCCMK4N7MauRJcEVKakeSvyjnjlRxlxXidWNwPM+uATPXYSGX+7Oxjbz EDHxvfOFad/5PwM7nARoZoFvaFfkMOVXPcZmQaHflZM8GgMH2hcifIbi/3ExfvbEDoIz fnaSoivfV92QMFRSJjFdLuhR6LSeDKsEh2dAnlSS84W9aLdDgMT9j0cQ5iP0UuxJStIy dMyN0U2GQbVs7ltWNi+O0q9Afzz1mox2hbLZvUhmx2pUyCKF++L4id1bf+t+TQmolPVF XrAe5bGVER2G1NWGdJokiio/CtGH3onqRBhkZA16vmNu/wqT4DfkvcFm3R02O8jz6TLo rlAQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLV+SdMiUm8xKa4oiET9BAHgA/GV1M69QBhXSX4LDaWm9KCXODoZNs55p90Ggti/A== X-Received: by 10.194.43.131 with SMTP id w3mr4040750wjl.76.1467384947899; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 07:55:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from McAsterix.local ([92.109.37.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t188sm6844451wma.8.2016.07.01.07.55.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 01 Jul 2016 07:55:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <57768471.4080707@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 16:55:45 +0200 From: Huub van Helvoort User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gregory Mirsky , "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" , "rtgwg@ietf.org" , "sfc@ietf.org" , "BIER (bier@ietf.org)" , "nvo3@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [sfc] New documents published by Overlay OAM DT References: <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF11221A217BD@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> In-Reply-To: <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF11221A217BD@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 02 Jul 2016 06:47:15 -0700 Cc: "Ignas Bagdonas \(ibagdona@gmail.com\)" , "Carlos Pignataro \(cpignata\) \(cpignata@cisco.com\)" , "Erik Nordmark \(nordmark@sonic.net\)" , "dekumar@cisco.com" , "Petr Lapukhov \(petr@fb.com\)" , "Alia Atlas \(akatlas@gmail.com\)" , "David Mozes \(davidm@mellanox.com\)" X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: huubatwork@gmail.com List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 14:55:51 -0000
Dear Greg,

You wrote:

the design team had published two documents:

·         Overlay OAM Requirements https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ooamdt-rtgwg-ooam-requirement-00

·         OAM for Overlay Networks: Gap Analysis https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ooamdt-rtgwg-oam-gap-analysis-00


Both documents have subsections pro-active and on-demand for FM
but active and passive for PM.

Why is there no distinction made for active and passive FM,
and pro-active and on-demand for PM?

Best regards, Huub.


-- 
================================================================
Always remember that you are unique...just like everyone else...
From nobody Thu Jul 7 06:33:18 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietf.org Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1B9612D4FB; Thu, 7 Jul 2016 06:33:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-yang-02.txt X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.25.1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20160707133313.23662.54890.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 06:33:13 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: rtg-bfd@ietf.org X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 13:33:14 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Bidirectional Forwarding Detection of the IETF. Title : Yang Data Model for Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) Authors : Lianshu Zheng Reshad Rahman Santosh Pallagatti Mahesh Jethanandani Greg Mirsky Filename : draft-ietf-bfd-yang-02.txt Pages : 50 Date : 2016-07-07 Abstract: This document defines a YANG data model that can be used to configure and manage Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD). The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-yang/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfd-yang-02 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bfd-yang-02 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Fri Jul 8 00:56:36 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAFC712D5B8 for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 00:56:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.946 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.946 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fEGubfgp4tzW for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 00:56:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17DF212D13E for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 00:56:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1693; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1467964587; x=1469174187; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:mime-version; bh=hvPlxVu8iNEjaTFv8tPKTAQwhMIDebnst0xRYT4InQY=; b=HI95K9fFgzUj2g1VXnD3gWoTNPntlpOwdQUfkcElNthJv/U9JKxp9lkL V93KnrE7xnlokl3DjPOimWKx2e+E9FsHJxGmSRAW+Be5wsK+UiMPoqhaH J+ENM7Vjb9ULz3/xOKsEbTYXQzBygRx9PIX3w6rJGout1etTKEwehd/Nd g=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DHCQApXH9X/xbLJq1bhBQqUrQUgnWEC?= =?us-ascii?q?iKHcQEBAQEBAWYnhEMzdAE+Al8BDAYCAQGILA6tRo9GAQEBBwEBAQEjhieBeAi?= =?us-ascii?q?KD4JaBYFFl0+OTYlNhV+QDVSDczoyAYkVAQEB?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,328,1464652800"; d="scan'208,217";a="636609792" Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Jul 2016 07:56:24 +0000 Received: from [10.60.67.84] (ams-bclaise-8913.cisco.com [10.60.67.84]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u687uOCS023023; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 07:56:24 GMT To: draft-ietf-bfd-yang@tools.ietf.org, "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" From: Benoit Claise Subject: draft-ietf-bfd-yang: YANG compilation warning Message-ID: <8dc85677-6473-9d0d-a663-76362f3a20c0@cisco.com> Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 09:56:25 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------50E7405335EF0D571E21D9A9" Archived-At: X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 07:56:31 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------50E7405335EF0D571E21D9A9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear authors, Thanks for you new draft version 2. Just one compilation warning for ietf-bfd-ip-sh@2016-07-04.yang: ietf-bfd-ip-sh@2016-07-04.yang:1: warning: unexpected latest revision "2016-01-04" in ietf-bfd-ip-sh@2016-07-04.yang, should be 2016-07-04 See http://www.claise.be/IETFYANGPageCompilation.html for the details. Regards, Benoit --------------50E7405335EF0D571E21D9A9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear authors,

Thanks for you new draft version 2.
Just one compilation warning for ietf-bfd-ip-sh@2016-07-04.yang:
ietf-bfd-ip-sh@2016-07-04.yang:1: warning: unexpected latest revision "2016-01-04" in ietf-bfd-ip-sh@2016-07-04.yang, should be 2016-07-04
See http://www.claise.be/IETFYANGPageCompilation.html for the details.

Regards, Benoit

--------------50E7405335EF0D571E21D9A9-- From nobody Fri Jul 8 06:05:15 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietf.org Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A04A612D681; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 06:05:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-yang-03.txt X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.25.1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20160708130509.32109.81561.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 06:05:09 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: rtg-bfd@ietf.org X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 13:05:09 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Bidirectional Forwarding Detection of the IETF. Title : Yang Data Model for Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) Authors : Lianshu Zheng Reshad Rahman Santosh Pallagatti Mahesh Jethanandani Greg Mirsky Filename : draft-ietf-bfd-yang-03.txt Pages : 50 Date : 2016-07-08 Abstract: This document defines a YANG data model that can be used to configure and manage Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD). The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-yang/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfd-yang-03 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bfd-yang-03 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Fri Jul 8 06:06:37 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C342F12B03A for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 06:06:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.946 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.946 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UbSAR7ZWyUSh for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 06:06:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1DF712D18A for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 06:06:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5234; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1467983192; x=1469192792; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=Q3KdNIdE9ut6/FJ2sKgwv1N//bk5Vr6TylJoew8M/Jo=; b=Fd3otsi7RskEkH/oSHBrbIy4T3MpQaxKzn3HrIK478+sCOwsMUs3zmGu 2g3kLY6zs0oIxnvu0aGbFYf9MHSwjq8urB2tLUd86tp6giDix0Qi9JaG8 E1N1ROxN8OimY4S9TSuZo0+ulM6dGigVQnTMgjJ1dShL5zfMGnHqpsbto o=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BhBgAepH9X/4kNJK1bgnBOVnwGrHmHE?= =?us-ascii?q?YJ1hAoihXYCgS08EAEBAQEBAQFlJ4RMAQEFgQkCAQgRAwECKAchERQJCAIEARK?= =?us-ascii?q?IFgMXDrkaDYQmAQEBAQEBAQMBAQEBAQEBIIYnhE2CQ4IehTsFgUWMd4UehQY0A?= =?us-ascii?q?Yw6ghSPLIgah3MBNR+DcW4BiDIBfgEBAQ?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,330,1464652800"; d="scan'208,217";a="293444836" Received: from alln-core-4.cisco.com ([173.36.13.137]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 08 Jul 2016 13:06:31 +0000 Received: from XCH-RCD-010.cisco.com (xch-rcd-010.cisco.com [173.37.102.20]) by alln-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u68D6VR0016241 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 8 Jul 2016 13:06:31 GMT Received: from xch-rcd-005.cisco.com (173.37.102.15) by XCH-RCD-010.cisco.com (173.37.102.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 08:06:31 -0500 Received: from xch-rcd-005.cisco.com ([173.37.102.15]) by XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com ([173.37.102.15]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 08:06:31 -0500 From: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" To: "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" , "draft-ietf-bfd-yang@tools.ietf.org" , "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" Subject: Re: draft-ietf-bfd-yang: YANG compilation warning Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-bfd-yang: YANG compilation warning Thread-Index: AQHR2O5DX/yh8P/Y4Um2q3m7QtYbM6AOkfoA Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 13:06:31 +0000 Message-ID: References: <8dc85677-6473-9d0d-a663-76362f3a20c0@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <8dc85677-6473-9d0d-a663-76362f3a20c0@cisco.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.5.160527 x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [161.44.212.133] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D3A51D6517EE1Arrahmanciscocom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 13:06:36 -0000 --_000_D3A51D6517EE1Arrahmanciscocom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Uploaded -03 to fix this. Regards, Reshad. From: "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" > Date: Friday, July 8, 2016 at 3:56 AM To: "draft-ietf-bfd-yang@tools.ietf.org" >, "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" > Subject: draft-ietf-bfd-yang: YANG compilation warning Resent-From: >, > Resent-To: >, Reshad >, >, >, >, > Resent-Date: Friday, July 8, 2016 at 3:56 AM Dear authors, Thanks for you new draft version 2. Just one compilation warning for ietf-bfd-ip-sh@2016-07-04.yang: ietf-bfd-ip-sh@2016-07-04.yang:1: = warning: unexpected latest revision "2016-01-04" in ietf-bfd-ip-sh@2016-07-= 04.yang, should be 2016-07-04 See http://www.claise.be/IETFYANGPageCompilation.html for the details. Regards, Benoit --_000_D3A51D6517EE1Arrahmanciscocom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-ID: <7F10028FB3709344AD7A0BEC2A6DBB65@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Uploaded –03 to fix this.

Regards,
Reshad.

From: "Benoit Claise (bclaise)= " <bclaise@cisco.com> Date: Friday, July 8, 2016 at 3:56 = AM
To: "draft-ietf-bfd-yang@tools.ietf.org" &= lt;draft-ietf-bfd-yan= g@tools.ietf.org>, "rtg-bfd= @ietf.org" <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
Subject: draft-ietf-bfd-yang: YANG = compilation warning
Resent-From: <alias-bounces@ietf.org>, <bclaise@cisco.com>
Resent-To: <vero.zheng@huawei.com>, Reshad <rrahman@cisco.com>, <mjethanandani@gmail.com>, <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>, <santosh.pallagatti@gma= il.com>, <draft-i= etf-bfd-yang@ietf.org>
Resent-Date: Friday, July 8, 2016 a= t 3:56 AM

Dear authors,

Thanks for you new draft version 2.
Just one compilation warning for ietf-bfd-ip-sh@2016-07-04.yang:
ietf-bfd-ip-sh@2016-07-04.yang:1: warning: unex= pected latest revision "2016-01-04" in ietf-bfd-ip-sh@2016-07-04.yang, should be 2016-07-04
See http://www.claise.be/IETFYANGPageCompilation.html for the details.

Regards, Benoit

 --_000_D3A51D6517EE1Arrahmanciscocom_-- From nobody Tue Jul 12 17:48:10 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F06DD12D0E1; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:48:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -103.889 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.889 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FviA3Mom4H3X; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:48:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C5C712D66D; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:48:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 65EE6B81336; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:48:04 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Subject: RFC 7880 on Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (S-BFD) X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20160713004804.65EE6B81336@rfc-editor.org> Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:48:04 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Cc: rtg-bfd@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 00:48:06 -0000 A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 7880 Title: Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (S-BFD) Author: C. Pignataro, D. Ward, N. Akiya, M. Bhatia, S. Pallagatti Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: July 2016 Mailbox: cpignata@cisco.com, wardd@cisco.com, nobo.akiya.dev@gmail.com, manav@ionosnetworks.com, santosh.pallagatti@gmail.com Pages: 24 Characters: 45987 Updates: RFC 5880 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-base-11.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7880 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17487/RFC7880 This document defines Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (S-BFD), a simplified mechanism for using BFD with a large proportion of negotiation aspects eliminated, thus providing benefits such as quick provisioning, as well as improved control and flexibility for network nodes initiating path monitoring. This document updates RFC 5880. This document is a product of the Bidirectional Forwarding Detection Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC From nobody Tue Jul 12 17:48:32 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C9EA12DB38; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:48:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -103.889 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.889 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fs91QFMqtVPQ; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:48:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26D8012DB40; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:48:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id D5F73B8133E; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:48:21 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Subject: RFC 7881 on Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (S-BFD) for IPv4, IPv6, and MPLS X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20160713004821.D5F73B8133E@rfc-editor.org> Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:48:21 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rtg-bfd@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 00:48:31 -0000 A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 7881 Title: Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (S-BFD) for IPv4, IPv6, and MPLS Author: C. Pignataro, D. Ward, N. Akiya Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: July 2016 Mailbox: cpignata@cisco.com, wardd@cisco.com, nobo.akiya.dev@gmail.com Pages: 8 Characters: 16352 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-ip-06.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7881 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17487/RFC7881 This document defines procedures for using Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (S-BFD) in IPv4, IPv6, and MPLS environments. This document is a product of the Bidirectional Forwarding Detection Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC From nobody Tue Jul 12 17:48:52 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63CA012DB53; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:48:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -103.889 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.889 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cV3nW8x2WzDt; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:48:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEF0912DB38; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:48:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id B5D57B81347; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:48:37 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Subject: RFC 7882 on Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (S-BFD) Use Cases X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20160713004837.B5D57B81347@rfc-editor.org> Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 17:48:37 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Cc: rtg-bfd@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 00:48:47 -0000 A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 7882 Title: Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (S-BFD) Use Cases Author: S. Aldrin, C. Pignataro, G. Mirsky, N. Kumar Status: Informational Stream: IETF Date: July 2016 Mailbox: aldrin.ietf@gmail.com, cpignata@cisco.com, gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com, naikumar@cisco.com Pages: 15 Characters: 35774 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-use-case-08.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7882 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17487/RFC7882 This document describes various use cases for Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (S-BFD) and provides requirements such that protocol mechanisms allow for simplified detection of forwarding failures. These use cases support S-BFD, which is a simplified mechanism for using BFD with a large proportion of negotiation aspects eliminated, accelerating the establishment of a BFD session. The benefits of S-BFD include quick provisioning, as well as improved control and flexibility for network nodes initiating path monitoring. This document is a product of the Bidirectional Forwarding Detection Working Group of the IETF. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC From nobody Wed Jul 13 00:08:33 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98D3A12B028 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 00:08:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.189 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.189 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zgVjJ05T3Z1d for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 00:08:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DC13128E19 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 00:08:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5CF8E1E3C4; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 03:08:54 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 03:08:54 -0400 From: Jeffrey Haas To: rtg-bfd@ietf.org Subject: Re: RFC 7880 on Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (S-BFD) Message-ID: <20160713070854.GS3711@pfrc.org> References: <20160713004804.65EE6B81336@rfc-editor.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160713004804.65EE6B81336@rfc-editor.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Archived-At: X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 07:08:31 -0000 Congratulations to the working group on RFCs 7880-7886 for Seamless BFD. This wraps up a very large bit of Working Group work. -- Jeff On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 05:48:04PM -0700, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org wrote: > A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. > > > RFC 7880 > > Title: Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (S-BFD) > Author: C. Pignataro, D. Ward, > N. Akiya, M. Bhatia, S. Pallagatti > Status: Standards Track > Stream: IETF > Date: July 2016 > Mailbox: cpignata@cisco.com, > wardd@cisco.com, > nobo.akiya.dev@gmail.com, > manav@ionosnetworks.com, > santosh.pallagatti@gmail.com > Pages: 24 > Characters: 45987 > Updates: RFC 5880 > > I-D Tag: draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-base-11.txt > > URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7880 > > DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17487/RFC7880 > > This document defines Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection > (S-BFD), a simplified mechanism for using BFD with a large proportion > of negotiation aspects eliminated, thus providing benefits such as > quick provisioning, as well as improved control and flexibility for > network nodes initiating path monitoring. > > This document updates RFC 5880. > > This document is a product of the Bidirectional Forwarding Detection Working Group of the IETF. > > This is now a Proposed Standard. > > STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track > protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions > for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official > Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the > standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this > memo is unlimited. > > This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. > To subscribe or unsubscribe, see > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce > https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist > > For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search > For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk > > Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the > author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless > specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for > unlimited distribution. > > > The RFC Editor Team > Association Management Solutions, LLC > From nobody Wed Jul 13 02:35:35 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3951D12D74F for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 02:35:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.189 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.189 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4eV2iMfNT414 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 02:35:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9FE912B019 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 02:35:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 371A51E3C4; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 05:35:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 05:35:52 -0400 From: Jeffrey Haas To: rtg-bfd@ietf.org Subject: IETF 96 - Agenda Message-ID: <20160713093551.GB4358@pfrc.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Archived-At: X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 09:35:34 -0000 Working Group, A tentative agenda has been posted: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/96/agenda/bfd/ -- Jeff From nobody Mon Jul 18 19:24:41 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B86412D0AA; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 19:24:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.808 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.808 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gv64iaBD_6mU; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 19:24:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E589A12D0A4; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 19:24:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2678; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1468895076; x=1470104676; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=QqExr/8hjPJDTSq91Br1CY6gG+iu9PZ0/WjVmkY05t0=; b=SfAxcGZSwbeI7IqRWmz+iCAx2noiY0aESTa1MCdCOKDj5rirw0ZwIoOy 6FcL6sZkpCxgvvziIBVQlOma+F1pNo8wrC6RXCcr9MCMPVKsZYIsBQjsf HHdnn4q8xWRZCPDZ0pcx8mt4lrf5D750I2t19acxBHPoUVBYLxjYaQFYy c=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CEAgDdjo1X/4UNJK1bgz9WfAa4YYF6I?= =?us-ascii?q?oV4AhyBGzgUAQEBAQEBAWUnhFwBAQUjEUMCDAQCAQgRBAEBAwIjAwICAjAUAQg?= =?us-ascii?q?IAgQBDQUIiCgOr22ODwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARyBAYUphE2HQYJaB?= =?us-ascii?q?Y4LixkBhhKIRYFyToQLiHOQHQEeNoNzbgGGe38BAQE?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,387,1464652800"; d="scan'208";a="130164875" Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 19 Jul 2016 02:24:35 +0000 Received: from XCH-RCD-018.cisco.com (xch-rcd-018.cisco.com [173.37.102.28]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u6J2OZqb031496 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 19 Jul 2016 02:24:35 GMT Received: from xch-rcd-020.cisco.com (173.37.102.30) by XCH-RCD-018.cisco.com (173.37.102.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 21:24:35 -0500 Received: from xch-rcd-020.cisco.com ([173.37.102.30]) by XCH-RCD-020.cisco.com ([173.37.102.30]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 21:24:35 -0500 From: "Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi)" To: "bess@ietf.org" , "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" , "mpls@ietf.org" Subject: RE: New Version Notification for draft-gmsm-bess-evpn-bfd-00.txt Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-gmsm-bess-evpn-bfd-00.txt Thread-Index: AQHR14OkSoSUTH6fiECcys2OUSg506AfGXbQ Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 02:24:35 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20160706124054.7765.88133.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20160706124054.7765.88133.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.24.33.206] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "Ali Sajassi \(sajassi\)" X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 02:24:39 -0000 SGVsbG8gYWxsLA0KICBkcmFmdC1nbXNtLWJlc3MtZXZwbi1iZmQtMDAudHh0IHdhcyBwcmVzZW50 ZWQgYnkgR3JlZyBNaXJza3kgYXQgSUVURiA5NiBNUExTIFdHIGFuZCBpcyBzY2hlZHVsZWQgZm9y IHByZXNlbnRhdGlvbiBhdCBCRVNTIGFuZCBCRkQgV0cgbWVldGluZ3MuIEF1dGhvcnMgcmVxdWVz dCBjb21tZW50cy8gc3VnZ2VzdGlvbnMgb24gdGhpcyBkcmFmdC4NClRoYW5rcw0KUHJhc2FkDQoN Ci0tLS0tT3JpZ2luYWwgTWVzc2FnZS0tLS0tDQpGcm9tOiBpbnRlcm5ldC1kcmFmdHNAaWV0Zi5v cmcgW21haWx0bzppbnRlcm5ldC1kcmFmdHNAaWV0Zi5vcmddIA0KU2VudDogV2VkbmVzZGF5LCBK dWx5IDA2LCAyMDE2IDY6MTEgUE0NClRvOiBNQUxMSUsgTVVESUdPTkRBIChtbXVkaWdvbikgPG1t dWRpZ29uQGNpc2NvLmNvbT47IE1BTExJSyBNVURJR09OREEgKG1tdWRpZ29uKSA8bW11ZGlnb25A Y2lzY28uY29tPjsgR3JlZyBNaXJza3kgPGdyZWdvcnkubWlyc2t5QGVyaWNzc29uLmNvbT47IFZl bmdhZGEgUHJhc2FkIEdvdmluZGFuICh2ZW5nZ292aSkgPHZlbmdnb3ZpQGNpc2NvLmNvbT47IEdy ZWdvcnkgTWlyc2t5IDxncmVnb3J5Lm1pcnNreUBlcmljc3Nvbi5jb20+OyBBbGkgU2FqYXNzaSAo c2FqYXNzaSkgPHNhamFzc2lAY2lzY28uY29tPg0KU3ViamVjdDogTmV3IFZlcnNpb24gTm90aWZp Y2F0aW9uIGZvciBkcmFmdC1nbXNtLWJlc3MtZXZwbi1iZmQtMDAudHh0DQoNCg0KQSBuZXcgdmVy c2lvbiBvZiBJLUQsIGRyYWZ0LWdtc20tYmVzcy1ldnBuLWJmZC0wMC50eHQgaGFzIGJlZW4gc3Vj Y2Vzc2Z1bGx5IHN1Ym1pdHRlZCBieSBWZW5nYWRhIFByYXNhZCBHb3ZpbmRhbiBhbmQgcG9zdGVk IHRvIHRoZSBJRVRGIHJlcG9zaXRvcnkuDQoNCk5hbWU6CQlkcmFmdC1nbXNtLWJlc3MtZXZwbi1i ZmQNClJldmlzaW9uOgkwMA0KVGl0bGU6CQlGYXVsdCBNYW5hZ2VtZW50IGZvciBFVlBOIG5ldHdv cmtzDQpEb2N1bWVudCBkYXRlOgkyMDE2LTA3LTA2DQpHcm91cDoJCUluZGl2aWR1YWwgU3VibWlz c2lvbg0KUGFnZXM6CQkxMA0KVVJMOiAgICAgICAgICAgIGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL2lu dGVybmV0LWRyYWZ0cy9kcmFmdC1nbXNtLWJlc3MtZXZwbi1iZmQtMDAudHh0DQpTdGF0dXM6ICAg ICAgICAgaHR0cHM6Ly9kYXRhdHJhY2tlci5pZXRmLm9yZy9kb2MvZHJhZnQtZ21zbS1iZXNzLWV2 cG4tYmZkLw0KSHRtbGl6ZWQ6ICAgICAgIGh0dHBzOi8vdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmcvaHRtbC9kcmFm dC1nbXNtLWJlc3MtZXZwbi1iZmQtMDANCg0KDQpBYnN0cmFjdDoNCiAgIFRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQg cHJvcG9zZXMgYSBwcm9hY3RpdmUsIGluLWJhbmQgbmV0d29yayBPQU0gbWVjaGFuaXNtIHRvDQog ICBkZXRlY3QgbG9zcyBvZiBjb250aW51aXR5IGFuZCBtaXNzLWNvbm5lY3Rpb24gZmF1bHRzIHRo YXQgYWZmZWN0DQogICB1bmljYXN0IGFuZCBtdWx0aS1kZXN0aW5hdGlvbiBwYXRocywgdXNlZCBi eSBCcm9hZGNhc3QsIHVua25vd24NCiAgIFVuaWNhc3QgYW5kIE11bHRpY2FzdCB0cmFmZmljLCBp biBhbiBFVlBOIG5ldHdvcmsuICBUaGUgbWVjaGFuaXNtcw0KICAgcHJvcG9zZWQgaW4gdGhlIGRy YWZ0IHVzZSB0aGUgcHJpbmNpcGxlcyBvZiB0aGUgd2lkZWx5IGFkb3B0ZWQNCiAgIEJpZGlyZWN0 aW9uYWwgRm9yd2FyZGluZyBEZXRlY3Rpb24gcHJvdG9jb2wuDQoNCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICANCg0KDQpQbGVhc2Ugbm90ZSB0aGF0IGl0IG1heSB0YWtlIGEgY291cGxlIG9mIG1p bnV0ZXMgZnJvbSB0aGUgdGltZSBvZiBzdWJtaXNzaW9uIHVudGlsIHRoZSBodG1saXplZCB2ZXJz aW9uIGFuZCBkaWZmIGFyZSBhdmFpbGFibGUgYXQgdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmcuDQoNClRoZSBJRVRG IFNlY3JldGFyaWF0DQoNCg== From nobody Thu Jul 21 05:39:16 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0FE412DA63; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 05:39:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.808 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.808 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DMKZ8kAHJ5ZW; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 05:39:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04B2F12DA18; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 05:39:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2752; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1469104748; x=1470314348; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=4zhsmLmN1NqbnKq4kAKDaSR+DOC0Pn1Omp4LoxhbXzA=; b=AbxD/jstpHX7Wjrnq/oc1JVt9Q8Xi2QJhCbG5U4EyeK32s/7Gt4FYZAr ROKzr4DdAcdptNXT1qoCqxLTXg51pFj81b9QRAh/mLvJEU5ckzQpgXGdC jOdKkXJE69n4hKYs9jX/z57XGwpGKotrW1AAmQvtl4qEYssmKgTn3QJcG A=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AmAgD4wZBX/5pdJa1dgz9WfAa4XoF7I?= =?us-ascii?q?oV4AoEtOBQBAQEBAQEBZSeEXAEBBXcCDAQCAQgRBAEBKAcyFAkIAgQBDQWIMA6?= =?us-ascii?q?9AwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARyGKoRNihsBBI4MOYphAYYViFWBbE6EC?= =?us-ascii?q?4h1kCABHjaDc24Bhk5/AQEB?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,399,1464652800"; d="scan'208";a="128368079" Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Jul 2016 12:39:07 +0000 Received: from XCH-ALN-016.cisco.com (xch-aln-016.cisco.com [173.36.7.26]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u6LCd767012483 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 21 Jul 2016 12:39:07 GMT Received: from xch-rcd-005.cisco.com (173.37.102.15) by XCH-ALN-016.cisco.com (173.36.7.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 07:39:06 -0500 Received: from xch-rcd-005.cisco.com ([173.37.102.15]) by XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com ([173.37.102.15]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 07:39:06 -0500 From: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" To: "Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi)" , "bess@ietf.org" , "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" , "mpls@ietf.org" Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-gmsm-bess-evpn-bfd-00.txt Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-gmsm-bess-evpn-bfd-00.txt Thread-Index: AQHR14OkSoSUTH6fiECcys2OUSg506AfGXbQgARGo4A= Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 12:39:06 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20160706124054.7765.88133.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.5.160527 x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.86.240.53] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "Ali Sajassi \(sajassi\)" , "draft-gmsm-bess-evpn-bfd@ietf.org" X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 12:39:11 -0000 Hi, Some questions on the draft: - Section 4 mentions that LSP-Ping is needed to exchange discriminators because the MPLS label stack doesn=B9t contain enough information to disambiguate the sender of the session. Isn=B9t the IP hdr enough? - Section 7.1.1 mentions SH label, I believe this is the ESI label as per section 8.3 of RFC7432? - There are alternative encapsulation formats with sub-TLVs for unicast and multicast. Is it an alternative to the label stack or on top of the label stack? Even if obvious, I think the advantage of those alternative formats should be stated. Regards, Reshad. On 2016-07-19, 4:24 AM, "Rtg-bfd on behalf of Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi)" wrote: >Hello all, > draft-gmsm-bess-evpn-bfd-00.txt was presented by Greg Mirsky at IETF 96 >MPLS WG and is scheduled for presentation at BESS and BFD WG meetings. >Authors request comments/ suggestions on this draft. >Thanks >Prasad > >-----Original Message----- >From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org] >Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2016 6:11 PM >To: MALLIK MUDIGONDA (mmudigon) ; MALLIK MUDIGONDA >(mmudigon) ; Greg Mirsky >; Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi) >; Gregory Mirsky ; Ali >Sajassi (sajassi) >Subject: New Version Notification for draft-gmsm-bess-evpn-bfd-00.txt > > >A new version of I-D, draft-gmsm-bess-evpn-bfd-00.txt has been >successfully submitted by Vengada Prasad Govindan and posted to the IETF >repository. > >Name: draft-gmsm-bess-evpn-bfd >Revision: 00 >Title: Fault Management for EVPN networks >Document date: 2016-07-06 >Group: Individual Submission >Pages: 10 >URL: =20 >https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gmsm-bess-evpn-bfd-00.txt >Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gmsm-bess-evpn-bfd/ >Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gmsm-bess-evpn-bfd-00 > > >Abstract: > This document proposes a proactive, in-band network OAM mechanism to > detect loss of continuity and miss-connection faults that affect > unicast and multi-destination paths, used by Broadcast, unknown > Unicast and Multicast traffic, in an EVPN network. The mechanisms > proposed in the draft use the principles of the widely adopted > Bidirectional Forwarding Detection protocol. > > =20 > =20 > > >Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at >tools.ietf.org. > >The IETF Secretariat > From nobody Thu Jul 21 05:46:29 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18C7B12D149; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 05:46:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.808 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.808 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c9CpsoVPAb3B; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 05:46:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCBD112DAE1; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 05:46:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1938; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1469105169; x=1470314769; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=VYVSAx7caXSkt4KjZDmeGUFrIDlUvldBByYr8JZrTJs=; b=iAPr9K4+MldOKgvST2Anhoj0PBUFzkYhGB+or/TSpGasYPLuCw/+2MmH 2T+RxHGxhn2F9bi6hXeDwbp7HEaNP3pUX71WxyozBwN2OVDHGnKd88b92 mujTtZfXhGP1v2N5j9SzpqTjkTeMRkdUlSf0WExMuSz5vQb8I+GniDB0i c=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AmAgCmw5BX/4gNJK1dgz9WfAa4XoF7I?= =?us-ascii?q?oV4AoEtOBQBAQEBAQEBZRwLhF0BBQEBODQLEAIBCC0JECcLJQIEDgWIMA69AgE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARyGKoRNhH+FHAWZJgGGFYhVgWxOhAuIdZAgA?= =?us-ascii?q?R42ghAXgUxuhk9/AQEB?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,399,1464652800"; d="scan'208";a="300606076" Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 21 Jul 2016 12:46:08 +0000 Received: from XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (xch-aln-002.cisco.com [173.36.7.12]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u6LCk8IC013185 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 21 Jul 2016 12:46:08 GMT Received: from xch-rcd-005.cisco.com (173.37.102.15) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 07:46:07 -0500 Received: from xch-rcd-005.cisco.com ([173.37.102.15]) by XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com ([173.37.102.15]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 07:46:07 -0500 From: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" To: "draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover-01.txt Thread-Topic: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover-01.txt Thread-Index: AQHR2FsqzWHHff9cEkef4MUe/rKkfqAjYGIA Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 12:46:07 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20160707142313.23733.70094.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20160707142313.23733.70094.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.5.160527 x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.86.240.53] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <6C13DD96ABDF9E43A45EA669D10BBDD9@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.org" X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 12:46:17 -0000 I second the comments made by Greg, Ccing BFD WG since BFD multipoint is used for failure detection and BGP is being extended to carry BFD discriminator. Regards, Reshad. On 2016-07-07, 10:23 AM, "BESS on behalf of internet-drafts@ietf.org" wrote: > >A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >directories. >This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS of the IETF. > > Title : Multicast VPN fast upstream failover > Authors : Thomas Morin > Robert Kebler > Filename : draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover-01.txt > Pages : 18 > Date : 2016-07-07 > >Abstract: > This document defines multicast VPN extensions and procedures that > allow fast failover for upstream failures, by allowing downstream PEs > to take into account the status of Provider-Tunnels (P-tunnels) when > selecting the upstream PE for a VPN multicast flow, and extending BGP > MVPN routing so that a C-multicast route can be advertized toward a > standby upstream PE. > > > >The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover/ > >There's also a htmlized version available at: >https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover-01 > >A diff from the previous version is available at: >https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover-01 > > >Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >submission >until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > >Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > >_______________________________________________ >BESS mailing list >BESS@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess From nobody Fri Jul 22 14:07:04 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8FC812D82F; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 14:06:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -15.808 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.808 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yDK3CLDLVBUR; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 14:06:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7BCF12D1D2; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 14:06:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2440; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1469221617; x=1470431217; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=AL/OtPryCKEegfj9WgjGlVn6oJ/fjPN4N8ocUz+y0R8=; b=XFWN4LM/KLgWXuGpplKwR23awG6+MQLaueCVu4UExKf98GNsysur+uuQ JLnYjE/jOSm9LqpBt1OdxgtPN3KqkJo6g1D5liIbxpxoeIrzbXYo0/6wV 1LYI25iWhDCZdH6pumUG4ROk9zTQs29ojavx/cOFgDDMV+9fNTcB7ons9 8=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BxAwCSipJX/4MNJK1egz9WfAa4XIF7I?= =?us-ascii?q?4V5AoEyOBQBAQEBAQEBXSeEXQEFAQE4NAsQAgEIGBUJECcLJQIEAQ0FiDAOujQ?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEchiqETYR/hRwFmSYBhhWIWIFsToQLiHWQI?= =?us-ascii?q?AEeNoIQF4FMbod0fwEBAQ?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,405,1464652800"; d="scan'208";a="128954609" Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 22 Jul 2016 21:06:56 +0000 Received: from XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com (xch-aln-005.cisco.com [173.36.7.15]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u6ML6uN6027075 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 22 Jul 2016 21:06:56 GMT Received: from xch-rcd-005.cisco.com (173.37.102.15) by XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com (173.36.7.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 16:06:56 -0500 Received: from xch-rcd-005.cisco.com ([173.37.102.15]) by XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com ([173.37.102.15]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 16:06:56 -0500 From: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" To: "draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover@ietf.org" , "draft-gmsm-bess-evpn-bfd@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover-01.txt Thread-Topic: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover-01.txt Thread-Index: AQHR2FsqzWHHff9cEkef4MUe/rKkfqAjYGIAgAIeSgA= Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 21:06:56 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20160707142313.23733.70094.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.5.160527 x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.86.253.234] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <4477EB61DD3F6E4BA6BF27FD0C84B7F4@emea.cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.org" X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 21:07:00 -0000 Since BGP may be used to exchange discriminators for EVPN also, would it make sense to have a sepaarte BESS draft just for BFD discriminator exchange? Regards, Reshad. On 2016-07-21, 2:46 PM, "BESS on behalf of Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" wrote: >I second the comments made by Greg, Ccing BFD WG since BFD multipoint is >used for failure detection and BGP is being extended to carry BFD >discriminator. > >Regards, >Reshad. > > > >On 2016-07-07, 10:23 AM, "BESS on behalf of internet-drafts@ietf.org" > wrote: > >> >>A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >>directories. >>This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS of the IETF. >> >> Title : Multicast VPN fast upstream failover >> Authors : Thomas Morin >> Robert Kebler >> Filename : draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover-01.txt >> Pages : 18 >> Date : 2016-07-07 >> >>Abstract: >> This document defines multicast VPN extensions and procedures that >> allow fast failover for upstream failures, by allowing downstream PEs >> to take into account the status of Provider-Tunnels (P-tunnels) when >> selecting the upstream PE for a VPN multicast flow, and extending BGP >> MVPN routing so that a C-multicast route can be advertized toward a >> standby upstream PE. >> >> >> >>The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover/ >> >>There's also a htmlized version available at: >>https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover-01 >> >>A diff from the previous version is available at: >>https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover-01 >> >> >>Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >>submission >>until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >> >>Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >>ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >> >>_______________________________________________ >>BESS mailing list >>BESS@ietf.org >>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess > >_______________________________________________ >BESS mailing list >BESS@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess From nobody Fri Jul 22 23:19:45 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D24C412D8E2; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 23:19:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.108 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oqpo6CjBvbt9; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 23:19:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usplmg20.ericsson.net (unknown [198.24.6.130]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0769F12D903; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 23:19:34 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c618062d-f79886d000002334-4d-57930107aac0 Received: from EUSAAHC004.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.84]) by usplmg20.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id E9.BB.09012.70103975; Sat, 23 Jul 2016 07:30:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from EUSAAMB103.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.120]) by EUSAAHC004.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.84]) with mapi id 14.03.0294.000; Sat, 23 Jul 2016 02:19:33 -0400 From: Gregory Mirsky To: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" , "draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover@ietf.org" , "draft-gmsm-bess-evpn-bfd@ietf.org" Subject: RE: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover-01.txt Thread-Topic: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover-01.txt Thread-Index: AQHR2FsqzWHHff9cEkef4MUe/rKkfqAjYGIAgAIeSgCAACPmAA== Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 06:19:33 +0000 Message-ID: <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF11221ADC6A3@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> References: <20160707142313.23733.70094.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.12] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFupmkeLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42KZXLonRJeDcXK4wcJFghYrjs9ktpjy5yCT xacDrxgtrq1oZbf4/GcbowOrx5TfG1k9liz5yRTAFMVlk5Kak1mWWqRvl8CVceHkdZaCbxIV 7w8eYm9g3CrSxcjJISFgItE3t4ERwhaTuHBvPVsXIxeHkMBRRonLVyeAJYQEljNKnP2aB2Kz CRhJvNjYww5SJCJwl1Hi/M3fLCAJZgEviRkH9rOB2MICnhKrPzYBNXMAFXlJLOowAgmLCDhJ 9MxdxwRiswioSrw9cJEZxOYV8JXYcv89E8TibkaJ7TvugiU4BQwkrv7cBWYzAl33/dQaJohd 4hK3nsxngrhaQGLJnvPMELaoxMvH/1ghbCWJOa+vMUPU60gs2P2JDcLWlli28DXUYkGJkzOf sExgFJuFZOwsJC2zkLTMQtKygJFlFSNHaXFBTm66kcEmRmAUHZNg093BeH+65yFGAQ5GJR5e hfhJ4UKsiWXFlbmHGCU4mJVEeBs5J4cL8aYkVlalFuXHF5XmpBYfYpTmYFES5xV7pBguJJCe WJKanZpakFoEk2Xi4JRqYJTvKz1w7djl0sWbMzkZldUeZFxV3/1If/Hnn1N0ldW4/+wxPb1N +usyju9e1x023VqyZtGBy7OCIn7ZqL7f1cHTfmaRyQaR5EiHP7OObDkoWv14B+s0/U/G8m2v cx8esd6ZlFCx8TL3eTfBF7clHiUY9tq8TDoeIf1TewWT5CFlwU0aS9IKbGOUWIozEg21mIuK EwFVZ/ORngIAAA== Archived-At: Cc: "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.org" X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 06:19:40 -0000 Hi Reshad, I absolutely agree and encourage new draft that defines the BGP-BFD Attribu= te and its relationship with BFD Discriminator TLV in LSP Ping (RFC 5884). = And another question to the authors of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover, = Do you see scenarios where draft-ietf-bfd-multipoint-active-tail can be use= d? Regards, Greg -----Original Message----- From: Reshad Rahman (rrahman) [mailto:rrahman@cisco.com]=20 Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 11:07 PM To: draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover@ietf.org; draft-gmsm-bess-evpn-bfd@i= etf.org Cc: Gregory Mirsky ; rtg-bfd@ietf.org; bess@ie= tf.org Subject: Re: [bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover-01.txt Since BGP may be used to exchange discriminators for EVPN also, would it ma= ke sense to have a sepaarte BESS draft just for BFD discriminator exchange? Regards, Reshad. On 2016-07-21, 2:46 PM, "BESS on behalf of Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" wrote: >I second the comments made by Greg, Ccing BFD WG since BFD multipoint=20 >is used for failure detection and BGP is being extended to carry BFD=20 >discriminator. > >Regards, >Reshad. > > > >On 2016-07-07, 10:23 AM, "BESS on behalf of internet-drafts@ietf.org" > wrote: > >> >>A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts=20 >>directories. >>This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS of the IETF. >> >> Title : Multicast VPN fast upstream failover >> Authors : Thomas Morin >> Robert Kebler >> Filename : draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover-01.txt >> Pages : 18 >> Date : 2016-07-07 >> >>Abstract: >> This document defines multicast VPN extensions and procedures that >> allow fast failover for upstream failures, by allowing downstream PEs >> to take into account the status of Provider-Tunnels (P-tunnels) when >> selecting the upstream PE for a VPN multicast flow, and extending BGP >> MVPN routing so that a C-multicast route can be advertized toward a >> standby upstream PE. >> >> >> >>The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover/ >> >>There's also a htmlized version available at: >>https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover-01 >> >>A diff from the previous version is available at: >>https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover-0 >>1 >> >> >>Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of=20 >>submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at=20 >>tools.ietf.org. >> >>Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >>ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >> >>_______________________________________________ >>BESS mailing list >>BESS@ietf.org >>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess > >_______________________________________________ >BESS mailing list >BESS@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess From nobody Mon Jul 25 12:43:19 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E5412B05E for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 12:43:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.189 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.189 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BbL0OSMtDv6n for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 12:43:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B6D512D5B9 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 12:43:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7C5BC1E320; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 15:44:01 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 15:44:01 -0400 From: Jeffrey Haas To: rtg-bfd@ietf.org Subject: Candidate minutes for the IETF-96 (Berlin) BFD meeting Message-ID: <20160725194401.GB31283@pfrc.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Archived-At: X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 19:43:18 -0000 Working Group, https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/96/minutes/minutes-96-bfd Ignas Bagdonas did his usual immaculate job at taking minutes for our session in Berlin. Please review them for correctness and content. The deadline for comments is this Friday, July 29. -- Jeff & Reshad From nobody Mon Jul 25 14:27:48 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DED2512DA3B for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 14:27:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OFIDMgDfjo98 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 14:27:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usplmg21.ericsson.net (usplmg21.ericsson.net [198.24.6.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B63D412D0CA for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 14:27:32 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c6180641-36fff70000001190-02-579684422f99 Received: from EUSAAHC006.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.90]) by (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id E7.7F.04496.24486975; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 23:27:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from EUSAAMB103.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.120]) by EUSAAHC006.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.90]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 17:27:30 -0400 From: Gregory Mirsky To: Jeffrey Haas , "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" Subject: RE: Candidate minutes for the IETF-96 (Berlin) BFD meeting Thread-Topic: Candidate minutes for the IETF-96 (Berlin) BFD meeting Thread-Index: AQHR5qzOR6kAFzbCmkOyRfBylopFL6ApqSQg Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 21:27:30 +0000 Message-ID: <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF11221ADDAEE@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> References: <20160725194401.GB31283@pfrc.org> In-Reply-To: <20160725194401.GB31283@pfrc.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.10] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrCLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXRPlK5zy7Rwg9+7pC32H3zLavH5zzZG ByaPJUt+Mnlc7t3KGsAUxWWTkpqTWZZapG+XwJUxc+5DpoInLBUzb59iamD8xNzFyMkhIWAi 0TL1GnsXIxeHkMAGRokXj6YwQjjLGSV6Lq9gBaliEzCSeLGxhx3EFhHwkOg+9pwRxBYWcJb4 suY2VNxF4unnJYwQtpFE05duNhCbRUBV4tTDO2A2r4CvxIXXjWC2kICuxK+dv5lAbE4BPYk9 n++BXcQoICbx/dQasDizgLjErSfzmSAuFZBYsuc81NWiEi8f/2OFsJUkJi09xwpRryOxYPcn NghbW2LZwtfMEHsFJU7OfMIygVFkFpKxs5C0zELSMgtJywJGllWMHKXFBTm56UaGmxiBYX9M gs1xB+PeXs9DjAIcjEo8vAuCp4ULsSaWFVfmHmKU4GBWEuENbgAK8aYkVlalFuXHF5XmpBYf YpTmYFES59V/qRguJJCeWJKanZpakFoEk2Xi4JRqYNSauGjy+mtrp7Y3GKzYwl1/s6/C99C1 tJaCoGAxg5dH31aHm16LWJY6y7Hz9oJtInfEF1ZmTXzrsHmF3g75V7/8/v/le/eks1Qye9/G mw9/xEZe5fqU77Vr6i5tG5OJS451i+yeJjhh6t+8jWL5xab/bFMLHcWfLciVPdYSpOApxagu GvtUWViJpTgj0VCLuag4EQAL+mpZdwIAAA== Archived-At: X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 21:27:37 -0000 Hi Jeff, great minutes. No comments, changes from my side. Regards, Greg -----Original Message----- From: Rtg-bfd [mailto:rtg-bfd-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Haas Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 12:44 PM To: rtg-bfd@ietf.org Subject: Candidate minutes for the IETF-96 (Berlin) BFD meeting Working Group, https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/96/minutes/minutes-96-bfd Ignas Bagdonas did his usual immaculate job at taking minutes for our sessi= on in Berlin. Please review them for correctness and content. The deadline for comments is this Friday, July 29. -- Jeff & Reshad From nobody Mon Jul 25 16:43:03 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DED0C12B026; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 16:42:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.698 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AC_BR_BONANZA=0.001, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WFqCWqZHcRV5; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 16:42:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com (mail-wm0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D33E212D867; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 16:42:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id i5so177690324wmg.0; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 16:42:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/pjgK/PUCwaB9ncsn/7RWmlGzIGskNtCdoJ9m0SFAlg=; b=yuEogx7fKgj6kQQ23pY+edsusNyk2uO2kniFox3hxujHdvFQPArLkT98qCZfoBIm89 ogZv/cP05PN968jvYJJtdq1MUbM4DBCmo4n8yh9YHEPH8ta4BKpwOBaHM17Bh7mwq1l+ ixBjXd/HsQJzeDTxtI8auzEA0RJiuQj6YTqql02wVClrFJ6tbHrH0FRBTfzk3Xr2niiU tS6HNC19rka0si7qjnQjUdCqVxHgjzQWhnFlbZDo/neRVj6GLNI+BiHUxv0H9XodSb1D bVlPyS92m1qvESsfW1ojA9DZbOhmyZjYHO9KpOy6WvAeT61mtMfrGOo2kiBnMg2OpWcH dtLg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/pjgK/PUCwaB9ncsn/7RWmlGzIGskNtCdoJ9m0SFAlg=; b=E4A9JJ0+NL5wwcNjkowVD6fAXi/VxWeQsdh8TXQZSue5ImIV3+0OHmzv8rtsTcDe9B 5gzqSMDjScbSCYD90Cv4q/kTgAa+Efo1wNxglaGuidqsbM9faLfLyqD8nAApA68Omb3k QYJBcc+ln178nFJEGMrZyabAV0VOR7qtAK872WlbgnYe1zNrOHQDQezHxA6rVR6aBf91 cXOR0j9emYDHx7B2WaUuCdTUlyibWfFK7SdDPoonZ9W3lSTtAIL4JB1N39SKrGgWvHoD LNtjaEwpfxDu/FtbXHKlVGtSx7FQGqDDDW2NR5hMlr+J8lMjoRBtN/2jNL5fXa7LAsX/ DmlQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouu8y3Hvn7jtlf4UkOVSvwExkNPO/0i3Gk8Zm4sb5s6m6LYQ+3axokFfc2Hv3puULvjOZyYvPrXC36c6fg== X-Received: by 10.28.71.197 with SMTP id m66mr23091216wmi.26.1469490155251; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 16:42:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.200.162 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 16:42:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <14687_1469186942_5792037E_14687_3711_1_AC1ADC68A92CF94FA8CFCB406C1CBE3D09E30C11@OPEXCLILM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> References: <14687_1469186942_5792037E_14687_3711_1_AC1ADC68A92CF94FA8CFCB406C1CBE3D09E30C11@OPEXCLILM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> From: Greg Mirsky Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 16:42:34 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bess] draft minutes from our session at IETF 96 To: thomas.morin@orange.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c06cbe2b46da205387e5659 Archived-At: Cc: "rtg-bfd@ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.org" X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 23:42:46 -0000 --94eb2c06cbe2b46da205387e5659 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Thomas, et. al, my note is regarding the presentation and the discussion of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover. Minutes state "some discussion on BFD boostraping and suggestion we may want to have BFD WG aware". I recall that I've used stronger than "may want" encouragement to bring BFD-related work to attention of the BFD WG. In fact, I've suggested that the work on bootstrapping p2mp BFD session belongs in BFD WG. And shortly after the meeting BFD WG co-chair, Reshad Rahman, concurred with my that comment on the mailing list. Regards, Greg On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 4:29 AM, wrote: > HI everyone, > > The draft minutes of yesterday's session are here: > https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/96/minutes/minutes-96-bess > > Please read and suggest any relevant correction or adjustment. > These minutes will become final on September 12th. > > Best, > > -Thomas/Martin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. > > > _______________________________________________ > BESS mailing list > BESS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess > > --94eb2c06cbe2b46da205387e5659 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Thomas, et. al,
my note is regarding the presentati= on and the discussion of=C2=A0draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover.
Minutes state "some discussion on BFD boo= straping and suggestion we may want to have BFD WG aware".
I recall that I= 've used stronger than "may want" encouragement to bring BFD-= related work to attention of the BFD WG. In fact, I've suggested that t= he work on bootstrapping p2mp BFD session belongs in BFD WG. And shortly af= ter the meeting BFD WG co-chair, Reshad Rahman, concurred with my that comm= ent on the mailing list.

Regards, Greg

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 4:29 AM, <thomas.morin@orange.com> wrote:
______________________________________________________________________=
___________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confiden=
tielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu=
 ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les message=
s electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou =
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged inf=
ormation that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and dele=
te this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been =
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess


--94eb2c06cbe2b46da205387e5659--