From rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org Mon Sep 8 04:30:20 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rtg-dir-archive@megatron.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-rtg-dir-archive@core3.amsl.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 424E13A6929; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 04:30:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D4523A6929 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 04:30:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nxuBKlxakdMZ for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 04:30:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from runaway.fenron.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:117:128:230:48ff:fe92:8e81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1DC93A6823 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 04:30:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from runaway.fenron.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by runaway.fenron.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m88B09hQ032109 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 04:00:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner@runaway.fenron.com) Received: (from fenner@localhost) by runaway.fenron.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m88B0989032092 for rtg-dir@ietf.org; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 04:00:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner) Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 04:00:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200809081100.m88B0989032092@runaway.fenron.com> From: fenner@fenron.com (Bill Fenner) To: rtg-dir@ietf.org (Routing Area Directorate) Subject: IESG agenda for 2008-09-11 telechat. X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Routing Area Directorate List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org IESG Agenda Good approximation of what will be included in the Agenda of next Telechat (2008-09-11). ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Administrivia 1.1 Roll Call 1.2 Bash the Agenda 1.3 Approval of the Minutes of the past telechat 1.4 List of Remaining Action Items from Last Telechat 2. Protocol Actions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the Internet infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?" 2.1 WG Submissions 2.1.1 New Item Area Date RTP Payload Format for Adaptive TRansform RAI Acoustic Coding (ATRAC) Family (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 2 draft-ietf-avt-rtp-atrac-family-18.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: Document Shepherd is Tom Taylor . Token: Cullen Jennings Sieve Email Filtering: Reject and Extended APP Reject Extensions (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 2 draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject-07.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Lisa Dusseault 2.1.2 Returning Item Area Date RAI Session Initiation Protocol Service Examples (BCP) - 1 of 2 draft-ietf-sipping-service-examples-15.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: Shopping for more positions. Token: Jon Peterson TSV Unicast UDP Usage Guidelines for Application Designers (BCP) - 2 of 2 draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-guidelines-10.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Magnus Westerlund 2.2 Individual Submissions 2.2.1 New Item Area Date APP URI Scheme for GSM Short Message Service (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 2 draft-wilde-sms-uri-16.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Lisa Dusseault APP Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV) SEARCH (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 2 draft-reschke-webdav-search-18.txt [Open Web Ballot] Note: AD is shepherding Token: Chris Newman 2.2.2 Returning Item NONE 3. Document Actions 3.1 WG Submissions Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.1.1 New Item NONE 3.1.2 Returning Item NONE 3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If not, what changes would make it so?" 3.2.1 New Item NONE 3.2.2 Returning Item NONE 3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG , but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks that publication is harmful to work in WG and recommends not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this document violates the IETF procedures for and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval. The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions indicate consensus with the response proposed by the document shepherd. Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document. 3.3.1 New Item Area Date INT WiMAX Forum/3GPP2 Proxy Mobile IPv4 (Informational) - 1 of 3 draft-leung-mip4-proxy-mode-09.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Jari Arkko Credential Protection Ciphersuites for SEC Transport Layer Security (TLS) (Experimental) - 2 of 3 draft-hajjeh-tls-identity-protection-06.txt [Open Web Ballot] Token: Pasi Eronen INT The Subnetwork Encapsulation and Adaptation Layer (SEAL) (Experimental) - 3 of 3 draft-templin-seal-23.txt Token: Mark Townsley 3.3.2 Returning Item NONE 4. Working Group Actions 4.1 WG Creation 4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review NONE 4.1.2 Proposed for Approval NONE 4.2 WG Rechartering 4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review Area Date INT Sep 4 Softwires (softwire) - 1 of 1 Token: Mark 4.2.2 Proposed for Approval Area Date OPS Aug 28 Operational Security Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure (opsec) - 1 of 1 Token: Ron 5. IAB News We Can Use 6. Management Issues 6.1 IESG process change to action approval (Chris Newman) 7. Working Group News From rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org Fri Sep 12 20:46:36 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rtg-dir-archive@megatron.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-rtg-dir-archive@core3.amsl.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 461B33A6878; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 20:46:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: rtg-dir@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47BBC3A6940; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 20:46:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.14 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.14 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.459, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id flfMYXh487Xt; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 20:46:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from exprod7og109.obsmtp.com (exprod7og109.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.171]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 507AE3A6878; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 20:46:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from source ([66.129.228.6]) by exprod7ob109.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 20:46:32 PDT Received: from emailwf1.jnpr.net ([10.10.2.33]) by p-emsmtp03.jnpr.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 12 Sep 2008 20:45:17 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: FW: Call for Nominees Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 23:45:14 -0400 Message-ID: <3525C9833C09ED418C6FD6CD9514668C04AB61E0@emailwf1.jnpr.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Call for Nominees Thread-Index: AckU917peDj27q7tSeq/yFfSeaxBvQAWt3KA From: "Ross Callon" To: , , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Sep 2008 03:45:17.0117 (UTC) FILETIME=[230B1ED0:01C91553] X-BeenThere: rtg-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Routing Area Directorate List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: rtg-dir-bounces@ietf.org Joel has informed us that we still have relatively few nominees for the open IESG, IAB, and IAOC positions. Thus people are encouraged to nominate good candidates (including themselves), and WG chairs are encouraged to forward his email (included below) to their WGs.=20 Thanks, Ross -----Original Message----- From: ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of NomCom Chair Sent: 12 September 2008 12:47 To: IETF Announcement list Subject: Call for Nominees=20 The 2008-9 IETF Nominating Committee needs your help. We have started getting candidates. If we are going to do our job in time, we have only 3 more weeks to get enough candidates to have a reasonable pool for all the jobs. At the moment, we do not have a reasonable pool for any jobs. If you are willing to serve, please nominate yourself. If there is someone you think would do a good job, please nominate them. The web site at: http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/group/nomcom/08 Has the list of positions we are seeking people for, as well as tools for providing both nominations and feedback. Alternatively, you can submit nominations by sending email to me. Please help us. Thank you, Joel M. Halpern jmh@joelhalpern.com nomcom-chair@ietf.org _______________________________________________ IETF-Announce mailing list IETF-Announce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce